https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85315
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #10)
> OK, so whats the deal here. I can't really follow what the final request, or
> action is.
>
> Is there a conclusion on what needs to be done? if anything?
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92535
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka ---
With ODR name hashing fix and fix to streaming the access types we now get:
957 false returned: 'different references' in compare_symbol_references
at ../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:465
961 false returned: '
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97884
--- Comment #1 from s.baur...@tu-berlin.de ---
Created attachment 49584
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49584&action=edit
preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97884
Bug ID: 97884
Summary: INT_MIN falsely expanded to 64 bit
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97417
--- Comment #39 from Levy ---
Checked all pass from 250r.shorten_memrefs to 270r.ce2
In 269r.combine I saw the following combination merged the replaced address:
---
modifying insn i327: r9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97873
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85304
Nikhil changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nmahalle at in dot ibm.com
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97883
Bug ID: 97883
Summary: [C++20] Segmentation fault on template with
braced initializer list A<{}>
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97744
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029
--- Comment #5 from Bruno Haible ---
Nice! Thank you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93421
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e3e6c700f04fe6992b9077541e434172c1cbdae
commit r11-5114-g1e3e6c700f04fe6992b9077541e434172c1cbdae
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91191
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at redhat dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85316
Bug 85316 depends on bug 91029, which changed state.
Bug 91029 Summary: missed optimization regarding value of modulo operation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97882
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-17
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94936
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94936
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cbc9dab25fb807278d2e09ec3e89e466385c9fce
commit r9-9054-gcbc9dab25fb807278d2e09ec3e89e466385c9fce
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #12)
> config.sub and config.guess are imported, unmodified, from upstream
> config.git.
thanks I will try to do that and test it over the next days (I've be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
config.sub and config.guess are imported, unmodified, from upstream
config.git.
libtool has lots of local changes, hopefully all of them submitted
upstream but maybe not and maybe some no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e27e7a582a9b86bcf86f5c103cd947672746e97
commit r11-5111-g1e27e7a582a9b86bcf86f5c103cd947672746e97
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22326
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I agree that match.pd is a sensible place for this (and the front end is
not, we should be getting optimizations out of the front ends).
I'd encourage anyone looking at this also to look at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92535
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka ---
Created attachment 49582
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49582&action=edit
Memory use of GCC 10 release branch with ICF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97877
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97877
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e0da4aed176a8de042a8482beb65499e29448556
commit r11-5108-ge0da4aed176a8de042a8482beb65499e29448556
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 49581
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49581&action=edit
regenerated files
the second patch is all the regenerated files .. much larger :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97882
Bug ID: 97882
Summary: Segmentation Fault on improper redeclaration of
function
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97876
--- Comment #3 from Eric Niebler ---
It seems like GitHub actions uses the latest libstdc++ by default when testing
even with old (e.g., clang-4) toolsets. That seems busted, but regardless, this
is now breaking _all_ my Linux clang tests for any
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97870
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Possibly related to the asm goto enhancements.
This test should work only for x86-64. Running it on other targets can give
an error.
So error about inc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92535
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka ---
Here are main reason for miscompares:
1125 libxul.so.wpa.076i.icf: false returned: 'variables types are
different' in equals at ../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:1697
1171 libxul.so.wpa.076i.icf: false returned: 'DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97866
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Leoshkevich ---
I believe it's already fixed by:
commit 253c415a1acba50711c82693426391743ac18040
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
Date: Sun Nov 15 11:22:19 2020 -0500
Do not put reload insns in the last empty BB.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97866
--- Comment #2 from Ilya Leoshkevich ---
Never mind, I managed to reproduce it now:
ubuntu-focal-amd64$ git rev-parse --short HEAD
77f67db2a47
ubuntu-focal-amd64$ ../configure --target=s390x-linux-gnu --exec-prefix=/usr
--disable-bootstrap --di
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92535
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
Created attachment 49578
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49578&action=edit
Memory use of GCC trunk (11) without ICF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92535
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
Created attachment 49577
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49577&action=edit
Memory use of GCC trunk (11) with ICF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92535
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93083
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Short test from Bug 97751:
template
struct use_as_nttp {};
template
struct has_nttp {};
template
using has_nttp_2 = has_nttp;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93083
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janpmoeller at gmx dot de
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97751
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Reso
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97801
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97837
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97876
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Changing the _Stop_state_ref default constructor to:
_Stop_state_ref() noexcept {}
allows it to compile. It shouldn't be needed, but I suppose since the
constructor is already non-trivial (due to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97876
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It works fine in Clang 9.0.0 though. We've never really set a hard limit on how
many old versions of Clang we support, but given that 9 and 10 (and trunk)
work, I'm inclined to think that three versions see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97878
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97866
Ilya Leoshkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iii at linux dot ibm.com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86707
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97749
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 70489, which changed state.
Bug 70489 Summary: ICE in cxx_eval_increment_expression initializing a VLA in a
constexpr function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70489
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994
Bug 16994 depends on bug 70489, which changed state.
Bug 70489 Summary: ICE in cxx_eval_increment_expression initializing a VLA in a
constexpr function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70489
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70489
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85375
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97881
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96191
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ee527923b1ce92c6b16c587d072720a6c813c95
commit r8-10627-g3ee527923b1ce92c6b16c587d072720a6c813c95
Author: Richard Sand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97881
Bug ID: 97881
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in warn_about_ambiguous_parse, at
cp/parser.c:20800
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97877
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97878
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97877
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
We ICE because stmt's DECL_LANG_SPECIFIC is null:
965 /* Map block scope extern declarations to visible declarations with the
966 same name and type in outer scopes if any. */
967 if (VAR_OR_FUN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97880
Bug ID: 97880
Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in emit_library_call_value_1,
at calls.c:5298
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97879
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 from G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97877
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97879
Bug ID: 97879
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in from_mode_char, at
attribs.h:298
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85315
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97878
Bug ID: 97878
Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in
cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at
cp/constexpr.c:6825
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97877
Bug ID: 97877
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in cp_genericize_r, at
cp/cp-gimplify.c:968
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96835
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Weinzierl ---
Adding a default constructor to the vector class still does not allow us to
create the object on the target:
#include
#define mydt double
#pragma omp declare target
struct vector {
vector() {};
v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96835
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Weinzierl ---
We've found some more stuff. This works:
#include
#define mydt double
#pragma omp declare target
struct vector {
vector(mydt x, mydt y);
mydt dot(vector o);
mydt v[2];
};
vector::vector(mydt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97876
Bug ID: 97876
Summary: stop_token header doesn't compile on clang-8 with
-std=c++20
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83073
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97871
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83072
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Macleod ---
I've adjusted range-ops so that EVRP will recognize that
c |= 1
is a non-zero range, and I've added a test case to check it.
The rest of this PR involves exposing ranges in a better way to fold-const.
N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83072
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a5f9c27bfc4417224e332392bb81a2d733b2b5bf
commit r11-5105-ga5f9c27bfc4417224e332392bb81a2d733b2b5bf
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97871
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c2cf58f0e3a32b803c890ea8daa8d9f550cf9888
commit r11-5104-gc2cf58f0e3a32b803c890ea8daa8d9f550cf9888
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97827
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
Draft patch (untested):
diff --git a/gcc/varasm.c b/gcc/varasm.c
index ada99940f65..51a507393a8 100644
--- a/gcc/varasm.c
+++ b/gcc/varasm.c
@@ -6738,9 +6738,11 @@ default_elf_asm_named_section (const char *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97828
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97828
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04cb64dadb5c115b4ad093ff92c3f5a0a87ef15f
commit r10-9036-g04cb64dadb5c115b4ad093ff92c3f5a0a87ef15f
Author: Patrick Palka
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96791
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aaron Sawdey :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b91b3e9df171970a907638d9b2e0bca1e792975
commit r11-5097-g6b91b3e9df171970a907638d9b2e0bca1e792975
Author: Aaron Sawdey
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97869
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ecf65330c11544ebf35e198087b4a42be089c620
commit r11-5099-gecf65330c11544ebf35e198087b4a42be089c620
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97839
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97858
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka ---
Jakub,
with code patterns
if (foo)
ininit var
...
if (foo)
use var
the false positive really depends on how far we do jump threading and similar
transforms.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97858
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97871
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> Started with r11-4927. Iain, I think the assert should go:
>
> --- a/gcc/cp/parser.c
> +++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c
> @@ -13536,7 +13536,6 @@ cp_parser_declaration (cp_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97858
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That said, can't reproduce with simplified:
void
foo (char *str, char *tail, ...)
{
__builtin_va_list ap;
if (tail)
__builtin_va_start (ap, tail);
for (int first = 1; str; first = 0)
{
*st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97839
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97871
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97875
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon ---
Checking the Arm v8-M manual, my understanding is that this architecture does
not support unaligned vector loads/stores.
However, my understanding is that vldrw.32 accepts to load from addresses
aligned on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97872
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-17
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97858
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Well, so one enhancement request would be for va_list fields don't warn about
the internal fields, but warn about use of uninitialized va_list itself.
And the second thing is if the
if (tail)
va_start (ap,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97874
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97873
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
gcc-7 goes the x86 abs expander way:
abs:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
movl%edi, %edx
movl%edi, %eax
sarl$31, %edx
xorl%edx, %eax
subl%edx, %eax
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97874
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97873
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97828
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8661f4faa875f361cd22a197774c1fa04cd0580b
commit r11-5096-g8661f4faa875f361cd22a197774c1fa04cd0580b
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97874
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97875
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-17
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97858
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Fixed d7ab349c44f
Thanks, my original intention was to mostly track the fact that we do not want
to warn about fields of va_list type that is internal to compiler though
:)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97314
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96919
Bhavana Kilambi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bhavana.kilambi@blackfigtec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97862
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 49576
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49576&action=edit
gcc11-pr97862.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97858
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97858
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d7ab349c44f30bed90b03b45865f6c7c5de1dfd8
commit r11-5095-gd7ab349c44f30bed90b03b45865f6c7c5de1dfd8
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97857
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
