https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104191
Bug ID: 104191
Summary: Incorrect max_size() for node-based containers
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104182
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9718bc4b03c1a94f7cf64860bbc828aa53c56234
commit r12-6822-g9718bc4b03c1a94f7cf64860bbc828aa53c56234
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101072
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:053bcc97f4a59e3f2811b8a1edf60fd733a580a0
commit r12-6821-g053bcc97f4a59e3f2811b8a1edf60fd733a580a0
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104190
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 52271
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52271&action=edit
warnings
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104190
Bug ID: 104190
Summary: arm-linux-gnueabi shows warnings of use-after-free?
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104189
Bug ID: 104189
Summary: [sparc] Inconsistent behavior for -mcpu=v9 -m32 on
Linux and Solaris
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104184
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
https://geometrica.saclay.inria.fr/team/Marc.Glisse/tmp/mybug.cc.xz
(1.7M after compression still exceeds the limit)
With -Wall -Wextra
Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.
0xec0348
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104188
--- Comment #10 from Zbynek Vyskovsky ---
Thanks for quick fix!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104184
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
comment #1 actually reduces to
struct voider {
using type = void;
};
template struct rename : P {};
template using ignore = voider;
template typename ignore::type>::type g(T a) {}
void f() { g(1); }
(st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104172
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||orion at cora dot nwra.com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104188
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
A patc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104156
--- Comment #9 from Chengnian Sun ---
Thanks, Andrew.
What about -flto? Does GCC still guarantee such a compilation consistency wrt
to debug info in the presence of -flto?
If yes, I can enable this flag for several testing runs.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92479
--- Comment #14 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #12)
> Interestingly, both gcc and clang have nothing to say about this code:
>
> extern void g( int);
>
> void f( int a)
> {
> if (a >= 0)
> {
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101785
--- Comment #9 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 52270
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52270&action=edit
fix linker searching issue for aarch64-linux-android
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101785
--- Comment #8 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> *** Bug 104155 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-January/589107.html
Hi Andrew pinski, Can you review t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104166
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-01-22
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104179
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104156
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Chengnian Sun from comment #7)
> A quick question. Besides the flags `-fcompare-debug -g3 -O3`, are there any
> other flags I should enable to better/faster find such -fcompare-debug
> failures?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104173
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #2)
> Interestingly, here's a non-template variant of the testcase that seems to
> be rejected by every GCC version:
Yes this one is definitely interesting. Changing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104182
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104188
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 52269
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52269&action=edit
A patch
This this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104188
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
Since vbroadcastf32x4 != vbroadcastss, we can't replace vbroadcastf32x4
with {1to16} broadcast.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104188
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104188
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104188
--- Comment #4 from Zbynek Vyskovsky ---
Sure, the code:
#include
#ifndef NO_VECTORIZE
#ifdef __x86_64__
#include
#include
#endif
#ifdef __aarch64__
#include
#endif
#endif
typedef union Mat44 {
float m[4][4];
#ifndef NO_VECTORIZE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104176
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104176
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ea451e27934939d490553d3a394e8cbf9cefda8
commit r12-6819-g9ea451e27934939d490553d3a394e8cbf9cefda8
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99935
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||terrynini38514 at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100968
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99935
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104188
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99935
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||featherrain26 at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98889
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99935
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eliz at gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101779
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99935
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 104186 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104186
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99935
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sanjayr at ymail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104185
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104188
--- Comment #2 from Zbynek Vyskovsky ---
> {1to16} says to broadcast from first element to all 16.
The vbroadcastf32x4 is supposed to copy first four elmenents to 4-7, 8-11 and
12-15 .
> Why do you think this is wrong code?
It doesn't work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104187
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104188
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104188
Bug ID: 104188
Summary: gcc omitting AVX-512 broadcast instruction
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104187
Bug ID: 104187
Summary: Call site specific attribute to control inliner
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104181
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104159
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104150
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104150
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1fb81bda97014ba14d55c4c2e143d31ffe2e264
commit r12-6818-ga1fb81bda97014ba14d55c4c2e143d31ffe2e264
Author: David Malcolm
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104159
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45b999f642a531c083c982dda79fa6ad65730a7c
commit r12-6817-g45b999f642a531c083c982dda79fa6ad65730a7c
Author: David Malcolm
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104186
Bug ID: 104186
Summary: Stack overflow in demangle_type() -> print_str() in
libiberty/rust-demangle.c:869, cxxfilt
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104127
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c1a93102b41a558f3ad49a7c66015257535c747
commit r12-6816-g6c1a93102b41a558f3ad49a7c66015257535c747
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103641
--- Comment #20 from Roger Sayle ---
IMHO, the problem is in tree-vect-patterns.cc's vect_synth_mult_by_constant.
The comment above line 3054 reads:
/* Use MAX_COST here as we don't want to limit the sequence on rtx costs.
The vectorizer'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104185
Bug ID: 104185
Summary: Stack Overflow in str_buf_append():
rust-demangle.c:1493 in cxxfilt
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104180
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104182
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104180
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104180
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |c++
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104183
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104178
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |tree-optimization
--- Comment #4 from A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104184
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104184
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
And the stack trace for comment #1
Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.
0xff6b0d tsubst(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*)
../../src/gcc/cp/pt.cc:16068
0xff5f6d tsubst(t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104184
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
A different reduction from the same code. This one does not compile with clang
anymore. ICEs with -Wall -W, but not if I remove one of them.
using mp_false = struct mp_identity { using type = void; };
templat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104180
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-01-22
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104184
Bug ID: 104184
Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE Error reporting routines
re-entered. xref_basetypes
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: dia
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104181
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f4f9c0085eb68e0546804b156aa8bb388f2d3e0
commit r12-6815-g0f4f9c0085eb68e0546804b156aa8bb388f2d3e0
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104172
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
>From my side, I think best would be just to partially revert
r9-1033-gc765c8cb73b0bb91e9f0401ab6567b6218b910e5
(all the rs6000_passes_ieee128 and ieee128_mangling_gcc_8_1 related stuff in
there, don't set t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104183
Bug ID: 104183
Summary: gcc6 error with building icu for ppc64
Product: gcc
Version: 6.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104117
--- Comment #12 from Sergey Fedorov ---
Not sure if the error is related, but trying to build icu with gcc6 in Macports
gives this:
/opt/local/bin/g++-mp-6 -DU_ATTRIBUTE_DEPRECATED= -DU_I18N_IMPLEMENTATION
-DU_HAVE_STRTOD_L=1 -DU_HAVE_XLOCALE_H
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104182
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104182
Bug ID: 104182
Summary: [12 Regression] Wrong code since
r12-6329-g4f6bc28fc7dd86bd
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104178
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104181
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104181
Bug ID: 104181
Summary: The redundant build.log file in the root directory
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104180
Bug ID: 104180
Summary: [10/11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure
(length) w/ -O1
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: compare-debug-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104178
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Version|unknown
75 matches
Mail list logo
