https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95293
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Time to dig out the F2018 standard...
15.5.2.4 Ordinary dummy variables
9 If the dummy argument has the TARGET attribute
That's fulfilled
does not have the VALUE attribute,
That's fulfilled.
and either
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95299
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95298
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
*** Bug 95299 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95300
Bug ID: 95300
Summary: Decimal floating-point constants suffer double
rounding
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95299
Bug ID: 95299
Summary: sorry, unimplemented: mangling typename_type
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95298
Bug ID: 95298
Summary: sorry, unimplemented: mangling record_type
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95293
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 10:43:23PM +, david.sagan at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95293
>
> --- Comment #2 from David Sagan ---
> The gcc documentation says:
>
> ‘a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95297
Bug ID: 95297
Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95296
Bug ID: 95296
Summary: Segfault when trying to return a void value
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: jit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95293
--- Comment #2 from David Sagan ---
The gcc documentation says:
‘array-temps’
Warns at run time when for passing an actual argument a temporary array had to
be generated. The information generated by this warning is sometimes useful in
optimizat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95293
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95295
Bug ID: 95295
Summary: g++ produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95189
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For memcmp, it looks completely wrong to use c_getstr, I think in that case it
should use string_constant instead, or if it uses it, it should punt if the
returned length by it is smaller than the length of t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95189
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95294
Bug ID: 95294
Summary: [vax] Convert the backend to MODE_CC so it can be kept
in future releases
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95222
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|needs-bisection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95293
Bug ID: 95293
Summary: Fortran not passing array by reference
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95292
Bug ID: 95292
Summary: internal compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93978
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94038
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a57aa11191617754c8d43b3eb6a2576e970a0668
commit r11-591-ga57aa11191617754c8d43b3eb6a2576e970a0668
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93978
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a57aa11191617754c8d43b3eb6a2576e970a0668
commit r11-591-ga57aa11191617754c8d43b3eb6a2576e970a0668
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94361
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95291
Bug ID: 95291
Summary: ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95290
Bug ID: 95290
Summary: ice in useless_type_conversion_p
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94038
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d1556ecfae3eff010ef7dc15f3da998403fa196
commit r11-590-g6d1556ecfae3eff010ef7dc15f3da998403fa196
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95289
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95289
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ba391077d41324f6c0585f0ec76be0f44dd5b43
commit r10-8172-g3ba391077d41324f6c0585f0ec76be0f44dd5b43
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95289
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3cb0c7cc160a50f830bfa9aa5a3264b773a28bf8
commit r11-589-g3cb0c7cc160a50f830bfa9aa5a3264b773a28bf8
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91796
--- Comment #8 from Maxim Egorushkin ---
Another example
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61975526/gcc-optimization-better-at-o0-than-o3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95289
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|__gnu_debug::__get_distance |[10/11 Regression]
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95191
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8df7ee67f6fdc780e9453f2baa8d1bf62c000761
commit r11-588-g8df7ee67f6fdc780e9453f2baa8d1bf62c000761
Author: Thomas Koenig
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95191
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
Tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95275
--- Comment #2 from Frantisek Sumsal ---
Slight update of the reproducer - the fetch & checkout is no longer necessary
as the required changes were merged into master.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95276
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 48588
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48588&action=edit
shortened test case
Here's the test case as shortened by multidelta.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95289
Bug ID: 95289
Summary: __gnu_debug::__get_distance is not C++11 constexpr
compliant
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95276
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.0|10.2
Summary|[11 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95276
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68606
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70462
Pádraig Brady changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||P at draigBrady dot com
--- Comment #6 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95288
Bug ID: 95288
Summary: Poor error message with function-scope enum definition
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95287
--- Comment #1 from Raul Tambre ---
Possibly of interest:
https://godbolt.org/z/NQus4z
Shows the implementation divergence with regard to DR777 and DR2233.
Only MSVC currently handles all cases correctly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95287
Bug ID: 95287
Summary: Incorrect default argument checking for
specializations of functions with parameter packs
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95276
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 48586
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48586&action=edit
(somewhat reduced) test case
Here's a somewhat reduced test case; I did not spend too much time
throwing out un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95279
--- Comment #3 from Frantisek Sumsal ---
Original issue: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/15583
Patch: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/15860
Code in question:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/src/libsystemd/sd-bus/b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95286
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I don't think this is a bug, the result of uniform_real_distribution depends on
floating point arithmetic which depends on optimisations.
The output of the mt19937_64 engine is portable between different
i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95286
--- Comment #5 from fdlbxtqi ---
I tried other architectures. Same issues here. WHY???
cqwrteur@Home-Server:~/fast_io_all/fast_io/helpers/fp$ g++ -o dontagree
dontagree.cc -Ofast -std=c++20 -s -march=x86-64
cqwrteur@Home-Server:~/fast_io_all/fas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95286
--- Comment #4 from fdlbxtqi ---
I test on another Amd ryzen computer. Same issue here. Why???
cqwrteur@Home-Server:~/fast_io_all/fast_io/helpers/fp$ g++ -o dontagree
dontagree.cc -Ofast -std=c++20 -s -march=native
cqwrteur@Home-Server:~/fast_i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95286
--- Comment #3 from fdlbxtqi ---
#include
#include
#include
int main()
{
std::mt19937_64 eng;
std::uniform_real_distribution dis(-1.0f,1.0f);
float v{};
for(std::size_t i(0);i!=36;++i)
v=di
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95286
fdlbxtqi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|Amd ryzen 2700. Linux, |Amd ryzen 3600. Linux,
|Min
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94087
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95286
fdlbxtqi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host|amd ryzen 2700. Linux, |Amd ryzen 2700. Linux,
|Min
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95286
Bug ID: 95286
Summary: -march=native causes mt19937_64 +
uniform_real_distribution generating wrong result.
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
52 matches
Mail list logo
