https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100844
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100817
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
int a;
int bar();
void __attribute__((cold)) b ()
{
#define FOO \
for (; a;) \
for (; a >= 0;)
#define FOO1 FOO FOO FOO FOO FOO FOO FOO FOO FOO FOO
#define FOO2 FOO1 FOO1 FOO1 FOO1 FOO1 FOO1 FOO1 FOO1 FOO1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100843
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100751
--- Comment #24 from Gejoe ---
Thank you Martin for all the info. Kindly bear with me for the delayed
acknowledgement.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100844
Bug ID: 100844
Summary: ICE with -O2: Segmentation fault signal terminated
program cc1
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100843
Bug ID: 100843
Summary: ICE with -O1: in try_store_by_multiple_pieces, at
builtins.c:6739
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100665
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Matthew Malcomson from comment #1)
> Hi there.
> I believe this is how it should work (if I'm understanding & remembering
> correctly).
>
> When creating a nested function, we make a single objec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 98365, which changed state.
Bug 98365 Summary: Miss vectoization for signed char ifcvt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98365
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98375
Bug 98375 depends on bug 98365, which changed state.
Bug 98365 Summary: Miss vectoization for signed char ifcvt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98365
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98365
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98365
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:28daadc98094501175c9dfe4a985871fa6aa4f94
commit r12-1138-g28daadc98094501175c9dfe4a985871fa6aa4f94
Author: liuhongt
Date: Wed Jan 6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100774
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100781
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100781
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100781
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:715914d3f9e4e40af58d22103c7650cdd720ef92
commit r12-1137-g715914d3f9e4e40af58d22103c7650cdd720ef92
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100774
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1ffbfc2659e7e8fa5c5d633869870af8fca5e8ee
commit r12-1134-g1ffbfc2659e7e8fa5c5d633869870af8fca5e8ee
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53598
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
We should warn about an unused result of any (in)equality, relational, or
three-way comparison.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54379
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70949
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> his PR appears to have been fixed between r11-6743 and r11-6879.
Confirmed. Could someone be kind enough to add the test to the test suite?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35014
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libfortran |other
--- Comment #12 from Domini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100785
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P4 |P2
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88356
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94324
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|fortran |target
--- Comment #8 from Domini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60576
--- Comment #34 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I still get
==33027==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address
0x7ffee0fa7e08 at pc 0x00010ef9b521 bp 0x7ffee0fa7a40 sp 0x7ffee0fa71f0
...
with GCC12 and
gfc /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96859
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Sorry I didn't use the right compiler. If I do so, I get
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = EXC_BAD_ACCESS
(code=EXC_I386_GPFLT)
frame #0: 0x000101443613 f951`splay_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98712
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100835
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100749
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Indu Bhagat :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a87efd32384ee78ee33d20703deaa65fba81cb2d
commit r12-1132-ga87efd32384ee78ee33d20703deaa65fba81cb2d
Author: Indu Bhagat
Date: Mon M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42579
--- Comment #12 from R. Diez ---
*** Bug 77488 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77488
R. Diez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42579
R. Diez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdiezmail-gcc at yahoo dot de
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34040
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #17 from Domi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Using an instrumented compiler I get
% gfcg pr87993.f90
../../work/libiberty/splay-tree.c:496:19: runtime error: member access within
misaligned address 0x00010001 for type 'struct splay_tree_s',
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43979
--- Comment #2 from Hendrik de Wilde-Geisler
---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> This has been working for me and others. I suspect you are building where
> srcdir == objdir which is not really supported.
Thanks. I'm quite sure I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77488
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82176
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100666
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.1.1, 12.0
Summary|[9/10/1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100646
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100576
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100590
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100580
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE with |[10 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100342
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] wrong|[10 Regression] wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100838
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100666
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:718a78fcfb03ca3c552800b510ef3eb085bcbb76
commit r11-8492-g718a78fcfb03ca3c552800b510ef3eb085bcbb76
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:742b4b7a644dbb4dd4a5f26c91380db826a6de07
commit r11-8491-g742b4b7a644dbb4dd4a5f26c91380db826a6de07
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100646
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a2fa2e819d4714cecf5048eda2b7e52ba9e3cdd
commit r11-8490-g3a2fa2e819d4714cecf5048eda2b7e52ba9e3cdd
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100576
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f4d6ea0c64e45add18294bfbd2ceb6512bbd
commit r11-8489-gf4d6ea0c64e45add18294bfbd2ceb6512bbd
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100590
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:490ffb47ad10df1793c4894c7c888d7a10576f1a
commit r11-8488-g490ffb47ad10df1793c4894c7c888d7a10576f1a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100580
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4d64d136e4e35fb2ee90771848944bb2ffeaf85
commit r11-8487-gc4d64d136e4e35fb2ee90771848944bb2ffeaf85
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100342
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81c2cd08fafcdc0ff48f6cf440bef86f98822a23
commit r11-8486-g81c2cd08fafcdc0ff48f6cf440bef86f98822a23
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65816
Anon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zcsfjvvwjsgomjypri at twzhhq
dot c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100842
Bug ID: 100842
Summary: Invalid -Wstringop-truncation with strncat and -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89961
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100754
--- Comment #4 from Martin ---
Some additional reading hinted me how the intermediate representation can be
help or is enough in itself to reproduce the bug.
I have attached the intermediate representation for the Derived object file, by
adding
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100754
--- Comment #3 from Martin ---
Created attachment 50898
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50898&action=edit
Intermediate representation of "Derived" class.
Achieved by adding -save-temps to the g++ compile line.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89961
xaizek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xaizek at posteo dot net
--- Comment #11 from x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100840
--- Comment #4 from Chengnian Sun ---
Hi Andrew,
GCC does not crash on the test program in PR69899.
For the program in this PR, GCC does not crash at -O0, but from -O1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100825
--- Comment #2 from vopl at bk dot ru ---
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50540
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100813
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100161
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pdimov at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100827
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100817
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 50897
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50897&action=edit
patch
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> The number of iterations grows linear with loop depth, s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100785
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100832
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joern.rennecke at embecosm dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100838
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100829
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100785
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That revision changed already the original dump:
- __asm__("":"+m" <<< error >>>:);
+ __asm__("":"+m" x->a:);
and during gimplification the asm stmt used to be removed instead of being
kept.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98845
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 31 May 2021, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98845
>
> --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
> Fixed on master with r12-248-gb58dc0b803057c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100785
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100827
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100826
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-05-31
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100815
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|[10/11/12 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100814
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-05-31
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100813
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100817
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
The number of iterations grows linear with loop depth, starting with 6 for
for (; a;)
for (; a >= 0;)
for (; a;)
for (; a; a += 2)
;
adding 2 for every
for (; a;)
for (; a >= 0;)
added. Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98845
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Fixed on master with r12-248-gb58dc0b803057c0e.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100812
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100841
Bug ID: 100841
Summary: xtensa-linux: dwarf2cfi.c:291:12: error: comparison of
integer expressions of different signedness: 'const
unsigned int' and 'int'
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88670
Bug 88670 depends on bug 88601, which changed state.
Bug 88601 Summary: We may consider adding __builtin_convertvector and
__builtin_shufflevector for better compatibility with Clang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88601
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88601
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88601
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ef8176e0fac935c095cc39f4ecdfd43cdb8cb3f3
commit r12-1128-gef8176e0fac935c095cc39f4ecdfd43cdb8cb3f3
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100835
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-05-31
Status|UNCONFIR
84 matches
Mail list logo