https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92065
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #28 from Ri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100637
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dcde81134cb24da8e261a4346c806c676297922b
commit r12-960-gdcde81134cb24da8e261a4346c806c676297922b
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Fri Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100606
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:11784fe27d879a10dc8a79212c37f50d4f7146f3
commit r12-959-g11784fe27d879a10dc8a79212c37f50d4f7146f3
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100690
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:317a38cd468d565dc8ce45c6da0dbccf38808f70
commit r12-958-g317a38cd468d565dc8ce45c6da0dbccf38808f70
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100712
Bug ID: 100712
Summary: The vec_splatid instruction allows the creation of
XXSPLTIDP instructions which produces undefined
results.
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711
Bug ID: 100711
Summary: Miss optimization for pandn
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100463
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-05-21
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96089
--- Comment #2 from Antoni ---
Created attachment 50851
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50851&action=edit
Add patch to set an arbitrary value to a global variable
I made this patch to set an arbitrary value to a global varia
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100537
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Target|arm-linux-g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100489
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100489
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a335afe208cd27cf8ee4cb028fb7769700ab6245
commit r10-9857-ga335afe208cd27cf8ee4cb028fb7769700ab6245
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80456
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75c5c4ab2662a92f0e3811cb17e27cc61814b400
commit r10-9856-g75c5c4ab2662a92f0e3811cb17e27cc61814b400
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100054
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe0f9ef823dda3205638a2f23d08eb7d0bc497b9
commit r10-9855-gfe0f9ef823dda3205638a2f23d08eb7d0bc497b9
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90479
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe0f9ef823dda3205638a2f23d08eb7d0bc497b9
commit r10-9855-gfe0f9ef823dda3205638a2f23d08eb7d0bc497b9
Author: Jason Merrill
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100032
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d83c30ec6c4865ca23a135c067eb9b56ac74a1f2
commit r10-9854-gd83c30ec6c4865ca23a135c067eb9b56ac74a1f2
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91933
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:59d821d3cce3496b3f4ede6293ffe192d0e56014
commit r10-9853-g59d821d3cce3496b3f4ede6293ffe192d0e56014
Author: Jason Merrill
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95486
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92e9b2a995f718f1c2ab1cd0840b439c24d3535f
commit r10-9852-g92e9b2a995f718f1c2ab1cd0840b439c24d3535f
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96873
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92e9b2a995f718f1c2ab1cd0840b439c24d3535f
commit r10-9852-g92e9b2a995f718f1c2ab1cd0840b439c24d3535f
Author: Jason Merrill
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93867
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92e9b2a995f718f1c2ab1cd0840b439c24d3535f
commit r10-9852-g92e9b2a995f718f1c2ab1cd0840b439c24d3535f
Author: Jason Merrill
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99118
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92e9b2a995f718f1c2ab1cd0840b439c24d3535f
commit r10-9852-g92e9b2a995f718f1c2ab1cd0840b439c24d3535f
Author: Jason Merrill
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99180
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92e9b2a995f718f1c2ab1cd0840b439c24d3535f
commit r10-9852-g92e9b2a995f718f1c2ab1cd0840b439c24d3535f
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93295
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92e9b2a995f718f1c2ab1cd0840b439c24d3535f
commit r10-9852-g92e9b2a995f718f1c2ab1cd0840b439c24d3535f
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41723
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e41d610696b81e72d1d06db176b281424e32fc23
commit r10-9851-ge41d610696b81e72d1d06db176b281424e32fc23
Author: Jason Merrill
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52625
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de47fb31b13e6bd20d693cb1eef47cbfb5de20ce
commit r10-9850-gde47fb31b13e6bd20d693cb1eef47cbfb5de20ce
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92918
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:decd38f99dd05eb54ddcaee7c52f21a56a844613
commit r10-9849-gdecd38f99dd05eb54ddcaee7c52f21a56a844613
Author: Jason Merrill
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96673
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e206f71eaf98149224269b00407bc5def6ae2dca
commit r10-9848-ge206f71eaf98149224269b00407bc5def6ae2dca
Author: Jason Merrill
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99901
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b68416a940b32b739cdc033e018bab5161a721d
commit r10-9847-g5b68416a940b32b739cdc033e018bab5161a721d
Author: Jason Merrill
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96311
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8909ed58700694f5ba66499739edfea90a0fc813
commit r10-9846-g8909ed58700694f5ba66499739edfea90a0fc813
Author: Jason Merrill
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95870
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff24ef677edee888012aaddeb0ec9bbe366b4f57
commit r10-9845-gff24ef677edee888012aaddeb0ec9bbe366b4f57
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99201
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c365bb1462a7a9dadf9b8f8668a0c832b18056c
commit r10-9844-g7c365bb1462a7a9dadf9b8f8668a0c832b18056c
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99643
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dce71e0a274f58fe7cbabba8760f78469ba13548
commit r10-9843-gdce71e0a274f58fe7cbabba8760f78469ba13548
Author: Jason Merrill
