https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99622
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think 101588, 101557 and this bug are all the same issue. initializing not
via {} works.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101846
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:95e1eca43d106d821720744ac6ff1f5df41a1e78
commit r12-2869-g95e1eca43d106d821720744ac6ff1f5df41a1e78
Author: liuhongt
Date: Wed Aug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58927
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||6.1.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54969
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53776
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Looks fully fixed since GCC 8.1.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46479
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47213
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bodzio131 at op dot pl
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38002
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47213
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42111
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100800
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22485
--- Comment #24 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://twitter.com/__phantomderp/status/1419067136983638017 is definintely a
twitter thread that should be read.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93043
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91979
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100538
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98039
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
>It gets worse: If
The accepts invalid does not happen for 11.1.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101810
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
Making SYMESZ a size_t as the patch does, is a complete fix if the code is only
compiled for 64-bit hosts where unsigned int is smaller than size_t. If
compiled for 32-bit then the expression calculating buffe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57546
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egor.kochetov at intel dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68098
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57546
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid, wrong-code
Ever confi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54311
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Last reconfirmed|2013-04-1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56693
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Notes from the May, 2015 meeting:
The consensus of CWG was that the cv-qualification of the argument and
parameter must match, so the original example should be rejected.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20313
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2010-06-06 00:14:05 |2021-8-11
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20816
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-02-01 00:00:00 |2021-8-11
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30952
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2009-06-03 22:19:39 |2021-8-11
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101871
Bug ID: 101871
Summary: Array of strings of different length passed as an
argument produces invalid result.
Product: gcc
Version: og10 (devel/omp/gcc-10)
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101870
Bug ID: 101870
Summary: std::lerp is missing Arithmetic overloads
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53164
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||niqiuha at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82657
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61837
Jiu Fu Guo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82336
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||frrrwww at gmail dot com
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68070
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60531
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kaballo86 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81059
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60531
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92031
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.4 |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53009
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79064
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90537
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80961
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101846
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
But when upper bits is not used, vpmovdw version seems better.
v4hi
bar_dw_128 (v8hi x)
{
return __builtin_shufflevector (x, x, 0, 2, 4, 6);// 4, 5, 6, 7);
}
- vpshufb .LC2(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0
+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67054
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||devgs at ukr dot net
--- Comment #10 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80851
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101846
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
expand_vec_perm_1 is supposed to generate 1 instruction, but it doesn't
consider load of const_vector, if we handle (In reply to Hongtao.liu from
comment #2)
> For foo, vmovdqa is avx_vec_concatv16si/2, and we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85363
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||80683
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80683
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99759
--- Comment #3 from Fangrui Song ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #2)
> > this means the ctors.65535 will come last.
> Nope, it will come first. And since DT_INIT_ARRAY pointers are executed in
> the order they appear in the array, it wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85363
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67898
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||61355
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61355
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhonghao at pku dot org.cn
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86251
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61355
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||support at neoee dot net
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82773
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80273
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-08-12
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80242
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-08-12
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87970
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78216
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69623
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kariya_mitsuru at hotmail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61953
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69623
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||smw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83870
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71420
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=80
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101869
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.8.1
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101869
Bug ID: 101869
Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] &enumclass::enumvalue is
rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101663
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:21fd62e5ca9967bba8f97fd6244a8c6a564c2146
commit r12-2868-g21fd62e5ca9967bba8f97fd6244a8c6a564c2146
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69621
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is a reduced testcase:
inline namespace [[gnu::abi_tag("mytag")]] a {
class string{};
}
template struct S { static void f(); };
extern string s;
void g() { S::f(); }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99759
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95302
--- Comment #5 from URABE, Shyouhei ---
Confirmed fixed at GCC 10.3.0. Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101868
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Works for me on the trunk:
I almost want to say this was fixed by PR 101373.
Before Pre we had:
if (hash_6(D) == 0)
goto ; [0.00%]
else
goto ; [100
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101868
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Works for me on the trunk:
repro:
.LFB9:
.cfi_startproc
subq$24, %rsp
testq %rsi, %rsi
je .L14
movq(%rsi), %rax
testq %rax, %rax
jne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66234
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101868
Bug ID: 101868
Summary: Incorrect reordering in -O2 with LTO
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31397
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54336
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
GCC and clang agree here and rejects the code.
ICC and MSVC accept the code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54399
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note ICC and GCC are the same here.
MSVC and clang are the same here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54399
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46811
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I can reproduce the problem with boost 1.63 but using 1.74 fixes the issue.
Note even clang takes a long time to error out with 1.63.
So I really doubt there is much to be done here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96209
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-08-11
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101867
--- Comment #10 from cqwrteur ---
../../../../../../../gcc/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/fs_ops.cc:767:15: error:
'getcwd' was not declared in this scope; did you mean
'std::filesystem::__gnu_posix::getcwd'?
767 | if (getcwd(buf.get(), size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86503
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71093
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-02-16 00:00:00 |2021-8-11
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72760
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 79326 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79326
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101866
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78367
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101056
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101866
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:326a020be21aeec77eab9a7247c0591c56745b37
commit r9-9670-g326a020be21aeec77eab9a7247c0591c56745b37
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101866
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1318b1d317b529cdd474a7660a82d47b228a054
commit r10-10032-gf1318b1d317b529cdd474a7660a82d47b228a054
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101866
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e3647c98e474d0f204061859996356e6af5ae8d
commit r11-8854-g6e3647c98e474d0f204061859996356e6af5ae8d
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510
--- Comment #23 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f8ac77533951d79d4e6a65841aa30293b2f11fdd
commit r9-9669-gf8ac77533951d79d4e6a65841aa30293b2f11fdd
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510
--- Comment #22 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a5cc427fbc796fd97218b3d9b80b6a22268893a
commit r9-9668-g1a5cc427fbc796fd97218b3d9b80b6a22268893a
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101866
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed on trunk, but I'll backport it too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101866
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:93f1dbc7cdcc4b31ea4061efb4c2acf2d4f81eb8
commit r12-2866-g93f1dbc7cdcc4b31ea4061efb4c2acf2d4f81eb8
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66659
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72760
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2016-08-01 00:00:00 |2021-8-11
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91849
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at magfr dot
user.lysator.liu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70384
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70384
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.1.0, 5.1.0, 9.1.0
Known to work|
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo