https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97283
--- Comment #1 from colton.w.lewis at protonmail dot com ---
Never mind.
I just updated master and see the logic bug is fixed. Feel free to close this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97283
Bug ID: 97283
Summary: GNAT rejects valid formal type definition with
-gnat2020
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97282
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
And here is a version which uses two 64-bit numbers for calculation of he
sum of decimal digits as a benchmark for the division and modulo:
unsigned long digsum3 (myint x)
{
unsigned long ret;
__uint64_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97273
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96983
--- Comment #28 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #27 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Is thie PR fixed?
Not at all: I'm still seeing it on sparc*-sun-solaris2.11, and there are
tons of reports for other targets on gcc-te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58931
Mike Crowe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mac at mcrowe dot com
--- Comment #6 from M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97282
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97282
Bug ID: 97282
Summary: division done twice for modulo and divsion for 128-bit
integers
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93542
Mike Crowe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91486
--- Comment #11 from Mike Crowe ---
Created attachment 49305
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49305&action=edit
Small fix to f9ddb696a289cc48d24d3d23c0b324cb88de9573
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91486
--- Comment #10 from Mike Crowe ---
Unfortunately https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f9ddb696a289cc48d24d3d23c0b324cb88de9573
mentioned in comment 9 contains a small bug (all my fault) that Jonathan
pointed out in
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/2020-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97281
Bug ID: 97281
Summary: Mark- march=x86-64-v[234] binaries
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96983
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-03
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97280
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-03
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97280
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8510e3301bd519352fc20876da8994f68a0c7e93
commit r11-3640-g8510e3301bd519352fc20876da8994f68a0c7e93
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sat Oct 3 07:2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97280
Bug ID: 97280
Summary: Documentation typo - 'roudnevenl'
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97279
Bug ID: 97279
Summary: GCC ignores the operation definition of the template
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93115
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97278
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
19 matches
Mail list logo
