[Bug tree-optimization/95570] New: ICE: Segmentation fault in vect_loop_versioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95570 Bug ID: 95570 Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault in vect_loop_versioning Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tr

[Bug tree-optimization/95569] ICE in tmmark：verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95569 --- Comment #2 from Qian Chao --- Bootstrap and tested on aarch64 platform. No new regression witnessed.

[Bug tree-optimization/95569] ICE in tmmark：verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95569 --- Comment #1 from Qian Chao --- Bootstrap and tested on aarch64 platform. No new regression witnessed.

[Bug target/95018] [10/11 Regression] Excessive unrolling for Fortran library array handling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018 --- Comment #37 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #36) > The patch which restores cunroll behavior was committed. Thanks! Will you also backport to gcc 10, the other affected branch?

[Bug tree-optimization/95569] New: ICE in tmmark：verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95569 Bug ID: 95569 Summary: ICE in tmmark：verify_ssa failed Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug target/95018] [10/11 Regression] Excessive unrolling for Fortran library array handling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018 Jiu Fu Guo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/88398] vectorization failure for a small loop to do byte comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88398 --- Comment #39 from Jiu Fu Guo --- I’m thinking to draft a patch for this optimization. If any suggestions, please point out, thanks.

[Bug c++/95568] New: No CTAD with list initialization within requires-clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95568 Bug ID: 95568 Summary: No CTAD with list initialization within requires-clause Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug bootstrap/91972] Bootstrap should use -Wmissing-declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91972 --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #4) > > Why is it missing the static keyword then? (Or alternatively, why isn't it > > in an anonymous namespace?) > > Huh? Without the warning developers may sim

[Bug libgcc/78017] weak reference usage in gthr-posix.h (__gthread*) is broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78017 Ben Longbons changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b.r.longbons at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/65213] Extend -Wmissing-declarations to variables [i.e. add -Wmissing-variable-declarations]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65213 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/95567] New: Defaulted virtual <=> has the wrong behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95567 Bug ID: 95567 Summary: Defaulted virtual <=> has the wrong behavior Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/95050] coroutine: no "mandatory copy elision" for prvalue await_resume expression.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95050 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac9b05305d376cfa391dd57a46515cbdc165f094 commit r10-8261-gac9b05305d376cfa391dd57a46515cbdc165f094 Author: Iain Sandoe Dat

[Bug middle-end/95556] Not replacing __builtin___memcpy_chk() as documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95556 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/95556] Not replacing __builtin___memcpy_chk() as documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95556 --- Comment #9 from Jeff Davis --- I still feel like the documentation is misleading on this point. Regardless, it doesn't seem like you think there is any bug here, so go ahead and close.

[Bug fortran/95088] ICE in gfc_build_class_symbol, at fortran/class.c:653

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95088 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch submitted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-June/054479.html

[Bug fortran/95091] ICE in gfc_hash_value, at fortran/class.c:538

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95091 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5aaccde3db39fac7e7f6677ceccc1eadd9c6a424 commit r11-1024-g5aaccde3db39fac7e7f6677ceccc1eadd9c6a424 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: Su

[Bug fortran/94109] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Memory leak introduced in 8.3.0->8.3.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94109 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug fortran/95088] ICE in gfc_build_class_symbol, at fortran/class.c:653

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95088 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-07 Assignee

[Bug fortran/95476] Reading file of length zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95476 Martin Diehl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/95091] ICE in gfc_hash_value, at fortran/class.c:538

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95091 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b342cfd648e6658363c7c8fef83af8f59dba1795 commit r11-1022-gb342cfd648e6658363c7c8fef83af8f59dba1795 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: Su

[Bug target/95566] New: x86 instruction selection --- some REX prefixes unnecessary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95566 Bug ID: 95566 Summary: x86 instruction selection --- some REX prefixes unnecessary Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug fortran/94109] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Memory leak introduced in 8.3.0->8.3.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94109 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Memory leak introduced in |[8/9/10/11 Regression]

[Bug target/95018] [10/11 Regression] Excessive unrolling for Fortran library array handling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018 --- Comment #35 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jiu Fu Guo : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:557a40f599f64e40cc1b20254bf82acc775375f5 commit r11-1020-g557a40f599f64e40cc1b20254bf82acc775375f5 Author: guojiufu Date: Thu May 2

[Bug tree-optimization/50439] gfortran infinite loop with -floop-interchange

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50439 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/50439] gfortran infinite loop with -floop-interchange

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50439 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:905ba62ec96f8469c1085861d9ceec58fbee5709 commit r11-1018-g905ba62ec96f8469c1085861d9ceec58fbee5709 Author: Thomas Koenig Date:

[Bug fortran/95186] Optimize allocate(..., source=0) or allocate(..., source=[0.0, 0.0, ...]) to use calloc instead of malloc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95186 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug fortran/95476] Reading file of length zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95476 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #