https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101312
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE with -g: ‘verify_type’ |ICE with -g and may_alias
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101312
Bug ID: 101312
Summary: ICE with -g: ‘verify_type’ failed,
verify_type(tree_node const*), gen_type_die_with_usage
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #7 from ofv at wanadoo dot es ---
make BOOT_CFLAGS='-O1' V=1 all
make BOOT_CFLAGS='-O0' V=1
both fails the same way as the initial report.
export CFLAGS="-march=i686 -mtune=generic -O0 -pipe"
export CXXFLAGS="-march=i686 -mtune=ge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101301
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #3)
> What CPU is in your Power system, and what -mcpu= did you compile with?
> What is the ABI you are using? (That last one doesn't seem to matter in
> this pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101311
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101311
--- Comment #1 from Josh Nave ---
Additionally, other instructions could have been used (such as `pxor`) which
are less float-centric (and maybe faster?).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101311
Bug ID: 101311
Summary: GCC refuses to use SSE registers to carry out an
explicit XOR on a float.
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101310
Bug ID: 101310
Summary: Bind(C): CFI_section seems confused by pointer arrays
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101306
Christopher Yeleighton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101309
--- Comment #1 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
BTW, I did not test any other intrinsics that rearrange the elements of their
input array arguments. TRANPOSE seemed like the most obvious one to try first.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97001
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Just use cppreference.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101309
Bug ID: 101309
Summary: Bind(C): gfortran creates invalid C descriptor for
result of TRANSPOSE intrinsic
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101306
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
You should report this to doxygen then. The html is produced by doxygen, not
GCC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57840
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Christopher Yeleighton from comment #5)
> I am no Doxygen guru but the source at https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/libstdc++-api.20210701.html/
> a00209_source.html > has 2 @{ (#l00051,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101301
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
What CPU is in your Power system, and what -mcpu= did you compile with?
What is the ABI you are using? (That last one doesn't seem to matter in
this particular case, but :-) )
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57840
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Like 2371 is a comment using doxygen syntax. That comment was there in 2014
when I wrote comment 3 here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101301
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101273
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101308
Bug ID: 101308
Summary: Bind(C): gfortran does not create C descriptors for
scalar pointer/allocatable arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97001
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Yeleighton ---
The problem with a module-level @since is that std:: symbols are easiest to
locate in the std namespace (which provides a huge index of everything). Items
that are undocumented (there is a lot of th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101268
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Yeleighton ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> (In reply to Christopher Yeleighton from comment #0)
> > (I mean patches are not welcome)
>
> Have you actually tried submitting any? I only see bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101307
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Yeleighton ---
(In reply to Christopher Yeleighton from comment #0)
> 1. Please remove the trailing comma from the title: Variable templates for
> type traits.
The trailing full stop, of course.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101307
Bug ID: 101307
Summary: Variable templates for type traits—corrections
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101294
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57840
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Yeleighton ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> I'm not sure why the comment on the primary template doesn't show up (maybe
> doxygen is only interested in a definition) and adding comments to the
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101294
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52c3fdf3e4780f75297515d3c2a3dae9b36586ba
commit r12-1996-g52c3fdf3e4780f75297515d3c2a3dae9b36586ba
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Fri Jul 2 10:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57840
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Yeleighton ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> It shows up in the latest docs:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/libstdc++-api.20210701.html/a03925.
> html
>
> But several other classes do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101306
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Yeleighton ---
(In reply to Christopher Yeleighton from comment #1)
> Interestingly enough, the problem does not affect https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/libstdc++-api.20210701.html/
> a00209_source.html#l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101306
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Yeleighton ---
Interestingly enough, the problem does not affect https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/libstdc++-api.20210701.html/a00209_source.html#l00060
>. It may be a timing issue—the latter document is w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101273
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:46d1cb4c218ff1fb73b391a28218ee1f362e8ca1
commit r11-8688-g46d1cb4c218ff1fb73b391a28218ee1f362e8ca1
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101306
Bug ID: 101306
Summary: positioning at line anchors is disturbed by the
navigation bar
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101273
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:152f4d0e4d3b524ce30d05f20e23a44b0dd29765
commit r12-1995-g152f4d0e4d3b524ce30d05f20e23a44b0dd29765
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Sat J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101301
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Here's the assembly for the switch statement with -O3:
cmpl$5, %edi
je .L6
jle .L18
movl$8, %eax
cmpl$8, %edi
je .L1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
Thanks.
> '--with-bugurl=https://github.com/msys2/MINGW-packages/issues'
> '--with-gnu-as' '--with-gnu-ld' '--with-boot-ldflags=-pipe
> -Wl,--dynamicbase,--nxcompat,--no-seh -Wl,--large-address-aware
> -Wl,
34 matches
Mail list logo