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90664
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b13ac26df5e401ce5914b8ec0c862d56edd57913
commit r10-9842-gb13ac26df5e401ce5914b8ec0c862d56edd57913
Author: Jason Merrill
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91217
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a12ae580e13f5856983142a0234651d8e8aad599
commit r10-9841-ga12ae580e13f5856983142a0234651d8e8aad599
Author: Jason Merrill
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97938
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5e7801808d2e9e99dc2931462c69a80c6f0e89cc
commit r10-9840-g5e7801808d2e9e99dc2931462c69a80c6f0e89cc
Author: Jason Merrill
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100551
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100700
gnzlbg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100705
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|warn about dead store |RFE: warn about dead store
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100489
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a1010428b3861464eb319c629c68cb13b9ca01e
commit r11-8449-g0a1010428b3861464eb319c629c68cb13b9ca01e
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100489
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84fd1b5dff70cd74aee7e8b18f66959d8b8e1ce7
commit r12-954-g84fd1b5dff70cd74aee7e8b18f66959d8b8e1ce7
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100693
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100693
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Confirmed. The define_insn for it is for SImode only as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100676
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b42b5a8a207de5e021a2916281f46bcd60b20d2
commit r12-952-g6b42b5a8a207de5e021a2916281f46bcd60b20d2
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100710
Bug ID: 100710
Summary: static_cast to derived* of base* pointing to
non-static data member of base type not rejected in
constant expression
Product: gcc
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100656
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Using a temporary may help:
subroutine s(x)
character(:), allocatable, optional :: x(:)
character(:), allocatable :: y(:)
if ( present(x) ) then
if ( allocated(x) ) then
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100694
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-05-20
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100708
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100709
Bug ID: 100709
Summary: Use of a function parameter pack in an expression
expected to be constexpr in a deduction guide produces
an unclear diagnostic.
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100700
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to gnzlbg from comment #2)
> Until C++17, creating an enum value that's out-of-range of the enum was
> unspecified behavior. In C++ standard >= 17 (e.g. -std=c++17), this became
> undefined behav
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100708
Bug ID: 100708
Summary: dynamic_cast can convert xvalue to lvalue
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51577
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asif_bahrainwala at hotmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99611
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100684
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|spurious -Wnonnull with -O1 |[11 Regression] spurious
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100684
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9480491a6447576e8e695b8ea3c4989cf72c9670
commit r12-948-g9480491a6447576e8e695b8ea3c4989cf72c9670
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100700
--- Comment #2 from gnzlbg ---
> in a call to f(-1) the function falls off the end,
Indeed, thanks. Using <= in the condition removes the warning.
> and ditto in a call to h ((enum E)2)
Until C++17, creating an enum value that's out-of-range
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92065
--- Comment #27 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The code seems to compile with today's trunk, but still fails with 11-branch.
Could one of Paul's recent commits have fixed this? If so, a backport might
be nice.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100655
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88240
--- Comment #23 from Thomas De Schampheleire ---
Thanks a lot!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100696
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100639
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d5cbe0f0d4b7bc11f80b2236521f90ec94e95767
commit r12-946-gd5cbe0f0d4b7bc11f80b2236521f90ec94e95767
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100706
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
GCC does not generate the PLTs directly normally. It is the linker.
Does using BFD ld instead of gold fix the issue?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100700
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100702
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #225 from John Buddery ---
Yes, I looked briefly at that - I added a new class, but then started hitting
bundling errors because it wasn't being positioned correctly in the 3
instruction bundle.
It will need more changes to itanium2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #224 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2021-05-20 10:59 a.m., jvb at cyberscience dot com wrote:
> but I need to work out how to vary the attribute, as you were right: scall
> maps
> to a "B" type attribute, but brl is an L+X in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100701
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100701
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a71f55c482ada2c6c31d450ac22494b547512127
commit r12-945-ga71f55c482ada2c6c31d450ac22494b547512127
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Thu Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100661
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100707
--- Comment #1 from wang ivor ---
A quick workaround: https://wandbox.org/permlink/n8E5xJuJhq1CUA0e
Create a module that only contains the namespace declaration, and 'export
import' it whenever you declare a new namespace.
