[Bug c++/100240] Compiler crashes with segmentation fault on a chrono library using nvcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100240 --- Comment #4 from Peter Taraba --- Actually this works: nvcc -o dt ./DeeperThought/*.cu -save-temps But files it creates even if zipped are above 1MB (which is not allowed to be attached).

[Bug c++/99683] Deduction failure when using CTAD of CNTTP inside a deduction guide

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99683 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bcd77b7b9f35bd5b559ed593c3b3e346c1e6f364 commit r12-100-gbcd77b7b9f35bd5b559ed593c3b3e346c1e6f364 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Sat

[Bug c++/99200] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ used as template parameter causes internal compiler error (segmentation fault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99200 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bcd77b7b9f35bd5b559ed593c3b3e346c1e6f364 commit r12-100-gbcd77b7b9f35bd5b559ed593c3b3e346c1e6f364 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Sat

[Bug c++/93383] ICE on accessing field of a structure which is non-type template parameter, -std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93383 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bcd77b7b9f35bd5b559ed593c3b3e346c1e6f364 commit r12-100-gbcd77b7b9f35bd5b559ed593c3b3e346c1e6f364 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Sa

[Bug c++/95291] ICE in resolve_args at gcc/cp/call.c:4482

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95291 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bcd77b7b9f35bd5b559ed593c3b3e346c1e6f364 commit r12-100-gbcd77b7b9f35bd5b559ed593c3b3e346c1e6f364 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Sat

[Bug c++/89565] [C++2a] ICE on template instantiating user defined non-type template from template value member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89565 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bcd77b7b9f35bd5b559ed593c3b3e346c1e6f364 commit r12-100-gbcd77b7b9f35bd5b559ed593c3b3e346c1e6f364 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Sat

[Bug c++/87709] c++17 class template argument deduction not working in a very specific case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87709 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f1a2cb9c2dc09eed53da5d5787d14bec700b10b commit r12-99-g5f1a2cb9c2dc09eed53da5d5787d14bec700b10b Author: Patrick Palka Date: Sat

[Bug c++/93413] Destructor definition not found during constant evaluation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93413 Luke Dalessandro changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ldalessandro at gmail dot com --- Com

[Bug c++/99495] constexpr virtual destructor is used before its definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99495 Peter Dimov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pdimov at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 fro

[Bug c++/100240] Compiler crashes with segmentation fault on a chrono library using nvcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100240 --- Comment #3 from Peter Taraba --- unfortunately this is using nvcc, which calls probably gcc internally, so adding option "-save-temps to the complete compilation command" is not going to provide what you want. also, I have no clue what "spa

[Bug libstdc++/100243] New: [10 Regression] invalid use of incomplete type 'std::__detail::__iter_traits >' {aka 'struct std::indirectly_readable_traits'}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100243 Bug ID: 100243 Summary: [10 Regression] invalid use of incomplete type 'std::__detail::__iter_traits >' {aka 'struct std::indirectly_readable_traits'} Product: gcc

[Bug fortran/97571] long parsing phase for simple array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug jit/100242] libgccjit.so: error: in expmed_mode_index, at expmed.h:249

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100242 --- Comment #2 from Antoni --- Created attachment 50666 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50666&action=edit Third part of the reproducer

[Bug jit/100242] libgccjit.so: error: in expmed_mode_index, at expmed.h:249

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100242 --- Comment #1 from Antoni --- Created attachment 50665 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50665&action=edit Second part of the reproducer

[Bug jit/100242] New: libgccjit.so: error: in expmed_mode_index, at expmed.h:249

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100242 Bug ID: 100242 Summary: libgccjit.so: error: in expmed_mode_index, at expmed.h:249 Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libgcc/98952] powerpc*: __trampoline_setup inverted test for trampoline size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98952 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- Fixed on trunk. Needs backports to 11 and whatever else is still an open branch when the backports are done :-)

[Bug c++/100240] Compiler crashes with segmentation fault on a chrono library using nvcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100240 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added URL|https://www.frisky.world/20 | |21/04/lets-talk-abo

[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- This is on aarch64: Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/11/lto-wrapper Target: aarch64-redhat-linux Configured with: ../configure --enable-bootstr

[Bug fortran/97571] long parsing phase for simple array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection --- Comment #1 from Mar

[Bug target/100241] New: internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 Bug ID: 100241 Summary: internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug libgcc/98952] powerpc*: __trampoline_setup inverted test for trampoline size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98952 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Michael Meissner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a30a3f06b908e4e781324c2e813cd1db87119df commit r12-97-g9a30a3f06b908e4e781324c2e813cd1db87119df Author: Michael Meissner Date:

[Bug c++/100240] Compiler crashes with segmentation fault on a chrono library using nvcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100240 Peter Taraba changed: What|Removed |Added CC||taraba.peter at mail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/100240] New: Compiler crashes with segmentation fault on a chrono library using nvcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100240 Bug ID: 100240 Summary: Compiler crashes with segmentation fault on a chrono library using nvcc Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug libstdc++/100017] error: 'fenv_t' has not been declared in '::' x86_64-w64-mingw32 host cross toolchain fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017 --- Comment #11 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8) > I can only fix the case where the target (in the build tree) is > found first and then its #include_next finds the host (installed on > the host). > > But that

[Bug rtl-optimization/100239] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.c:9865 with __builtin_shuffle()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100239 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug libstdc++/100017] error: 'fenv_t' has not been declared in '::' x86_64-w64-mingw32 host cross toolchain fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017 --- Comment #10 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8) > I can only fix the case where the target (in the build tree) is > found first and then its #include_next finds the host (installed on > the host). > > But that

[Bug rtl-optimization/100239] New: [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.c:9865 with __builtin_shuffle()

/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r12-96-20210423095621-g886b6c1e8af-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 12.0.0 20210423 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug libstdc++/100017] error: 'fenv_t' has not been declared in '::' x86_64-w64-mingw32 host cross toolchain fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017 --- Comment #9 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8) > I can only fix the case where the target (in the build tree) is > found first and then its #include_next finds the host (installed on > the host). > > But that s

[Bug libstdc++/100238] New: [11/12] Link failure in debug libstdc++ on MinGW due to atomicitiy.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100238 Bug ID: 100238 Summary: [11/12] Link failure in debug libstdc++ on MinGW due to atomicitiy.cc Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/100227] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] write with implicit loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100227 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug c++/92145] -Wdeprecated-copy false-positive when inheriting base assignment operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92145 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/97571] long parsing phase for simple array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Mark J Olah from comment #5) > Whatever is happening inside the AST evaluation in this case is not only > extraordinarily inefficient, but also apparently exponential with the size > o

[Bug fortran/97571] long parsing phase for simple array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571 --- Comment #5 from Mark J Olah --- I reported this in bug #100235, where it was suggested this would be treated as WONTFIX. It seems this bug is reporting on the same issue arising from rttov: https://nwp-saf.eumetsat.int/site/software/rttov/

[Bug libstdc++/100237] Unnecessary std::move in ranges::min, ranges::max and ranges::minmax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100237 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-04-23 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug fortran/97571] long parsing phase for simple array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||molah at ucar dot edu --- Comment

[Bug fortran/100235] 10.3.0 Performance regressions for compile-time math intrinsics computation on arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100235 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/100235] 10.3.0 Performance regressions for compile-time math intrinsics computation on arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100235 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/100237] New: Unnecessary std::move in ranges::min, ranges::max and ranges::minmax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100237 Bug ID: 100237 Summary: Unnecessary std::move in ranges::min, ranges::max and ranges::minmax Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/100236] arm: UB in arm_compute_save_core_reg_mask (shift exponent 4294967295 is too large for 32-bit type 'int')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100236 --- Comment #1 from Alex Coplan --- GCC compiled with UBSan here. I should have mentioned it needs -march=armv8.1-m.main.

[Bug target/100236] New: arm: UB in arm_compute_save_core_reg_mask (shift exponent 4294967295 is too large for 32-bit type 'int')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100236 Bug ID: 100236 Summary: arm: UB in arm_compute_save_core_reg_mask (shift exponent 4294967295 is too large for 32-bit type 'int') Product: gcc Version: 11.0

[Bug target/100041] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4022

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100041 --- Comment #22 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:716bb02b40ecef5564abb5ba45a594323123a104 commit r12-94-g716bb02b40ecef5564abb5ba45a594323123a104 Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Fri Ap

[Bug fortran/100235] New: 10.3.0 Performance regressions for compile-time math intrinsics computation on arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100235 Bug ID: 100235 Summary: 10.3.0 Performance regressions for compile-time math intrinsics computation on arrays Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/99540] ICE: Segmentation fault in aarch64_add_offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99540 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|A

[Bug target/99249] SVE: ICE in aarch64_expand_sve_const_vector (during RTL pass: early_remat)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99249 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|A

[Bug target/98119] [10 Regression] SVE: Wrong code with -O1 -ftree-vectorize -msve-vector-bits=512 -mtune=thunderx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98119 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|A

[Bug target/99929] [8/9/10 Backport] SVE: Wrong code at -O2 -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99929 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c3a699b91dac954271c9fd96416128fc39cb3f9 commit r10-9760-g2c3a699b91dac954271c9fd96416128fc39cb3f9 Author: Richard Sand

[Bug target/98119] [10 Regression] SVE: Wrong code with -O1 -ftree-vectorize -msve-vector-bits=512 -mtune=thunderx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98119 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:367aa5ee879c6bbfc4bf7ae94c680f0614581661 commit r10-9759-g367aa5ee879c6bbfc4bf7ae94c680f0614581661 Author: Richard Sand

[Bug c++/98056] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have array_type in build_special_member_call, at cp/call.c:9862 since r11-2183-g0f66b8486cea8668

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98056 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug c++/100234] [11/12 Regression] Coroutines ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100234 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug target/99932] OpenACC/nvptx offloading execution regressions starting with CUDA 11.2-era Nvidia Driver 460.27.04

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99932 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 50662 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50662&action=edit Updated cuda reproducer Slimmed down further, eliminated gang/worker reduction parts.

[Bug c++/100234] [11/12 Regression] Coroutines ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100234 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.2 CC|

[Bug c++/100234] New: [11/12 Regression] Coroutines ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100234 Bug ID: 100234 Summary: [11/12 Regression] Coroutines ICE Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/100182] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of atomic_float/1.cc and atomic_float/wait_notify.cc on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182 --- Comment #22 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d2324a5ab3ff097864ae6828cb1db4dd013c70d1 commit r12-91-gd2324a5ab3ff097864ae6828cb1db4dd013c70d1 Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Fri Ap

[Bug target/100232] [OpenMP][nvptx] Reduction fails with optimization and 'loop'/'for simd' but not with 'for'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100232 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #1) > Can you try the patch for PR81778 ? > It's possible you're looking at a duplicate. Unfortunately, it does not seem to make a difference - it still fails

[Bug target/100232] [OpenMP][nvptx] Reduction fails with optimization and 'loop'/'for simd' but not with 'for'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100232 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- Can you try the patch for PR81778 ? It's possible you're looking at a duplicate.

[Bug libstdc++/100233] New: [10/11/12] std::views::elements only accepts types that are defined on std::get

std::ranges::elements_view, 0>; | ^ :56:93: note: constraints not satisfied In file included from :44: /opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20210423/include/c++/12.0.0/ranges: In substitution of &#

[Bug sanitizer/95693] [8/9 Regression] Incorrect error from undefined behavior sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95693 --- Comment #13 from Tibor Billes --- Thank you all for fixing it!

