https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94737
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 02:39:37AM +, busby1 at llnl dot gov wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94737
>
> --- Comment #4 from Lee Busby ---
> (In reply to kargl from comment #3)
> > (In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94736
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
Indirect jump `goto *p` is optimized off, so there's no indirect jump, either
no need for inserting endbr64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94737
--- Comment #4 from Lee Busby ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #3)
> (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #2)
> > Correction, this is not a regression.
> >
> > F2018 has, in 19.2, paragraph 2
> >
> > # The global identifier of an entity s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94767
Bug ID: 94767
Summary: (unsigned bitfield) + (int) operation results in int,
not unsigned int.
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94737
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|rejects-valid |
--- Comment #3 from kargl at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94746
--- Comment #3 from Alejandro Colomar ---
I tried to use ``#pragma GCC diagnostic`` to enable ``-Wsystem-headers`` only
for that macro. It bloated me with completely unrelated errors from libraries.
So it is not an option.
The only workaround
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94765
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94746
--- Comment #2 from Alejandro Colomar ---
Maybe the design is not perfect.
Maybe some special warnings should still be warned about when they are used in
user's code. I don't think there are any possible false positives with this
warning. But
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94698
--- Comment #4 from Frederic Marchal ---
French translation has been updated and submitted to the Translation Project.
Thanks for the report.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77488
Fangrui Song changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i at maskray dot me
--- Comment #8 from F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94766
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Similar thing with file gcc/go/gofrontend/names.cc:
trunk.git/gcc/go/gofrontend/names.cc:1027:47: performance: Function parameter
'pkgpath' should be passed by const reference. [passedByValue]
Source code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94766
Bug ID: 94766
Summary: gcc/go/gofrontend/gogo.h:1076:25: performance:
Function parameter 'afnname' should be passed by const
reference. [passedByValue]
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94765
Bug ID: 94765
Summary: Floating point type template parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94764
--- Comment #2 from tabloid.adroit at gmail dot com ---
Do you think it is still UB at this moment? If not, I guess PR14769 could be
worked on?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94764
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||14769
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94764
Bug ID: 94764
Summary: block extern incorrectly resolved to external linkage
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94746
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94763
Bug ID: 94763
Summary: UNRESOLVED scan assembler tests on arm-none-eabi
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94762
Bug ID: 94762
Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault (in is_tm_irrevocable)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, trans-mem
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94761
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94761
Bug ID: 94761
Summary: host != target
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94739
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94739
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8fc8bf801e46d0d478c50bddecf5d8edf9511849
commit r10-7961-g8fc8bf801e46d0d478c50bddecf5d8edf9511849
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sat Apr 25 10:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94737
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Summary|[8/9/10 Regr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94737
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|BIND(C) names are not |[8/9/10 Regression] BIND(C)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93924
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Up to revion r242391 I get the error:
function selector() result(f)
1
Error: CLASS variable 'f' at (1) must be dummy, allocatable or pointer
pr93924.f90:29:19:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94760
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94760
Bug ID: 94760
Summary: coroutines: mismatch between traits and promise
parameter preview.
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94749
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93563
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Gfortran 6.5 gives the error:
class(TreeNode_t), dimension(:), allocatable :: children
1
Error: Derived type at (1) has not been previously de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81480
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
You're missing extra flags to set up the necessary include paths.
Why not just run 'make check' instead?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94753
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-25
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94759
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |iains at gcc dot gnu.org
Target M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94759
Bug ID: 94759
Summary: coroutines: rejects traits specialisation with
non-class returns.
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93563
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-25
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93924
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94758
Bug ID: 94758
Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2310 on hppa64 with
__thread variable
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94578
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cf3f7b309ffdd888fdd85048ac9b4bcdc2713a45
commit r10-7960-gcf3f7b309ffdd888fdd85048ac9b4bcdc2713a45
Author: Thomas König
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94752
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94757
Bug ID: 94757
Summary: GCC does not optimise unsigned multiplication known
not to overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94752
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94755
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94755
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.4
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
Bug ID: 94756
Summary: strtoflt128 assigns some subnormals incorrectly on MS
Windows
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
44 matches
Mail list logo
