https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64691
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30128
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Strange code generated |byte independent store not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61481
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59986
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59786
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59786
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34653
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #10 from An
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35926
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40168
--- Comment #22 from Andrew Pinski ---
With the trunk on the second testcase, SLP works but we get stuff like:
_2 = (*b_420(D))[80];
_4 = (*b_420(D))[79];
_538 = {_2, _4};
_980 = _538 * vect__1.182_559;
Shouldn't that just be loading a v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28850
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2006-08-25 21:59:14 |2021-12-24
Keywords|patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39298
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91721
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Last reconfirmed|2019-09-1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86892
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Build|powerpc64le-unknown-linux-g |
|nu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38518
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host|suse-linux-x86_64 |
Component|rtl-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48064
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|windows 32 |i686-*-* x86_64-*-*
Severity|n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24314
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24314
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63809
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63809
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced testcase:
template
struct binary_traits{};
template <>
template
struct binary_traits
{
typedef int result_type;
};
- CUT
This is rejected since GCC 8 with:
:6:8: error: too many templ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65923
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mferoldif at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84435
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50986
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81557
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79517
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Confirmed, though with a reduced testcase, I got the opposite effect of having
the constructor/deconstructor causing the warning to show up while not having
it causes it not to show.
struct g
{
g();
~g(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39992
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-25
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39992
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||terra at gnome dot org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63295
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72768
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7748
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7748
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
First problem looks like:
S.C:16:50: error: attributes after parenthesized initializer ignored
[-fpermissive]
16 | S s2 (65534) __attribute__((init_priority(65534)));
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67324
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66472
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
GCC even warns for:
template struct Foo : T {
typedef T Base;
Foo(int size) : Base(size) {}
using Base::size;
};
While clang does not even warn for this case:
struct Foo {
Foo(int size) {}
int si
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37667
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103825
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103825
Bug ID: 103825
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE on switch on enum class in
bitfield
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89543
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89543
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431
--- Comment #47 from Lewis Hyatt ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #46)
> If you don't get much attention to the patch, it may be worth pinging it.
> But before that, I would also suggest submitting all the cleanups separately
> a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100084
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luizfvalle at pm dot me
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103824
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84214
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am almost want to say the new testsuite failure that just happened on the
trunk is caused by this too:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-December/587355.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103824
Bug ID: 103824
Summary: Enum class shadowed by class member in
using-enum-declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84083
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |tree-optimization
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61562
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55277
Bug 55277 depends on bug 32647, which changed state.
Bug 32647 Summary: spill failures with hard-register variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32647
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32647
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35696
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103785
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
Before
(insn 8 5 70 2 (set (reg:SI 1 dx [92])
(const_int 714200473 [0x2a91d599]))
"/export/gnu/import/git/gitlab/x86-gcc-test/gcc/ada/sem_type.adb":2563:7 70
{*movsi_internal}
(expr_list:REG_EQUIV (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103785
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8)
> Created attachment 52055 [details]
> Good and bad asm
>
> --- good.s2021-12-24 11:24:26.531365375 -0800
> +++ bad.s 2021-12-24 11:24:30.769344666 -0800
> @@ -10,7 +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103785
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 52055
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52055&action=edit
Good and bad asm
--- good.s 2021-12-24 11:24:26.531365375 -0800
+++ bad.s 2021-12-24 11:24:30.769344666 -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103785
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
sem_type.adb is miscompiled.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100854
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-24
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103797
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f921393e339090566c1589d81009caa954de90d
commit r12-6113-g8f921393e339090566c1589d81009caa954de90d
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95046
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f921393e339090566c1589d81009caa954de90d
commit r12-6113-g8f921393e339090566c1589d81009caa954de90d
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Fri D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
if that is not viable
you could prune it locally to the specific test,
or add the prune to the general set in testsuite/lib (perhaps making it
darwin-specific).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Any reason not to move the test to the lto testsuite?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-24
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99936
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #6)
> At the same time, they appear to show up only intermittently in linux test
> results, and haven't been fixed on the 11 branch either. Are C++ modules
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78766
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||skunk at iskunk dot org
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53607
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78766
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99936
--- Comment #6 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
At the same time, they appear to show up only intermittently in linux test
results, and haven't been fixed on the 11 branch either. Are C++ modules
considered experimental, or generally buggy?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823
Bug ID: 103823
Summary: g++.dg/torture/pr31863.C fails on darwin with "using
serial compilation of 2 LTRANS jobs"
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80552
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99936
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #4)
> Currently still fails on x86_64-apple-darwin21
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2021-December/743901.html),
> as well as the future aarc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86948
--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Roger Sayle from comment #7)
> A default expansion for MULT_HIGHPART_EXPR was proposed as part of
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-August/551316.html
> I'll split off just that pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99936
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58203
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||goswin-v-b at web dot de
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65199
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58203
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-24
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48983
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50666
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85047
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85047
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87499
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50676
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Simple testcase from the other bug:
/* { dg-do link } */
/* { dg-options "-flto-partition=max -flto -O2" } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target lto } */
/* Test for putting static with label references into s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50676
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 83375 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83375
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86948
--- Comment #8 from Alexander Monakov ---
How does your patch expand 64-bit highpart multiply (i.e. with 128-bit full
product) on 32-bit targets?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94150
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94150
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
There is a nice testcase in bug 96969 comment #1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94150
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alan at octopull dot co.uk
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96969
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86490
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
--- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67357
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61052
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43581
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61192
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cnsun at uwaterloo dot ca
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100888
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61192
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-24
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103822
--- Comment #1 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Oops wrong type of quotes, needs double quotes:
diff --git a/libbacktrace/Makefile.am b/libbacktrace/Makefile.am
index 8874f41338a..d200e3a9433 100644
--- a/libbacktrace/Makefile.am
+++ b/libbackt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103822
Bug ID: 103822
Summary: libbacktrace make check fails with GNU Make 3.81
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63997
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52722
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||link-failure
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52634
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81829
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||theivorytower at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80717
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.3
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63997
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|lto |testsuite
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47334
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|lto |middle-end
See Also|
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo