[Bug tree-optimization/98443] New: Failure to optimize out vector operations into a constant when possible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98443 Bug ID: 98443 Summary: Failure to optimize out vector operations into a constant when possible Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/91648] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in generate_finalization_wrapper, at fortran/class.c:2009

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91648 Ev Drikos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||drikosev at gmail dot com --- Comment #5 fro

[Bug target/97417] RISC-V Unnecessary andi instruction when loading volatile bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97417 --- Comment #58 from Kito Cheng --- Hi jiawei: I would suggest you just using inst count rather than cycle or time for measuring benchmark if you using qemu, since qemu is functional simulator not cycle accurate neither nearly-cycle accurate sim

[Bug target/92658] x86 lacks vector extend / truncate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92658 --- Comment #21 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #14) > The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6e40195ec3d3b402a5f6c58dbf359479bc4cbfa > > commit r11-485-gf6e40195ec3d3b402a5f6c5

[Bug target/98442] New: [X86] suboptimal for memset with CLEAR_BY_PIECES

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98442 Bug ID: 98442 Summary: [X86] suboptimal for memset with CLEAR_BY_PIECES Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: t

[Bug c++/98441] member function pointer incorrectly parsed as having trailing return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98441 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Santos --- Also, I build gcc with: -O42 -ffast-math -ffuzzy-dice -felide-function-bodies -pipe-clogged but that shouldn't make a difference.

[Bug c++/98441] New: member function pointer incorrectly parsed as having trailing return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98441 Bug ID: 98441 Summary: member function pointer incorrectly parsed as having trailing return type Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug c++/98436] issue with casting member function on linux32 bit only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98436 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/98433] double free detected in tcache 2, after merge of structures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98433 --- Comment #7 from Lionel GUEZ --- (In reply to kargl from comment #6) > Point being that quoting some third-party > interpretation of what one version of the Fortran standard > says is of limited value. OK. I am learning here. I thought thos

[Bug c/98431] Gcc crashes with segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98431 --- Comment #7 from Farshid Shadpey --- something went wrong i cut and paste between different computers, remote session, etc. The output below should be the correct file, plesae ignore the previous ones. Thanks Farshid # gcc -c -m64 -fPIC

[Bug c/98431] Gcc crashes with segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98431 --- Comment #6 from Farshid Shadpey --- Created attachment 49842 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49842&action=edit preprocessed file zipped

[Bug c++/98440] New: Accepts ill-formed reinterpret_cast(1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98440 Bug ID: 98440 Summary: Accepts ill-formed reinterpret_cast(1) Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: accepts-invalid Severity: normal Priori

[Bug fortran/98433] double free detected in tcache 2, after merge of structures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98433 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- > @Steve: that's pretty basic F2003 stuff, almost TR15581... Yes, I know. Point being that quoting some third-party interpretation of what one version of the Fortran standard says is of limited

[Bug c/98418] Valid integer constant expressions based on expressions that trigger -Wshift-overflow are treated as non-constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98418 pskocik at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug c/98418] Valid integer constant expressions based on expressions that trigger -Wshift-overflow are treated as non-constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98418 --- Comment #2 from pskocik at gmail dot com --- You're right. The bug was in my code. struct foo { unsigned bit: (0xll<<40)!=0; }; is indeed UB due to http://port70.net/~nsz/c/c11/n1570.html#6.5.7p4, but struct foo { unsigned bit: (0xf

[Bug c/98431] Gcc crashes with segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98431 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug target/98439] New: [11 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at final.c:3096

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98439 Bug ID: 98439 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at final.c:3096 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug rtl-optimization/97421] aarch64: Wrong code with -O2 -fmodulo-sched

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97421 Roman Zhuykov changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/97421] aarch64: Wrong code with -O2 -fmodulo-sched

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97421 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Roman Zhuykov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0963fa93dcc47d290d1597ff88ff162f5bdd1b13 commit r10-9171-g0963fa93dcc47d290d1597ff88ff162f5bdd1b13 Author: Roman Zhuykov

[Bug rtl-optimization/97421] aarch64: Wrong code with -O2 -fmodulo-sched

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97421 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Roman Zhuykov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2435878321b053aebb2e2a886465662199542875 commit r9-9129-g2435878321b053aebb2e2a886465662199542875 Author: Roman Zhuykov Da

[Bug rtl-optimization/97421] aarch64: Wrong code with -O2 -fmodulo-sched

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97421 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Roman Zhuykov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2850df4edce86b13d503e5bf636a874fb21198fc commit r8-10694-g2850df4edce86b13d503e5bf636a874fb21198fc Author: Roman Zhuykov D

[Bug c++/56389] Return types differs in block scope function declarations and function implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56389 Gabriel Ravier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gabravier at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/98438] New: Rather bad optimization of midpoint implementation for __int128 (and other types)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98438 Bug ID: 98438 Summary: Rather bad optimization of midpoint implementation for __int128 (and other types) Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug c++/98436] issue with casting member function on linux32 bit only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98436 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Samuel Benjamin from comment #4) > I got your point, But why is this working with 64bit and other gcc versions > other than 7.4.0 - 32 bit ? Undefined behaviour means anything can happen, incl

[Bug c++/98436] issue with casting member function on linux32 bit only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98436 Samuel Benjamin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug c++/98436] issue with casting member function on linux32 bit only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98436 --- Comment #4 from Samuel Benjamin --- I got your point, But why is this working with 64bit and other gcc versions other than 7.4.0 - 32 bit ?

[Bug fortran/98433] double free detected in tcache 2, after merge of structures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98433 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug other/98437] New: confusing wording in the description of option -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98437 Bug ID: 98437 Summary: confusing wording in the description of option -fsanitize=address Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/98436] issue with casting member function on linux32 bit only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98436 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/92065] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92065 --- Comment #23 from Ev Drikos --- Created attachment 49841 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49841&action=edit Test Cases Only Hello, I'm wondering whether a quick and dirty hack that would keep derived type data per class a

[Bug c++/98436] issue with casting member function on linux32 bit only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98436 Samuel Benjamin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug c++/98436] issue with casting member function on linux32 bit only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98436 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/98436] New: issue with casting member function on linux32 bit only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98436 Bug ID: 98436 Summary: issue with casting member function on linux32 bit only Product: gcc Version: 7.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo