[Bug bootstrap/98318] libcody breaks DragonFly bootstrap

2020-12-16 Thread rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98318 --- Comment #2 from Rimvydas (RJ) --- With configure fixed in g:6d972f5183d8d476cfb008b85e224aa9b90e628d only missing header issue remains in netclient.cc and netserver.cc: g++ -std=c++11 -g -fno-enforce-eh-specs -fno-stack-protector -fno-thread

[Bug tree-optimization/98339] New: GCC could not vectorize loop with conditional reduced add and store

2020-12-16 Thread wwwhhhyyy333 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98339 Bug ID: 98339 Summary: GCC could not vectorize loop with conditional reduced add and store Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optim

[Bug middle-end/93644] [10/11 Regression] spurious -Wreturn-local-addr with PHI of PHI

2020-12-16 Thread noloader at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93644 --- Comment #13 from Jeffrey Walton --- On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 9:05 PM eggert at cs dot ucla.edu wrote: > ... > (B) there's no way to shut off the false alarm, not even with '# pragma GCC > diagnostic ignored "-Wreturn-local-addr"'. https://gc

[Bug c/94722] implement __attribute__((no_stack_protector)) function attribute

2020-12-16 Thread i at maskray dot me via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94722 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i at maskray dot me --- Comment #7 from F

[Bug middle-end/93195] -fpatchable-function-entries : __patchable_function_entries should consider comdat groups

2020-12-16 Thread i at maskray dot me via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93195 --- Comment #10 from Fangrui Song --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > I believe this broke building the kernel, see > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-December/561974.html > for details. For > ld: .init.data has both

[Bug tree-optimization/88767] 'unroll and jam' not optimizing some loops

2020-12-16 Thread guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88767 --- Comment #13 from Jiu Fu Guo --- Hi Richard, As checking the changed code as in comment 9, it seems there is another opportunity to improve the performance: By improving locality of array A usage. Unroll and jam loop1 into loop4 (or unroll

[Bug c++/98305] spurious -Wmismatched-new-delete on template instance

2020-12-16 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98305 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Incomprehensible|spurious |-Wmismatched-

[Bug middle-end/93644] [10/11 Regression] spurious -Wreturn-local-addr with PHI of PHI

2020-12-16 Thread eggert at cs dot ucla.edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93644 --- Comment #12 from eggert at cs dot ucla.edu --- There are really two bugs here: (A) GCC emits the false alarm. (B) there's no way to shut off the false alarm, not even with '# pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wreturn-local-addr"'. Although th

[Bug middle-end/93644] [10/11 Regression] spurious -Wreturn-local-addr with PHI of PHI

2020-12-16 Thread eggert at cs dot ucla.edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93644 --- Comment #11 from eggert at cs dot ucla.edu --- Created attachment 49783 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49783&action=edit another instance of a -Wreturn-local-addr false alarm I ran into a different instance of the bug to

[Bug bootstrap/98338] [11 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure on x86_64-linux

2020-12-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98338 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 49782 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49782&action=edit range-op.gcda

[Bug bootstrap/98338] [11 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure on x86_64-linux

2020-12-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98338 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 49781 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49781&action=edit range-op.ii.xz

[Bug bootstrap/98338] New: [11 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure on x86_64-linux

2020-12-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98338 Bug ID: 98338 Summary: [11 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure on x86_64-linux Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug bootstrap/98323] current trunk won't build with clang

2020-12-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- See also http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2396.htm#dr_496

[Bug bootstrap/98323] current trunk won't build with clang

2020-12-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug tree-optimization/97750] [11 Regression] ICE in during GIMPLE pass: wrestrict since r11-4135-ge864d395b4e862ce

2020-12-16 Thread amacleod at redhat dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97750 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Macleod --- The op1-range expression solving for the RHS of a cast of the form low_precision_var = (low_precision) high_precision_var doesnt support pointers properly. It fills in possible bit/ranges in high_precisio

[Bug bootstrap/98323] current trunk won't build with clang

2020-12-16 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/98108] Broken Schwarz counter for iostreams initialization

2020-12-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98108 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- Right, this actually has nothing to do with threads. The behaviour is exactly the same as if file1.cc contained this instead: void threadfunc(); struct StaticThread { StaticThread() { threadf

