https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91532
Bug 91532 depends on bug 33315, which changed state.
Bug 33315 Summary: stores not commoned by sinking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33315
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84859
Bug 84859 depends on bug 33315, which changed state.
Bug 33315 Summary: stores not commoned by sinking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33315
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33315
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84935c9822183ce403bb361c5f405711b9a808c6
commit r11-408-g84935c9822183ce403bb361c5f405711b9a808c6
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33315
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16996
Bug 16996 depends on bug 33315, which changed state.
Bug 33315 Summary: stores not commoned by sinking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33315
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94566
Bug 94566 depends on bug 33315, which changed state.
Bug 33315 Summary: stores not commoned by sinking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33315
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
Bug 11832 depends on bug 33315, which changed state.
Bug 33315 Summary: stores not commoned by sinking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33315
What|Removed |Added
-
I know you've realised the problem here now, but ...
This mailing list is for automated mails from our bugzilla database.
To report a bug please use bugzilla. Sending email directly to the
list will often be ignored, and will never create a bugzilla report.
See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ for detai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37451
luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37451
--- Comment #11 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
fixed on master.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37451
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xiong Hu Luo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a15faa730f99100f6f3ed12663563356ec5a2c0
commit r11-407-g8a15faa730f99100f6f3ed12663563356ec5a2c0
Author: Xionghu Luo
Date: Thu M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61837
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xiong Hu Luo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a15faa730f99100f6f3ed12663563356ec5a2c0
commit r11-407-g8a15faa730f99100f6f3ed12663563356ec5a2c0
Author: Xionghu Luo
Date: Thu M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88842
luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86142
--- Comment #2 from ensadc at mailnesia dot com ---
I was misled by Clang. Seems like there's a Clang bug then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95145
Bug ID: 95145
Summary: [10/11 Regression]internal compiler error: in
analyze_functions, at cgraphunit.c:1380
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95082
Paul Clarke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pc at us dot ibm.com
--- Comment #2 from P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95144
--- Comment #1 from Evan Nemerson ---
Godbolt link with corrected flags for MSVC: https://godbolt.org/z/M9sgxe
Sorry about that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94778
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94778
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d2a359fe5d72e28433c92e64dcbdaa93eb39caf4
commit r11-405-gd2a359fe5d72e28433c92e64dcbdaa93eb39caf4
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Thu May 14 16:3
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 4:19 PM Geoff Mulligan wrote:
>
> Version:
> gcc -v
> Using built-in specs.
> COLLECT_GCC=gcc
> COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/7/lto-wrapper
> OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none
> OFFLOAD_TARGET_DEFAULT=1
> Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
> Configured with: ../src/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95144
Bug ID: 95144
Summary: Many AVX-512 functions take an int instead of unsigned
int
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
Obviously I'm an idiot. signed vs unsigned. Ugh. But maybe the
compiler should complain about the if test...
Geoff
On 5/14/20 4:45 PM, Geoff Mulligan wrote:
Version:
gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/7/lto-wrapper
OFFLOAD_TARGET_
Version:
gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/7/lto-wrapper
OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none
OFFLOAD_TARGET_DEFAULT=1
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu
7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04'
--with-bugu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95143
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Possibly fixed as part of PR 94885.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95143
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.1.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95143
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Baumanns ---
fails with this version:
g++-10.1 (GCC) 10.1.0
Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95143
--- Comment #8 from Bernd Baumanns ---
fails with this version:
g++ (Compiler-Explorer-Build) 10.1.0
Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95138
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-5-14
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95143
--- Comment #7 from Bernd Baumanns ---
I hope you have now all you need.
This bug is only triggered in C++20 mode and with inheritance.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95143
--- Comment #6 from Bernd Baumanns ---
simplified source (without include type_traits):
class false_type
{
public:
static constexpr bool value = false;
};
class true_type{
public:
static constexpr bool value
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95143
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Baumanns ---
Created attachment 48544
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48544&action=edit
source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95143
--- Comment #4 from Bernd Baumanns ---
Created attachment 48543
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48543&action=edit
g++-10 -v -save-temps -std=c++2a /mnt/j/test.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95142
--- Comment #2 from Hayden Kowalchuk ---
slightly further testing shows all affected versions only need these flags to
trigger
sh4-linux-gnu-gcc-* -O1 -ffast-math -mpretend-cmove -c ice_sh4.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93901
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e1592f8e1d6366699e05c0824fc3dc39ca7314b
commit r11-403-g4e1592f8e1d6366699e05c0824fc3dc39ca7314b
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95143
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Baumanns ---
Created attachment 48541
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48541&action=edit
ii file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95139
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Code using the GCC diagnostic functions should use %wd instead of
HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT, both for translation and because HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT
is a format for the host printf and may not be un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95061
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a36428b5fbc825e2d3455f5770b5d6e71c63413
commit r11-402-g3a36428b5fbc825e2d3455f5770b5d6e71c63413
Author: Ian Lance Taylor
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95142
Gabriel Ravier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gabravier at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95140
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
No. GCC's manual recommends using either flexible array members or zero-length
arrays, and explicitly discourages abuses of arrays of length one (nothing is
said about any such exceptions for larger arrays):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95133
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in |[8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95134
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95143
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95143
Bernd Baumanns changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://godbolt.org/z/yVjQf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95143
Bug ID: 95143
Summary: SFINAE failure with static_cast
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95142
Bug ID: 95142
Summary: ICE when compiling certain logic with -Ofast and
-mpretend-cmove when dealing with floats
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95141
Bug ID: 95141
Summary: Incorrect integer overflow warning message for bitand
expression
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95140
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The warning should change, not the conservative assumption. There is a lot of
code in the wild with such trailing arrays, not everything uses flexible array
members, [0] or [1] for that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95140
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95140
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95140
Bug ID: 95140
Summary: [10/11 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-overflow for a
loop unrolled past the end of a trailing array
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #27 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 06:39:24PM +, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
>
> --- Comment #26 from Thomas Koenig ---
> (In reply to wschmidt from commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95137
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe ---
Hi Rafael,
nor me, the coros implementation is a set of AST transforms - so is supposed to
present the following code with valid trees - which would be analysed "as
normal".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95139
Bug ID: 95139
Summary: Messages using string concatenation can not be
translated
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #26 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to wschmidt from comment #24)
> I'm afraid I disagree. A divide-by-zero that cannot ever be executed is
> not an error.
