https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104946
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104946
Bug ID: 104946
Summary: [12 regression] Suboptimal gimple foding for blendvpd
under sse4.1
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104941
Siddhesh Poyarekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104942
Siddhesh Poyarekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |siddhesh at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104945
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Yes this is definitely an issue I think:
// Explicit specializations for integer types.
#define _Cxx_hashtable_define_trivial_hash(_Tp) \
template<>\
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104945
Bug ID: 104945
Summary: std::hash ignores the top 32 bits when
size_t is 32 bit
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104944
Bug ID: 104944
Summary: incorrect alignas(void) accepted (with warning if
templated)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 101895, which changed state.
Bug 101895 Summary: [11/12 Regression] SLP Vectorizer change pushes
VEC_PERM_EXPR into bad location spoiling further optimization opportunities
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101895
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104943
Bug ID: 104943
Summary: Analyzer fails to purge state for local structs
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95000
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d1d95846e3c901faea6fe36a36e47b9169f5b133
commit r12-7659-gd1d95846e3c901faea6fe36a36e47b9169f5b133
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104941
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
And a similar problem from openssl:
$ cat bn_ctx.i
int BN_CTX_startBN_STACK_push_newsize;
void
memcpy2(void *__dest, void *__src, int __len) {
long __trans_tmp_1 = __builtin_dynamic_object_size(__dest, 0)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104942
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104942
Bug ID: 104942
Summary: ICE in size_for_offset, at tree-object-size.cc:352
since r12-6482-g06bc1b0c539e3a60
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104941
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-03-15
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104941
Bug ID: 104941
Summary: ICE error: invalid (pointer) operands ‘minus_expr’
since r12-6482-g06bc1b0c539e3a60
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104908
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|gfortran 11/trunk |[11/12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104937
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc/2001-11/msg00790.html
Regarding the debug info argument in there, this is being discussed for DWARF6.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104937
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For
_Complex unsigned
foo (_Complex unsigned x, _Complex unsigned y)
{
return y / x;
}
int
main ()
{
_Complex int a = foo (6 + 43i, 6 + 43i);
__builtin_printf ("%d %d\n", __real__ a, __imag__ a);
re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104939
Rob Farmer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95000
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||104940
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104940
Bug ID: 104940
Summary: RFE: integrate analyzer with an SMT solver
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104937
--- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka ---
There was PR104604 where _Complex unsigned division was fixed, but I didn't
notice any other related wrong-code PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104937
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103984
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 52632
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52632&action=edit
gcc12-pr103984.patch
Full untested patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104939
Bug ID: 104939
Summary: Reading a file with / in leads to corrupt data
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104938
Bug ID: 104938
Summary: Possibly wrong location definition in DWARF with
-ftree-cpp at -Og only
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88398
--- Comment #49 from Wilco ---
(In reply to d_vampile from comment #48)
> (In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #41)
> > (In reply to Wilco from comment #40)
> > > (In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #39)
> > > > I’m thinking to draft a patch for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103984
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Wonder about:
--- gcc/gimplify.cc.jj 2022-03-04 15:14:53.197812540 +0100
+++ gcc/gimplify.cc 2022-03-15 17:44:45.110734179 +0100
@@ -6997,8 +6997,6 @@ gimplify_target_expr (tree *expr_p, gimp
if (i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79318
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
fce323e-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.1 20220315 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104927
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 04:10:41PM +, federico.perini at gmail dot com
wrote:
> --- Comment #2 from federico ---
> Yeah I'm surprised but wrong. The "overriding" option of the rhs size
> specification is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97106
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
This:
...
$ cat alias.c
void __f ()
{
__builtin_printf ("hello\n");
}
void f () __attribute__ ((alias ("__f")));
int
main (void)
{
f ();
return 0;
}
...
works fine at -O0 and -O1:
...
$ ./gcc.sh -O0 ./
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104934
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104934
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> And the bug is?
> The S class doesn't have the key method defined, so some other TU needs to
> define it and thus provide the vtable and rtti for it.
> Wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104927
federico changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104936
Bug ID: 104936
Summary: [nvptx] Handle weak decl/def distinction in common
code
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103984
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
What the gimplifier sees is:
unit-size
align:64 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1 canonical-type
0x7fffe8f0bd20
fields
addressable used public external autoin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103328
--- Comment #21 from Avi Kivity ---
Benno, many thanks for the fix. Please consider posting it to gcc-patches as
that may speed up review and merging.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104927
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103984
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
In particular, in ehcleanup1 it is the sink_clobbers optimization added for
PR51117.
I think it would be strongly preferrable to fix this in the FE, because if we'd
need to change sink_clobbers, I'd be afra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103984
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And it is ehcleanup that sinks the clobber. Before ehcleanup1 we have:
;; basic block 16, loop depth 0, maybe hot
;;prev block 15, next block 17, flags: (NEW, REACHABLE, VISITED)
;;pred: 15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744
--- Comment #18 from Marc Poulhiès ---
Solved our regressions in pr99744-{1,2,4,5}.c, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Marc Poulhiès from comment #16)
> Hi!
> I'm seeing regressions in pr99744-{1,2,4,5}.c for an i586 target where
> MMX/SSE are not enabled.
Please try
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69623
--- Comment #9 from jim x ---
After reading [temp.deduct.call] p1 more carefully, I think you're right. Since
the first function parameter pack does not participate in template argument
deduction, the deduction will start to perform from the seco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103984
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
What the C++ FE emits looks just weird to me. In the gimple dump:
[pr103984.C:35:1] D.31524.name = string_piece::str
([pr103984.C:35:1] &arg); [return slot optimization]
[pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104911
--- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #4)
> typesem.s indeed shows small codegen differences, while for semantic3.s
> there are
> both codegen differences per se as well as label renamings that may not
> effec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104923
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b5baf569f77e1f172061642d4d8593e1ea737add
commit r12-7657-gb5baf569f77e1f172061642d4d8593e1ea737add
Author: Peter Bergner
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104934
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And the bug is?
The S class doesn't have the key method defined, so some other TU needs to
define it and thus provide the vtable and rtti for it.
Without -fsanitize=vptr the typeinfo isn't needed on this par
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104768
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
Hmm, reading about it a bit more, it's more about enabling algorithms that were
not possible before, than about performance improvements.
So, we should aim at having test-cases, both openacc and openmp that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104893
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0)
> The per-thread call stack is handled for .local memory by the CUDA driver.
>
> For the 'soft stack' that's not the case.
Hmm, actually there's .local memory used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104931
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
But maybe the code relies on a positive 'delta' - after all the same issue must
exist for integer typed IVs. Probably most interesting cases get folded early
in the correct way if they do not iterate.
Giv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104666
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104935
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
And the revision is also responsible for slower build time here of 481.wrf:
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=301.270.8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103177
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103177
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ffe9c0a0d3564a6083ea6194eb3374a89c29c085
commit r12-7656-gffe9c0a0d3564a6083ea6194eb3374a89c29c085
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91229
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:98afdc3e2bfccf0a1337013b54f2c5634ef40ee5
commit r12-7655-g98afdc3e2bfccf0a1337013b54f2c5634ef40ee5
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104935
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104814
--- Comment #7 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
Gave trunk a try and it worked fine for me. Thanks for the fix!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104935
Bug ID: 104935
Summary: [12 Regression] 554.roms_r ELF binary increased with
r12-7612-g69619acd8d9b5856
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104934
Bug ID: 104934
Summary: -fsanitize=undefined codegen err
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104933
Bug ID: 104933
Summary: [nvptx] muniform-simt optimization: determine
inside/outside SIMT region at compile time
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104482
--- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin ---
One fix has been posted via
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-March/591768.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104911
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 52630
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52630&action=edit
stage 2 and 3 objects and assembler output
I've now compiled typesem.d and semantic3.d using the stage 1 and 2 g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104916
--- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries ---
Anyway, having reread the volta architecture whitepaper again, I think it's ok
to use the solution I already found that does work (see PR104783): add a warp
sync at simt exit.