[Bug target/89581] Unneeded stack alignment on windows x86

2020-12-16 Thread gabravier at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89581 Gabriel Ravier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gabravier at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/98047] assignment does not drop qualifier as observed by typeof

2020-12-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98047 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58a45ce44a9acf3d15fada265d2a391a8e1bc960 commit r11-6165-g58a45ce44a9acf3d15fada265d2a391a8e1bc960 Author: Martin Uecker Date: We

[Bug c/98260] volatile triggers incorrect warning "set but not used"

2020-12-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98260 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec13758ed41936bf803640f0dd8c259c034fe4b9 commit r11-6164-gec13758ed41936bf803640f0dd8c259c034fe4b9 Author: Martin Uecker Date: We

[Bug tree-optimization/98337] New: Failure to optimize out on-stack array construction when unneeded

2020-12-16 Thread gabravier at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98337 Bug ID: 98337 Summary: Failure to optimize out on-stack array construction when unneeded Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/98336] New: [OOP] CLASS assignment to derived-type component does not use __copy/allocate

2020-12-16 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98336 Bug ID: 98336 Summary: [OOP] CLASS assignment to derived-type component does not use __copy/allocate Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wr

[Bug rtl-optimization/98335] New: [9/10/11 Regression] Poor code generation for partial struct initialization

2020-12-16 Thread mcolavita at fb dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98335 Bug ID: 98335 Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] Poor code generation for partial struct initialization Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug bootstrap/98300] GCC 11 failed to build on Windows 10. I guess the new module completely breaks this.

2020-12-16 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98300 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/98297] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_elaborated_type_specifier, at cp/parser.c:19653

2020-12-16 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98297 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/98307] Dependency check fails when using "allocatable" instead of "pointer" (forall_3.f90)

2020-12-16 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98307 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.

[Bug target/92729] [avr] Convert the backend to MODE_CC so it can be kept in future releases

2020-12-16 Thread abebeos at lazaridis dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729 --- Comment #47 from abebeos at lazaridis dot com --- Relevant news: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-December/562114.html

[Bug fortran/98307] Dependency check fails when using "allocatable" instead of "pointer" (forall_3.f90)

2020-12-16 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98307 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'm regtesting the following patch candidate: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c index adc6b8fefb5..e35b2f9ed34 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c +++ b/gcc/fortra

[Bug fortran/98307] use "allocatable" instead of "pointer" (forall_3.f90)

2020-12-16 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98307 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/98323] current trunk won't build with clang

2020-12-16 Thread nathan at acm dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323 --- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell --- On 12/16/20 12:45 PM, dcb314 at hotmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323 > > --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- > (In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #2) >> stu

[Bug testsuite/98280] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-logical-ors-char.c fails after t11-5958 with assembler output differences

2020-12-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98280 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Edelsohn : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cdb1c276560b26a9c3bc837340669962ef1b430a commit r11-6159-gcdb1c276560b26a9c3bc837340669962ef1b430a Author: David Edelsohn Date:

[Bug bootstrap/98324] [11 Regression] bootstrap broken with a LTO build configured with --enable-default-pie

2020-12-16 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98324 --- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell --- need to copy some more libcpp configurey bits ...

[Bug c++/98297] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_elaborated_type_specifier, at cp/parser.c:19653

2020-12-16 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98297 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- Fixed trunk, 8d8bb85b486 2020-12-16 | c++: Fix template parm ICE [PR 98297] backports to 10, 9, & 8 in progress

[Bug other/98328] [11 Regression] "make install-strip" failed by r11-6081

2020-12-16 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98328 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/98315] [11 regression] libcody breaks Solaris bootstrap

2020-12-16 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98315 --- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell --- sorry for not getting this right sooner: b7b6879f0b5: c++: Another solaris header use [PR 98315]

[Bug c++/98315] [11 regression] libcody breaks Solaris bootstrap

2020-12-16 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98315 --- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell --- gah! there was me thinking the only networking thing in cp is mapper-client.cc. (It's the only thing that cares about networking. That mapper-resolver.cc needed a tweak should have clued me in

[Bug target/98302] [11 Regression] Wrong code on aarch64

2020-12-16 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98302 --- Comment #11 from Martin Liška --- > which is miscompiled at -O2 -ftree-vectorize or -O3. What a great reduction, can you please share knowledge how did you achieve that?!

