https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102626
Bug ID: 102626
Summary: [c++20] compiler crash when invoking constexpr
function in the constructor of template class
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102605
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 5 Oct 2021, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102605
>
> --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102490
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09d886e671f2230acca082e6579a69b8df8fb202
commit r12-4202-g09d886e671f2230acca082e6579a69b8df8fb202
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98712
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09d886e671f2230acca082e6579a69b8df8fb202
commit r12-4202-g09d886e671f2230acca082e6579a69b8df8fb202
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49244
--- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #24)
> I wanted to look at #c20, but at least my i9-7960X for e.g. lock; btsl $65,
> var
> acts the same as lock; btsl $1, var rather than lock; btsl $1, var+8,
> so maybe #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93644
--- Comment #18 from Eric Gallager ---
This affects musl's getcwd implementation, btw:
https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/unistd/getcwd.c?id=v1.2.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90698
--- Comment #13 from Eric Gallager ---
For the purposes of clarifying the "lacks support" wording, where exactly does
the failure occur if one tries to enable it? That is, in which step?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55522
Ilya Konstantinov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ilya.konstantinov at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102625
Bug ID: 102625
Summary: [meta-bug] -mcmodel=large can't link
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: meta-bug
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102485
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #4)
> (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Paul Clarke from comment #2)
> > > "-many" is supposed to make those black boxes just work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102622
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.2.0
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102359
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102359
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Qing Zhao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:433516e1c6b1f8eeceeceb83cec5ea02a14065dc
commit r12-4200-g433516e1c6b1f8eeceeceb83cec5ea02a14065dc
Author: qing zhao
Date: Tue Oct 5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102485
--- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #3)
> (In reply to Paul Clarke from comment #2)
> > "-many" is supposed to make those black boxes just work. This worked before
> > recent changes to binutils/GC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94853
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101104
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100799
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner ---
So I took dgebal.f and ran delta on it to try and reduce it to something
manageable (I wish creduce worked on fortran files!) and got the following
which still shows us accessing above the stack.
SUBR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102622
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is a slightly more reduced testcase (without the reasonable values):
static inline const unsigned &max1(const unsigned &t, const unsigned &t1)
{
return t > t1 ? t : t1;
}
extern int var_20, var_22;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102622
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|Wrong code with -O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102548
--- Comment #10 from Steven Boswell II ---
Great work! Thanks!
The patch seems to apply to gcc 10 also, but I haven't built the result yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102485
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Paul Clarke from comment #2)
> GCC putting the base ".machine" directive at the beginning of the file makes
> any command-line use of "-many" (-Wa,-many) be ignored. Is that OK?
If peopl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92010
--- Comment #16 from qingzhe huang ---
> Ah yeah, I can reproduce the crash when invoking cc1plus directly and also
> when
> passing -Q to the driver. Might be better to open a separate PR for this as
> it
> seems to be a latent bug.
just open
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102624
Bug ID: 102624
Summary: testcase lambda-uneval11.C causes cc1plus segment
fault
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92010
--- Comment #15 from qingzhe huang ---
>>Might be better to open a separate PR for this as it
seems to be a latent bug.
thanks, I will file a new bug.
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Sent: October 5, 2021 5:05 PM
To: nickhuan...@hotmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102548
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[9/10 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92010
--- Comment #14 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to qingzhe huang from comment #13)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #12)
> > (In reply to qingzhe huang from comment #11)
> > > The testcase g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-uneval11.C still suffers a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102548
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e1edbce89a93dde8653666eaf402d58dda43e3b0
commit r11-9075-ge1edbce89a93dde8653666eaf402d58dda43e3b0
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102515
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dcf70cb0d85d04ff680a361e32d79c326ae8b3fc
commit r11-9074-gdcf70cb0d85d04ff680a361e32d79c326ae8b3fc
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102496
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5fec46a0b4a94190209c81f4091a0369a056727d
commit r11-9073-g5fec46a0b4a94190209c81f4091a0369a056727d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102548
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:737f95bab557584d876f02779ab79fe3cfaacacf
commit r12-4198-g737f95bab557584d876f02779ab79fe3cfaacacf
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102595
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102582
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102623
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
Status|ASSI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dea2e6c7b5af2ec620fd94d824f006440907a34d
commit r10-10170-gdea2e6c7b5af2ec620fd94d824f006440907a34d
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4aabb9ac284fea307aa70bb8ae4bdce298461bc7
commit r10-10169-g4aabb9ac284fea307aa70bb8ae4bdce298461bc7
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102547
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] g++ 11. |[11 Regression] g++ 11. ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102547
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Bob Steagall from comment #4)
> I have applied this tentative change to line 23436 of gcc/cp/pt.c from the
> gcc-11.2.0 source tarball, and can confirm that the test case compiles for
> me.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102623
Bug ID: 102623
Summary: Failure to detect destructed scalar objects in
consteval function
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102622
Bug ID: 102622
Summary: Wrong code with -O3 for skylake-avx512 and
icelake-server
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102547
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4c470c376b4cb82c9a0b7e8a4b88c44d5e4289d
commit r12-4196-gd4c470c376b4cb82c9a0b7e8a4b88c44d5e4289d
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566
--- Comment #19 from Thiago Macieira ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #17)
> Created attachment 51558 [details]
> The v6 patch
>
> Please try this.
Confirmed for all inputs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566
--- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #16)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14)
> > Created attachment 51556 [details]
> > The v5 patch
> >
> > Changes in v5:
> >
> > 1. Check SSA_NAME before SSA_NAME_OCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51556|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102607
--- Comment #1 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña ---
A workaround is to define `B`'s destructor as
`constexpr virtual ~B() { }`.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102620
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100557
--- Comment #2 from Luke Dalessandro ---
Still failing in trunk, here's a CE link to the preprocessed source
https://godbolt.org/z/YPfTGnT5f.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102477
--- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Created attachment 51557
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51557&action=edit
another testcase, failing at -O
$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O testcase.c
during RTL pass: expand
testcase.c: In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102621
Bug ID: 102621
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in convert_nonlocal_reference_op,
at tree-nested.c:1166
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102620
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102620
Bug ID: 102620
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_array_span, at
fortran/trans-array.c:865
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102619
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #1 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102619
Bug ID: 102619
Summary: [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in
gfc_conv_descriptor_dtype, at
fortran/trans-array.c:215
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102606
--- Comment #4 from Karine EM ---
That would make sense, and I think it is also what happens when compiling the
example with Clang and -O0 since the compilation takes only a few seconds then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102618
Bug ID: 102618
Summary: d-demangle: anonymous symbols are not being properly
skipped
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102490
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jakub at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102616
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-05
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102617
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||98940
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102617
Bug ID: 102617
Summary: [C++23] P2360R0 - Extend init-statement to allow
alias-declaration
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102616
Bug ID: 102616
Summary: [C++23] P2334R1 - Add support for preprocessing
directives elifdef and elifndef
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102615
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102615
Bug ID: 102615
Summary: [C++23] P2316R2 - Consistent character literal
encoding
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102614
Bug ID: 102614
Summary: [C++23] P2314R4 - Character sets and encodings
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102613
Bug ID: 102613
Summary: [C++23] P2246R1 - Character encoding of diagnostic
text
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102612
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102612
Bug ID: 102612
Summary: [C++23] P2242R3 - Non-literal variables (and labels
and gotos) in constexpr functions
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92010
--- Comment #13 from qingzhe huang ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #12)
> (In reply to qingzhe huang from comment #11)
> > The testcase g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-uneval11.C still suffers a segment fault if
> > run by compiler cc1plus with l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102611
Bug ID: 102611
Summary: [C++23] P2128R6 - Multidimensional subscript operator
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102606
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102604
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon ---
Right, using -Os makes these tests pass (but vsqrt.f32 and vsqrt.f64 would
fail), but I'm still wondering about the purpose of vmla?
Rather than benchmarking, the costs may come from the Architecture
docu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102610
Bug ID: 102610
Summary: [C++23] P2036R3 - Change scope of lambda
trailing-return-type
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14)
> Created attachment 51556 [details]
> The v5 patch
>
> Changes in v5:
>
> 1. Check SSA_NAME before SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI.
Why don't you just move this to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566
--- Comment #15 from Thiago Macieira ---
Works now for the failing case. Additionally:
bool tbit(std::atomic &i)
{
return i.fetch_and(~CONSTANT, std::memory_order_relaxed) & (CONSTANT);
}
Will properly produce LOCK BTR (CONSTANT=2):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102609
Bug ID: 102609
Summary: [C++23] P0847R7 - Deducing this
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102507
Indu Bhagat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102608
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102608
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
old32_34 = .DEFERRED_INIT (4, 2, 0);
...
- _24 = .DEFERRED_INIT (4, 2, 0);
- __res ={v} _24;
+ __res ={v} old32_34;
# 68 "../arch/mips/include/asm/cmpxchg.h"
This is due to __typeof(*((volatile u32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51551|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102608
Bug ID: 102608
Summary: [12 regression] Recent change to VN causes bogus
Wuninitialized warnings & kernel build failures
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102607
Bug ID: 102607
Summary: [modules] option -g results in undefined reference to
`typeinfo for type`
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: link
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102605
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4f6dbe18374385b8199ca3d6121e37a1189b589
commit r12-4187-gd4f6dbe18374385b8199ca3d6121e37a1189b589
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102604
--- Comment #1 from Richard Earnshaw ---
I wonder if it might be better to change this test to use -Os, since then the
cost model is much more consistent as it's based on size rather than speed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53164
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92010
--- Comment #12 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to qingzhe huang from comment #11)
> The testcase g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-uneval11.C still suffers a segment fault if
> run by compiler cc1plus with latest code.
Hmm, I can't reproduce that on latest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102571
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 51554
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51554&action=edit
gcc12-pr102571.patch
Untested patch for the OpenMP optimization that will result in this bug not
triggering fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 102603, which changed state.
Bug 102603 Summary: Compile-time evaluation of indirection via dangling pointer
is not rejected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102603
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70331
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fchelnokov at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102603
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 93389, which changed state.
Bug 93389 Summary: Failure to detect UB in constexpr context
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93389
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70331
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||klaus.doldinger64@googlemai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93389
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102605
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> You need
>
> if (p_2(D) == _Literal (char *) &global[2])
>
> and of course you need to provide the
>
> char global[10];
>
> declaration. And then we sti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102540
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Macleod ---
> >
> > It would probably resolve an entire class of things where we don't
> > recognize an
> > equivalence between a cast and a bitmask of equivalent precision.
> >
> > This would also mean the reverse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 98930, which changed state.
Bug 98930 Summary: ICE with static variable in template function used as
template argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98930
What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98930
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98930
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f3930418cb82000fae3cb4e98e870428800cf295
commit r12-4186-gf3930418cb82000fae3cb4e98e870428800cf295
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91356
--- Comment #11 from Niels Möller ---
Here's a bit more docs on using std::unique_ptr [[clang::trivial_abi]] with
clang and its C++ library.
https://libcxx.llvm.org//DesignDocs/UniquePtrTrivialAbi.html
As for "No, it needs co-operation between
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102602
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102605
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102606
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