The tricky bit is that we rely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69623
--- Comment #8 from Ed Catmur ---
(In reply to jim x from comment #7)
>
> auto f(auto..., auto a, auto...) { return a; }
>
> IIUC, this is just disallowed since all arguments would only match the first
> function parameter pack.
Maybe?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744
Marc Poulhiès changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||poulhies at adacore dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104931
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
I think the issue is latent on trunk. The fix should be
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c
index b767056aeb0..21e25cabbd2 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c
+++ b/gcc/t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104932
Bug ID: 104932
Summary: [nvptx] Subreg validation error for V2SI
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104931
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-03-15
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104931
Bug ID: 104931
Summary: wrong-code with number_of_iterations_lt_to_ne
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104781
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
r12-7654-gda24fce323eaf088 should fix that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104916
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 52629
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52629&action=edit
Attempt, runs into driver internal error
FTR, this is an attempt at a fix.
It does the "predicate ld/st to onl
--- Comment #14 from Ulrich Drepper ---
My standard build now fails in stage 1 with this patch when compiling
unwind-dw2.c for x86:
.../gcc-builds/20220315/gcc/include/cetintrin.h: In function
‘_Unwind_RaiseException’:
.../gcc-builds/20220315/gcc/include/cetintrin.h:47:1: error: inlining failed in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104930
--- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin ---
It's regressed from r12-5752-gd08236359eb229, in the new bif infrastructure we
don't use the type opaque_V4SI_type_node for prototype of overloaded built-in
functions any more.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104929
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
In this particular case the problem is that UBSAN adds the non-NULL tests, so
the IL becomes if (!s) __ubsan_handle_nonnull_arg (...); sprintf(s, " "); if
(!s) __ubsan_handle_nonnull_arg (...); return __bui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104930
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104930
Bug ID: 104930
Summary: built-in function requires "-flax-vector-conversions"
to get better warning
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104929
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
I think the point here is that s is not guaranteed to be non-NULL. You can add
if (s == 0) __builtin_unreachable();
to suppress the warning.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104929
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
It's a quite known limitation that usage of sanitizers tends to emit false
positives of various warnings.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104929
Bug ID: 104929
Summary: UBSAN: false positive with sprintf
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104890
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da24fce323eaf088239e0f900dd23f6b05d552c1
commit r12-7654-gda24fce323eaf088239e0f900dd23f6b05d552c1
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104917
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> What if x = y + 1 or y = x + 1 ?
We then do
(y+1)[i] += a[i];
(y+1)[i+1] += a[i+1];
y[i] += a[i];
y[i+1] += a[i+1];
instead of
(y+1)[i] += a[i];
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104928
--- Comment #1 from Tee Hao Wei ---
Created attachment 52628
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52628&action=edit
Preprocessed, gzipped reproducer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104928
Bug ID: 104928
Summary: std::counting_semaphore on Linux can sleep forever
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104917
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101895
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49fb0af9bf8f16907980d383c2bbc85e185ec2e0
commit r12-7653-g49fb0af9bf8f16907980d383c2bbc85e185ec2e0
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Tue M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104894
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104847
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though the nontype-class-union1.C testcase doesn't have explicit designator
syntax either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104847
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104927
Bug ID: 104927
Summary: Invalid array size specification accepted
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104926
Bug ID: 104926
Summary: [nvptx] Use human-readable register names
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104637
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104925
Bug ID: 104925
Summary: [nvptx] Use "%" as register prefix
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104814
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] |[10/11 Regression] ifcvt:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104623
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE in |[11 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104623
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:efd1582926f3278a5e57ebab7d87fc870f06ecea
commit r12-7652-gefd1582926f3278a5e57ebab7d87fc870f06ecea
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104814
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a2645cd8fb33b36d737b310e26f4c47401305c7b
commit r12-7651-ga2645cd8fb33b36d737b310e26f4c47401305c7b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104923
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.0|11.3
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103743
Jiu Fu Guo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |guojiufu at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Co
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
