https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95063
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95062
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95060
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |11.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95067
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-12
Summary|[10/11 Regr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95068
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57359
Bug 57359 depends on bug 95045, which changed state.
Bug 95045 Summary: [11 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95045
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95045
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95045
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bb63ca63e744c08bc5a9ffa53df62ea35f098b0b
commit r11-308-gbb63ca63e744c08bc5a9ffa53df62ea35f098b0b
Author: Richard Biener
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #18 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
Currently, I'm thinking to enhance GCC 'cunroll' as:
if the loop has multi-exits or upbound is not a fixed number, we may not do
'complete unroll' for the loop, except -funroll-all-loops is specified.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #17 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
For this case, as you said, I also think it is better to avoid unrolling for
the loop.
'#pragma GCC unroll 1' could help to prevent the loop to be unrolled, even
someone compiles it with aggressive unroll opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95071
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95074
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
This is where we're confused by the function introduced by M::f:
/* We do not perform argument-dependent lookup if
normal lookup finds a non-function, in accordance
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95074
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
--- Comment #1 from Mare
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95074
Bug ID: 95074
Summary: Function found via ADL when it should not
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95073
Bug ID: 95073
Summary: Add "did you mean" when fn declaration could be found
via ADL
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 83403, which changed state.
Bug 83403 Summary: Missed register promotion opportunities in loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83403
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83403
luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91518
luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 91518, which changed state.
Bug 91518 Summary: [9 Regression] segfault when run CPU2006 465.tonto since
r263875
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91518
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95061
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fbfa806e65c552e81b363756fd8e2925651f7333
commit r10-8134-gfbfa806e65c552e81b363756fd8e2925651f7333
Author: Ian Lance Tay
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95072
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95061
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4f157ed7749fd13c3562dd09696f7d675b86434f
commit r11-302-g4f157ed7749fd13c3562dd09696f7d675b86434f
Author: Ian Lance Taylor
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95072
Bug ID: 95072
Summary: -Warray-bounds false positive with flexible array
bounds (regression from GCC 9)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #10 from Bill Seurer ---
I tried the update on the spec 2000/2006 tests that were ICEing before and they
compile now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95071
Bug ID: 95071
Summary: ICE on select type block with assumed-rank selector
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94766
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95066
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95070
Bug ID: 95070
Summary: vec_cntlz_lsbb implementation uses BE semantics on LE
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95069
Bug ID: 95069
Summary: Capture by reference cannot use list-initalization
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94835
Stephen Casner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95066
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Reduced:
template
struct Foo {
template
explicit(static_cast(true)) operator Foo();
};
template
template
Foo::operator Foo() {
return {};
}
int
main ()
{
Foo a;
Foo b = a;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95048
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Argh, this only works if the wide encoding happens to be UCS-4 (or for 16-bit
wchar_t, UCS-2) because std::codecvt_utf8 only supports converting between that
and UTF-8. Which is why I used std::codecvt in t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95048
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Using std::codecvt_utf8 fixes it:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/fs_path.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/fs_path.h
@@ -836,8 +836,7 @@ namespace __detail
}
}
#else // ! windows
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95048
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Summary|wstring-co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95048
Carlos O'Donell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||carlos at redhat dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95048
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92583
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f50f6daa140186a048cbf33f54f4591eabf5f12
commit r11-291-g0f50f6daa140186a048cbf33f54f4591eabf5f12
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92654
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f50f6daa140186a048cbf33f54f4591eabf5f12
commit r11-291-g0f50f6daa140186a048cbf33f54f4591eabf5f12
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95060
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90748
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in |[9/10 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90748
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f981395c220c9afd73be138294946e085e64af78
commit r11-289-gf981395c220c9afd73be138294946e085e64af78
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93499
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1422c2e4462c9b7c44aa035ac56af77565556181
commit r11-288-g1422c2e4462c9b7c44aa035ac56af77565556181
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1422c2e4462c9b7c44aa035ac56af77565556181
commit r11-288-g1422c2e4462c9b7c44aa035ac56af77565556181
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Koenig ---
Hi,
I was unable to find a performance problem, so I take back my
presumption of the original problem. I have checked two versions
of the preprocessed source, with
+#pragma GCC unroll 1
while (coun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-11
Ever confirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95052
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 48511
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48511&action=edit
gcc11-pr95052.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94928
--- Comment #22 from Myron Walker ---
It does the same things a gcov and lcov combined but in python. It also does
merging of data but in a different way than gcov-tool. I might need to change
that. Another part of it is to allow access to di
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95068
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 from G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95068
Bug ID: 95068
Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_class_from_expr, at
fortran/trans-expr.c:484
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94775
--- Comment #16 from Marek Polacek ---
It caused testsuite failures on non-x86-64 platforms, see bug 94896.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95067
Bug ID: 95067
Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in tree_fits_shwi_p, at
tree.c:7262
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95051
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94775
--- Comment #15 from Roman Zhuykov ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #14)
> Patch reverted from 10/11.
