[Bug gcov-profile/100751] __gcov_dump and __gcov_reset usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100751 Gejoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gejoed at rediffmail dot com --- Comment #1 fro

[Bug gcov-profile/100751] New: __gcov_dump and __gcov_reset usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100751 Bug ID: 100751 Summary: __gcov_dump and __gcov_reset usage Product: gcc Version: 8.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: gcov-profile

[Bug target/100711] Miss optimization for pandn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711 --- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #3) > > (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2) > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > > > I suppose we're confused about the vec_duplicate. Would g

[Bug ipa/100513] [10/11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in lookup_page_table_entry) for bootstrap-O3 since r11-6411-gae99b315ba5b9e1c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100513 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/100711] Miss optimization for pandn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711 --- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > > I suppose we're confused about the vec_duplicate. Would generally swapping > > the duplicate and the bit_n

[Bug target/95782] [ppc64le] ICE in _cpp_pop_context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95782 --- Comment #1 from Evan Nemerson --- This seems to also happen on s390x with -mzvector: # s390x-linux-gnu-gcc-10 -march=z14 -mzvector -o test test.c test.c:4:1: internal compiler error: in _cpp_pop_context, at libcpp/macro.c:2644 4 | b(vec

[Bug target/100310] [AVX512] Missing support for v{,p}expand* instructions that w/o mask operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100310 --- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu --- w/o mask operands, v{,p}expand* are equal to mov instructions.

[Bug testsuite/100748] [12 regression] 30_threads/jthread/95989.cc fails after r12-843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- I'd better disable it again until I have time to figure it out.

[Bug testsuite/100750] New: new test case gcc.target/powerpc/rop-5.c fails on BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100750 Bug ID: 100750 Summary: new test case gcc.target/powerpc/rop-5.c fails on BE Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug c++/74762] [9/10/11/12 Regression] missing uninitialized warning (C++, parenthesized expr, TREE_NO_WARNING)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74762 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Assignee|unassigned at gc

[Bug c++/74765] missing uninitialized warning (parenthesis, TREE_NO_WARNING abuse)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74765 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug target/100085] Bad code for union transfer from __float128 to vector types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100085 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to luoxhu from comment #7) > (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #3) > > The rotates in 6 and 7 are not merged, and neither are the vec_selects in > > 8 and 9. Both should be pretty

[Bug testsuite/100748] [12 regression] 30_threads/jthread/95989.cc fails after r12-843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I do see it failing on at least one powerpc64 LE machine. PR97944 said it used to fail randomly.

[Bug testsuite/100749] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/pch/valid-1.c fails after r12-949

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100749 Bug ID: 100749 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/pch/valid-1.c fails after r12-949 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug testsuite/100748] [12 regression] 30_threads/jthread/95989.cc fails after r12-843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-05-24 Status|UNCONFI

[Bug testsuite/100748] New: [12 regression] 30_threads/jthread/95989.cc fails after r12-843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748 Bug ID: 100748 Summary: [12 regression] 30_threads/jthread/95989.cc fails after r12-843 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug go/100537] Bootstrap-O3 and bootstrap-debug fail on 32-bit ARM after gcc-12-657-ga076632e274a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100537 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/100746] NRVO should not introduce aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100746 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- PR 80740 ?

[Bug target/100745] GCC generates suboptimal assembly from vector extensions on AArch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100745 Nicolas F. changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #50861|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/100745] GCC generates suboptimal assembly from vector extensions on AArch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100745 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas F. --- I'll attach a second version of profile.c, with the vector extension code that's actually going to be used in mpv (some cleanup has been done). Performance is unchanged. Some absolute numbers from gcc 11.1.0:

[Bug go/100537] Bootstrap-O3 and bootstrap-debug fail on 32-bit ARM after gcc-12-657-ga076632e274a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100537 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:358832c46a378e5a0b8a2fa3c2739125e3e680c7 commit r12-1022-g358832c46a378e5a0b8a2fa3c2739125e3e680c7 Author: Ian Lance Taylor Da

[Bug c++/95298] [9/10/11/12 Regression] sorry, unimplemented: mangling record_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95298 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-05-24 Known to fail|

[Bug fortran/100724] -fwhole-program breaks module use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100724 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.3.1, 11.1.0, 12.0,

[Bug other/100747] New: Possibly Wrong Permissions in "liboffloadmic"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100747 Bug ID: 100747 Summary: Possibly Wrong Permissions in "liboffloadmic" Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/100479] range adaptors handle cached iterators incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100479 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:46ed811bcb4b86a81ef3d78ea8cfffc6cd043144 commit r12-1018-g46ed811bcb4b86a81ef3d78ea8cfffc6cd043144 Author: Patrick Palka Date: M

[Bug libgomp/100573] [OpenMP] 'omp target teams' fails with nvptx and GCN offloading: FAIL libgomp.c-c++-common/for-3.c + for-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100573 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Guess that is because the functions that have #pragma omp target teams directive in it are marked declare target to. So, either we'd need to play with macros etc. to make sure that those functions aren't dec

[Bug target/88360] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c 2343

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88360 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|WAITING

[Bug target/89694] Redundant code with optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89694 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|WAITING

[Bug c++/90217] Greater optimization of C++ Code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90217 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug libgomp/100573] [OpenMP] 'omp target teams' fails with nvptx and GCN offloading: FAIL libgomp.c-c++-common/for-3.c + for-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100573 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > I think we want to fix both for-3.c and for-9.c similarly to > r11-2571-g916c7a201a9a1dc94f2c056a773826a26d1daca9 i.e. > #define DO_PRAGMA(x) _Pragma (#x) > #def

[Bug c++/84862] collect2: fatal error: lto-wrapper returned 1 exit status

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84862 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|WAITING

[Bug c/84187] -O0 fails inline assembly compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84187 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 Status|WAITING

[Bug other/78889] GCC fails to build due to graphite-dependences.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78889 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|WAITING

[Bug rtl-optimization/81955] corrupted double-linked list (not small)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81955 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 Status|WAITING

[Bug lto/79760] ICE in type_in_anonymous_namespace_p in ipa-utils.h:219

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79760 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vctrex at mailfence dot com --- Comment

[Bug lto/81612] lto1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81612 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|WAITING

[Bug libgcc/61238] Getting Linker error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61238 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/100666] [9/10/11/12 Regression] warning: ignoring return value of 'constexpr _Tp&& std::forward(typename std::remove_reference<_Tp>::type&) [with _Tp = std::nullptr_t; ...]', declared with at

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100666 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/100368] Missing guaranteed elision in constexpr evaluation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100368 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/100746] New: NRVO should not introduce aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100746 Bug ID: 100746 Summary: NRVO should not introduce aliasing Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priori

[Bug go/100537] Bootstrap-O3 and bootstrap-debug fail on 32-bit ARM after gcc-12-657-ga076632e274a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100537 --- Comment #16 from Ian Lance Taylor --- I have a patch for this.

[Bug fortran/99519] [OpenMP] PRIVATE/FIRSTPRIVATE with CLASS / polymorphic list items

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99519 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- The patch was now committed as: commit r12-1016-g0e3b3b77e13cac764a135a7118613c47686e0a62 Author: Tobias Burnus Date: Mon May 24 16:50:51 2021 +0200 OpenMP/Fortran: Handle polymorphic scalars in data

[Bug fortran/86470] [8/9/10/11 Regression] [OOP] ICE with OMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86470 --- Comment #16 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #14) > It looks as if the committed patch handles this specific testcase correctly, > however, there are still many issues with PRIVATE and FIRSTPRIVATE with > polymor

[Bug fortran/86470] [8/9/10/11 Regression] [OOP] ICE with OMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86470 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e3b3b77e13cac764a135a7118613c47686e0a62 commit r12-1016-g0e3b3b77e13cac764a135a7118613c47686e0a62 Author: Tobias Burnus Date: M

[Bug gcov-profile/100744] Undefined symbol __gcov_flush when building with -fprofile-arcs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100744 --- Comment #2 from Raffael Casagrande --- Oh, I didn't notice this change. Thanks for pointing this out!

[Bug gcov-profile/100744] Undefined symbol __gcov_flush when building with -fprofile-arcs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100744 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/100745] New: GCC generates suboptimal assembly from vector extensions on AArch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100745 Bug ID: 100745 Summary: GCC generates suboptimal assembly from vector extensions on AArch64 Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gcov-profile/100744] New: Undefined symbol __gcov_flush when building with -fprofile-arcs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100744 Bug ID: 100744 Summary: Undefined symbol __gcov_flush when building with -fprofile-arcs Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/100743] New: Segmentation fault passing a polymorphic as an optional argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100743 Bug ID: 100743 Summary: Segmentation fault passing a polymorphic as an optional argument Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/99960] MVE: Wrong code storing V2DI vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99960 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32d4fa7d3792566b378ba0de003d50c0301de3a0 commit r11-8460-g32d4fa7d3792566b378ba0de003d50c0301de3a0 Author: Alex Coplan Date:

[Bug c++/100742] New: False positive -Wignored-attributes with std::map and aligned(8) attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100742 Bug ID: 100742 Summary: False positive -Wignored-attributes with std::map and aligned(8) attribute Product: gcc Version: 9.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug tree-optimization/100740] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu since r9-4145

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100740 bin cheng changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/100345] gcc 11.1 build "make -n install" fails linking gcov undefined reference to std::__throw_bad_array_new_length()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100345 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to DocMAX from comment #6) > check: https://github.com/xenia-project/xenia/issues/1819 I don't think this is related, I think you're just linking wrong.

[Bug target/100734] [12 Regression] /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/include-fixed/stdlib.h:291:8: internal compiler error: in from_mode_char, at attribs.h:304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100734 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- It's after stage1.  I'm bisecting.