[Bug target/100232] New: [OpenMP][nvptx] Reduction fails with optimization and 'loop'/'for simd' but not with 'for'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100232 Bug ID: 100232 Summary: [OpenMP][nvptx] Reduction fails with optimization and 'loop'/'for simd' but not with 'for' Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #41 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #40) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #39) > > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #38) > > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #37) > > > > Oh, and

[Bug rtl-optimization/100230] ASan: alloc-dealloc-mismatch in early-remat.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100230 --- Comment #3 from Alex Coplan --- Fixed on trunk so far.

[Bug rtl-optimization/100230] ASan: alloc-dealloc-mismatch in early-remat.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100230 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alex Coplan : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d87c2251c441f056e0a44f928ffcb8a8a679b6b commit r12-90-g5d87c2251c441f056e0a44f928ffcb8a8a679b6b Author: Alex Coplan Date: Fri Apr

[Bug libstdc++/99402] [10 Regression] std::copy creates _GLIBCXX_DEBUG false positive for attempt to subscript a dereferenceable (start-of-sequence) iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99402 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/100180] experimental/net/internet/address/v6/members.cc fails on arm-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100180 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-04-23 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/98736] [10 Regression] Wrong partition order generated in loop distribution pass since r10-619-g5879ab5fafedc8f6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98736 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/98736] [10 Regression] Wrong partition order generated in loop distribution pass since r10-619-g5879ab5fafedc8f6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98736 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c6a1173cccfd9c466e43bafa7ef7940b93d1495 commit r10-9758-g6c6a1173cccfd9c466e43bafa7ef7940b93d1495 Author: Bin Cheng Dat

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #40 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #39) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #38) > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #37) > > > Oh, and FYI a cc1 cross from x86_64 to x86_64-apple-darwin

[Bug libstdc++/100180] experimental/net/internet/address/v6/members.cc fails on arm-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100180 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e1e7b77904f1fe2a6dbfe84bb4fc026584ba480 commit r12-89-g0e1e7b77904f1fe2a6dbfe84bb4fc026584ba480 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #39 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #38) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #37) > > Oh, and FYI a cc1 cross from x86_64 to x86_64-apple-darwin19.6.0 doesn't > > seem > > to reproduce the issue

[Bug c++/100231] New: [C++17] Variable template specialization inside a class gives compilation error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100231 Bug ID: 100231 Summary: [C++17] Variable template specialization inside a class gives compilation error Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug target/99932] OpenACC/nvptx offloading execution regressions starting with CUDA 11.2-era Nvidia Driver 460.27.04

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99932 --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 50660 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50660&action=edit Cuda reproducer

[Bug c++/98767] Function signature lost in concept diagnostic message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98767 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:87fc34a461cf362947a430d8a241f653fd83bc7b commit r12-86-g87fc34a461cf362947a430d8a241f653fd83bc7b Author: Patrick Palka Date: Fri

[Bug c++/99362] [10 Regression] invalid unused result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99362 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||georg.schwab at emocean dot io --- Comme

[Bug c++/100210] [[nodiscard]] constructor causes warning on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100210 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE CC|

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #38 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #37) > Oh, and FYI a cc1 cross from x86_64 to x86_64-apple-darwin19.6.0 doesn't seem > to reproduce the issue with the reduced testcase (I seee no call to > ___UTF_8_p

[Bug libstdc++/99402] [10 Regression] std::copy creates _GLIBCXX_DEBUG false positive for attempt to subscript a dereferenceable (start-of-sequence) iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99402 --- Comment #13 from François Dumont --- Fixed on gcc-10 branch by this commit https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=ab83ce42ea0b2fbc09d51b7bd5e69905dcaa2041.

[Bug target/100217] [11/12 Regression] ICE when building valgrind testsuite with -march=z14 since r11-7552

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100217 --- Comment #8 from Ilya Leoshkevich --- Yeah, inline asm seems to be problematic: /home/iii/gcc/build/gcc/xgcc -B/home/iii/gcc/build/gcc/ /home/iii/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/vector/long-double-asm-hardreg.c -fdiagnostics-plain-outpu

[Bug c/69558] [8 Regression] glib2 warning pragmas stopped working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69558 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 --- Comment #31 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug c++/98297] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_elaborated_type_specifier, at cp/parser.c:19653

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98297 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Ah, tracked already in PR98358.