Well, there is PR90302. We could insert some piece of code into the
IL.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95137
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95134
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.0.4/gcc/Standards.html#index-ffreestanding-58
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95138
Bug ID: 95138
Summary: ICE on transfer to unlimited polymorphic
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95134
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95111
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95137
Bug ID: 95137
Summary: Sanitizers seem to be missing support for coroutines
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95121
Craig Topper changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||craig.topper at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95046
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9056cd80351c65c3b9a3257644236f2007c46a3f
commit r11-400-g9056cd80351c65c3b9a3257644236f2007c46a3f
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Thu Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #25 from Bill Schmidt ---
But I'm not going to worry about it further.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #24 from wschmidt at linux dot ibm.com ---
On 5/14/20 12:08 PM, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
>
> --- Comment #23 from Steve Kargl ---
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 02:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95130
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
See bug 92292. The extra attribute isn't ignored, it simply means the
function has multiple format attributes, which is valid, but should
probably be special-cased for this case of built-i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #23 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 02:57:37PM +, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
>
> Bill Schmidt changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57943
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78446
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78446
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:098cf31aa2631db6922d4de5661c1b0ce19af0aa
commit r11-399-g098cf31aa2631db6922d4de5661c1b0ce19af0aa
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95119
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.4
Summary|CLOSE hangs when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95119
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cdc34b505796327b3eee9e97bc5f27ba71fd9e7a
commit r11-397-gcdc34b505796327b3eee9e97bc5f27ba71fd9e7a
Author: Thomas Koenig
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95134
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-ffreestanding should avoid |Add a target option to
|libc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95119
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95133
--- Comment #2 from James Greenhalgh ---
Should reproduce further back if you force it on with -ftree-vectorize .
i.e.
gcc foo.c -ftree-vectorize -O3
Breaks somewhere between:
gcc version 7.0.0 20160615
gcc version 7.0.0 20160907
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94748
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94697
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94515
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94514
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94515
Bug 94515 depends on bug 94514, which changed state.
Bug 94514 Summary: aarch64: unwinding across mixed pac-ret and non-pac-ret
frames is broken
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94514
What|Removed |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94515
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Szabolcs Nagy :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62ab8b9114b0bdae508ed76fa9028e0040d35e6b
commit r8-10253-g62ab8b9114b0bdae508ed76fa9028e0040d35e6b
Author: Szabolcs Nagy
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94514
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Szabolcs Nagy :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d523cd5109bc5ab42edf85385f6a1085e0d6028c
commit r8-10252-gd523cd5109bc5ab42edf85385f6a1085e0d6028c
Author: Szabolcs Nagy
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95136
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95135
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85883
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gccbugreport at yandex dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95136
Bug ID: 95136
Summary: missing -Wuninitialized on an array access with a
variable offset
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95132
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94743
--- Comment #19 from Christophe Lyon ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #8)
> Patch sent: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-April/544872.html
>
> This is a simple improvement, hopefully simple enough for stage 4, yet
> us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94514
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Szabolcs Nagy :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6173489dbfe5828b2c4082d7a450a766779f87c7
commit r9-8592-g6173489dbfe5828b2c4082d7a450a766779f87c7
Author: Szabolcs Nagy
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94515
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Szabolcs Nagy :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:95833c34424f340a7e465ee38b6a41369bc7c90b
commit r9-8593-g95833c34424f340a7e465ee38b6a41369bc7c90b
Author: Szabolcs Nagy
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94748
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Szabolcs Nagy :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a1b74d49e2e25b29675fac4322bb7ba6cec5894
commit r9-8595-g9a1b74d49e2e25b29675fac4322bb7ba6cec5894
Author: Szabolcs Nagy
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94697
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Szabolcs Nagy :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6e42cdee5de2b3441afc88cc1166bdffe57
commit r9-8594-gf6e42cdee5de2b3441afc88cc1166bdffe57
Author: Szabolcs Nagy
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95119
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
So, in order for this to hang, two close statements
on the same unit are needed, the first one with an
error message.
Seems like the unit is not unlocked on the error return.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95135
Bug ID: 95135
Summary: Inconsistent CTAD behaviour with the "new" operator.
Product: gcc
Version: 7.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95134
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95133
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-14
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
shl %eax
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 28
pushl $x
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 32
callmemcpy
addl$28, %esp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 4
ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE0:
.size func, .-func
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 11.0.0 2020051
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95133
Bug ID: 95133
Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in
gimple_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at
tree-cfg.c:6075
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95107
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE in |ICE in hash_operand, at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95132
Bug ID: 95132
Summary: Concept checked after auto return type deduction
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
