https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102906
--- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #5)
> (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #4)
> > If I'm not mistaken, if you click on "REGRESSED" for that specific line,
> > you'll see that only ssa-dom-th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102997
--- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez ---
It's been mentioned that this SPEC test has irreconcilable differences between
the train and peak runs, and cannot be reasonably compared. Is the slowdown
reported between two runs of compatible runs (two
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102997
--- Comment #11 from Aldy Hernandez ---
>From what I gather, this is only reproducible with PGO. If so, it may be worth
nothing that Jeff has mentioned that the backward threader probably does not do
a very good job with keeping profile counts
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102906
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #4)
> If I'm not mistaken, if you click on "REGRESSED" for that specific line,
> you'll see that only ssa-dom-thread-7.c actually regressed with the
> corresponding
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103125
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Ever confirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103125
Bug ID: 103125
Summary: [ARM]Useless stack initialization on aarch64
big-endian
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102789
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102789
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7cb3b868f702e63e53ee1880c6b8a61676144395
commit r11-9219-g7cb3b868f702e63e53ee1880c6b8a61676144395
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102789
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4f024c99a05f1c6852d1e5daad4a172f4cdd24a1
commit r10-10257-g4f024c99a05f1c6852d1e5daad4a172f4cdd24a1
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102789
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6cce26752d8431a1ef6d3f9a97fa0ee2e9f96816
commit r9-9815-g6cce26752d8431a1ef6d3f9a97fa0ee2e9f96816
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103124
--- Comment #1 from HaoChen Gui ---
Build command gcc -O2 -S test.c -mcpu=power9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103124
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103124
Bug ID: 103124
Summary: PPC: "mr" instruction is unnecessary when extending DI
to V1TI
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103123
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Clang produces:
:4:10: warning: magnitude of floating-point constant too large for type
'double'; maximum is 1.7976931348623157E+308 [-Wliteral-range]
return 1.0e999;
^
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103123
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103123
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The code in GCC:
/* Both C and C++ require a diagnostic for a floating constant
outside the range of representable values of its type. Since we
have __builtin_inf* to produce an infinity, this i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103123
Bug ID: 103123
Summary: incorrect or misleading warning "floating constant
exceeds range of ..." in ISO C11 and C17
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103122
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103090
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
Similar like Jakub did in r7-532, We need another IFN & optab to do the
optimization. The IFN and optab is like atomic_logic_test_and_set_sf which used
to perform logic operation and set SF.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103077
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103077
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae1de0bf72fca92f94a7e29f51ce4448b877db4a
commit r12-4986-gae1de0bf72fca92f94a7e29f51ce4448b877db4a
Author: liuhongt
Date: Fri Nov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102464
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1f7ead09cd41d32e2fe902eb32e587c36e7
commit r12-4985-ga1f7ead09cd41d32e2fe902eb32e587c36e7
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Nov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102464
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ad1e8081f4797a99a96b513ffe14c7305e9b3d8
commit r12-4984-g2ad1e8081f4797a99a96b513ffe14c7305e9b3d8
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Nov
it a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
GCC version:
gcc version 12.0.0 20211107 (9defce622893f87d954e0089e0ea79e1e388a480) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103054
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103121
Bug ID: 103121
Summary: Warnings
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103120
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103120
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-linux-gnu, |
|x86_64-apple-darwin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98925
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Extend modref to handle |Extend ipa-prop to handle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103120
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-lin ux-gnu |x86_64-linux-gnu,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103055
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103120
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Component|middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103120
Bug ID: 103120
Summary: [12 Regression] test miscompiled with -O2 on darwin
since r12-4790
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103055
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:87e57378ba554212a32a0743fee03481d1289318
commit r12-4981-g87e57378ba554212a32a0743fee03481d1289318
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Sun N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102816
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3371e7f18df52867b0b88966bd98d3f1eff6f815
commit r11-9217-g3371e7f18df52867b0b88966bd98d3f1eff6f815
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102685
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1cab51131ad4d5501bf3f01e694704142a10c1a
commit r11-9216-gb1cab51131ad4d5501bf3f01e694704142a10c1a
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102715
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:db1da3d37e33b0adcd7fed68cfdb96e8ee265ccf
commit r11-9215-gdb1da3d37e33b0adcd7fed68cfdb96e8ee265ccf
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102817
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:907fd5049735ed1bd17e221db5a812dedee5dfc8
commit r11-9214-g907fd5049735ed1bd17e221db5a812dedee5dfc8
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99348
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1b740d8000cac8048c728fb0bd75c7146429
commit r11-9213-g1b740d8000cac8048c728fb0bd75c7146429
Author: Harald Anlauf
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102521
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1b740d8000cac8048c728fb0bd75c7146429
commit r11-9213-g1b740d8000cac8048c728fb0bd75c7146429
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103054
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Please have a look at the testsuite, too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96159
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
So it looks like __atomic_load assumes the type is _Atomic which has the right
alignment to it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103111
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
--- Comment #41 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Andrew Aladjev from comment #38)
> Sure, patches works perfect. But we need somehow decrease the chance of
> similar regressions in future. It is possible by adding any basic "canadian"
> build into
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
--- Comment #40 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Andrew Aladjev from comment #38)
> Sure, patches works perfect. But we need somehow decrease the chance of
> similar regressions in future. It is possible by adding any basic "canadian"
> build into
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
--- Comment #39 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Andrew Aladjev from comment #38)
> Sure, patches works perfect. But we need somehow decrease the chance of
> similar regressions in future. It is possible by adding any basic "canadian"
> build into
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
--- Comment #38 from Andrew Aladjev ---
Sure, patches works perfect. But we need somehow decrease the chance of similar
regressions in future. It is possible by adding any basic "canadian" build into
the list of tests to be done before release.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
--- Comment #37 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #36)
> (In reply to Andrew Aladjev from comment #35)
> > Hello cqwrteur, do you have an influence on core gcc developers? Please
> > provide an idea to add at least one "canadi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
--- Comment #36 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Andrew Aladjev from comment #35)
> Hello cqwrteur, do you have an influence on core gcc developers? Please
> provide an idea to add at least one "canadian" test before release.
> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103119
Bug ID: 103119
Summary: ICE in get_imports, at gimple-range-gori.cc:230
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
--- Comment #35 from Andrew Aladjev ---
Hello cqwrteur, do you have an influence on core gcc developers? Please provide
an idea to add at least one "canadian" test before release. x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
-> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu will be enough. W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
--- Comment #34 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 51747
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51747&action=edit
Correct Patch by just fixing configure and configure.ac with -nostdinc++
Tested with over 20 canadian cross builds
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
--- Comment #33 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Andrew Aladjev from comment #32)
> I've added include_next_fenv dirty patch. I want just to quickly explain how
> to use it.
>
> First of all I've noticed (many years ago) that gcc developers are m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
--- Comment #32 from Andrew Aladjev ---
I've added include_next_fenv dirty patch. I want just to quickly explain how to
use it.
First of all I've noticed (many years ago) that gcc developers are making
releases based on limited set of basic tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102943
--- Comment #27 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
>
> This PR is still open, at least for slowdown in the threader with LTO. The
> issue is ranger wide, so it may also cause slowdowns on non-LTO builds for
> WRF, though I haven't checked
>
> This PR is still open, at least for slowdown in the threader with LTO. The
> issue is ranger wide, so it may also cause slowdowns on non-LTO builds for
> WRF, though I haven't checked.
I just wanted to record the fact somewhere since I was looking up the
revision range mostly to figure out i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
--- Comment #31 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Andrew Aladjev from comment #30)
> Created attachment 51746 [details]
> Include fenv dirty patch for gcc 11.2.0
>
> Please apply carefully, it is not safe.
no. adding -nostdinc++ is the right solu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
--- Comment #30 from Andrew Aladjev ---
Created attachment 51746
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51746&action=edit
Include fenv dirty patch for gcc 11.2.0
Please apply carefully, it is not safe.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103118
Bug ID: 103118
Summary: [modules] ICE tree check in get_merge_kind at
cp/module.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102943
--- Comment #26 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #25)
> LNT sees new regresion on WRF build times (around 6%) at Nov 3
>
> https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=287.548.8
> https://lnt.opensuse.or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101337
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101337
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ee11be7f2d788e6055ebed9746a8d8ac3cb04b8e
commit r12-4979-gee11be7f2d788e6055ebed9746a8d8ac3cb04b8e
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89078
--- Comment #2 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I did look over the entire list of still-open issues and did not see any
further low-hanging fruit. It also seemed to me that some of the issues on the
list are cases where it appears the implemen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102943
--- Comment #25 from Jan Hubicka ---
LNT sees new regresion on WRF build times (around 6%) at Nov 3
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=287.548.8
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=289.270.8
The revis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103095
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103054
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 51745
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51745&action=edit
documentation update
Forgot the documentation part of the patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103117
Bug ID: 103117
Summary: uncprop produces harder to analyze but not better code
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103054
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle2 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21678
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29970
--- Comment #15 from Martin Uecker ---
Another version of the patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/583593.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103116
Bug ID: 103116
Summary: SLP vectoriser fails to peel for gaps
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103115
--- Comment #1 from ygal klein ---
I see that in the first program I gave as an example I forgot to insert the
line
write(*, "('size(titles) = ',i1)") size(titles)
bf the block
anyway - it is there (one can see the output).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103095
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103115
Bug ID: 103115
Summary: reallocation of character array fails when appending a
constant size 4 array
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96159
--- Comment #3 from Martin Uecker ---
The documentation:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fatomic-Builtins.html#g_t_005f_005fatomic-Builtins
"The four non-arithmetic functions (load, store, exchange, and
compare_exchange) all have a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102906
--- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon ---
If I'm not mistaken, if you click on "REGRESSED" for that specific line, you'll
see that only ssa-dom-thread-7.c actually regressed with the corresponding
flags.
For ivopts-4.c, if seems you need -mthumb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103076
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103054
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-11-07
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103057
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.3
Summary|Internal compil
79 matches
Mail list logo