[Bug target/99748] MVE: Wrong code at -O0 with float to integer conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99748 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/99748] MVE: Wrong code at -O0 with float to integer conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99748 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:283367662c25057fd7c9c98257cca858f85b75fc commit r10-9755-g283367662c25057fd7c9c98257cca858f85b75fc Author: Alex Coplan Date:

[Bug target/100217] [11/12 Regression] ICE when building valgrind testsuite with -march=z14 since r11-7552

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100217 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- That said, I'm afraid I don't really understand what wrong happens with the patch I've attached. Trying something like: long double foo (void) { register long double f0 asm ("f0"); f0 = 1.0L; f0 += 127

[Bug target/100217] [11/12 Regression] ICE when building valgrind testsuite with -march=z14 since r11-7552

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100217 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Ilya Leoshkevich from comment #5) > That would be an ideal solution, but I wonder how to implement it? Suppose > we find a way to convince expand to pick FPRX2mode for such a long double. > What

[Bug target/100217] [11/12 Regression] ICE when building valgrind testsuite with -march=z14 since r11-7552

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100217 --- Comment #5 from Ilya Leoshkevich --- That would be an ideal solution, but I wonder how to implement it? Suppose we find a way to convince expand to pick FPRX2mode for such a long double. What if the following comes up? register long double

[Bug target/100152] [10/11/12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #37 from Richard Biener --- Oh, and FYI a cc1 cross from x86_64 to x86_64-apple-darwin19.6.0 doesn't seem to reproduce the issue with the reduced testcase (I seee no call to ___UTF_8_put remaining with -O3 -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing

[Bug rtl-optimization/100225] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in add_cross_iteration_register_deps, at ddg.c:291

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100225 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/100217] [11/12 Regression] ICE when building valgrind testsuite with -march=z14 since r11-7552

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100217 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/100222] Redundant mark_irreducible_loops () in predicate.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100222 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/100222] Redundant mark_irreducible_loops () in predicate.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100222 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:500305a92ef85e6b87ad428a35221c62f4037b93 commit r12-82-g500305a92ef85e6b87ad428a35221c62f4037b93 Author: Richard Biener Date: F

[Bug target/100217] [11/12 Regression] ICE when building valgrind testsuite with -march=z14 since r11-7552

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100217 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- That seems like quite undesirable API change. Can't the backend when it sees long double register vars for the fN registers change the mode from TFmode to that new FPRX2mode, so that old code keeps working?

[Bug target/100217] [11/12 Regression] ICE when building valgrind testsuite with -march=z14 since r11-7552

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100217 Ilya Leoshkevich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iii at linux dot ibm.com --- Comment

[Bug fortran/100227] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] write with implicit loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100227 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/100225] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in add_cross_iteration_register_deps, at ddg.c:291

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100225 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Ah, you are right, sorry.

[Bug target/99488] dwz: /usr/lib/gcc/mips64el-linux-gnuabi64/11/go1: Found two copies of .debug_line_str section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99488 --- Comment #12 from YunQiang Su --- This problem disappears if we build gcc 11 with binutils 2.36.

[Bug rtl-optimization/100225] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in add_cross_iteration_register_deps, at ddg.c:291

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100225 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|85099 | CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/100230] ASan: alloc-dealloc-mismatch in early-remat.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100230 --- Comment #1 from Alex Coplan --- Testing a fix.

[Bug rtl-optimization/100230] ASan: alloc-dealloc-mismatch in early-remat.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100230 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-04-23 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug rtl-optimization/100230] New: ASan: alloc-dealloc-mismatch in early-remat.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100230 Bug ID: 100230 Summary: ASan: alloc-dealloc-mismatch in early-remat.c Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rt

[Bug target/100216] arm: UB in arm_canonicalize_comparison (shift exponent 127 is too large for 64-bit type)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100216 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/98297] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_elaborated_type_specifier, at cp/parser.c:19653

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98297 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

  1   2   >