https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91304
fsmoke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fsmoke at mail dot ru
--- Comment #6 from fsmok
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95332
--- Comment #7 from John Dong ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> Fixed on master, do you want to backport the patch to active branches?
yes, please backport to active branches. thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95332
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.0
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95332
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:17d1594bfe08f3c768e024b180816cbe37ac08ac
commit r11-679-g17d1594bfe08f3c768e024b180816cbe37ac08ac
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Thu M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95380
Bug ID: 95380
Summary: ipcp-unit-growth was renamed to ipa-cp-unit-growth
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95353
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95252
--- Comment #6 from Kito Cheng ---
Oh, seems like add uses is enough, exact pattern might add about ~200 line to
md file include RV32E/RV32/RV64 I guess.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95379
--- Comment #3 from Asher Gordon ---
Thanks for the quick reply!
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Why not just use { .foo = 0 }; instead?
Well I could do that, but I feel that it doesn't convey the message of "set all
fields to zer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95303
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.0, 11.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95370
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88398
--- Comment #33 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
It would be relatively easy if the target supports unaligned access. like
read64ne in
https://git.tukaani.org/?p=xz.git;a=blob;f=src/liblzma/common/memcmplen.h
Then the alignment issue is relaxed. It may be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88398
--- Comment #32 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #31)
> (In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #30)
> > (In reply to Wilco from comment #29)
>
> > > The key question remains whether it is legal to assume the limit implies
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95379
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95379
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Why not just use { .foo = 0 }; instead?
Also this attribute is model after sparse's attribute, does sparse implement
what you are asking (https://sparse.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page)?
Reference:
http
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95332
--- Comment #4 from John Dong ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Hello.
>
> I support the patch, do you have a copyright agreement and can you send the
> patch to the GCC patches mailing list?
>
> One small nit I noticed:
> /home/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95322
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fc78e991c35a5ee14efafb4e5566a9570fa31dd4
commit r10-8194-gfc78e991c35a5ee14efafb4e5566a9570fa31dd4
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72783
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95252
--- Comment #5 from Jim Wilson ---
Created attachment 48625
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48625&action=edit
add uses to gpr_save pattern
the code using MASK_SAVE_RESTORE is just for testing purposes
unfinished, adds 3 new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95252
--- Comment #4 from Jim Wilson ---
Created attachment 48624
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48624&action=edit
disable reg rename when -msave-restore
the code using MASK_SAVE_RESTORE is just for testing purposes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95252
--- Comment #3 from Jim Wilson ---
I tried both. Turning off register naming works. It gives a code size
decrease of about 0.003% for the libraries I looked at which can be ignored.
This probably also reduces performance; I didn't check that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95379
Bug ID: 95379
Summary: Don't warn about the universal zero initializer for a
structure with the 'designated_init' attribute.
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95378
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Every __atomic_xxx built-in has the same problem. They'll all accept
cv-qualified types as output parameters.
This seems to fix it, but I'll finish testing it and submit it tomorrow:
--- a/gcc/c-family/c-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95273
--- Comment #8 from Bill Seurer ---
Those are new ones. I will track down the source tomorrow morning if no one
else has in the meantime.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95378
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95282
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bbaec68c86f8e89a3460cc022c75d4c4179bfb0a
commit r11-674-gbbaec68c86f8e89a3460cc022c75d4c4179bfb0a
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95282
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95378
Bug ID: 95378
Summary: __atomic_load will write to objects of cv-qualified
types
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95377
Bug ID: 95377
Summary: inconsistent behaviors at -O1
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95305
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95301
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Reduced:
template
struct range {
int start;
int limit;
range():
start(1, limit(2) // missing ) after 1
{ }
};
template
struct _no_inline_box_init : T {};
Which gives:
95301.cc:10:10:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95301
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Wouter van Ooijen from comment #0)
> This code emits an excessive amount of error messages, which seem to repeat.
It looks like it, but actually it's about a different template each time, each
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95301
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
95301.cc:1:24: error: 'int_fast64_t' does not name a type
1 | template< typename T = int_fast64_t, T zero = 0 >
|^~~~
95301.cc:14:10: error: explicit specialization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95305
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 48621
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48621&action=edit
preprocessed source
Compile with -std=gnu++17
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95322
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed on master so far, backport to follow soon.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95322
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c2582c0406250c66e2eb3651f8e8638796b7f53
commit r11-673-g6c2582c0406250c66e2eb3651f8e8638796b7f53
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94926
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94354
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:979e89a9a94f66241fa8355e2b2e8f4a680c83e1
commit r11-672-g979e89a9a94f66241fa8355e2b2e8f4a680c83e1
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94354
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95348
--- Comment #5 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)>
> Can you please share some statistics how big are the files and how many runs
> do you merge?
There were on the order of 10,000 processes. Source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95373
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 08:04:22PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95373
>
> --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Patch:
>
> diff --git a/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95322
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Thanks Daniel, I'm just testing Casey's resolution, and extending it to
join_view, so I'll send another mail once that testing is complete.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95253
Daniel Starke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |preprocessor
--- Comment #3 from Daniel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95376
Bug ID: 95376
Summary: [11 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/torture/pr92088-1.c
after r11-611
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95322
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Krügler ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> A new LWG issue has been submitted, and there is a suggested resolution.
Will take care and inform in this issue here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95373
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/primary.c b/gcc/fortran/primary.c
index d73898473df..67105cc9ab1 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/primary.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/primary.c
@@ -1998,6 +1998,28 @@ is_inquiry_re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95322
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.2
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95373
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Keywords|ice-on-v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95137
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95346
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |iains at gcc dot gnu.org
Target M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95350
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c949ec9c4e88d2ff6dbd5b179abddf3703129577
commit r11-670-gc949ec9c4e88d2ff6dbd5b179abddf3703129577
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95104
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95369
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
I think the problem is that we never called digest_init prior calling
convert_nontype_argument.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95373
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-27
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95104
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6f64bc18a664e1d003120cfa8508cb5fe06fa7ad
commit r9-8629-g6f64bc18a664e1d003120cfa8508cb5fe06fa7ad
Author: Harald Anlauf
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95371
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #1 from Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95104
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:50cd4503e59f29e379d0515c48e67d0658ee4562
commit r10-8193-g50cd4503e59f29e379d0515c48e67d0658ee4562
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95375
Bug ID: 95375
Summary: ICE in add_use_op, Error: mismatching comparison
operand types
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95371
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10 Regression] ICE |[10/11 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95355
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d014acc1ea263df7ed44aa6cb7f75bb8e512aed
commit r11-669-g7d014acc1ea263df7ed44aa6cb7f75bb8e512aed
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Wed May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95374
Bug ID: 95374
Summary: ICE: gfc_array_size failed
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95373
Bug ID: 95373
Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in build_reference_type, at
tree.c:7942
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95372
Bug ID: 95372
Summary: ICE in find_array_section, at fortran/expr.c:1687
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95367
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95371
Bug ID: 95371
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE concepts with template template
parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95369
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
This is not really about designated initializers; we wrongly reject this one
too:
struct S {
unsigned a;
unsigned b;
};
template struct X { };
void f()
{
X<{ 1u, 2u }> x;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95370
Bug ID: 95370
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in execute, at
adjust-alignment.c:74 since r11-508-gdfa4fcdba374ed44
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95370
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91330
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95314
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95314
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c98bd673ef93836f03491201f1c63929ea429cd6
commit r11-668-gc98bd673ef93836f03491201f1c63929ea429cd6
Author: David Malcolm
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95319
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91330
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac43b32ce2e0e38848d06a1567f6db2bbeb678dc
commit r11-667-gac43b32ce2e0e38848d06a1567f6db2bbeb678dc
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95319
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a6deb68d01316055072b8856185da4eaf77836d1
commit r10-8192-ga6deb68d01316055072b8856185da4eaf77836d1
Author: Jason Merrill
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95319
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6efa97ea1d2fe6df1fbb9df78faaa2248a8618d7
commit r11-666-g6efa97ea1d2fe6df1fbb9df78faaa2248a8618d7
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95175
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95369
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
This is accepted fine (as it should be):
struct S {
int a;
int b;
};
int
main ()
{
S s{.a = 1, .b = 2};
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95369
Bug ID: 95369
Summary: braced-init-list with designated initializers as
template-argument rejected
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95368
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95349
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Downing ---
>From the C standard:
If a value is copied into an object having no declared type using memcpy or
memmove, or is copied as an array of character type, then the effective type of
the modified object for that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95360
--- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #4)
> So, it seems gdb ignores the "recommended breakpoint location" at 0x4004cb,
> because there's an earlier one on the same line at 0x4004bc.
>
> The gdb approach is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95368
Bug ID: 95368
Summary: gcc things that a lambda capture is both const and
mutable
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95367
--- Comment #1 from Ferruh YIGIT ---
Created attachment 48620
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48620&action=edit
.i file generated by "--save-temps" param
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95349
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Downing ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> (In reply to Andrew Downing from comment #5)
> > Also, I'm not sure if operations that implicitly create
> > objects in storage are allowed to do so if an obje
atest/gcc/tree-vect-slp.c:3464
0x1025ede execute
../../gcc-latest/gcc/tree-vectorizer.c:1320
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate
[2]
https://git.dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-net/tree/drivers/net/hinic/base/hinic_pmd_nicio.c?h=v20.05
[3]
gcc (GCC) 11.0.0 20200
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95353
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||88443
Assignee|unassigned at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95349
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Andrew Downing from comment #5)
> Also, I'm not sure if operations that implicitly create
> objects in storage are allowed to do so if an object has already explicitly
> created in that storage
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a7fd43c38f7469a3ef5ee30e889d60e1376d4dfc
commit r11-665-ga7fd43c38f7469a3ef5ee30e889d60e1376d4dfc
Author: Mark Eggleston
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95349
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Downing ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> I think std::launder merely acts as optimization barrier here and without we
> manage to propagate the constant. We still "miscompile" things dependent on
> wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95191
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95191
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b3b9ee70f3ea73bae3f7d2956172ca9c0a338980
commit r9-8628-gb3b9ee70f3ea73bae3f7d2956172ca9c0a338980
Author: Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95366
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95348
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to qinzhao from comment #3)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> > Thank you for the report. It's a known limitation Honza noticed me about.
> > Is the size problematic from size perspectiv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95242
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95348
--- Comment #3 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> Thank you for the report. It's a known limitation Honza noticed me about.
> Is the size problematic from size perspective or speed perspective?
I thin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95310
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95222
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95222
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c473d8f32510fcc96d584ee5099b856cfd3d8d6
commit r10-8189-g0c473d8f32510fcc96d584ee5099b856cfd3d8d6
Author: Jason Merrill
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95222
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7e7d9fcff56385812764cba63e1ebf6f4c6c0320
commit r11-662-g7e7d9fcff56385812764cba63e1ebf6f4c6c0320
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mon
1 - 100 of 203 matches
Mail list logo
