https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102447
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I have looked in detail (I have the 3rd, 4th and 5th editions here) but my
brain started oozing out of my ears.
15.10.2.15 NonemptyClassRanges and 15.10.2.16 NonemptyClassRangesNoDash are the
relevant sec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98930
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE when using function |ICE with static variable in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98930
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-02
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98930
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 98288 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98288
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95968
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm, clang also rejects this (even with libc++).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95264
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102561
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102561
--- Comment #1 from Haoxin Tu ---
Similar case:
#include
int a;
void b(int c) {
uint16_t d;
uint16_t *e;
int16_t f;
int64_t g;
if ((g || (d = 0)) == c << (0 <= (*e ^= c)))
*e - f && (a = d);
}
Error:
during GIMPLE pass: vrp-thre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102561
Bug ID: 102561
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault during GIMPLE
pass: evrp (on -O2 and above)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102447
TC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from TC --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102560
Bug ID: 102560
Summary: [12 Regression] g++.dg/Walloca1.C ICE with aggressive
GC
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: GC, ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102557
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102546
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Other cases where that is true are operator_mult (both op1 and op2),
operator_divide, operator_trunc_mod, operator_abs, operator_absu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102546
--- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Absolutely, but I didn't want to pollute the patch for this PR. Consider
the patch to do so pre-approved :-).
On Sat, Oct 2, 2021, 00:20 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> http
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102546
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102546
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102546
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f9ccf17de7f7581412c6bffd4a37beca9a79836
commit r12-4088-g5f9ccf17de7f7581412c6bffd4a37beca9a79836
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99348
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This might actually be related to pr102521. The following variant compiles ok:
program p
type t
character(3) :: c
end type
! type(t), parameter :: x(1) = t('abc')
type(t), parameter ::
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102540
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> FRE1 has the following difference, simplifying the (unsigned int) truncation.
>
> :
>a.0_1 = a;
>_2 = (unsigned int) a.0_1;
>b = _2;
> - c_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100611
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||victor.burckel at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101243
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101133
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100673
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100673
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102285
--- Comment #18 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13)
> We could try sth like the following which should cover this testcase and
> also hopefully doesn't break anything else.
>
> diff --git a/gcc/expr.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100954
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102100
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101429
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92936be47461b99d624b6a90a745f6cdc60d3e51
commit r12-4084-g92936be47461b99d624b6a90a745f6cdc60d3e51
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102100
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92936be47461b99d624b6a90a745f6cdc60d3e51
commit r12-4084-g92936be47461b99d624b6a90a745f6cdc60d3e51
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100611
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100579
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99904
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102285
--- Comment #17 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> > OK, so the issue is likely that we're probing the lhs with EXPAND_WRITE but
> > when we expand the memset we end up with using expand_expr_addr_expr_1
> > with EXPAND_NORMAL.
>
> then can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86968
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||robotux at celest dot fr
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100127
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99576
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-01
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66792
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66792
Bug 66792 depends on bug 66742, which changed state.
Bug 66742 Summary: abort on sorting list with custom allocator that is not
stateless
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66742
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66742
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100612
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98935
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99327
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99327
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78113
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90943
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.3
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94418
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98691
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100153
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96733
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92546
--- Comment #24 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:acf3a21cbc26b39b73c0006300f35ff017ddd6cb
commit r12-4083-gacf3a21cbc26b39b73c0006300f35ff017ddd6cb
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66742
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff7793bea465019683b3a07d7ffceb6eae22def5
commit r12-4082-gff7793bea465019683b3a07d7ffceb6eae22def5
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100612
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:34e9407b3b4298bd587e0df2e0047679019b66cf
commit r12-4081-g34e9407b3b4298bd587e0df2e0047679019b66cf
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99327
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:59ffa3e3dba5a7805585c61dd4387c5644249d52
commit r12-4071-g59ffa3e3dba5a7805585c61dd4387c5644249d52
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78113
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cfb582f62791dfadc243d97d37f0b83ef77cf480
commit r12-4068-gcfb582f62791dfadc243d97d37f0b83ef77cf480
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90943
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c46ecb0112e91c80ee111439e79a58a953e4479d
commit r12-4067-gc46ecb0112e91c80ee111439e79a58a953e4479d
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94418
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d335d73889d897d073b987b4323db05317fccad3
commit r12-4063-gd335d73889d897d073b987b4323db05317fccad3
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100153
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:681707ec28d56494fa61a80c62500724d55f8586
commit r12-4062-g681707ec28d56494fa61a80c62500724d55f8586
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96733
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:741c7350c08b0884689466867b6c9e711c7b109e
commit r12-4061-g741c7350c08b0884689466867b6c9e711c7b109e
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101367
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-01
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102544
--- Comment #7 from Ron ---
That last case was using a fortran version of the test code as follows:
program SMALL_TEST_F
use openacc
implicit none
integer :: v
v = 0
!$acc parallel copy(v)
if (a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102544
--- Comment #6 from miko at predsci dot com ---
Q: /home/mikostul/test_gfortran $ ./Small_test_F
GCN debug: HSA run-time initialized for GCN
GCN debug: HSA_SYSTEM_INFO_ENDIANNESS: LITTLE
GCN debug: HSA_SYSTEM_INFO_EXTENSIONS: IMAGES
GCN debug: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102521
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The code works if we replace the r.h.s. in the initialization by an array:
program p
type t
integer :: n
end type
! type(t), parameter :: a(4) = t(1)! ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98432
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102557
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100368
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102553
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Can you please attach a pre-processed source file generated by clang?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56688
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|anlauf at gmx dot de |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97050
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33925
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102103
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102103
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4dc7ce6fb3917958d1a6036d8acf2953b9c1b868
commit r12-4059-g4dc7ce6fb3917958d1a6036d8acf2953b9c1b868
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102373
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102373
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by John David Anglin
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aac3b6a7e3a7b810005343e62e6822338fcb85d4
commit r11-9052-gaac3b6a7e3a7b810005343e62e6822338fcb85d4
Author: John David
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102373
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by John David Anglin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1710910087fb1f4a7706e9ce838163ffcbc50b4
commit r12-4058-gf1710910087fb1f4a7706e9ce838163ffcbc50b4
Author: John David Anglin
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102283
--- Comment #5 from Giuseppe D'Angelo ---
(Sorry for the delay)
Thank you for the analysis. I'm now not really sure if GCC is doing something
wrong (vs Clang/MSVC). Feel free to close/suspend this task if you strongly
believe GCC is right here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102544
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Stubbs ---
Sorry, I should have said to compile with -fopenacc.
If you did do that, please post the GCN_DEBUG output.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100734
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by John David Anglin
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:356390c14aa70a95c15845512f2381b627cf9a96
commit r11-9051-g356390c14aa70a95c15845512f2381b627cf9a96
Author: John David
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102544
--- Comment #4 from miko at predsci dot com ---
The result is:
v is -1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102559
Bug ID: 102559
Summary: missing warning comparing result of a nonnull function
to null
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102557
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha ---
Semi-reduced testcase for the reference:
#include
void
test01 (char *mname)
{
std::istringstream iss;
iss.str (mname);
iss.str (mname);
}
% g++-12.0.0 -std=c++20 -O3 -fopenacc --param max-inline-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102285
--- Comment #16 from Qing Zhao ---
> On Oct 1, 2021, at 1:51 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
> wrote:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102285
>
> --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
> Because the variable doesn't need to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102558
Bug ID: 102558
Summary: missing warning comparing T[static N] to null
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102557
Bug ID: 102557
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault signal
terminated program cc1plus (indefinite recursion in
modref_ref_node::insert_access)
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102556
Bug ID: 102556
Summary: equality comparison of a [static N] parameter to null
not folded
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102285
--- Comment #15 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13)
> Because the variable doesn't need to be addressable.
>
> OK, so the issue is likely that we're probing the lhs with EXPAND_WRITE but
> when we ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102555
Bug ID: 102555
Summary: missing -Waddress comparing &p[0] to zero
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 90378, which changed state.
Bug 90378 Summary: [9/10/11/12 regression] -Os -flto miscompiles 454.calculix
after r266385 on Arm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90378
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90378
Maxim Kuvyrkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86968
Maxim Kuvyrkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86968
Maxim Kuvyrkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102554
Bug ID: 102554
Summary: [ 10/11/12 Regresion ] Inlining missed at -O3 with
non-default --param=early-inlining-insns and pragma
optimize
Product: gcc
Version: 10.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101783
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c99923f8c544ec07109e8333acb2c2388c38a1b
commit r12-4051-g7c99923f8c544ec07109e8333acb2c2388c38a1b
Author: qingzhe huang
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102553
--- Comment #5 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> Can you compile it with clang?
msvc, clang they all work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102553
--- Comment #4 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> Can you compile it with clang?
yes I can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102538
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yeah, the above mentioned reshape* change results in the r32 index of d->cur
being ignored when recursing into the anonymous union.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102538
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102542
--- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez ---
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 1:46 PM rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
> > Could I inconvenience you to tweak this function with your insight? It's a
> > tiny function, and it seems you're much more qualified
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102553
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo