https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99493
--- Comment #1 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña ---
Slightly simplified: https://godbolt.org/z/rv97Gh.
```C++
struct A{};
templateconstexpr const A*tpo{&a};
templatestruct B{};
B>b;
```
```
:4:10: error: the address of 'A{}' is not a valid templa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99589
Bug ID: 99589
Summary: lambda init-capture without initializer in C++20
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99588
Bug ID: 99588
Summary: variable set but not used warning on static _Atomic
assignment
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99587
Bug ID: 99587
Summary: warning: ‘retain’ attribute ignored while
__has_attribute(retain) is true
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89965
--- Comment #18 from William Bader ---
I did a bisection for the bug from my previous comment (which is still present
in the current gcc 11 in master):
058e97ecf33ad0dfd926b3876a4bcf59ac9556ff is the first bad commit
commit 058e97ecf33ad0dfd926b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99586
Bug ID: 99586
Summary: Use of class template identifier checked for CTAD
before instantiation
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
URL: https://godbolt.org/z/4KWWjT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97476
Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
--- Comment #6 from Arnd Bergmann ---
I figured out the qnx4 warning in the end: https://godbolt.org/z/hvqjr3
struct qnx4_inode_entry {
char di_status;
union {
struct {
char di_fname[16];
char di_pad[32];
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70816
Arthur O'Dwyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99585
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Actually the SIZE intrinsic might be a red herring, as the following variant
does also ICE:
module m
type t
end type
type t2
integer :: n
end type t2
contains
function h (x) result(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99585
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Reduced example:
module m
type t
end type
type t2
type(t), allocatable :: my(:)
end type t2
contains
function h (x) result(z)
class(t2) :: x(:)
type(t) :: z(size(x(1)%my))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99112
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99585
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99585
Bug ID: 99585
Summary: ICE with SIZE intrinsic on nested derived type
components
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99112
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c2d7c39fcb8a3cb67600cdb6fde49ecb0e951589
commit r11-7661-gc2d7c39fcb8a3cb67600cdb6fde49ecb0e951589
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99047
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 50385
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50385&action=edit
Patch under test
had omitted the conversion to bool (it seems that almost all coroutines do use
a boolean type he
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99047
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-14
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
--- Comment #5 from Arnd Bergmann ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4)
> Most warnings designed to detect invalid accesses (not just
> -Wstringop-overread but also -Wstringop-overflow and
> -Wformat-overflow/-truncation, -Wrestrict, and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99345
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99584
Bug ID: 99584
Summary: ICE Segmentation fault when expanding lambda noexcept
specifier with invalid parameter pack
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99583
Bug ID: 99583
Summary: Parameter packs not expanded in lambda noexcept
specifier
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
21 matches
Mail list logo