// namespace_decl.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100707
Bug ID: 100707
Summary: [modules] ICE on nested namespace
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100646
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Sum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100706
Bug ID: 100706
Summary: Invalid instructions in plt calls on PPC
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100704
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Hmm, I didn't realize we can't push %xmm regs... With loads+stores the
> pushes do not look less efficient for this particular example? I suppose a
> nice
> archite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96488
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.4
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96488
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5bd98868260de9cfc44224cf3833eb86e95d7c47
commit r9-9544-g5bd98868260de9cfc44224cf3833eb86e95d7c47
Author: Eric Botcazou
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100281
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Andreas Krebbel
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e43f47686980e9d0081aa765b619bdc89189b51a
commit r11-8448-ge43f47686980e9d0081aa765b619bdc89189b51a
Author: Andreas Krebb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96488
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a4b3683e3cb00459eb74d1a37be8936abd529865
commit r10-9839-ga4b3683e3cb00459eb74d1a37be8936abd529865
Author: Eric Botcazou
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96488
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a470d058707bf3e555f30adc68237f422d0a7d47
commit r11-8447-ga470d058707bf3e555f30adc68237f422d0a7d47
Author: Eric Botcazou
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96488
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:325bb080259d3a00c5f5a7378872f78a2b889dfb
commit r12-943-g325bb080259d3a00c5f5a7378872f78a2b889dfb
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #223 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2021-05-20 10:59 a.m., jvb at cyberscience dot com wrote:
> The simplest variant I have is:
>
> (define_insn "call_nogp"
> [(call (mem:DI (match_operand:DI 0 "call_operand" "?b,s"))
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96488
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60977
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #222 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2021-05-20 10:02 a.m., dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
>
> --- Comment #220 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
> On 2021-05-20 9:37
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #221 from John Buddery ---
Thanks - that is neater, as it avoids the need to change the calls in ia64.c,
which gets messy.
The simplest variant I have is:
(define_insn "call_nogp"
[(call (mem:DI (match_operand:DI 0 "call_operand"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100690
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97051
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hewillk at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100675
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100704
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, I didn't realize we can't push %xmm regs... With loads+stores the pushes
do not look less efficient for this particular example? I suppose a nice
architectural enhancement would be a push-multiple -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100705
Bug ID: 100705
Summary: warn about dead store
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #220 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2021-05-20 9:37 a.m., jvb at cyberscience dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
>
> --- Comment #219 from John Buddery ---
> Great, thanks - I'll look at ia64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100704
Bug ID: 100704
Summary: Vector register isn't used to push BLKmode argument
onto stack
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100145
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Note after inlining we still have a backedge into BB 3:
[local count: 1073741824]:
c = 0;
b.1_7 = b;
if (b.1_7 != 0)
goto ; [34.00%]
else
goto ; [66.00%]
[local count: 3318838410]:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100688
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
One other thing: the docs should make it clear about the leading ".".
If I want to create the equivalent of:
__attribute__((section(".section")))
do I call it with:
gcc_jit_lvalue_set_link_section(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #219 from John Buddery ---
Great, thanks - I'll look at ia64.c and build and test with that change.
Yes, "b" on ia64 seems to be a branch register, and the brl op only accepts
immediate values not registers. Initially I hoped the ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100688
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks for the patch; I like the idea; various nits below:
> diff --git a/gcc/jit/docs/topics/expressions.rst
> b/gcc/jit/docs/topics/expressions.rst
> index 396259ef07e..b39f6c02527 100644
> --- a/gcc/jit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100701
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #218 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2021-05-20 5:19 a.m., jvb at cyberscience dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
>
> --- Comment #217 from John Buddery ---
> Thanks very much for adding the bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100703
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Grund ---
It goes further: Even the usual conversion rules for pointer types don't apply:
void foo(__vector_pair*){}
void bar(const __vector_pair*){}
int main(){
__vector_pair p;
foo(p); // works
bar(p); // f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100655
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100361
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Joern Rennecke
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f772bd9847cdbf6a7a6d856de87cb65472d56f4
commit r11-8446-g5f772bd9847cdbf6a7a6d856de87cb65472d56f4
Author: Joern Renneck
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo