https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105335
--- Comment #3 from LIU Hao ---
Windows uses a full-width 32-bit exit status, but there is no standard
convention for them.
1. If a process has exited successfully, the status is zero. This matches
POSIX.
2. If a process has exited due to a fau
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105342
--- Comment #4 from 。 <570070308 at qq dot com> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Is it really important though?
The doc says that "The asm statement allows you to include assembly
instructions directly within C code. This may h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105342
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Yes it is greater than a function call as it has to be a barrier to even
> memory which does NOT escape the function.
>
> Yes inlining does change it from deal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105342
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||inline-asm
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105342
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Yes it is greater than a function call as it has to be a barrier to even memory
which does NOT escape the function.
Yes inlining does change it from dealing with escaped memory to even local
ones. I doubt i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105342
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105338
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Regression: jump or cmove |[12 Regression] Regression:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100810
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 105337 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105337
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105336
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Can you provide a testcase that exhibits such behavior?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105335
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105342
Bug ID: 105342
Summary: [Extended Asm]Memory barrier geater than a function
call
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105334
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105297
--- Comment #15 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #13)
> (In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #11)
> > (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #10)
> > >
> > > Interestingly that doesn't seem to make a difference. Wha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39612
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||MF21330112 at smail dot
nju.edu.cn
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105341
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105341
Bug ID: 105341
Summary: Load introduction when writing a global variable
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105340
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to okay from comment #4)
> When compiling gcc from source code, which parameter should give to
> configure script? such as ${BINUTILS_SOURCE_DIR}/configure
> --prefix=${NATIVE_PREFIX} --with-sysroo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105340
--- Comment #4 from okay ---
When compiling gcc from source code, which parameter should give to configure
script? such as ${BINUTILS_SOURCE_DIR}/configure --prefix=${NATIVE_PREFIX}
--with-sysroot=${CROSS_PREFIX} etc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105340
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79700
--- Comment #19 from Jiang An ---
Oh... I was wrong. TR1 mentioned -f and -l variants of "new" (C99) function
families (e.g. truncf), but no those of "old" (C89) math function families.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105340
--- Comment #2 from okay ---
[root]# cat main.c
int main()
{
return 0;
}
[root]# /home/gcc-7.5.0/host-aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc/xgcc -o main main.c
xgcc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found
compilation terminate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105340
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-04-22
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105339
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
We need to add macro for _mm_{mask,maskz}_scalef_round_{sd,ss} intriniscs for
gcc-9/10/11/12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105340
Bug ID: 105340
Summary: xgcc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but
liblto_plugin.so not found
Product: gcc
Version: 7.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105339
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102892
jiawei changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jiawei at iscas dot ac.cn
--- Comment #11 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105334
--- Comment #5 from Kewen Lin ---
Oops, sorry that I just verified the original case in PR103623 previously,
missed to find it doesn't have pack bif.
Maybe we could add one test case to cover both unpack and pack ICEs, such as:
$cat gcc/testsu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105339
Bug ID: 105339
Summary: [x86] missing AVX-512F scalef functions when
optimization is disabled
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105334
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Created attachment 52849
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52849&action=edit
proposed patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105334
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Oh duh, this is pack, not unpack. I see the problem now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105329
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Macleod ---
Just to bookmark where the analysis is since im out for a few days, in the
restrict pass, with ranger tracing on, the code sequence is:
[local count: 14831835]:
__nleft_49 = (const size_type) _48;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96957
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44317
Kaz Kylheku changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kkylheku at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103197
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:748d46cd049c89a799f99f14547267ebae915af6
commit r12-8222-g748d46cd049c89a799f99f14547267ebae915af6
Author: Segher Boessenkool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:748d46cd049c89a799f99f14547267ebae915af6
commit r12-8222-g748d46cd049c89a799f99f14547267ebae915af6
Author: Segher Boessenkool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103197
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:26fa464f42622c60d6929720dd37143a21054ede
commit r12-8221-g26fa464f42622c60d6929720dd37143a21054ede
Author: Segher Boessenkool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:26fa464f42622c60d6929720dd37143a21054ede
commit r12-8221-g26fa464f42622c60d6929720dd37143a21054ede
Author: Segher Boessenkool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105329
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Macleod ---
The problem goes away if we use --param=evrp-mode-legacy. Ranger picks up a
few more things and we eliminate a couple of latter comparisons which in turn
affect threading, etc etc. and we present the restr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102185
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
The test fails on riscv because it doesn't handle floatABI == "double".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100813
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105334
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-04-21
Resolution|DUPL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103623
--- Comment #34 from Segher Boessenkool ---
*** Bug 105334 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105334
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105338
Bug ID: 105338
Summary: Regression: jump or cmove generated for pattern (x ?
CST : 0)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104845
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93256
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Works for 12.0., fails with 9.4.0.
So, I assume this has been fixed in the meantime, it would be interesting
to see when.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99307
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105321
--- Comment #8 from James Touton ---
Thanks for the quick action on this!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105337
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Perhaps similar or dup of PR100810?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105337
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93256
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105337
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
printf isn't really needed. This fails even with -O2, doesn't with -O1 or -O0:
__attribute__((noipa)) void
bar (int x)
{
(void) x;
}
int a;
int
foo (void)
{
int b, c;
for (b = 0; b < 3; b++)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105337
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Eh, disregard previous comment, sorry.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105337
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Ah, but the testcase has UB: c is used uninitialized.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105335
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The reason for the lower byte only is because posix says exit value is
truncated to char.
This seems like libiberty not knowing that win32 does not truncate to byte
unlike posix.
