[Bug c++/19249] abstract classes should not access virtually inherited class constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19249 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|| --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---

[Bug tree-optimization/103603] [11 Regression] stack overflow on ranger for huge program, but OK for legacy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103603 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.3 Known to work|

[Bug fortran/103607] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in do_subscript, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2927

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103607 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5

[Bug fortran/103609] [11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_sym_get_dummy_args, at fortran/symbol.c:5243

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103609 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.3

[Bug fortran/103606] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in resolve_fl_procedure, at fortran/resolve.c:13297

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103606 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5

[Bug testsuite/103522] New test case gcc.dg/ubsan/pr103456.c fails in r12-5649

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103522 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/100736] ICE: unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100736 HaoChen Gui changed: What|Removed |Added CC||guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/103571] ABI: V2HF, V4HF and V8HFmode argument passing issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103571 --- Comment #10 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #9) > (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #8) > > (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #6) > > > (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #5) > > > > > > > There're seve

[Bug target/87438] ICE building gfortran for MicroBlaze target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87438 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/103613] microblaze: ICE in reload pass when building PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103613 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/103571] ABI: V2HF, V4HF and V8HFmode argument passing issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103571 --- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #8) > (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #6) > > (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #5) > > > > > There're several places in i386-expand.c which assume TARGET_AVX51

[Bug middle-end/100738] Gimple failed to simplify ((v4si) ~a) < 0 ? c : d to ((v4si)a) >= 0 ? c : d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100738 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/100738] Gimple failed to simplify ((v4si) ~a) < 0 ? c : d to ((v4si)a) >= 0 ? c : d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100738 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:691f05c2197a7b79cb2d7fdbabe3182e22da320a commit r12-5832-g691f05c2197a7b79cb2d7fdbabe3182e22da320a Author: Haochen Jiang Date: Thu

[Bug target/103571] ABI: V2HF, V4HF and V8HFmode argument passing issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103571 --- Comment #8 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #6) > (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #5) > > > There're several places in i386-expand.c which assume TARGET_AVX512FP16 for > > case V8HF/V16HF/V32HF, if we want to

[Bug c/103614] New: Modulo equality optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103614 Bug ID: 103614 Summary: Modulo equality optimization Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assig

[Bug target/103613] New: microblaze: ICE in reload pass when building PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103613 Bug ID: 103613 Summary: microblaze: ICE in reload pass when building PIE Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug c++/91247] Variadic template expansion - Mistmatch argument pack length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91247 --- Comment #4 from Mario Galindo --- It has been fixed fixed in GCC 10.2.0 and GCC 11+ Thanks.

[Bug libstdc++/103612] get_time parsing error for two digits year

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103612 --- Comment #2 from Pablo --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Dup of bug 101152 ? No, I don't think so. Here the problem is %y acts like %Y, it uses 4 digits of the input, and It doesn't produce an error even in the case where the

[Bug target/103302] wrong code with -fharden-compares

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103302 --- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva --- Created attachment 51947 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51947&action=edit candidate patch under testing Could the fix be as simple as this? The resulting code is awful, with such s

[Bug c++/92662] change in gcc 8 vs 9: call of overloaded ‘basic_string()’ is ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92662 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/71369] Error message is confusing when missing template keyword with operator().

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71369 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71369] Compile failure about template function call operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71369 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pi

[Bug c++/90652] Recursive concept leads to segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90652 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- With a "fixed" source to the new syntax of concepts I get: : In substitution of 'template requires (ToJson) && !(Serializable) std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream&, const T&) [with T = char]': :5:86: req

[Bug libstdc++/103612] get_time parsing error for two digits year

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103612 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug libstdc++/103612] New: get_time parsing error for two digits year

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103612 Bug ID: 103612 Summary: get_time parsing error for two digits year Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: li

[Bug tree-optimization/103603] [11 Regression] stack overflow on ranger for huge program, but OK for legacy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103603 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Macleod --- Yes, there is an updated patch that bootstraps posted here for approval: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-December/586351.html Give it a go.

