[Bug tree-optimization/98516] [11 Regression] Wrong code generated by tree vectorizer since r11-3823-g126ed72b9f48f853

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98516 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 5 Jan 2021, mar...@mpa-garching.mpg.de wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98516 > > --- Comment #9 from Martin Reinecke --- > Thanks, this fixes the reduced test case

[Bug target/98550] [11 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2219 on s390x-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98550 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING Assignee|marxin at gcc

[Bug target/98550] [11 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2219 on s390x-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98550 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/98549] [11 Regression] ICE in rs6000_emit_le_vsx_store, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:9938 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98549 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/98544] [11 regression] Wrong code generated by tree vectorizer since r11-3917-g28290cb50c7dbf87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98544 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11 regression] Wrong code |[11 regression] Wrong code

[Bug tree-optimization/98544] [11 regression] Wrong code generated by tree vectorizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98544 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Sta

[Bug lto/98540] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE: error: type variant with 'TYPE_ALIAS_SET_KNOWN_P' since r7-6939-g853ef4e5632df328

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98540 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/98549] [11 Regression] ICE in rs6000_emit_le_vsx_store, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:9938 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98549 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/98540] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE: error: type variant with 'TYPE_ALIAS_SET_KNOWN_P' since r7-6939-g853ef4e5632df328

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98540 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 49894 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49894&action=edit Reduced test-case Started with r7-6939-g853ef4e5632df328 and it was rejected before: $ g++ lambda.cpp -O3 -Wall

[Bug middle-end/98555] New: Functions optimized to zero length break function pointer inequality

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98555 Bug ID: 98555 Summary: Functions optimized to zero length break function pointer inequality Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/98554] New: why the explicit conversion function of derived class return type is not a candidate in the context of direct-initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98554 Bug ID: 98554 Summary: why the explicit conversion function of derived class return type is not a candidate in the context of direct-initialization Product: gcc V

[Bug tree-optimization/98138] BB vect fail to SLP one case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98138 --- Comment #5 from Kewen Lin --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #4) > One rough idea seems: > 1) Relax this condition all_uniform_p somehow to get SLP instance building > to go deeper and get those p1/p2 loads as SLP nodes. > 2) Introdu

[Bug tree-optimization/98537] [11 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn since r11-5839

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98537 --- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #1) > Mine. For vec_cmpmn, it goes into ix86_expand_fp_vec_cmp/ix86_expand_int_vec_cmp, when cmp is integer mask, we need to use ix86_expand_sse_movcc instead of emit_move

[Bug tree-optimization/98552] Make more use of __builtin_undefined for assuring that variables do not change

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98552 Tobias Schlüter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tobi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/98537] [11 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn since r11-5839

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98537 --- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu --- Mine.

[Bug fortran/98517] gfortran segfault on character array initialization from parameter value since r8-5900-g266404a8d62b99ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98517 --- Comment #5 from Eric Reischer --- Sorry, that meant to say, "I can confirm the attached patch resolves the crash". Thanks :-)

[Bug analyzer/97072] -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak false positive when writing through some pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97072 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/98223] gcc.dg/analyzer/pr94851-1.c XPASSes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98223 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/98073] error: in can_merge_p, at analyzer/region-model.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98073 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/97072] -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak false positive when writing through some pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97072 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac3966e315ada63eb379d560a012fa77c3909155 commit r11-6497-gac3966e315ada63eb379d560a012fa77c3909155 Author: David Malcolm Date: Tu

[Bug analyzer/98073] error: in can_merge_p, at analyzer/region-model.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98073 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:23fc2be633c61f24a4fbd4096c669e7147ca44ae commit r11-6496-g23fc2be633c61f24a4fbd4096c669e7147ca44ae Author: David Malcolm Date: Tu

[Bug analyzer/98223] gcc.dg/analyzer/pr94851-1.c XPASSes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98223 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df1eba3ceada6e8990c00ccfa6c5a2c9b1c13334 commit r11-6495-gdf1eba3ceada6e8990c00ccfa6c5a2c9b1c13334 Author: David Malcolm Date: Tu

[Bug c++/98441] [11 Regression] member function pointer incorrectly parsed as having trailing return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98441 --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek --- Looks like a simple thinko: --- a/gcc/cp/decl.c +++ b/gcc/cp/decl.c @@ -12241,9 +12241,11 @@ grokdeclarator (const cp_declarator *declarator, tree late_return_type = declarator->u.function.late_retur

[Bug middle-end/98553] New: missing warning on strncmp reading past the end of a zero size member array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98553 Bug ID: 98553 Summary: missing warning on strncmp reading past the end of a zero size member array Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug fortran/98517] gfortran segfault on character array initialization from parameter value since r8-5900-g266404a8d62b99ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98517 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 09:19:51PM +, emr-gnu at hev dot psu.edu wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98517 > > --- Comment #3 from Eric Reischer --- > Confirm the attached patch resolves

[Bug c++/98551] [10/11 Regression] ICE in replace_result_decl, at cp/constexpr.c:2150

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98551 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/98552] Make more use of __builtin_undefined for assuring that variables do not change

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98552 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |11.0 Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/98552] New: Make more use of __builtin_undefined for assuring that variables do not change

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98552 Bug ID: 98552 Summary: Make more use of __builtin_undefined for assuring that variables do not change Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug c++/98551] New: [11 Regression] ICE in replace_result_decl, at cp/constexpr.c:2150

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98551 Bug ID: 98551 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in replace_result_decl, at cp/constexpr.c:2150 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/98519] rs6000: @pcrel unsupported on this instruction error in pveclib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98519 --- Comment #15 from Michael Meissner --- FWIW, the hook that will need to be modified is rs6000_md_asm_adjust in rs6000.c. It appears you are passed the outputs, the inputs, the constraints, and the clobbers. Right now, we just mark the CA reg

[Bug go/98510] [11 Regression] bootstrap broken in libgo on sparc64-linux-gnu, building the 32bit multilib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98510 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/98493] [11 regression] bootstrap build fails in go part of build after r11-6371

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98493 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Bug go/98510] [11 Regression] bootstrap broken in libgo on sparc64-linux-gnu, building the 32bit multilib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98510 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f47c00cf95d7dbbe7147c61a4a6bc20921c3da2c commit r11-6489-gf47c00cf95d7dbbe7147c61a4a6bc20921c3da2c Author: Ian Lance Taylor Date

[Bug bootstrap/98493] [11 regression] bootstrap build fails in go part of build after r11-6371

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98493 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a9f76d03bbc791cb55e4e0658f23efd0103ea9b0 commit r11-6488-ga9f76d03bbc791cb55e4e0658f23efd0103ea9b0 Author: Ian Lance Taylor Date

[Bug fortran/89661] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_61.f90 -O (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89661 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/82099] internal compiler error: in type_throw_all_p, at cp/except.c:1186 when using a function pointer for templated predicate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82099 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/96675] [10 Regression] tautological-compare warning emitted for NTTP bitwise comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96675 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/96742] [10 Regression] "warning: comparison of unsigned expression in ‘< 0’ is always false" with dependent values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96742 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/97975] [8/9 Regression] ICE unexpected expression '(int)A< >::b' of kind implicit_conv_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97975 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE |[8/9 Regression] ICE |

[Bug c++/98043] [8/9 Regression] ICE ‘verify_gimple’ failed since r5-3726-g083e891e69429f93b958f6c18e2d52f515bae572

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98043 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE |[8/9 Regression] ICE |

[Bug c++/98103] [10 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'integer_cst' in cxx_eval_dynamic_cast_fn, at cp/constexpr.c:2003

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98103 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/97427] constexpr destructor for const object incorrectly rejected as modifying const object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97427 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/82099] internal compiler error: in type_throw_all_p, at cp/except.c:1186 when using a function pointer for templated predicate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82099 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff22b4e8d0613170601d28eec9462ea31147c7c7 commit r10-9209-gff22b4e8d0613170601d28eec9462ea31147c7c7 Author: Marek Polacek

[Bug c++/96675] [10 Regression] tautological-compare warning emitted for NTTP bitwise comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96675 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6fd09a6e8bcadaa69e1fdca09263990cc1c5245f commit r10-9208-g6fd09a6e8bcadaa69e1fdca09263990cc1c5245f Author: Marek Polacek D

[Bug c++/96742] [10 Regression] "warning: comparison of unsigned expression in ‘< 0’ is always false" with dependent values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96742 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6fd09a6e8bcadaa69e1fdca09263990cc1c5245f commit r10-9208-g6fd09a6e8bcadaa69e1fdca09263990cc1c5245f Author: Marek Polacek

[Bug c++/97975] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE unexpected expression '(int)A< >::b' of kind implicit_conv_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97975 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0684e49ee8d859fc527b22ed206930371a3 commit r10-9207-gd0684e49ee8d859fc527b22ed206930371a3 Author: Marek Polacek D

[Bug c++/98043] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE ‘verify_gimple’ failed since r5-3726-g083e891e69429f93b958f6c18e2d52f515bae572

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98043 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:48aa64322e824d674b955459ea3816f3047629a3 commit r10-9206-g48aa64322e824d674b955459ea3816f3047629a3 Author: Marek Polacek

[Bug c++/98103] [10 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'integer_cst' in cxx_eval_dynamic_cast_fn, at cp/constexpr.c:2003

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98103 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a38b0c6d62d90a5a30cbd00d32e7b58ee1a21b78 commit r10-9205-ga38b0c6d62d90a5a30cbd00d32e7b58ee1a21b78 Author: Marek Polacek D

[Bug c++/97427] constexpr destructor for const object incorrectly rejected as modifying const object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97427 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a8a0d38b128d36a0cf1ac6a7879307b937418ee commit r10-9204-g4a8a0d38b128d36a0cf1ac6a7879307b937418ee Author: Marek Polacek D

[Bug libfortran/98507] timezone is incorrect on last day of year for "TZ" hours

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98507 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|fortran |libfortran --- Comment #1 fro

[Bug target/98550] New: [11 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2219 on s390x-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98550 Bug ID: 98550 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2219 on s390x-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/98517] gfortran segfault on character array initialization from parameter value since r8-5900-g266404a8d62b99ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98517 --- Comment #3 from Eric Reischer --- Confirm the attached patch resolves the crash. I have not checked, however, if the generated code is correct.

[Bug target/98549] New: [11 Regression] ICE in rs6000_emit_le_vsx_store, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:9938 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98549 Bug ID: 98549 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in rs6000_emit_le_vsx_store, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:9938 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug middle-end/98548] New: missing warning on strcmp with a nonstring member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98548 Bug ID: 98548 Summary: missing warning on strcmp with a nonstring member Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug bootstrap/98506] ../../gcc/libcody/resolver.cc:178:43: error: 'O_CLOEXEC' was not declared in thi s scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98506 --- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell --- Your patch is fine, if you'd like to apply it. I'd not noticed it go by :(

[Bug target/98519] rs6000: @pcrel unsupported on this instruction error in pveclib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98519 --- Comment #14 from Bill Schmidt --- I agree, Peter.

[Bug fortran/78746] charlen_03, charlen_10 ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|u

[Bug c++/98547] GCC spends many minutes instead of seconds building a file with array initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98547 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Se

[Bug c++/98547] New: GCC spends many minutes instead of seconds building a file with array initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98547 Bug ID: 98547 Summary: GCC spends many minutes instead of seconds building a file with array initialization Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug testsuite/98225] gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp ltrans_args tests FAIL

ake check-gcc-c RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/-v/-Wl,-v outputs.exp" I've just run the corresponding xgcc invocation manually. > you should see where the collect-ld is invoked: > > collect2 version 11.0.0 20210105 (experimental)^M > /home/ed/gnu/gcc-build/gcc/collect-ld

[Bug tree-optimization/98535] [11 Regression] ICE in operands_scanner::get_expr_operands(tree_node**, int) building 538.imagick_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug other/98533] [11 Regression] ICE: 'verify_type' failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98533 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Sta

[Bug c/98536] warning with -Wvla-parameter for unspecified bound getting specified later

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98536 --- Comment #2 from Martin Uecker --- The whole point of '*' is to have a way to not specify the bound. It is a very explicit way of saying that I can't (or don't want) to specify the bound. In contrast of not specifying anything, i.e. [], whic

[Bug fortran/98517] gfortran segfault on character array initialization from parameter value since r8-5900-g266404a8d62b99ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98517 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/98517] gfortran segfault on character array initialization from parameter value since r8-5900-g266404a8d62b99ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98517 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c index 249f402b8d9..da8e3b63249 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c @@ -12437,7 +12437,8 @@ resolve_charlen (gfc_

[Bug c++/98545] [11 Regression] ICE in write_expression, at cp/mangle.c:3352

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98545 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-01-05 CC|

[Bug middle-end/98508] Sanitizer disable -Wall and -Wextra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98508 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- There's no need to change the fn spec. The simple (and safe) solution to this request is to check calls to see if they're to IFN_ASAN_MARK, like this: diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-uninit.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-uninit

[Bug c++/98546] New: long compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98546 Bug ID: 98546 Summary: long compilation Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassi

[Bug testsuite/98225] gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp ltrans_args tests FAIL

should see where the collect-ld is invoked: collect2 version 11.0.0 20210105 (experimental)^M /home/ed/gnu/gcc-build/gcc/collect-ld @outputs.ld1_args^M GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.35.1^M The arguments are in a response-file: @outputs.ld1_args maybe that looks different for you?

[Bug testsuite/98225] gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp ltrans_args tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98225 --- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger --- > It is interesting that some tests are reported failing > on the x86_64-pc-linux-gnu platform that I also use. Right: it's not the platform per

[Bug tree-optimization/98544] [11 regression] Wrong code generated by tree vectorizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98544 --- Comment #1 from Martin Reinecke --- Problem seems to be related to the use of __restrict__. If I remove the DUCC0_RESTRICT from the function definitions of "radb3", "radb4" etc., the problem goes away. However I don't see where I'm violatin

[Bug c++/98545] New: [11 Regression] ICE in write_expression, at cp/mangle.c:3352

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98545 Bug ID: 98545 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in write_expression, at cp/mangle.c:3352 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug testsuite/98225] gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp ltrans_args tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98225 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0) > * Despite -save-temps, the lto-wrapper input objects are removed at the end, > so I cannot manually rerun lto-wrapper to investigate. You could modify gcc/test

[Bug target/98495] X86 _mm_extract_pi16 incorrectly sign extends result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98495 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6dd35cf9300ae482038c26655b3cee3e72cefb1 commit r11-6484-gf6dd35cf9300ae482038c26655b3cee3e72cefb1 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Tue Jan 5 10:5

[Bug testsuite/98225] gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp ltrans_args tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98225 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger --- It is interesting that some tests are reported failing on the x86_64-pc-linux-gnu platform that I also use. I really wonder what prevents these failures for me. Could you say if there the outputs.exp test

[Bug middle-end/98508] Sanitizer disable -Wall and -Wextra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98508 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- It is not simple at all. While the ifns don't modify the references variable, they do modify the corresponding shadow memory, which is something GCC aliasing oracle doesn't track at all, so by supplying deta

[Bug tree-optimization/98535] [11 Regression] ICE in operands_scanner::get_expr_operands(tree_node**, int) building 538.imagick_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/98544] New: [11 regression] Wrong code generated by tree vectorizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98544 Bug ID: 98544 Summary: [11 regression] Wrong code generated by tree vectorizer Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug middle-end/98508] Sanitizer disable -Wall and -Wextra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98508 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/98515] [11 Regression] Possible regression causing "is protected within this context" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98515 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/98543] New: fails to diagnose unnecessary functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98543 Bug ID: 98543 Summary: fails to diagnose unnecessary functions Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug testsuite/98225] gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp ltrans_args tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98225 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger --- > Unfortunately I cannot reproduce. > > I configured like this: > ../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/home/ed/gnu/install --enable-languages=all > >

[Bug testsuite/98225] gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp ltrans_args tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98225 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger --- Unfortunately I cannot reproduce. I configured like this: ../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/home/ed/gnu/install --enable-languages=all and use GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.35.1

[Bug middle-end/19987] [meta-bug] fold missing optimizations in general

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987 Bug 19987 depends on bug 94802, which changed state. Bug 94802 Summary: Failure to recognize identities with __builtin_clz https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94802 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/94802] Failure to recognize identities with __builtin_clz

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94802 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/94802] Failure to recognize identities with __builtin_clz

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94802 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5de7bf5bc98ec9edc6838a443521204d0eca7605 commit r11-6482-g5de7bf5bc98ec9edc6838a443521204d0eca7605 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug c/98536] warning with -Wvla-parameter for unspecified bound getting specified later

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98536 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/98516] [11 Regression] Wrong code generated by tree vectorizer since r11-3823-g126ed72b9f48f853

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98516 --- Comment #9 from Martin Reinecke --- Thanks, this fixes the reduced test case for me as well! Unfortunately there seems to be more where this one came from, since my comprehensive test suite still fails ... I'll try to produce test cases and

[Bug c/98539] incorrect warning with -Wvla-parameter for unspecified bound in multi-dim array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98539 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- *** Bug 98091 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/98091] unspecified VLA bound formatted as [0] instead of [*] in -Wvla-parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98091 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/98539] incorrect warning with -Wvla-parameter for unspecified bound in multi-dim array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98539 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/98519] rs6000: @pcrel unsupported on this instruction error in pveclib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98519 --- Comment #13 from Peter Bergner --- We are talking inline asm here, correct? If so, the user is fully in charge of using the correct mnemonic. It just seems to me that "m" should always mean non pc-relative addresses for all the existing inl

[Bug c/98503] [11 regression] -Warray-bounds false positive with global variables at -O2 since r11-3306-g3f9a497d1b0dd9da

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503 --- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor --- The main purpose of the "partly outside" warning is to detect reads/writes that cross the trailing array boundary. Those typically come up when a "typeless" buffer (either char array or one allocated by a fu

[Bug c++/98501] potential optimization for base<->derived pointer casts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98501 --- Comment #2 from Ivan Sorokin --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > I think there's a duplicate of this PR. I searched the list of bugs and I found PR95663. Is it it?

[Bug tree-optimization/98535] [11 Regression] ICE in operands_scanner::get_expr_operands(tree_node**, int) building 538.imagick_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535 --- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- This backtrace started with my commit 64432b680eab0bddbe9a4ad4798457cf6a14ad60 but before this it still ICEd with: foo.c: In function 'i': foo.c:12:1: error: type mismatch in 'vec_perm_expr' 1

[Bug c/63944] [DR413] Partial overriding of nonconstant struct/union initializers with designated initializers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63944 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/64918] invalid (?) warning when initializing structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64918 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/65455] typeof _Atomic fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65455 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/91465] [9 Regression] unexpected expression of kind overload (ICE)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91465 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/91678] [9 Regression] decltype returns wrong type under certain conditions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91678 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

  1   2   3   >