Note I thought the c standa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105337
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105337
--- Comment #1 from Zhendong Su ---
Compiler Explorer: https://godbolt.org/z/1bds4P7c7
gcc version 12.0.1 20220421 (experimental) [master r12-8217-g605a80bb733] (GCC)
[587] %
[587] % gcctk -O1 small.c; ./a.out
[588] %
[588] % gcctk -Os small.c
[589] % ./a.out
Aborted
[590] %
[590] % cat small.c
int printf(const char *, ...);
int a;
int f() {
int b, c;
for (b = 0; b < 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59881
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105276
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Macleod ---
Created attachment 52848
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52848&action=edit
proposed patch
When I removed the recursion from range_of_stmt, I neglected to incorporate the
existing known
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105321
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99308
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96592
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d65b274f1f44c59382b7dad7759cfaf3c8397cf8
commit r11-9927-gd65b274f1f44c59382b7dad7759cfaf3c8397cf8
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102177
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fef3d31bd35f53cbcacaec63b279d38c38b78abe
commit r11-9926-gfef3d31bd35f53cbcacaec63b279d38c38b78abe
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105180
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|K&R style definition does |[9/10/11/12 Regression] K&R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105101
--- Comment #13 from Michael_S ---
It turned out that on all micro-architectures that I care about (and majority
of those that I don't care) double precision floating point division is quite
fast.
It's so fast that it easily beats my clever reci
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105336
--- Comment #1 from Avi Kivity ---
I guess I should mention the programs uses C++20 coroutines, and it could be
the case that debug information for coroutines is generated incorrectly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105310
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Fritz Reese
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:30e6e43f0bbd84ac01cfcbfbd4b60f4495365b7d
commit r9-10022-g30e6e43f0bbd84ac01cfcbfbd4b60f4495365b7d
Author: Fritz Reese
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105310
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Fritz Reese
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:592a59bcee098060493ffe8847f69fb3bd22b4aa
commit r10-10550-g592a59bcee098060493ffe8847f69fb3bd22b4aa
Author: Fritz Reese
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105336
Bug ID: 105336
Summary: truncated address sanitizer stack traces
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105335
Bug ID: 105335
Summary: libiberty does not handle script exit codes correctly.
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105310
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Fritz Reese
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:15798c5d50f1318fcc0c0e7b0e71281f9a38433c
commit r11-9922-g15798c5d50f1318fcc0c0e7b0e71281f9a38433c
Author: Fritz Reese
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105321
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:93b65ed9706e2ceb4be7b28c9ff9be759e68a614
commit r12-8216-g93b65ed9706e2ceb4be7b28c9ff9be759e68a614
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105310
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Fritz Reese :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c049f638da4f7b32b11e4d895184e0960bae5291
commit r12-8215-gc049f638da4f7b32b11e4d895184e0960bae5291
Author: Fritz Reese
Date: Tue A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105333
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101709
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df783ecbaaea340297df8a3bd068ce131a33
commit r11-9921-gdf783ecbaaea340297df8a3bd068ce131a33
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105297
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105297
--- Comment #13 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #11)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #10)
> >
> > Interestingly that doesn't seem to make a difference. What seems to matter
> > is whether the constexpr fun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97140
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105334
Bug ID: 105334
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at
lra-constraints.cc:4168 (error: unable to generate
reloads)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105226
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.3.1
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104861
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100786
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e1b247774e0239f73b59e07f30db4e400f9b4eb
commit r10-10549-g1e1b247774e0239f73b59e07f30db4e400f9b4eb
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103361
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ed8728e2646897c98826cf43be2e4682d04fc2c
commit r10-10548-g4ed8728e2646897c98826cf43be2e4682d04fc2c
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103596
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a7dd8900d0a183d843e9d8ec91e091dbe4fbd5b
commit r10-10547-g8a7dd8900d0a183d843e9d8ec91e091dbe4fbd5b
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104337
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f058e124350d3b19a79b3b7754b2ccab59bec7b1
commit r10-10546-gf058e124350d3b19a79b3b7754b2ccab59bec7b1
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104786
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e513d5641077d41ff85e6f877f8997e173886cd6
commit r10-10545-ge513d5641077d41ff85e6f877f8997e173886cd6
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104861
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb077526a705da3f29db47824efefdcfc0072df2
commit r10-10544-geb077526a705da3f29db47824efefdcfc0072df2
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105226
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:813b14ede7207555e65e6ce976ff0c04ab2b7875
commit r10-10543-g813b14ede7207555e65e6ce976ff0c04ab2b7875
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105070
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b285999440c000685c4e4dae9c2a9a8a8fe9e176
commit r10-10542-gb285999440c000685c4e4dae9c2a9a8a8fe9e176
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103848
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105324
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105333
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93602
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression]|[9/10 Regression] Missing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 104966, which changed state.
Bug 104966 Summary: [11/12 Regression] Yet another bogus -Warray-bounds warning
in libstdc++ headers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104966
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104966
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105297
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e6c0e69af8da436e1d1d2d23d8c38410d78ecf2
commit r12-8214-g1e6c0e69af8da436e1d1d2d23d8c38410d78ecf2
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105322
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e6c0e69af8da436e1d1d2d23d8c38410d78ecf2
commit r12-8214-g1e6c0e69af8da436e1d1d2d23d8c38410d78ecf2
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105324
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d26c3e4f733fcb07d90680491dd1d7a9d08c4705
commit r11-9920-gd26c3e4f733fcb07d90680491dd1d7a9d08c4705
Author: Jonathan Wake
1 - 100 of 311 matches
Mail list logo
