https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99418
--- Comment #2 from Ivan Sorokin ---
It looks like this is related to ignore_off_by_one parameter of
ubsan_instrument_bounds.
As can be seen in gimple the problematic .UBSAN_BOUNDS checks against array
size plus 1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99440
Bug ID: 99440
Summary: [GCOV] Wrong coverage with callsite
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95405
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95432
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Assembly:
.loc 1 12 3 is_stmt 1 view .LVU12
.loc 1 10 8 is_stmt 0 view .LVU13
movaps %xmm0, (%rsp)
.loc 1 11 8 view .LVU14
movaps %xmm0, 32(%rsp)
.loc 1 12 13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95431
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Looks correct at the gimple level:
[t.c:6:3] # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT
[t.c:6:16] one.0_1 ={v} one;
[t.c:6:16] _2 = (char) one.0_1;
[t.c:6:8] a1[0] = _2;
[t.c:6:8] MEM [(char *)&a1 + 1B] = 770;
[t.c:6:8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99439
Bug ID: 99439
Summary: use_facet> (l); get() API with
kMonthDayYearFormat = L"%m/%d/%Y" should allow missing
leading zero
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98865
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-07
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99422
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerald at pfeifer dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99438
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99422
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||italolmm2018 at outlook dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99432
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99195
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99370
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99312
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98792
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-07
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99438
Bug ID: 99438
Summary: [11 regression] libgcc/soft-fp/divtf3.c:51:1: error:
unrecognizable insn
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99437
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-07
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99420
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99437
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Error: immediate value out |[11 Regression] Error:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99437
--- Comment #1 from Khem Raj ---
the version of gcc in use is
gcc version 11.0.1 20210306 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99437
Bug ID: 99437
Summary: Error: immediate value out of range 1 to 8 at operand
3 -- `shrn v1.8b,v1.8h,15'
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99418
--- Comment #1 from Ivan Sorokin ---
Here is the reduced example. It doesn't SIGSEGV, but it doesn't report any
sanitizer errors either:
$ g++ -g -fsanitize=bounds 3.cpp
$ cat 3.cpp
#include
void escape(int& a)
{}
void test(size_t n, size_t m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99434
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > This is just a register allocation issue dealing with mulx and TImode.
> >
> > If mulq was used instead (that is witho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99295
--- Comment #6 from Roland Illig ---
Thank you for updating the documentation. It reads really nice now and explains
everything I would need or like to know when I stumble upon this function
attribute.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99287
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99287
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d1bba463bd0d5692b7fa58ee37a61a55b2517456
commit r11-7546-gd1bba463bd0d5692b7fa58ee37a61a55b2517456
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98689
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 50320
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50320&action=edit
.s diff to gcc10 .s
The following code is wrong in gcc-11:
- ldw 12(%r3),%r28
+ ldw 12(%r3),%r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99434
--- Comment #2 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> This is just a register allocation issue dealing with mulx and TImode.
>
> If mulq was used instead (that is without -march=native), all of the
> functions are done c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99434
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Target|
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: italolmm2018 at outlook dot com
Target Milestone: ---
ICE when trying to 'export module' under C++23/C++2B:
gcc version 11.0.1 20210306 (experimental), confi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99432
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||99422
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99435
Bug ID: 99435
Summary: avr: incorrect I/O address ranges for some cores
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99434
Bug ID: 99434
Summary: std::bit_cast generates more instructions than
__builtin_bit_cast and memcpy with -march=native
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99433
Bug ID: 99433
Summary: custom friend pipe-operator| conflicts with range
adaptor?
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: italolmm2018 at outlook dot com
Target Milestone: ---
gcc version 11.0.1 20210306 (experimental), configured with: ../configure
--target=i686-elf --prefix=/home/italo/chos
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99422
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99431
--- Comment #3 from Jonathon Reinhart ---
Yep, that's it. I figured there had to be a dup, but couldn't find it. Thanks
Jakub.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99431
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94130
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathon.reinhart at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99431
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99429
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Slightly reduced:
namespace std {
struct strong_ordering {
int _v;
constexpr strong_ordering (int v) :_v(v) {}
constexpr operator int (void) const { return _v; }
static const strong_ordering less;
s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99429
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99218
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4fbef612ca1adb71c90eab0d6a682ec6af5b7c93
commit r10-9420-g4fbef612ca1adb71c90eab0d6a682ec6af5b7c93
Author: Harald Anlauf
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99431
Bug ID: 99431
Summary: Return value of __builtin_memset() incorrect if
partially optimized away
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99421
--- Comment #2 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 50318
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50318&action=edit
tar ball to repeat the failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99430
Bug ID: 99430
Summary: std::filesystem::path: UNC device paths with \\?\… not
supported properly
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99365
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96330
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99406
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99406
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:73a9216b8a47889234c94e3aaec193391ee6604d
commit r11-7543-g73a9216b8a47889234c94e3aaec193391ee6604d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99429
Mike Sharov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #50315|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99429
Bug ID: 99429
Summary: ICE for bool return from <=>
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99122
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99137
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99137
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:47a0284fe7d4c996cc054c13e196ee3983025fb3
commit r9-9270-g47a0284fe7d4c996cc054c13e196ee3983025fb3
Author: Tobias Burnus
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99137
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ed8fede89a705b031d3123c502717d7bc8b29320
commit r10-9419-ged8fede89a705b031d3123c502717d7bc8b29320
Author: Tobias Burnus
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
--- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus ---
Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-March/566366.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99405
Bug 99405 depends on bug 99396, which changed state.
Bug 99396 Summary: std::rotl and std::rotr Does not convert into ROTATE on the
gimple level
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99396
What|Removed |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99396
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99396
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84185598dc7470bad4e7f8c22b64e3c944efb670
commit r11-7542-g84185598dc7470bad4e7f8c22b64e3c944efb670
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99422
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I see the function is called before selecting a particular alternative, so
perhaps it means to care only about constraints like "X" and "" and not say
that mixed with other constraints etc.
But, shouldn't the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Alexander Lelyakin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexander.lelyakin@googlema
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98056
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
thanks for the reports (I have some idea about where the issue is coming from,
but not fixed yet).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98056
--- Comment #4 from Nils Gladitz ---
Not sure if this is helpful at all but I think I ran into the same issue and
reduced it to the following which is slightly shorter but also keeps the
standard C++ includes intact (manually reintroduced them af
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99422
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99422
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99421
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461
--- Comment #33 from Martin Liška ---
> Tested today's gcc against firefox-86 in lto+pgo mode. Built fine. Thank you!
I thank you. You tested various attempts I proposed :)
68 matches
Mail list logo