Maybe I've missed something in gcc-patches, but why it was reverted? I can
imagine reasons to revert in 10 branch, but in master...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94928
--- Comment #21 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Myron Walker from comment #20)
> So I will probably continue working on the python script or package that can
> do much of the enhanced processing. One of the benefits of the python is I
> can p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95066
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at linux dot
vnet.ibm.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95064
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95046
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b2d298ff845ab7a07ffbd51da79473736da3324
commit r11-281-g2b2d298ff845ab7a07ffbd51da79473736da3324
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Mon May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91383
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at linkmauve dot fr
--- Comment #6 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95065
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95066
--- Comment #1 from Owen Smith ---
#include
template
class IsSafelyCastable : public std::false_type {};
template <>
class IsSafelyCastable : public std::true_type {};
template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95012
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95012
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:47f4703c33c4936fd423c2a1180b2de144115d3d
commit r11-280-g47f4703c33c4936fd423c2a1180b2de144115d3d
Author: Ian Lance Taylor
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95066
Bug ID: 95066
Summary: [C++ 20] Incorrect valid compilation with a
conditional explicit
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95064
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||powerpc64*-linux-gnu
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95063
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95065
Bug ID: 95065
Summary: Remove std::bind1st and std::bind2nd when building in
-std=c++17
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95063
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Reduced testcase that is valid:
template
struct S {
T a:12;
S () : a(0)
{
#pragma omp for linear(a)
for (int k = 0; k < 64; ++k)
a++;
}
};
S s;
I guess this boils down to what type shoul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95064
Bug ID: 95064
Summary: [11 regression] ICEs in fortran compiler starting with
r11-255
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95031
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey Walton ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #2)
> Please note that C++ isn't supported in the -fanalyzer implementation in GCC
> 10. I hope to get it working for GCC 11 (but there's a lot of work to do).
Oh, s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95063
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-11
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95020
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95020
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95063
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95063
Bug ID: 95063
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in tsubst_decl, at cp/pt.c:14633
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95062
Bug ID: 95062
Summary: [10/11 Regression]
libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/pr92843-1.c:26:
verify_array: Assertion `array[i] == value' failed
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95031
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Please note that C++ isn't supported in the -fanalyzer implementation in GCC
10. I hope to get it working for GCC 11 (but there's a lot of work to do).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95043
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Please note that C++ isn't supported in the GCC 10 implementation of -fanalyzer
(I hope to do so for GCC 11, but there's a lot of work to do).
In particular, I haven't implemented exceptions yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95007
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
I guess I'm thinking about the case where a string literal has been exposed as
a non-const "char *": the RFE here is for -fanalyzer to be able to detect if we
ever write to such a string (with interprocedural
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95049
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84f4954c38228e4cb3e6f0b5471883e6c2523631
commit r11-277-g84f4954c38228e4cb3e6f0b5471883e6c2523631
Author: Richard Biener
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95029
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #3 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Just as a quick cross check: the 10.1 release works without problems, so this
indeed must have been introduced in one of the earliest commits after the 10.1
was branched off.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95058
--- Comment #4 from Bill Seurer ---
And for the power 7 specific one (the other one also occurs on power 7)
Executing on host: /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95058
--- Comment #5 from Bill Seurer ---
Created attachment 48509
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48509&action=edit
dump file p7 specific
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95061
Bug ID: 95061
Summary: shared libgo library not found when running the
testsuite
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95058
--- Comment #3 from Bill Seurer ---
Created attachment 48508
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48508&action=edit
dump file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95058
--- Comment #2 from Bill Seurer ---
PASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr68892.c (test for excess errors)
XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr68892.c scan-tree-dump slp2 "not profitable"
PASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr68892.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2 "BB vectorizatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95060
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95060
Bug ID: 95060
Summary: vfnmsub132ps is not generated with -ffast-math
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57359
Bug 57359 depends on bug 94988, which changed state.
Bug 94988 Summary: [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr64110.c
scan-assembler vmovd[\\t ]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94988
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94988
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57359
Bug 57359 depends on bug 95025, which changed state.
Bug 95025 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in execute_sm_exit at
gcc/tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2224 since r11-161-g283cb9ea6293e813
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95025
What|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95025
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95025
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b6ff3ddecfa93d53867afaaa078f85fc848abbbd
commit r11-272-gb6ff3ddecfa93d53867afaaa078f85fc848abbbd
Author: Richard Biener
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94988
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b6ff3ddecfa93d53867afaaa078f85fc848abbbd
commit r11-272-gb6ff3ddecfa93d53867afaaa078f85fc848abbbd
Author: Richard Biener
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95052
--- Comment #5 from Krzysztof Nowicki ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4)
> I don't expect the commit above to have changed anything for the latter
> form, and I would expect each back end to choose the same optimal code to
> emit in b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94928
--- Comment #20 from Myron Walker ---
So I will probably continue working on the python script or package that can do
much of the enhanced processing. One of the benefits of the python is I can
process the code coverage data outside of a build e
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
