https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102676
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
Why is malloc(1) always true?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102622
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102676
Bug ID: 102676
Summary: Failure to optimize out malloc/nothrow allocation
that's only used for bool checking
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #16 from Óscar Fuentes ---
With g++ 11.2 mingw-w64-i686 a simple test like this crashes:
int main() {
try {
throw 13;
}
catch(...) {
return 1;
}
return 0;
}
$ g++ foo.cpp
$ ./a.exe
terminate called after throwing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102622
--- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 51579
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51579&action=edit
Patch which I am testing
Patch which I am testing, it works for the testcase but I have not done a full
boots
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102622
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.0|9.5
Known to work|9.3.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102675
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102675
Bug ID: 102675
Summary: [12 regression] Bootstrap fails in libsanitizer:
'MD5_DIGEST_STRING_LENGTH' was not declared in this
scope
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102622
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is a testcase without avx-512f usage:
struct f{signed t:1;};
int g(struct f *a, int t) __attribute__((noipa));
int g(struct f *a, int t)
{
if (t)
a->t = -1;
else
a->t = 0;
int t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102666
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 102673 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102673
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102674
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102674
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.4.7
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102673
ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102674
Bug ID: 102674
Summary: internal compiler error: on fpclassify(_Decimal32)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102666
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102673
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102673
--- Comment #2 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ibuclaw from comment #0)
> Bisected, and the commit that changed behaviour was the fix for pr84648.
Commit was r9-4145.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102673
--- Comment #1 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Since pr101145, the function this now happens in is
number_of_iterations_until_wrap.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102673
Bug ID: 102673
Summary: [9 Regression] Wrong code with -O due to
adjust_cond_for_loop_until_wrap
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41244
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102672
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102672
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
There might be another bugs similar to this already too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102672
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Padding bytes are not zero in some cases and this is the case here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102672
Bug ID: 102672
Summary: [AArch64] Failure to optimize to using stp instead of
2 strs when possible
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56604
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
Pushed to my GitHub mirror while I'm still trying to get my ssh keys sorted
out:
https://github.com/cooljeanius/gcc/commit/19caef57e59207d8131bf2db59519ac45fdab6aa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65454
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65454
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2713e9f16d3f3597d71e4be6384ecd788684936
commit r12-4274-gb2713e9f16d3f3597d71e4be6384ecd788684936
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87447
--- Comment #4 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
After some tests, only the comparison operators seem to be affected.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87447
--- Comment #3 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
This is probably related to the == operator (and other ones), since gcc warns
on the following codes:
double foo (void)
{
double x = (1ULL << 63) + 1;
return x;
}
and
double foo (void)
{
return (1U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102671
Bug ID: 102671
Summary: -Wanalyzer-null-dereference false positive when
compiling GNU Emacs
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102670
Bug ID: 102670
Summary: Erroneous "missing template arguments" message for
wrapper of ADL function template
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102630
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102669
Bug ID: 102669
Summary: [12 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/unroll1.adb
scan-rtl-dump-times loop2_unroll
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102667
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-09
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102664
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-09
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102662
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102668
Bug ID: 102668
Summary: [12 regression] several libgomp alloc test case
failures after r12-3976
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102667
Bug ID: 102667
Summary: Inconsistent result of std::regex_match
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100740
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davidsondfgl at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102666
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98189
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87447
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102666
Bug ID: 102666
Summary: Wrong loop optimization for unsigned types
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102665
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102665
Bug ID: 102665
Summary: ELF-specific configure flags should be rejected on
non-ELF platforms
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102661
--- Comment #3 from lrspam at sfr dot fr ---
Thank you Andrew for you answer.
I will therefore use -fwrapv, in order to implement overflow detection the same
way I did with gcc 7.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102664
Bug ID: 102664
Summary: contrib/gcc-git-customization.sh uses echo -n, which
isn't portable
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21549
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Confirmed, --with-pic being documented would be very nice even though it is
> a generic libtool
> configure option, it is most used with libstdc++ as shown by th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102654
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |c++
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98677
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, I used both ubsan and valgrind, and couldn't reproduce it with any version
of GCC or clang I tried, including with the headers from GCC 10.2
I might try to reproduce it on Ubuntu, but if it's specific
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102663
Bug ID: 102663
Summary: add an install-dvi Makefile target to the toplevel
Makefile and all subdirectories
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102657
--- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager ---
It looks like it's also missing a dvi target:
Doing dvi in libcody
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `dvi'. Stop.
make[1]: *** [dvi-libcody] Error 1
make: *** [do-dvi] Error 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102662
Bug ID: 102662
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in validate, at
analyzer/constraint-manager.cc:581
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-che
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402
--- Comment #42 from Eric Gallager ---
Is this just about parallelism bottlenecks for the main build target (e.g. just
`make` or `make all`), or does it apply to other Makefile targets, too? (e.g.
the testsuite via `make check`, or docs via `make
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98677
--- Comment #4 from Egor Suvorov ---
Note that the issue requires both UBSanitizer and Valgrind enabled
simultaneously. Running with just one of them does not result in an error.
The versions are ones installed in Ubuntu 20.04.3 Focal Fossa (amd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102658
--- Comment #4 from Kewen Lin ---
Created attachment 51576
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51576&action=edit
rs6000-test-Adjust-test-cases-due-to-O2-vect
Tested successfully on P9LE, note that it relies on r12-4273.
Still
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102661
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102661
lrspam at sfr dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|9.3.0 |8.4.0
--- Comment #1 from lrspam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102661
Bug ID: 102661
Summary: signed integer overflow not detected in comparison
since gcc-8
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102660
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
--- Comment #1 from Andre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102660
Bug ID: 102660
Summary: Valid template default parameter of a friend function
is rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes but the point of the test (and the change it is meant to be testing) is to
verify it works before those changes.
63 matches
Mail list logo
