https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91161
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102850
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[10/11/12 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102767
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 102847 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102847
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102815
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #1)
> I don't have a big endian system at hand. Can you check whether the attached
> patch fixes it? Thanks - and sorry for not taking big endian into account.
Now co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102642
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102815
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4044db034b40c275b5f287d5854a102d22e07c0
commit r12-4528-gd4044db034b40c275b5f287d5854a102d22e07c0
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102642
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d3a05456dcc95e94c21977f4aa3260362f24e18
commit r11-9176-g5d3a05456dcc95e94c21977f4aa3260362f24e18
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102642
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:424945258d1778617b5d3d5273f6e1c10e718f80
commit r12-4527-g424945258d1778617b5d3d5273f6e1c10e718f80
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102852
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102713
Bug 102713 depends on bug 102658, which changed state.
Bug 102658 Summary: [12 regression] Many test case failures after r12-4240
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102658
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102658
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102852
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102852
Bug ID: 102852
Summary: [12 Regression] Compile time hog since
r12-4421-g0bd68793921ecf3b
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: compile-time
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102789
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102851
Bug ID: 102851
Summary: Failure to demangle c++ symbol
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: demangler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
--- Comment #28 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Ofer Shinaar from comment #27)
> (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #23)
> > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #22)
> > > *** Bug 101060 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102850
Bug ID: 102850
Summary: [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in begin_move_insn, at
sched-ebb.c:196
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102744
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c8d8c0be95e99dc0cba7f6fad2429243582119f
commit r12-4523-g3c8d8c0be95e99dc0cba7f6fad2429243582119f
Author: liuhongt
Date: Thu Oct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102706
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c8d8c0be95e99dc0cba7f6fad2429243582119f
commit r12-4523-g3c8d8c0be95e99dc0cba7f6fad2429243582119f
Author: liuhongt
Date: Thu Oct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102462
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c8d8c0be95e99dc0cba7f6fad2429243582119f
commit r12-4523-g3c8d8c0be95e99dc0cba7f6fad2429243582119f
Author: liuhongt
Date: Thu Oct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102697
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c8d8c0be95e99dc0cba7f6fad2429243582119f
commit r12-4523-g3c8d8c0be95e99dc0cba7f6fad2429243582119f
Author: liuhongt
Date: Thu Oct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102722
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c8d8c0be95e99dc0cba7f6fad2429243582119f
commit r12-4523-g3c8d8c0be95e99dc0cba7f6fad2429243582119f
Author: liuhongt
Date: Thu Oct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102834
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #1)
> Created attachment 51632 [details]
> 32-bit avx512f-pr96891-3.s
It relies on the existence of the pattern one_cmpldi2_doubleword, so that the
avx512bw_cmpv64qi3 and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102846
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from Jonath
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102849
Bug ID: 102849
Summary: missing warning for unsigned bitfield tests for
negativity
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102848
Bug ID: 102848
Summary: missing warning for bitfield overflow in C
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102847
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Component|bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102767
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102372
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102847
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102847
Bug ID: 102847
Summary: [12 regression] r12-4504 breaks powerpc64 build on
power 7
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102846
Bug ID: 102846
Summary: Misleading suggestion to include cassert
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102837
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> It is one of the following:
> g:8088a33df5f62fd6416fb8cb158b791e639aa707
Most likely this one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102837
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
It is one of the following:
g:8088a33df5f62fd6416fb8cb158b791e639aa707
g:053234120de7f87b050df78f0d9819ca4214
g:efa5449a094d3887e124d400ff0410af2c745b2d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102843
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102843
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102842
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10 Regression] ICE in |[10/11/12 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102845
Bug ID: 102845
Summary: Memory leak with nested OpenMP parallelism
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102842
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Component|other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102844
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11/12 Regression] vrp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102844
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
> 1a438d160e1dc845882c2ecba99513a09a931623
It was definitely latent before this patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102844
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Before:
[local count: 25265782]:
:
nd.7_11 = _46;
_12 = _46 + -128;
_13 = (unsigned char) _12;
dic = _13;
goto ; [100.00%]
[local count: 25265782]:
:
dic = 0;
[local count: 114848370]:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102840
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102844
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102844
Bug ID: 102844
Summary: gcc-9.x miscompiles unsigned char expression in switch
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102840
--- Comment #3 from Roger Sayle ---
With -m64, before:
test: movq.LC1(%rip), %mm0
paddb .LC0(%rip), %mm0
movq%xmm0, x(%rip)
ret
And after:
test: movq.LC2(%rip), %rax
movq%rax, x(%rip)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102828
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102843
Bug ID: 102843
Summary: [12 regression] gfortran.dg/deferred_type_param_6.f90
fails after r12-4457
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31573
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
--- Comment #27 from Ofer Shinaar ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #23)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #22)
> > *** Bug 101060 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>
> I can confirm Yujie Yang's patch works. Just a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102841
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libgomp |testsuite
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||44209
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90690
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to sandra from comment #2)
> I think this has been fixed? In a recent-ish trunk build, I see gcc -Q
> --help-warning prints
>
> -Werror-implicit-function-declaration
> -Werror=implicit-f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101893
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Clarke :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3cfbe5dc08b574bccc398256946cc03e2a767329
commit r12-4514-g3cfbe5dc08b574bccc398256946cc03e2a767329
Author: Paul A. Clarke
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102719
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Clarke :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3cfbe5dc08b574bccc398256946cc03e2a767329
commit r12-4514-g3cfbe5dc08b574bccc398256946cc03e2a767329
Author: Paul A. Clarke
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102840
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Roger Sayle from comment #1)
> I believe this test case is poorly written, and not correctly testing the
> original issue in PR target/22076 which concerned suboptimal moving of
> arguments via memory
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102783
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Tue, 19 Oct 2021, segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102783
>
> --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
> (In reply to jos.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102842
--- Comment #3 from tt_1 ---
sure I can provide happily gcc -v of host:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/10.3.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with:
/var/tmp/por
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102842
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-19
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102840
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-19
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102842
--- Comment #1 from tt_1 ---
Created attachment 51635
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51635&action=edit
preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102842
Bug ID: 102842
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in cselib_record_set at 02 or
greater
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102838
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102832
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102833
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-19
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102840
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102841
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102841
Bug ID: 102841
Summary: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/host_dat
a-7.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102829
--- Comment #2 from Laurynas Biveinis ---
FWIW adding "if (this == nullptr) __builtin_unreachable();" between
__atomic_load_n and return fails to workaround this issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102838
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Actually no, I'm wrong, there is
gomp_mutex_t lock __attribute__((aligned (64)));
in the middle of the structure, so the start of the structure is 64-byte
aligned.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 93183, which changed state.
Bug 93183 Summary: SVE does not use neg as conditional
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93183
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 93183, which changed state.
Bug 93183 Summary: SVE does not use neg as conditional
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93183
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93183
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102840
Bug ID: 102840
Summary: [12 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr22076.c by r12-4475
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95048
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Christian Fersch from comment #9)
> But is it possible to query the value of -fwide-exec-charset? I had quick
> look and couldn't find anything.
It's possible now: __GNUC_WIDE_EXECUTION_CHARS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92482
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102839
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> Martin, did you use -stdlib=libc++ with Clang? Otherwise you're just testing
> libstdc++ again with a different compiler.
I didn't, my bad. Will do it next tim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102839
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This is the same issue as PR 95048 comment 3 describes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92482
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6920d5a1a2834e9c62d441b8f4c6186b01107d13
commit r12-4505-g6920d5a1a2834e9c62d441b8f4c6186b01107d13
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102839
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102835
--- Comment #1 from Hongyu Wang ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
>
> I wonder what's the best way to handle the difference? Just add
> -fomit-frame-pointer
> to the testcase or allow for the %ebp vs. %esp difference?
For this te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102839
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-19
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102838
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Possibly triggered by enabling vectorization at -O2?
long long should for ia32 inside of structures (at least on linux but I think
it is the same for solaris too) have just 32-bit alignment and nothing else
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102839
Bug ID: 102839
Summary: filesystem::path::wstring runs in C locale /
practically always throws
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102838
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102838
Bug ID: 102838
Summary: [12 regression] Several tests SEGV in
gomp_loop_ull_init
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102746
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Илья Шипицин from comment #9)
> ok, so we'll migrate to gcc-12 :)
Yes, but please wait for the release of 12.1 that will happen at the end of
April 2022.
In the meantime, you can port to GCC 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102832
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102375
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102375
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b34f5c5ec75823d656b6882f12d46248402a2aa
commit r12-4503-g6b34f5c5ec75823d656b6882f12d46248402a2aa
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102837
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102837
Bug ID: 102837
Summary: [12 regression] Many 32-bit gdc tests FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102836
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
> It turns out that this happens because 32-bit Solaris/x86 only guarantees
> 4-byte stack alignment following the i386 psABI, so defaults to
> -mstackrealign.
>
> Adding
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102836
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102836
Bug ID: 102836
Summary: gcc.target/i386/pieces-memset-1.c etc. FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102835
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102835
Bug ID: 102835
Summary: gcc.target/i386/avx512fp16-trunchf.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102834
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
