https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97326
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97326
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Kre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97799
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #8)
> Comment on attachment 49548 [details]
> bugtest.f -- program evincing bug
>
> So, commit the test case to guard against regressions
> (since it is not immediatel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97806
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
int b;
long c;
int g();
void h(long *);
void i(long *);
void d() {
int e, f = b - e;
if (g())
h(&c + f);
else
i(&c + f);
__builtin_memset(0, 0, f * 8);
}
heh, quite simple - so much for test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97806
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #2 from R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97326
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andreas Krebbel :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d9ade39b8720b61cf63a8be181fb3b487f6ac5b
commit r11-4935-g5d9ade39b8720b61cf63a8be181fb3b487f6ac5b
Author: Andreas Krebbel
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97770
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97806
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97804
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97803
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Does it work if you add -fno-toplevel-reorder? SHF_GNU_RETAIN should preserve
the order of vars even if 'used' then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64711
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-12
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97799
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:87b7d45e358e4df93b6a93b2e7a55b123ea76f5d
commit r11-4933-g87b7d45e358e4df93b6a93b2e7a55b123ea76f5d
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97770
--- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu ---
> I guess that the vectorized popcount IFN is defined to be VnDI -> VnDI
> but we want to have VnSImode results. This means the instruction is
> wrongly modeled in vectorized form?
>
Yes, because we have __
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97806
Bug ID: 97806
Summary: [11 regression] bootstrap ICE starting with r11-4921
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97424
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5e00ad3ffbfb4df7242c313a0d836f5b538eb2fb
commit r11-4930-g5e00ad3ffbfb4df7242c313a0d836f5b538eb2fb
Author: David Malcolm
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97417
--- Comment #34 from Levy ---
(In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #33)
> I did say that I'm willing to fix code style issues. All major software
> projects I have worked with have coding style conventions. It makes it
> easier to maintain a la
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93848
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Assignee|unassigned at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
My attempt to build msp430 fails with:
In file included from
/home/jwakely/gcc/msp430-elf/msp430-elf/include/stdint.h:13,
from /home/jwakely/src/gcc/build-16bit/gcc/include/stdint.h:9,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org|redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97805
Bug ID: 97805
Summary: adaint.c:1488:12: note: 'LLONG_MIN' is defined in
header ''; did you forget to '#include
'?
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think the reduction is not a fair representation of the original code.
Obviously shifting by -1 is not OK, but the code doesn't do that ... at least
not for most targets.
The problem is specific to msp43
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97804
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Component|middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97804
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Created attachment 49550
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49550&action=edit
Testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97804
Bug ID: 97804
Summary: ICE in output_constructor_register_field
varasm.c:5407
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97799
George Hockney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.2.1
--- Comment #7 from George Hockn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97803
Bug ID: 97803
Summary: c-c++-common/asan/pointer-compare-1.c assumes variable
placement
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97802
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97793
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97802
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-11
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96416
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I suppose I could change the static_assert message to also suggest defining
your own specialization of std::pointer_traits, which is another way to make it
work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96416
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97802
Bug ID: 97802
Summary: [AArch64] Incorrect documentation for Arm64 NEON
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97784
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> There is targetm.sched.reassociation_width which specifies how re-assocation
> should make such sequence "wide".
Ah cool, thank you :-)
> Andrew is correc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97799
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I couldn't find any current 11-master, 10-, 9- and 8-branch version that
fails on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, under valgrind, and with -m32 and -m64.
So it looks very likely that Dominique is right that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88115
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:61827d5d9a5a09a8c05d5e41f95b03ebc6c43f61
commit r11-4925-g61827d5d9a5a09a8c05d5e41f95b03ebc6c43f61
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88115
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1c9b3c3408c1ec8043f9b9e1a148f84bb7f3b25
commit r11-4926-gb1c9b3c3408c1ec8043f9b9e1a148f84bb7f3b25
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95137
--- Comment #36 from Avi Kivity ---
A reminder that coroutines are crippled without this fixed, as it is standard
practice these days to use sanitizers.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97801
Bug ID: 97801
Summary: overload resolution ambiguity isn't detected when
rvalue ref qualifier is involved
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96416
Glen Joseph Fernandes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glenjofe at gmail dot com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97757
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Reduced test:
subroutine bar_array()
logical, save :: first = .true.
character(len=:), allocatable :: str
if (first) then
first = .false.
if (allocated (str)) STOP 7
str = "ABCDEF"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97417
--- Comment #33 from Jim Wilson ---
I did say that I'm willing to fix code style issues. All major software
projects I have worked with have coding style conventions. It makes it easier
to maintain a large software base when everything is using
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96416
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97799
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Did you happen to run valgrind using the 10.2.1 build?
Unfortunately I don't have valgrind on my new laptop (OSX Catalina).
However I have run the test 20 times with 10.2.1 without any failure, whil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97800
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97800
Bug ID: 97800
Summary: [11 regression] bootstrap build failure starting with
r11-4913
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96416
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
But on third thoughts, I don't know how to implement this reliably.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|msp430-elf |
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64711
Leslie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||laszlo.2.nemeth@continental
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97799
Ted Drain changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ted.drain at jpl dot nasa.gov
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96416
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96985
Leslie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||laszlo.2.nemeth@continental
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97518
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d6e5745a9a88314e27f387b2277299076862af67
commit r11-4924-gd6e5745a9a88314e27f387b2277299076862af67
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95989
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14)
> > --- a/libgcc/gthr-posix.h
> > +++ b/libgcc/gthr-posix.h
> > @@ -684,7 +684,12 @@ __gthread_equal (__gthread_t __t1, __gthread_t __t2)
> > static inline _
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97623
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e8b368c3d33fd8ddafdd37f8e1b2ba45d1a122e
commit r11-4923-g2e8b368c3d33fd8ddafdd37f8e1b2ba45d1a122e
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97799
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97799
George Hockney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.2.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97799
--- Comment #1 from George Hockney ---
Created attachment 49549
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49549&action=edit
details.txt -- detailed invocation and outputs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97799
Bug ID: 97799
Summary: Passing CHARACTER*(*) var(*) through ENTRY causes
segfaults
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97623
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Reduced. Nothing MSP430-specific here.
template struct A;
struct B {
typedef A type;
};
template struct A { static const T max = 1 ? 1 << (T) -1 : 0; };
template const T A::max;
class F {};
template v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14940
Julien Ruffin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||julien.ruffin at ivu dot de
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
LTO_WRAPPER=/home/dcb/gcc/results.2020/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/11.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../trunk.git/configure --prefix=/home/dcb/gcc/results.2020
--disable-bootstrap --disable-multilib --disable-werror
--with-pkgversion=46c705e70e078f6a192
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97787
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, the final linker input, namely /tmp/bibletime.kNyaLB.ltrans9.ltrans.o
would be a start. Adding -save-temps should eventually retain it (but likely
somewhere else with a different name).
You can also t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798
--- Comment #2 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 49547
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49547&action=edit
tester.ii
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> Would it be possible to provide a preprocess
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97794
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97298
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vladimir.kokovic at gmail dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Would it be possible to provide a preprocessed source file?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97787
Adrian Bunk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bunk at stusta dot de
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729
--- Comment #11 from abebeos at lazaridis dot com ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #10)
[...]
> The main problem is apparently that the target hasn't been properly worked
> on for a long time.
[...]
Yes, this seems to resul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798
Bug ID: 97798
Summary: FTB msp430-elf error: the value of
'__gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits_integer<__int20>::__max'
is not usable in a constant expression
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97790
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97797
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Koković ---
What is with ssa-fre-7.c ?
Vladimir Koković, DP senior(70),
Serbia, Belgrade, 10.November 2020
On 11.11.20. 12:53, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97790
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97797
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.2.1, 11.0
Status|ASSIGNE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97797
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d6da7c7e0843e0595d8c3b3aa37296b6c8f68dd0
commit r10-9003-gd6da7c7e0843e0595d8c3b3aa37296b6c8f68dd0
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97797
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ac93608d7e33a3e10bbd8d50259bc00a7d01237
commit r11-4914-g4ac93608d7e33a3e10bbd8d50259bc00a7d01237
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97623
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bd87cc14ebdb6789e067fb1828d5808407c308b3
commit r11-4913-gbd87cc14ebdb6789e067fb1828d5808407c308b3
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97768
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97793
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97768
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7c2be50afa7935d3a05e3c7761e69d8b539da5b
commit r10-9001-gf7c2be50afa7935d3a05e3c7761e69d8b539da5b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97796
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97797
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-11
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97797
Bug ID: 97797
Summary: internal compiler error: in build2, at tree.c:4814
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97796
Bug ID: 97796
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 0xb2ed5f
crash_signal - graphite
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97795
Bug ID: 97795
Summary: internal compiler error: in i386_pe_seh_unwind_emit
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38592
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-08-15 00:00:00 |2020-11-11
--- Comment #10 from Thomas K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30398
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97794
Bug ID: 97794
Summary: internal compiler error: tree code 'ssa_name' is not
supported in LTO streams
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21046
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2014-12-25 00:00:00 |2020-11-11
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Ko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97793
Bug ID: 97793
Summary: Bogus return-type warning
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97784
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 49544
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49544&action=edit
patch doing -fwrapv late
One piece of the approach would move reassoc after the last VRP pass:
diff --git a/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97789
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #6)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> > Nice. Next time, please mention the exact revision you use.
>
> Will do, although I suspect mentioning 20201107 i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97789
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> Nice. Next time, please mention the exact revision you use.
Will do, although I suspect mentioning 20201107 in the compiler name
was a small clue.
For more pre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97789
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #4)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> > I can't reproduce that.
>
> Presumably you mean on today's compiler ?
Yes.
>
> Richard's change of Monday 9 No
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97789
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> I can't reproduce that.
Presumably you mean on today's compiler ?
Richard's change of Monday 9 November seemingly fixes it.
I'll check this on next Friday's va
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97789
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97789
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
99 matches
Mail list logo