[Bug tree-optimization/100740] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu since r9-4145

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100740 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|wrong code at -O1 and above |[9/10/11/12 Regression]

[Bug c++/100741] [enhancement] Should show better error message if using ‘typedef’ instead of ‘using’.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100741 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Complete testcase: struct X { }; typedef Rng = X;

[Bug c++/100741] [enhancement] Should show better error message if using ‘typedef’ instead of ‘using’.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100741 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-05-24 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/100741] New: [enhancement] Should show better error message if using ‘typedef’ instead of ‘using’.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100741 Bug ID: 100741 Summary: [enhancement] Should show better error message if using ‘typedef’ instead of ‘using’. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/100733] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure for pr85213.c at -O1 -fdisable-tree-phiopt2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100733 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|-fcompare-debug failure for |[8/9/10/11/12 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/100740] New: wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

-zlib Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 12.0.0 20210524 (experimental) [master revision dc084c487e9:bd7ae6b8ef8:9d38e096c5e3b1c2233b28d0e6ff8ee81517af56] (GCC) [637] % [637] % gcctk -O0 small.c; ./a.out [638] % [638] % gcctk -O1 small.c [639] % ./a.out

[Bug middle-end/100733] -fcompare-debug failure for pr85213.c at -O1 -fdisable-tree-phiopt2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100733 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/100724] -fwhole-program breaks module use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100724 --- Comment #2 from Dave Love --- The manual says not to use -flto with -fwhole-program. Is that misleading? I checked self-built gfortran 10.2.0 again, and it definitely works for me without -flto on Debian 10, but it fails with Red Hat devto

[Bug debug/100725] dwarf error with --whole-program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100725 --- Comment #2 from Dave Love --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Those binutils are too old for dwarf5. > When the linker doesn't print any diagnostics, that isn't a big deal, but if > it needs to diagnose something and parse DWAR

[Bug other/100735] -fno-trampolines doc wrongly implies it affects C, C++ etc.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100735 Bruno Haible changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bruno at clisp dot org --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug libstdc++/91383] C++17 should remove some library feature deprecated in C++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91383 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- Some of the removed features are missing deprecated attributes, which should be fixed.

[Bug bootstrap/100345] gcc 11.1 build "make -n install" fails linking gcov undefined reference to std::__throw_bad_array_new_length()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100345 DocMAX changed: What|Removed |Added CC||forum at docmax dot tk --- Comment #6 from Doc

[Bug c++/100739] Definition of function template doesn't match declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100739 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/91383] C++17 should remove some library feature deprecated in C++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91383 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- Why don't you have CI that builds with other implementations, so that your co-workers are told automatically when they do that? It seems like you're expecting GCC to solve a non-technical problem with your

[Bug c++/100739] New: Definition of function template doesn't match declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100739 Bug ID: 100739 Summary: Definition of function template doesn't match declaration Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug middle-end/100738] Gimple failed to simplify ((v4si) ~a) < 0 ? c : d to ((v4si)a) >= 0 ? c : d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100738 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Severity|

[Bug c++/97938] [9/10 Regression] g++ crash when inferring type of auto parameter pack in lambda capture

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97938 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ba19b5543d31a76f494e76c32a548d70ac4d3cc1 commit r9-9553-gba19b5543d31a76f494e76c32a548d70ac4d3cc1 Author: Christophe Lyon

[Bug middle-end/100738] New: Gimple failed to simplify ((v4si) ~a) < 0 ? c : d to ((v4si)a) >= 0 ? c : d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100738 Bug ID: 100738 Summary: Gimple failed to simplify ((v4si) ~a) < 0 ? c : d to ((v4si)a) >= 0 ? c : d Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug c++/100737] g++ segfaults in template substitution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100737 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/100737] New: g++ segfaults in template substitution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100737 Bug ID: 100737 Summary: g++ segfaults in template substitution Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/100732] [11/12 Regression] ICE with -Wall: in ao_ref_init_from_ptr_and_range, at tree-ssa-alias.c:824 since r11-959-gb825a22890740f34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100732 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Summary|ICE with -Wall: in

[Bug target/100734] [12 Regression] /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/include-fixed/stdlib.h:291:8: internal compiler error: in from_mode_char, at attribs.h:304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100734 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- /* The character codes corresponding to all the access modes. */ static constexpr char mode_chars[5] = { '-', 'r', 'w', 'x', '^' }; Is this after building stage 1 or after building stage 2 ?

[Bug target/100734] [12 Regression] /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/include-fixed/stdlib.h:291:8: internal compiler error: in from_mode_char, at attribs.h:304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100734 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|bootstrap |target Summary|/test/gnu/gcc

[Bug bootstrap/97499] build dos cross compiler ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97499 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|WAITING

[Bug tree-optimization/58195] Missed optimization opportunity when returning a conditional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58195 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||25290 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/97690] (cond ? 2 : 0) is not optimized to int(cond) << 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97690 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pawel_sikora at zoho dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/55869] different bit shift/or optimization.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55869 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW