https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100958
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-08
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100958
Bug ID: 100958
Summary: two_value_replacement should move to match.pd
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100622
Jiu Fu Guo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
--- Comment #3 from HaoChen Gui ---
For pr56605.c, the pseudo is not taken mode promotion. The original combined
insn
compare:CC (and:DI (reg:DI 206)
changes to
compare:CC (and:SI (subreg:SI (reg:DI 206) 0)
So the dump scan fails. I will change
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4db34072d5336d13b66f7185ec6454aa7d36f3c7
commit r12-1275-g4db34072d5336d13b66f7185ec6454aa7d36f3c7
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Mon Jun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
--- Comment #2 from HaoChen Gui ---
For pr81348.c, the lxsihzx and vextsh2d are no long needed as the HI to DI mode
promotion is removed by my patch. The short could be loaded directly.
addis 9,2,.LANCHOR0+4@toc@ha
lha 9,.LANCHOR0+4@toc@l(9)
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91706
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a98f830332e5a623278aaeea39c2a88177b2a9a
commit r12-1273-g1a98f830332e5a623278aaeea39c2a88177b2a9a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91706
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f07edb5d7f3e77218ec846a9382f7c1d23e67b71
commit r12-1272-gf07edb5d7f3e77218ec846a9382f7c1d23e67b71
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100102
--- Comment #26 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1b3484a8e6c53c8084723e3f1738d402374198e
commit r12-1270-ga1b3484a8e6c53c8084723e3f1738d402374198e
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100957
Bug ID: 100957
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
copy_tree_body_r)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-cod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100954
--- Comment #2 from Taco Jerkface ---
Agreed. A typical user will use unit=42, when manually picking unit numbers.
However the bug remains for automatic, newunit unit numbers.
To reproduce:
1) Open a "newunit" file.
2) close file
3) write to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100954
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100956
Bug ID: 100956
Summary: Unused variable warnings ignore "if constexpr" blocks
where variables are conditionally used
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100955
Bug ID: 100955
Summary: varargs causes extra stores to/from stack
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
--- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also, this test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/parity_1.f90 -O0 execution test
only fails on power 10.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100954
Bug ID: 100954
Summary: writing to a character opens unit -10
Product: gcc
Version: 7.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100862
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100102
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100102
--- Comment #24 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fc930b3010bd0de899a3da3209eab20664ddb703
commit r10-9895-gfc930b3010bd0de899a3da3209eab20664ddb703
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100953
Bug ID: 100953
Summary: Add memory clobbers just for reads or just for writes
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100862
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e62029a785b3a5e98123da6ef01ca94c003c306d
commit r11-8521-ge62029a785b3a5e98123da6ef01ca94c003c306d
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100102
--- Comment #23 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1feb74046e0feb0596b93bbb822fae02940a90e
commit r11-8520-gf1feb74046e0feb0596b93bbb822fae02940a90e
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100299
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100637
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64735dc923e0a1a2e04c5313471d91ca8b954e9a
commit r12-1266-g64735dc923e0a1a2e04c5313471d91ca8b954e9a
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
Bug ID: 100952
Summary: [12 regression] several test case failures after
r12-1202
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
%rsp, %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa_register 6
movl$0, %eax
movd%eax, %xmm0
punpcklwd %xmm0, %xmm0
pshufd $0, %xmm0, %xmm0
movaps %xmm0, w(%rip)
nop
popq%rbp
.cfi_def_cfa 7, 8
ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE0:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100948
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100948
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100950
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100946
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82735
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e89759fdfc80db223bd852aba937acb2d7c2cd80
commit r12-1265-ge89759fdfc80db223bd852aba937acb2d7c2cd80
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Mon Jun 7 11:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100899
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93383
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||josephcanedo at hotmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100928
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100948
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #1 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100842
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100950
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #1 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100950
Bug ID: 100950
Summary: ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at
varasm.c:5514
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100949
Bug ID: 100949
Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_present,
at fortran/trans-expr.c:1975
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100948
Bug ID: 100948
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at
fortran/trans-expr.c:9069
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100947
Bug ID: 100947
Summary: gthr-default.h
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100946
Bug ID: 100946
Summary: [concepts] nonsensical results of compound
requirements in requires expressions
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100945
--- Comment #2 from Keith Clifford ---
I'm using Cygwin's sed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100945
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-07
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100945
Bug ID: 100945
Summary: Building gcc fails because mthumb\r unrecognized
option
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100944
Bug ID: 100944
Summary: missing -Warray-bounds accessing a flexible array
member of a nested struct
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100920
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:97d83259b91fb558f5b09bfb09529900f585c4c9
commit r12-1264-g97d83259b91fb558f5b09bfb09529900f585c4c9
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100920
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Thanks for the swift fix. It nicely resolves it for the malloc/alloca ...
> It doesn't seem to do anything for the rest of the common idioms however
> when I extend the testcase.
Yet there is a provision
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100918
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6cb35b606c39d5f21f3298c77bfbcaaef3fbc872
commit r12-1263-g6cb35b606c39d5f21f3298c77bfbcaaef3fbc872
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100943
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-07
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100900
--- Comment #8 from Avi Kivity ---
I see you added the changelog entry. I'll be sure to do that next time I post a
patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100943
Bug ID: 100943
Summary: [12 regression] new test gcc.dg/pr100887.c in r12-1256
fails with excess errors
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100900
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100900
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:23fa1e7eab7680ae0488b4c8802b0bcd8f78425d
commit r11-8519-g23fa1e7eab7680ae0488b4c8802b0bcd8f78425d
Author: Avi Kivity
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100900
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5e2e15f212e2458a1258b8c856895c755460bc6b
commit r12-1262-g5e2e15f212e2458a1258b8c856895c755460bc6b
Author: Avi Kivity
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100903
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100885
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bcb5e97899e324c092806b49256a515593268a54
commit r11-8518-gbcb5e97899e324c092806b49256a515593268a54
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100885
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52730540e83c81ee595a51feb7736ff753c98139
commit r12-1261-g52730540e83c81ee595a51feb7736ff753c98139
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Mon Jun 7 07
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98842
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:adec14811714e22a6c1f7f0199adc05370f0d8b0
commit r12-1260-gadec14811714e22a6c1f7f0199adc05370f0d8b0
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100102
--- Comment #22 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Eduard Rozenberg from comment #21)
> @ppalka Huge thanks for this fix - it's working well for me. Very happy to
> see the patch applied with no problems to gcc 10.3.0, because it could take
> s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100912
--- Comment #4 from Matheus Castanho ---
Just for completeness, setting the rpath showed the same results:
~/build/gcc> /home/mscastanho/usr/bin/g++ -g -Wl,-rpath,$HOME/usr/lib64
~/test-ieee128.cpp -o test-shared
~/build/gcc> ./test-shared
6.95
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100900
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100900
--- Comment #3 from Avi Kivity ---
Note, I posted a patch for this to gcc-patches, to save you the effort of
typing those 9 letters.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100912
--- Comment #3 from Matheus Castanho ---
Using objdump -dr ~/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6:
[...]
000c9340 <_ZSt16__convert_from_vRKP15__locale_structPciPKcz>:
c9340: 25 00 4c 3c addis r2,r12,37
c9344: c0 c5 42 38
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100250
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christian.holme at med dot
uni-goe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100924
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100900
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100920
--- Comment #6 from George Thopas ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #5)
> Thanks for reporting the problem.
Thanks for the swift fix. It nicely resolves it for the malloc/alloca ...
It doesn't seem to do anything for the rest of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100475
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
We should almost never use list-init in the library unless the standard
explicitly specifies it. Even if the standard specifies it, we should consider
whether that's a defect in the standard. Uniform init
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97770
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
Changing the signature will not help given we don't want to regress other
cases.
Instead we have to somehow remove the pro- and demotions with the help of
patterns. I think using .POPCOUNT should work ther
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100931
--- Comment #4 from Gabriel Ravier ---
Ah sorry for not clarifying. I get this bug for `-O3 -mtune=x` where x is one
of generic, core2, nehalem, westmere, sandybridge, ivybridge, haswell,
broadwell, znver1, znver2 and znver3. I have checked all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100931
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
I suppose this is still an expander/backend missed optimization which doesn't
consider doing a V2SImode store in DImode?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100924
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-07
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100923
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
The bug is that PTA computes
:
*j_15(D) = &l;
# PT = null
_2 = *j_15(D);
# PT = null
_3 = *_2;
and VN (in)correctly value-numbers the later load from 'l' to _3, pulling
the points-to info int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940
--- Comment #2 from 康桓瑋 ---
(In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #1)
> It seems that before r12-1184, the solution to PR100577 can be simply to
> remove const && delete operator(). The reason is that const & and &&
> overloads themselves are constraine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
It seems that before r12-1184, the solution to PR100577 can be simply to remove
const && delete operator(). The reason is that const & and && overloads
themselves are constrained, and if _Rhs meets __pipe_invocable, i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100923
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100922
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100909
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100904
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libgcc |preprocessor
Summary|[9/10/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100898
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100885
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100879
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|gcc is complaining of a |[10/11/12 Regression] gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100941
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |12.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100937
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91488
--- Comment #7 from gustavo ---
can be reproduced also trunk gcc in:
https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/v6T9j3r4M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91488
--- Comment #6 from gustavo ---
the bug is still here in gcc versión 11.1.1 20210531 (Red Hat 11.1.1-3) (GCC)
g++ -fgnu-tm -O1 -Wallbug.cc -o bug
In file included from /usr/include/c++/11/ios:40,
from /usr/include/c++/11/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91488
gustavo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gustavo at ugr dot es
--- Comment #5 from gust
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100929
--- Comment #5 from Denis Yaroshevskiy ---
x86 (https://godbolt.org/z/zPWbnqfPY)
Options: -O3 -mavx2
```
#include
__m256 if_else_float(__m256 x, __m256 y) {
__m256 mask = _mm256_cmp_ps(y, x, _CMP_LT_OQ);
return _mm256_blendv_ps(x, y, mas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100941
--- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #2)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #1)
> > The issue seems to be related to generic part, not target specific
> >
> > 006t.gimple
> >
> > U foo (V v, W w)
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100942
Bug ID: 100942
Summary: ccmp is not used if the value is used later
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100941
--- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #1)
> The issue seems to be related to generic part, not target specific
>
> 006t.gimple
>
> U foo (V v, W w)
> {
> U D.2852;
>
> _1 = {v, { 0, 0, 0, 0 }};
> _2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100941
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100887
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100898
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[9/10/11 Regression] ICE
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