[Bug tree-optimization/98334] New: Failure to optimally optimize add loop to mul

2020-12-16 Thread gabravier at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98334 Bug ID: 98334 Summary: Failure to optimally optimize add loop to mul Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree

[Bug target/98210] [11 Regression] SHF_GNU_RETAIN breaks gold linker generated binaries

2020-12-16 Thread jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210 --- Comment #6 from Jozef Lawrynowicz --- I've posted a patch where the HAVE_GAS_SHF_GNU_RETAIN configure test has been extended to check for SHF_GNU_RETAIN gold support: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-December/562100.html

[Bug c++/98333] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in check_qualified_type, at tree.c:6593

2020-12-16 Thread gscfq--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98333 Bug ID: 98333 Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in check_qualified_type, at tree.c:6593 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/98332] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in unshare_constructor, at cp/constexpr.c:1527

2020-12-16 Thread gscfq--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98332 Bug ID: 98332 Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in unshare_constructor, at cp/constexpr.c:1527 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/98331] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in haifa_luid_for_non_insn, at haifa-sched.c:7845

2020-12-16 Thread gscfq--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98331 Bug ID: 98331 Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in haifa_luid_for_non_insn, at haifa-sched.c:7845 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug c++/98330] New: [11 Regression] ICE in compute_parm_map, at ipa-modref.c:2900

2020-12-16 Thread gscfq--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98330 Bug ID: 98330 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in compute_parm_map, at ipa-modref.c:2900 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c++/98329] New: [11 Regression] ICE in cp_build_bit_cast, at cp/semantics.c:10730

2020-12-16 Thread gscfq--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98329 Bug ID: 98329 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in cp_build_bit_cast, at cp/semantics.c:10730 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/98305] Incomprehensible -Wmismatched-new-delete warning

2020-12-16 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98305 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/98328] [11 Regression] "make install-strip" failed

2020-12-16 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98328 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-12-16 Target Milestone|---

[Bug other/98328] New: [11 Regression] "make install-strip" failed

2020-12-16 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98328 Bug ID: 98328 Summary: [11 Regression] "make install-strip" failed Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug c++/98305] Incomprehensible -Wmismatched-new-delete warning

2020-12-16 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98305 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug c++/98327] C++ Module ICE on Linux

2020-12-16 Thread euloanty at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98327 fdlbxtqi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c++/98327] New: C++ Module ICE on Linux

2020-12-16 Thread euloanty at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98327 Bug ID: 98327 Summary: C++ Module ICE on Linux Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: un

[Bug c++/98326] New: ICE: in create_tmp_var, at gimple-expr.c:482, converting stateless generic-lambda to function pointer

2020-12-16 Thread leni536 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98326 Bug ID: 98326 Summary: ICE: in create_tmp_var, at gimple-expr.c:482, converting stateless generic-lambda to function pointer Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0

[Bug middle-end/95757] [11 regression] missing warning in gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-25.c since r11-1517

2020-12-16 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95757 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Still seeing this on powerpc64, too. g:8379916b167de9bebc32401526b6f53d06dca349, r11-6152 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-25.c" FAIL: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-25

[Bug bootstrap/98324] [11 Regression] bootstrap broken with a LTO build configured with --enable-default-pie

2020-12-16 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98324 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/98315] [11 regression] libcody breaks Solaris bootstrap

2020-12-16 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98315 --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- [...] >> Unfortunately not: there are still two instances of the problem: > > There is another path to get to a poisoned bcopy. Fixed thusly. >

[Bug c++/98322] optimizes to false instead true

2020-12-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98322 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jeline

[Bug bootstrap/98323] current trunk won't build with clang

2020-12-16 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/98322] optimizes to false instead true

2020-12-16 Thread sucicf1 at outlook dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98322 Ivan Sučić changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Ivan Sučić --- S

[Bug bootstrap/98323] current trunk won't build with clang

2020-12-16 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #2) > stupid underspecified offsetof I did try commenting out the offending block of code and a re-build and got further errors ;-< I don't know if you have access

[Bug c++/98315] [11 regression] libcody breaks Solaris bootstrap

2020-12-16 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98315 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell --- Another fix: 269e82d49e2

