https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22326
--- Comment #22 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-December/234474.html
So this issue seems invalid since "fabs(x)*y+zā or "fabs(x)+y+z"(x,y,z are
float) could result in -+Inf sometimes, while it won't getti
) 11.0.0 20201213 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
### Error
m_debuginfo/readpdb.c: In function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97694
--- Comment #5 from martin ---
Thanks a lot. The patch seems to work great. Tried it with the more complex
code from which the two failed tests were boiled down.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98261
--- Comment #3 from ć <570070308 at qq dot com> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> The bug reporting guidelines tell you to try -fsanitize=undefined before
> reporting a bug. That would have told you your code is wrong:
>
> A
> d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729
--- Comment #46 from abebeos at lazaridis dot com ---
This addresses the Bounty-Backers:
https://github.com/abebeos/avr-gnu/blob/master/doc/README.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98266
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-12-13
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98266
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98266
Bug ID: 98266
Summary: bogus array subscript is partly outside array bounds
on virtual inheritance
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98265
--- Comment #1 from Kartik Mohta ---
Created attachment 49755
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49755&action=edit
preprocessed file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98265
Bug ID: 98265
Summary: gcc-10 has significantly worse code generated with -O2
compared to -O1 (or gcc-9 -O2) when using the Eigen
C++ library
Product: gcc
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98217
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98263
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||89891
--- Comment #3 from Dominiq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98264
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tamar.christina at arm dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95372
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98264
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
Looks bad. Trying 501f470267445e03
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98264
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
10bbba9145700e2c won't build ;-<
git bisect skip says 3ed472af6bc9f83b7a8ac553b282f659a0bf53f7. Try that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98264
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
Seems ok. Trying 10bbba9145700e2c.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729
--- Comment #45 from abebeos at lazaridis dot com ---
(In reply to abebeos from comment #40)
> (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #39)
[...]
> I spend nearly a full-(over)-time month to achieve a result, fighting
> through incompl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92546
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
includes so std::boyer_moore_searcher can use
std::vector, but it doesn't need it at all. Using std::unique_ptr would do
fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98264
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Seems ok. Try 1751a78ecafb1d16d4a843dd22e739b8fd1cfede
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98261
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The bug reporting guidelines tell you to try -fsanitize=undefined before
reporting a bug. That would have told you your code is wrong:
A
d.C:26:14: runtime error: member call on address 0x7ffe71274e18 whic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98264
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Trying a git bisect now. First step hash
54f75d8fb3f54541e37432329581a362e6aab94e
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
For C testsuite file ./gcc.target/i386/avx-vaddsubpd-1.c
$ /home/dcb/gcc/results.20201213/bin/gcc -c -march=bdver2 -O3
./gcc.target/i386/avx-vaddsubpd-1.c
during GIMPLE pass: slp
In file included
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98263
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98263
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
bug 9337 => 93337
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93337
--- Comment #13 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #12)
> Could you open a new PR to simplify tracking?
Sure. # 98263
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98263
Bug ID: 98263
Summary: valgrind error in gfc_find_derived_vtab
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93337
--- Comment #12 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The valgrind invalid read is possibly an issue with error recovery when
handling
the assignment.
Modifying the testcase:
program p
type t
character(:), allocatable :: a
end type t
cla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98262
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Jager ---
Created attachment 49754
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49754&action=edit
Stderr when compiling with -O1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98262
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Jager ---
Created attachment 49753
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49753&action=edit
Stderr when compiling with -O0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98256
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98256
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49ec63666e086853401021e686f0aa4d285ce9dc
commit r11-5974-g49ec63666e086853401021e686f0aa4d285ce9dc
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98262
Bug ID: 98262
Summary: Internal compiler error when clobbering m68k frame
pointer in extended asm
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98261
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98261
Bug ID: 98261
Summary: Wrong optimize for virtual function
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729
abebeos at lazaridis dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chertykov at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92469
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d88e2cb54914cf8aa0ae68ca75dc45237acfcef0
commit r11-5972-gd88e2cb54914cf8aa0ae68ca75dc45237acfcef0
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98217
Martin Uecker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||muecker at gwdg dot de
--- Comment #7 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47781
David Crocker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcrocker at eschertech dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98260
Bug ID: 98260
Summary: volatile triggers incorrect warning "set but not used"
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97714
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93337
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Interesting, I made a valgrind version of gcc fortran.
> ...
My instrumented compiler gives
==67053==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x60400eee
at pc 0x00010007eafc bp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93337
--- Comment #10 from David Binderman ---
This valgrind problem has existed since sometime before 20201123.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98227
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98254
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'll check on Monday (if I find it).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93337
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
Hello
This is JoJo from WMResearch.
We recently published a new market research report:
< Global Automated DNARNA Extraction Equipment Market Research Report
2020-2026>and kindly let us know if you are interested in it.
If you are interested in getting more details or Sample report, please
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86551
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
48 matches
Mail list logo
