https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96513
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
What you could do, even if it is private code, is reduce it
(https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction) until it is very small
and doesn't give away any IP, and then post it. Otherwise, there is no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96460
--- Comment #4 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3)
> There already is a warning from -Wsign-conversion for it:
It's for the conversion, not the modulo. My hypothesis is that for the modulo,
the warning is much mor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96515
Bug ID: 96515
Summary: [concepts] Segfault on ill-formed pack expansions in
requires-expression
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96493
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f8ac30f1653ff69706c35af6d725f1d330600f11
commit r11-2603-gf8ac30f1653ff69706c35af6d725f1d330600f11
Author: Alan Modra
Date: Thu Aug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96486
--- Comment #18 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 49015
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49015&action=edit
Bring get_environment_variable almost to F2018 conformance
* check.c (gfc_check_get_environment_vari
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39398
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96514
Bug ID: 96514
Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed
(error: control flow in the middle of basic block 3)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96513
Bug ID: 96513
Summary: building terminated with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96512
--- Comment #1 from N Schaeffer ---
Created attachment 49014
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49014&action=edit
even simpler bug demonstrator
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96512
Bug ID: 96512
Summary: wrong code generated with avx512 intrinsics in some
cases
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96493
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
Yes, it is a bug present in any gcc version supporting pcrel.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96486
--- Comment #17 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 08:33:12PM +, jussilehtola at fedoraproject dot org
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96486
>
> --- Comment #16 from Susi Lehtola ---
> Yes, then I installed m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96511
Bug ID: 96511
Summary: Incorrect placement-new warning
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I have a patch (since yesterday; just no time to send it :-/ )
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96510
Bug ID: 96510
Summary: Unexpected constexpr deallocation error after implicit
conversion
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96460
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96468
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729
--- Comment #7 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
> I'd be really grateful for advice on how to test and improve this. Is there a
> test suite somewhere that I've missed? Ideally, one that works with a free
> simulator?
Probably best to ask on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96486
--- Comment #16 from Susi Lehtola ---
Yes, then I installed missing libgfortran debuginfos and the backtrace
shortened to
#0 0x401267 in zerolen_value
at /tmp/readvar2.f90:17
#1 0x4012c4 in main
at /tmp/readvar2.f90:22
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96484
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96484
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8b692f8b4c0e47bc8e11d9c3ab83049f68b2edbc
commit r8-10390-g8b692f8b4c0e47bc8e11d9c3ab83049f68b2edbc
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96484
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f86f80dbccece356fa5ca7e1fd4dc581cc6a1cc4
commit r9-8787-gf86f80dbccece356fa5ca7e1fd4dc581cc6a1cc4
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96484
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8b7e7fcb5fff8255122a8fa94109f7ae05aeaa81
commit r10-8581-g8b7e7fcb5fff8255122a8fa94109f7ae05aeaa81
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96161
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
See also g:4e39f563c0cd25401f689c2093cb8c13692156ef
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96497
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85282
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2019-09-08 00:00:00 |2020-8-6
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96489
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to DV Henkel-Wallace from comment #7)
> Thanks. That is clear.
>
> BTW FWIW, defining <=> myself and then defining == default does appear to do
> what I want (i.e. I don't have to use. = default
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96509
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Summary|out of boun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96509
Bug ID: 96509
Summary: out of bounds access makes a bounded loop infinite
with inlining
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96191
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6a3f3e08723063ea2dadb7ddf503f02972a724e2
commit r11-2598-g6a3f3e08723063ea2dadb7ddf503f02972a724e2
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96146
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96223
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|rejects-valid |
Assignee|unassigned at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96223
Richard Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96484
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6a13a4e3f29fc4ce5eff96d74ba965c9fdc02184
commit r11-2597-g6a13a4e3f29fc4ce5eff96d74ba965c9fdc02184
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96501
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Also, how would users suppress this warning for cases where it's not wanted?
Plenty of classes don't need a move constructor because moving is not more
efficient than copying, but they don't want a default
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96508
Bug ID: 96508
Summary: missing warning for invalid calls to builtins from
inline functions defined in system headers
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96489
--- Comment #7 from DV Henkel-Wallace ---
Thanks. That is clear.
BTW FWIW, defining <=> myself and then defining == default does appear to do
what I want (i.e. I don't have to use. = default with both operators). I saw
that cppreference claims
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96501
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Nuno Lopes from comment #0)
> I see a lot of old code that has copy constructors defined, but not move
> constructors. This pessimizes code since the definition of the copy
> constructor hides
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96507
Bug ID: 96507
Summary: Feature request: improve "-Waddress" (or equivalent)
for function references inside structs
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96475
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson ---
I can't reproduce on {ppc64le, ppc64, aarch64, m68k, x86_64}-linux-gnu, they
all inline the dispatcher at the end of each handler, w/ gcc-10.2.0 -O2.
However, for sparc64 gcc-10.2.0 -O2 does end each han
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93502
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86164
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96506
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-06
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96506
Bug ID: 96506
Summary: ICE when using an MMA type as a function param
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96505
Bug ID: 96505
Summary: attribute access effect lost after inlining
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96486
--- Comment #15 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 08:42:20AM +, jussilehtola at fedoraproject dot org
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96486
>
> --- Comment #13 from Susi Lehtola ---
> The gdb output is the s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93671
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96486
--- Comment #14 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 08:03:29AM +, markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
> (In reply to kargl from comment #6)
> > I do note there are other problems with get_environment_variable.
>
> It looks to me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96504
Bug ID: 96504
Summary: [coroutines] test failures with glibc-2.32
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96503
Bug ID: 96503
Summary: attribute alloc_size effect lost after inlining
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ip
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96493
--- Comment #1 from Peter Bergner ---
We will want this backported to GCC 10 too, correct?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96502
Bug ID: 96502
Summary: attribute malloc effect lost after inlining
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96500
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96446
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96446
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9c376d1c166e7c8b10bba6f1675d2471ffe8447f
commit r11-2595-g9c376d1c166e7c8b10bba6f1675d2471ffe8447f
Author: Peter Bergner
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96500
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96492
--- Comment #4 from Rich Townsend ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Can you run
> gdb --args ./cc1 -quiet -fself-test=../../gcc/gcc/testsuite/selftests
> /dev/null -o /dev/null
> and do
> run
> bt
> ?
[user@6d6cb5609b91 gcc]$ gdb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96501
Bug ID: 96501
Summary: [C++11] Should warn when classes only have copy
constructor defined
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96500
Bug ID: 96500
Summary: enum of underlying type bool do not
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96497
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96496
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96499
Bug ID: 96499
Summary: Compare std::variant with int using C++20 <=> occurs
internal compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96480
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression] missed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96480
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b3aa137212b1af0c824a9890eba2ca27a7271d56
commit r11-2593-gb3aa137212b1af0c824a9890eba2ca27a7271d56
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96498
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96496
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96498
Bug ID: 96498
Summary: Wrong location for function first declared as a friend
in a template
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnosti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96497
Bug ID: 96497
Summary: Compare std::variant with int using C++20 <=> is not a
constant expression
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96496
Bug ID: 96496
Summary: Conversion to enum with underlying type bool produces
wrong result
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96495
Bug ID: 96495
Summary: [gfortran] MERGE does not copy ALLOCATABLE property of
derived type
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32911
Matthew Wilcox changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matthew at wil dot cx
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93826
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-06
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96153
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #49006|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #44 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Sorry if my comment sounded harsh.
Anyway, the older issue I was referring to was
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53073 with SPEC2k6 464.h264ref.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95499
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
For 'character(len=:),allocatable :: str' there is '_str' with the string
length.
One can map it explicitly when mapping 'from(str)' by also mapping
'firstprivate(_str)' but the compiler will later remove i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96494
Bug ID: 96494
Summary: [nvptx] Enable effective target sync_int_long
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #43 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to john henning from comment #42)
> A comment, an invitation, and some questions from one of those "SPEC people".
>
> The comment:
>
> SPEC CPU starts from real applications (rather than artifi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96347
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #48953|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96492
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Can you run
gdb --args ./cc1 -quiet -fself-test=../../gcc/gcc/testsuite/selftests /dev/null
-o /dev/null
and do
run
bt
?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96492
--- Comment #2 from Rich Townsend ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Did GCC 10.1 work or any older version you tried to build this way in the
> past?
It's worked in 9.2, 9.3, and earlier releases; but not in 10.1.
If I try the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
john henning changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mailboxnotfound at yahoo dot
com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96427
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to vfdff from comment #4)
> I test your case base on x86-64 gcc 10.1 with -O2 -S -mavx512f, the .rodata
> aligned to 64 bytes, and it aligned to 32 bytes on x86-64 gcc 9.3 with -O2
> -S -mavx512f,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96491
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96483
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|11.0|10.2.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96483
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca6c1bda8023d17577f1fca0b406402fbaaba63f
commit r10-8580-gca6c1bda8023d17577f1fca0b406402fbaaba63f
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96491
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89b84cd794f984038984c10b03c3b0ab582f49cc
commit r11-2591-g89b84cd794f984038984c10b03c3b0ab582f49cc
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96483
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1f4c8afa1b2dac97f2ee78eacafe6eee246a4dae
commit r11-2590-g1f4c8afa1b2dac97f2ee78eacafe6eee246a4dae
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96471
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 49008
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49008&action=edit
hackish patch
The following implements this (just the very special case of a single location
expression with a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96471
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
So the DIEs in question are
DIE0: DW_TAG_subrange_type (0x769f3e10)
abbrev id: 0 offset: 0 mark: 1
DW_AT_type: die -> 0 (0x769f3eb0)
DW_AT_upper_bound: die -> 0 (0x769f30f0)
refering
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93826
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
Missed to list the PR in the commit :-(
* OpenMP 4.5 patch which rejects this is the following:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-August/551338.html
and https://gcc.gnu.org/g:57dd9f3bfca8bb752c6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96489
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p1185r2.html
Your understanding of <=> is from 2018, that's not how C++20 works.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96490
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-06
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96486
--- Comment #13 from Susi Lehtola ---
The gdb output is the same
(gdb) r
Starting program: /tmp/a.out
Fortran runtime error: Zero-length string passed as value to
get_environment_variable.
Error termination. Backtrace:
#0 0x401267 in zerolen_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96483
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
I have a simple patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96492
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Did GCC 10.1 work or any older version you tried to build this way in the past?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96486
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markeggleston at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96491
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96487
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-06
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96493
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-06
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96485
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |9.3.1
Keywords|
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