[Bug target/103611] GCC generates suboptimal code for SSE2/SSE4.1 64-bit integer element extraction on 32-bit x86 targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103611 --- Comment #4 from John Platts --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > Hmm, GCC 4.8.1-5.5.0 produces: > long long SSE2ExtractInt64<0>(long long __vector): > .LFB499: > .cfi_startproc > pshufd xmm1, xmm0, 1 > m

[Bug target/103611] GCC generates suboptimal code for SSE2/SSE4.1 64-bit integer element extraction on 32-bit x86 targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103611 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Hmm, GCC 4.8.1-5.5.0 produces: long long SSE2ExtractInt64<0>(long long __vector): .LFB499: .cfi_startproc pshufd xmm1, xmm0, 1 movdeax, xmm0 movdedx, xmm1 ret

[Bug middle-end/103149] cc1: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm' with -fharden-conditional-branches and SVE turned on

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103149 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/103149] cc1: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm' with -fharden-conditional-branches and SVE turned on

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103149 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0485ce9128f272fe7ccb48672f69d7be6bb26a9c commit r12-5831-g0485ce9128f272fe7ccb48672f69d7be6bb26a9c Author: Alexandre Oliva Date:

[Bug target/103611] GCC generates suboptimal code for SSE2/SSE4.1 64-bit integer element extraction on 32-bit x86 targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103611 --- Comment #2 from John Platts --- Here is some code for extracting 64-bit integers from a SSE2 vector using GCC vector extensions: #include #include using Int64M128Vect [[__gnu__::__vector_size__(16)]] = std::int64_t; template std::int64_t

[Bug target/103611] GCC generates suboptimal code for SSE2/SSE4.1 64-bit integer element extraction on 32-bit x86 targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103611 --- Comment #1 from John Platts --- Here is some C++ code for extracting 64-bit integers from a __m128i vector using SSE4.1: #include #include template std::int64_t SSE41ExtractInt64(__m128i vect) noexcept { static_assert(ElemIdx == (Elem

[Bug target/103611] New: GCC generates suboptimal code for SSE2/SSE4.1 64-bit integer element extraction on 32-bit x86 targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103611 Bug ID: 103611 Summary: GCC generates suboptimal code for SSE2/SSE4.1 64-bit integer element extraction on 32-bit x86 targets Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONF

[Bug c++/103600] Cannot use typeid result in constant expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103600 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Created attachment 51946 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51946&action=edit libstdc++: Implement P1328 "Making std::type_info::operator== constexpr" Jakub, that patch works for me. Her

[Bug tree-optimization/103603] [11 Regression] stack overflow on ranger for huge program, but OK for legacy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103603 --- Comment #4 from Kito Cheng --- Hi Andrew: Thanks for your quick response! the patch is work to me for the testcase, but...I got seg fault when I built x86 GCC. Here is a reduced case from gcov, and this testcase also take longer compilatio

[Bug rtl-optimization/98782] [11/12 Regression] Bad interaction between IPA frequences and IRA resulting in spills due to changes in BB frequencies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98782 --- Comment #15 from Tamar Christina --- > That is, we're trading two memory accesses in the call branch > (if we allocate R) against one memory access in both branches > (if we spill R). As the call branch gets more likely, > the cost of doing

[Bug libstdc++/101152] std::get_time %Y accepts years with less than 4 digits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101152 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- It's not essential, but I think that would be helpful

[Bug fortran/103610] ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.c:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103610 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/103607] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in do_subscript, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2927

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103607 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9eec77c0df9e5c67454a2e8f83246104458ba4f0 commit r12-5829-g9eec77c0df9e5c67454a2e8f83246104458ba4f0 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: T

[Bug c++/79452] Provide builtin to detect compile-time execution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79452 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely --- Well this request is satisfied by std::is_constant_evaluated() in C++20, which is what __builtin_is_constant_evaluated() exists for. PR 100974 adds a newer C++23 language feature that makes std::is_constan

[Bug fortran/103610] ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.c:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103610 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Tentative patch: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/array.c b/gcc/fortran/array.c index e5e22099405..a23fabbdcdb 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/array.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/array.c @@ -2330,6 +2330,9 @@ spec_dimen_

[Bug target/103370] [12 Regression] Assembler error building glibc for ColdFire soft-float

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103370 --- Comment #4 from Joseph S. Myers --- It seems this glibc build failure disappeared between commit b880d1514c1e3dd75a6ea311a5cc956742bd713c and commit 8e836af61b7027c0819da62c12a8d18b7c46f3fc. (Not verified that the GCC change was what's rele

[Bug fortran/103610] ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.c:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103610 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug testsuite/103586] New test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr101324.c fails on BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103586 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/103607] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in do_subscript, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2927

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103607 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassig

[Bug testsuite/103556] [12 regression] rop test cases start failing after r12-5780

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103556 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/103556] [12 regression] rop test cases start failing after r12-5780

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103556 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4394fd67264f5de650c2c3509c001c5f7203449d commit r12-5827-g4394fd67264f5de650c2c3509c001c5f7203449d Author: Peter Bergner Date: T

[Bug testsuite/103586] New test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr101324.c fails on BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103586 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4394fd67264f5de650c2c3509c001c5f7203449d commit r12-5827-g4394fd67264f5de650c2c3509c001c5f7203449d Author: Peter Bergner Date: T

[Bug middle-end/103364] s390x: TLS reference in /usr/lib64/libLLVM.so mismatches non-TLS reference in /usr/lib64/libLLVM.so

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103364 --- Comment #24 from Sarah Julia Kriesch --- There can be a dependency to this kernel bug: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188896 We want to integrate the patch from your colleague and look, what will be changed.

[Bug libgomp/103444] Fortran async IO is broken on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103444 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is as far as I have gotten on this bug. I don't know if this is a race condition in libgfortran's async_close(), a problem with gcc internal threading modeling (i.e., __gthrw_), and problem

[Bug analyzer/101962] Analyzer NULL false positive with pointer manipulation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101962 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/90341] pcsx2-git: "At global scope: cc1plus: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90341 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-reduction Status|WAITI

[Bug c++/71527] wrong type mismatch while template argument deduction/substitution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71527 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.1.0, 9.1.0 Known to fail|

[Bug fortran/103610] ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.c:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103610 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #1 from

[Bug fortran/103610] New: ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.c:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103610 Bug ID: 103610 Summary: ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.c:193 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug rtl-optimization/98782] [11/12 Regression] Bad interaction between IPA frequences and IRA resulting in spills due to changes in BB frequencies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98782 --- Comment #14 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thanks for the nice cut-down example. In the original comment and the covering note to patch 1, the highlighted spilled value is the final (terminating) value of foo + 1024. Let's start with

[Bug fortran/103609] [11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_sym_get_dummy_args, at fortran/symbol.c:5243

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103609 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #1 from

[Bug fortran/103609] New: [11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_sym_get_dummy_args, at fortran/symbol.c:5243

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103609 Bug ID: 103609 Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_sym_get_dummy_args, at fortran/symbol.c:5243 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug fortran/103608] New: ICE in do_intent, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:3035

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103608 Bug ID: 103608 Summary: ICE in do_intent, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:3035 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug fortran/103607] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in do_subscript, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2927

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103607 Bug ID: 103607 Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in do_subscript, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2927 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/103606] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in resolve_fl_procedure, at fortran/resolve.c:13297

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103606 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #1 from

[Bug fortran/103606] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in resolve_fl_procedure, at fortran/resolve.c:13297

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103606 Bug ID: 103606 Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in resolve_fl_procedure, at fortran/resolve.c:13297 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug c++/66641] An instance of an attribute-specifier-seq implies a simple-declaration while C++11 permits attribute-declaration and using-directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66641 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||101582 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/101582] C++ FE doesn't accept attribute-declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101582 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Keywords|

[Bug c++/66641] An instance of an attribute-specifier-seq implies a simple-declaration while C++11 permits attribute-declaration and using-directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66641 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.2.0 Keywords|

[Bug c++/100974] [C++23] Implement if consteval

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100974 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gonzalo.gadeschi at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/79452] Provide builtin to detect compile-time execution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79452 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69836] compilation error with constexpr in template types with redeclared methods

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69836 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > I wonder if this is just invalid code but no diagnostic required as state > changes inside the scope of TemplateObject. That is it needs to be reinterpret it aft

[Bug c++/103597] [12 Regression] False -Wimplicit-fallthrough= involving macro since r12-5638-ga3e75c1491cd2d50

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103597 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/69836] compilation error with constexpr in template types with redeclared methods

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69836 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I wonder if this is just invalid code but no diagnostic required as state changes inside the scope of TemplateObject.

[Bug libstdc++/101152] std::get_time %Y accepts years with less than 4 digits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101152 --- Comment #2 from Jordi Vilar --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > I think the bug is that it treats 03 as 1903 instead of 0003. It is not > supposed to print "N/A" though. > > %Y doesn't require exactly 4 digits, it allows 1-4

[Bug c++/103597] [12 Regression] False -Wimplicit-fallthrough= involving macro since r12-5638-ga3e75c1491cd2d50

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103597 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Completely untested patch to set the flag when a label is only known reachable through fallthrough from previous instructions, never jumped to, as the only goto to it is on a non-executable branch of GIMPLE_

[Bug testsuite/103556] [12 regression] rop test cases start failing after r12-5780

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103556 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug c++/83469] union is not accepted as a valid class-key in template name resolution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83469 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug c++/93809] bogus error class tag used in naming union on typedef typename ::U U2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93809 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug fortran/103588] ICE: Simplification error in gfc_ref_dimen_size, at fortran/array.c:2407

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103588 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:652c28736209f10bac1aa7ecb31f9056b518dacf commit r12-5826-g652c28736209f10bac1aa7ecb31f9056b518dacf Author: Harald Anlauf Date: T