[Bug libstdc++/98108] Broken Schwarz counter for iostreams initialization

2020-12-16 Thread i.hamsa at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98108 --- Comment #8 from i.hamsa at gmail dot com --- After re-reading the relevant parts of the standard, I have convinced myself that the program is indeed not required to work unless is included, even in a single-threaded version. Even though the s

[Bug c++/98322] optimizes to false instead true

2020-12-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98322 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/98315] [11 regression] libcody breaks Solaris bootstrap

2020-12-16 Thread nathan at acm dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98315 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- On 12/16/20 12:26 PM, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98315 > > --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- >> ---

[Bug testsuite/98325] New: [11 regression] gcc.dg/pr25376.c fails after r11-5027

2020-12-16 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98325 Bug ID: 98325 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/pr25376.c fails after r11-5027 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug bootstrap/98323] current trunk won't build with clang

2020-12-16 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug bootstrap/98324] New: [11 Regression] bootstrap broken with a LTO build configured with --enable-default-pie

2020-12-16 Thread doko at debian dot org via Gcc-bugs
-checking=yes,extra,rtl --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean /packages/gcc/11/gcc-11-11-20201216/build/./gcc/xg++ -B/packages/gcc/11/gcc-11-11-20201216/build/./gcc/ -nostdinc++ -nostdinc++ -I/packages/gcc/11/gcc-11-11-20201216/build/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/x86_64-linux-gnu

[Bug bootstrap/98323] current trunk won't build with clang

2020-12-16 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/98323] New: current trunk won't build with clang

2020-12-16 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323 Bug ID: 98323 Summary: current trunk won't build with clang Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug c++/98315] [11 regression] libcody breaks Solaris bootstrap

2020-12-16 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98315 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell --- > I think this is fixed by > 6ff747f023c 2020-12-16 | c++: Fix (some) solaris breakage > > please let me know Unfortunately not: there are stil

[Bug c++/98322] optimizes to false instead true

2020-12-16 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98322 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID CC|

[Bug c++/98322] New: optimizes to false instead true

2020-12-16 Thread sucicf1 at outlook dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98322 Bug ID: 98322 Summary: optimizes to false instead true Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ As

[Bug target/98302] [11 Regression] Wrong code on aarch64

2020-12-16 Thread acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98302 --- Comment #10 from Alex Coplan --- Reduced to: int c = 1705; char a; long f = 50887638; unsigned long long *h(unsigned long long *k, unsigned long long *l) { return *k ? k : l; } void aa() {} int main() { long d = f; for (char g = 0; g <

[Bug ada/98228] [11 Regression] ICE: Assert_Failure atree.adb:931: Error detected at s-gearop.adb:382:34 [a-ngrear.adb:313:7 [a-nllrar.ads:18:1]] on s390x-linux-gnu

2020-12-16 Thread mhillen at linux dot ibm.com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98228 Marius Hillenbrand changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mhillen at linux dot ibm.com --- Co

[Bug fortran/98284] ICE in get_array_index

2020-12-16 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98284 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Assignee|u

[Bug fortran/98284] ICE in get_array_index

2020-12-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98284 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5098d35fb1997aa6fd6d7e37d0fd4501a5fe2f9d commit r11-6149-g5098d35fb1997aa6fd6d7e37d0fd4501a5fe2f9d Author: Harald Anlauf Date: We

[Bug ada/98312] [11 Regression] Broken Ada bootstrap

2020-12-16 Thread pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98312 --- Comment #4 from pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org --- That’s a relief, thank you for the confirmation :)

[Bug target/98320] Parameter is malformed in the called function

2020-12-16 Thread schwab--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98320 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/98312] [11 Regression] Broken Ada bootstrap

2020-12-16 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98312 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Thank you for the fix, it works for me.

[Bug libstdc++/98108] Broken Schwarz counter for iostreams initialization

2020-12-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98108 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID --- Comment #7 from Jonathan W

[Bug ada/98312] [11 Regression] Broken Ada bootstrap

2020-12-16 Thread pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98312 pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pmderodat at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/98160] [11 Regression] ICE in default_tree_printer at gcc/tree-diagnostic.c:270 since r11-5732-gdce6c58db87ebf7f

2020-12-16 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98160 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4) > Fixed in r11-6028. Even the original test-case still ICEs after this revision. I'm testing r11-6147 right now.

[Bug tree-optimization/98160] [11 Regression] ICE in default_tree_printer at gcc/tree-diagnostic.c:270 since r11-5732-gdce6c58db87ebf7f

2020-12-16 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98160 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- New reduced test-case: $ cat 1.ii namespace xercesc_2_5 { class MemoryManager; class XMemory { void *operator new(unsigned long, MemoryManager *); }; class MemoryManager { public: virtual void *allocate()

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

2020-12-16 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 98160, which changed state. Bug 98160 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in default_tree_printer at gcc/tree-diagnostic.c:270 since r11-5732-gdce6c58db87ebf7f https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98160 What

[Bug tree-optimization/98160] [11 Regression] ICE in default_tree_printer at gcc/tree-diagnostic.c:270 since r11-5732-gdce6c58db87ebf7f

2020-12-16 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98160 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug target/98321] New: [nvptx] 'atom.add.f32' for atomic add of 32-bit 'float'

2020-12-16 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98321 Bug ID: 98321 Summary: [nvptx] 'atom.add.f32' for atomic add of 32-bit 'float' Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug libstdc++/96083] Clang can't compile : error: use of undeclared identifier '__builtin_sprintf'

2020-12-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96083 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:96d9670e88333d8896a5d2f2bb0403c1e2ad19ab commit r11-6146-g96d9670e88333d8896a5d2f2bb0403c1e2ad19ab Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug c++/98316] [11 regression] cc1plus doesn't link on Solaris 11.3

2020-12-16 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98316 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nathan at gcc dot gnu.org |ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/98315] [11 regression] libcody breaks Solaris bootstrap

2020-12-16 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98315 --- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell --- I think this is fixed by 6ff747f023c 2020-12-16 | c++: Fix (some) solaris breakage please let me know

[Bug c++/98316] [11 regression] cc1plus doesn't link on Solaris 11.3

2020-12-16 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98316 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- Looks good, and separating out cc1plus' libraries from other executables is goodness. do you want to take this bug?

[Bug c/98311] libcody configure checking problem

2020-12-16 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98311 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ada/98312] [11 Regression] Broken Ada bootstrap

2020-12-16 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98312 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED URL|

[Bug bootstrap/98314] [11 Regression] Install fails with "install -C"

2020-12-16 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98314 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug target/97141] [10/11 Regression] aarch64, SVE: ICE in decompose, at rtl.h (during expand) since r10-4676-g9c437a108a

2020-12-16 Thread acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97141 --- Comment #2 from Alex Coplan --- Adding -fno-tree-forwprop gives us an ICE in LRA instead: $ aarch64-elf-gcc -c pr97141.c -O3 -march=armv8.2-a+sve -fno-tree-forwprop during RTL pass: reload pr97141.c: In function 'g': pr97141.c:8:1: internal

[Bug c/98320] New: Parameter is malformed in the called function

2020-12-16 Thread ypn00vb at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98320 Bug ID: 98320 Summary: Parameter is malformed in the called function Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug libstdc++/98319] LFTS headers give errors if included as C++11 or C++98

2020-12-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98319 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed on trunk so far.

[Bug libstdc++/46447] std::atomic_flag slower than std::atomic_uchar

2020-12-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46447 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/93151] system_error header fails to compile with -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600

2020-12-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93151 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed on trunk so far.

[Bug target/98146] [11 Regression] section type conflict when "used" attribute is applied to decl with specific section

2020-12-16 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98146 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/98146] [11 Regression] section type conflict when "used" attribute is applied to decl with specific section

2020-12-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98146 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:151d1347c99acfcf0f5bcd8caac36dcc7353816d commit r11-6142-g151d1347c99acfcf0f5bcd8caac36dcc7353816d Author: H.J. Lu Date: Mon Dec 14 20:

[Bug target/98146] [11 Regression] section type conflict when "used" attribute is applied to decl with specific section

2020-12-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98146 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a976020603589e897fcfa3276590ef50b489d34 commit r11-6141-g2a976020603589e897fcfa3276590ef50b489d34 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu Dec 3 15:3

[Bug target/98146] [11 Regression] section type conflict when "used" attribute is applied to decl with specific section

2020-12-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98146 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6175383249143309fdc780a02bea484f4450def7 commit r11-6140-g6175383249143309fdc780a02bea484f4450def7 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu Dec 3 11:0

  1   2   >