https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96539
Bug ID: 96539
Summary: Unnecessary no-op copy with Os and tail call with
struct argument
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96538
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96446
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:38b240a9dc7186a51e577dd3ff73c31af3cfb0ab
commit r10-8594-g38b240a9dc7186a51e577dd3ff73c31af3cfb0ab
Author: Peter Bergner
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96492
--- Comment #5 from Rich Townsend ---
So, given that gcc 4.1.2 is really ancient, I've tried building 10.2 using gcc
9.3.0 instead (but still inside the Docker container). This builds fine, and in
fact I'm happy to go with this workaround.
Howev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96538
--- Comment #1 from Prateek Khade ---
(In reply to Prateek Khade from comment #0)
> I am trying to add int values present in the vector and store in long int
> type variable. If I am using for loop for calculating the sum of vector
> elements pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96538
Bug ID: 96538
Summary: Integer overflow when there are multiple operands in
addition operation.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96530
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96530
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e2882e76089cecdc268d0835c54cabfa80b5b0be
commit r11-2616-ge2882e76089cecdc268d0835c54cabfa80b5b0be
Author: Peter Bergner
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86535
--- Comment #35 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
I don't know that anybody has looked at the BSD support recently.
Thanks for your efforts. I agree that this is work for a programmer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96537
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.5.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96537
Bug ID: 96537
Summary: Missing std::pair constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96486
--- Comment #28 from Susi Lehtola ---
Harald, Andreas, thanks for clarifying: yes, "crash" == Fortran runtime error.
The program should run just fine, since the return array has the proper size
given by get_environment_variable. Instead, it ends
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86535
--- Comment #34 from Curtis Hamilton ---
Do you know if anyone has actively worked on the BSD code recently?
I'm abandoning my effort go get this working on freebsd. I'm not a really a
programmer and this is beyond my meager abilities.
So unle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96101
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Started with r6-3986-g38217d3ee7c6e1fe.
Hi Martin,
As Gerhardt says, it compiles OK with version 7.4.1 20191027.
The patch you reference is dated 2015-10-18!
Che
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96312
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96532
Christian Zietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||czietz at gmx dot net
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96532
--- Comment #4 from Thorsten Otto ---
Might be caused by x86 and s390 having a machine dependant pattern for
setmem/cpymem, possibly eliminating the library call again, while other
target's don't have such a pattern.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96424
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96536
Bug ID: 96536
Summary: -fcf-protection code in i386.md:restore_stack_nonlocal
uses invalid compare-and-jump rtl
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96535
Bug ID: 96535
Summary: GCC 10 ignoring function __attribute__ optimize for
all x86
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93553
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:676b5525e8333005bdc1c596ed086f1da27a450f
commit r11-2615-g676b5525e8333005bdc1c596ed086f1da27a450f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96424
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:87d6dae308d604bad111b1c0bfea7835888eed8d
commit r11-2614-g87d6dae308d604bad111b1c0bfea7835888eed8d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96532
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
23 matches
Mail list logo