[Bug fortran/103591] ICE in gfc_compare_string, at fortran/arith.c:1119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103591 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/103591] ICE in gfc_compare_string, at fortran/arith.c:1119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103591 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f47662204de27f7685699eeef89aa173ccf32d85 commit r12-5825-gf47662204de27f7685699eeef89aa173ccf32d85 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: M

[Bug libstdc++/101152] std::get_time %Y accepts years with less than 4 digits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101152 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libstdc++/71557] time_get is case sensitive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71557 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug testsuite/103586] New test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr101324.c fails on BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103586 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/103598] [12 regression] __PRETTY_FUNCTION_ lost namespaces in types since r12-5783-gf78eaffd1538efb4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103598 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug c++/103600] Cannot use typeid result in constant expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103600 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/103605] [PowerPC] fmin/fmax should be inlined always with xsmindp/xsmaxdp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103605 --- Comment #1 from pc at gcc dot gnu.org --- $ cat fmin.c #include double fm (double d0, double d1) { return fmin (d0, d1); }

[Bug target/103605] New: [PowerPC] fmin/fmax should be inlined always with xsmindp/xsmaxdp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103605 Bug ID: 103605 Summary: [PowerPC] fmin/fmax should be inlined always with xsmindp/xsmaxdp Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/103545] [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-2.c fails after r12-5580

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103545 pc at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pc at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/103603] [11 Regression] stack overflow on ranger for huge program, but OK for legacy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103603 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Macleod --- Created attachment 51944 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51944&action=edit Ported patch See if this works. I'll run it through testing, but this should be a port of the patches from PR

[Bug c++/103553] Show what decltype deduced in static_assert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103553 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Yes, I added that in GCC 11. To make this work, I think we'll have to print parser->scope when there's one. In this case it's full-name "struct is_same" so that could be extracted and used in finish_stat

[Bug c++/84516] bitfield temporaries > 32-bits have wrong type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84516 Bug 84516 depends on bug 95009, which changed state. Bug 95009 Summary: [9/10 Regression] decltype of increment or decrement bitfield expressions are wrong and causes assembler errors. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95009

[Bug c++/70733] Wrong code with nested structs and bit field.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70733 Bug 70733 depends on bug 95009, which changed state. Bug 95009 Summary: [9/10 Regression] decltype of increment or decrement bitfield expressions are wrong and causes assembler errors. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95009

[Bug c++/95009] [9/10 Regression] decltype of increment or decrement bitfield expressions are wrong and causes assembler errors.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95009 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11 Regression]|[9/10 Regression] decltype

[Bug c++/95009] [9/10/11 Regression] decltype of increment or decrement bitfield expressions are wrong and causes assembler errors.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95009 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e3fab19a79e3dc3cdf3e54ca20107e1dc15a3927 commit r11-9363-ge3fab19a79e3dc3cdf3e54ca20107e1dc15a3927 Author: Marek Polacek D

[Bug c++/103593] [11/12 Regression] Naming the constructor of a template class without using the injected-class-name causes parse error with C++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103593 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Yup, just the diagnostic is really bad because I still haven't fixed bug 97202 :(

[Bug c++/103593] [11/12 Regression] Naming the constructor of a template class without using the injected-class-name causes parse error with C++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103593 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/103603] [11 Regression] stack overflow on ranger for huge program, but OK for legacy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103603 --- Comment #2 from Kito Cheng --- Oh, apologize for misleading, it should fixed via pr103231 rather than pr103254. it work after g:5deacf6058d1bc7261a75c9fd1f116c4442e9e60, no new file, but it's not trivial backport-able.

[Bug c++/103593] [11/12 Regression] Naming the constructor of a template class without using the injected-class-name causes parse error with C++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103593 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug c++/95009] [9/10/11 Regression] decltype of increment or decrement bitfield expressions are wrong and causes assembler errors.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95009 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11 Regression] |

[Bug target/99531] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Performance regression since gcc 9 (argument passing / register allocation)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99531 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov --- Thank you for reporting this. It is true my patch caused this. I've reproduced the bug on master too. I will be working on this PR. I think a fix will be ready on the next week the best as the fix

[Bug c++/103600] Cannot use typeid result in constant expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103600 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- The new definition of operator== will be something like: #if __GXX_TYPEINFO_EQUALITY_INLINE || __cplusplus > 202002L _GLIBCXX23_CONSTEXPR inline bool type_info::operator==(const type_info& __arg) cons

[Bug d/103604] [12 Regression] trunk 20210506 fails to build in libphobos on mips64el-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103604 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

  1   2   >