[Bug tree-optimization/94727] [10 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 since r10-5071-g02d895504cc59be0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94727 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* --- Comment #2 from Richard

[Bug testsuite/94725] Tests with proprietary license notices

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94725 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle2 at outlook dot com,

[Bug tree-optimization/94718] Failure to optimize opposite signs check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94718 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-04-23 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/94727] [10 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 since r10-5071-g02d895504cc59be0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94727 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Summary|GCC produces incor

[Bug c/94722] implement __attribute__((no_stack_protector)) function attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94722 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug middle-end/94726] [10 Regression] internal compiler error: in uniform_vector_p, at tree.c:11214 since r10-2089-g21caa1a2649d586f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94726 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-04-23 Known to fail|

[Bug tree-optimization/94724] [10 Regression] wrong code at -O0 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r10-7344-gca6c722561ce9b9d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94724 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfir

[Bug tree-optimization/94717] [10 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in output_merged_store (gimple-ssa-store-merging.c:4307) with -O2 -fnon-call-exceptions -ftracer since r10-3575-g629387a6586a7531

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94717 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Summary|[10 Regression] IC

[Bug c++/94716] Address of constexpr variable not usable in constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94716 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug tree-optimization/94727] New: GCC produces incorrect code with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94727 Bug ID: 94727 Summary: GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimiza

[Bug analyzer/94713] Analyzer is buggy on uninitialized pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94713 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug analyzer/94714] Analyzer: no warning on access of an uninitialized variable of automatic storage duration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94714 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/94645] [10 Regression][concepts] incorrect concept evaluation with decltype, plus internal error since r10-7554-gf1ad7bac76b66257

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94645 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/94087] std::random_device often fails when used from multiple threads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94087 wnereiz at kawashiro dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wnereiz at kawashiro dot or

[Bug c/94726] New: internal compiler error: in uniform_vector_p, at tree.c:11214

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94726 Bug ID: 94726 Summary: internal compiler error: in uniform_vector_p, at tree.c:11214 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c++/90320] [8/9/10 Regression] Explicit constructor called implicitly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90320 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/94665] missed minmax optimization opportunity for if/else structure.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94665 z.zhanghaijian at huawei dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Sta

[Bug rtl-optimization/94665] missed minmax optimization opportunity for if/else structure.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94665 --- Comment #18 from z.zhanghaijian at huawei dot com --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #17) > [ Please don't add other email addresses for me; I get enough mail already, > I don't need all bugzilla mail in duplicate :-) ] OK

[Bug testsuite/94725] New: Tests with proprietary license notices

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94725 Bug ID: 94725 Summary: Tests with proprietary license notices Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite

[Bug tree-optimization/94724] New: wrong code at -O0 on x86_64-linux-gnu

-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: qrzhang at gatech dot edu Target Milestone: --- It happens at -O0. gcc-9 works fine. Bisection points to g:ca6c722561ce9b9dc7b59cfd9d2 The correct output is 1. $ gcc-trunk -v gcc version 10.0.1 20200422

[Bug tree-optimization/88443] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overflow warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Version|9.0 |7.0 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---

[Bug translation/94698] Improper French translation for "override"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94698 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cf88e25a2274f929d4789ca498fa3834836629c9 commit r10-7904-gcf88e25a2274f929d4789ca498fa3834836629c9 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/88443] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overflow warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443 Bug 88443 depends on bug 88441, which changed state. Bug 88441 Summary: missing warning on a buffer overflow with non-constant offset and constant size https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88441 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/88441] missing warning on a buffer overflow with non-constant offset and constant size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88441 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/94702] std::unsequenced_policy should not be defined for C++17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94702 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Created attachment 48358 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48358&action=edit Patch to set __cpp_lib_execution correctly If/when this bug is fixed we'll want something like this patch so

[Bug libstdc++/94702] std::unsequenced_policy should not be defined for C++17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94702 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > Another bug is that we don't support the __cpp_lib_execution macro, which > should have been updated to indicate this policy is supported. That has been fixe

[Bug c++/94723] New: Missing -Wdeprecated warning when user-declared copy assignment operator is defined as deleted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94723 Bug ID: 94723 Summary: Missing -Wdeprecated warning when user-declared copy assignment operator is defined as deleted Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug preprocessor/94657] [patch] libcpp uses 'AR = ar' tool even if --build/--host are passed explicitly.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94657 --- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich --- Sent as https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-April/544379.html

[Bug tree-optimization/84395] -Wstringop-truncation where -Wstringop-overflow is expected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84395 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-04-22 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/88443] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overflow warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443 Bug 88443 depends on bug 90132, which changed state. Bug 90132 Summary: make bootstrap fails with -O3 (gcc9 snapshot 20190414) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90132 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug bootstrap/90132] make bootstrap fails with -O3 (gcc9 snapshot 20190414)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90132 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW

[Bug c++/94510] [9 Regression] nullptr_t implicitly cast to zero twice in std::array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94510 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/89428] missing -Wstringop-overflow on a PHI with variable offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89428 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.0, 9.2.0 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/83819] [meta-bug] missing strlen optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83819 Bug 83819 depends on bug 85484, which changed state. Bug 85484 Summary: missing -Wstringop-overflow for strcpy with a string of non-const length https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85484 What|Removed |

[Bug tree-optimization/85484] missing -Wstringop-overflow for strcpy with a string of non-const length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85484 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/88443] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overflow warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443 Bug 88443 depends on bug 85484, which changed state. Bug 85484 Summary: missing -Wstringop-overflow for strcpy with a string of non-const length https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85484 What|Removed |

[Bug tree-optimization/82456] missing -Wstringop-overflow on strcpy reading past the end of an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82456 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- GCC 10 detects all these problems but only with -Warray-bounds (in -Wall) and not by -Wstringop-overflow (enabled by default), so I'm going to leave this open until it's also fixed there. $ gcc -O2 -S -Wall p

[Bug target/94622] testsuite/gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-1.c fails on powerpc64le with -mpcrel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94622 acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|AS

[Bug libfortran/94586] trigd_lib.inc:84:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'fmaf'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94586 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #48356|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/92815] [8/9/10 Regression] spurious -Wstringop-overflow writing into a flexible array of an extern struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92815 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2019-12-05 00:00:00 |2020-4-22 Known to fail|

[Bug libstdc++/94702] std::unsequenced_policy should not be defined for C++17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94702 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Another bug is that we don't support the __cpp_lib_execution macro, which should have been updated to indicate this policy is supported.

[Bug c/94722] implement __attribute__((no_stack_protector)) function attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94722 --- Comment #3 from Nick Desaulniers --- Ah, sorry, just was sent: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200316180303.GR2156@tucnak/ which is also relevant regarding naming. Still happy to buy the beers though.

[Bug c/94722] implement __attribute__((no_stack_protector)) function attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94722 --- Comment #2 from Nick Desaulniers --- Also note this post in the thread [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200422192113.gg26...@zn.tnic/T/#m88641fe74bdffe7beaa925dfe2d8146a08a47bac, also https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200422192113.gg26...@zn.

[Bug c/94722] implement __attribute__((no_stack_protector)) function attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94722 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Note that glibc currently uses __attribute__ ((__optimize__ ("-fno-stack-protector"))) (via a macro called inhibit_stack_protector) for this.

[Bug tree-optimization/81436] missing -Wstringop-overflow on strncat to a zero-size buffer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81436 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.0, 8.2.0, 9.1.0 Last reconfirmed|201

[Bug tree-optimization/88443] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overflow warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443 Bug 88443 depends on bug 80074, which changed state. Bug 80074 Summary: missing -Wstringop-overflow on a detected __builtin___sprintf_chk overflow https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80074 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/80074] missing -Wstringop-overflow on a detected __builtin___sprintf_chk overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80074 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Known to fail|

[Bug middle-end/79016] missing -Wstringop-overflow= overflowing allocated buffers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79016 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/88443] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overflow warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443 Bug 88443 depends on bug 79016, which changed state. Bug 79016 Summary: missing -Wstringop-overflow= overflowing allocated buffers https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79016 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c/94722] New: implement __attribute__((no_stack_protector)) function attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94722 Bug ID: 94722 Summary: implement __attribute__((no_stack_protector)) function attribute Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/88443] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overflow warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443 Bug 88443 depends on bug 91397, which changed state. Bug 91397 Summary: -Wstringop-overflow specified bound 18446744073709551615 exceeds maximum object size 9223372036854775807 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91397 What

[Bug c++/91397] -Wstringop-overflow specified bound 18446744073709551615 exceeds maximum object size 9223372036854775807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91397 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/94510] [9 Regression] nullptr_t implicitly cast to zero twice in std::array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94510 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:35699e75a502bb25a2cb23a456e8d6f036b8f226 commit r9-8526-g35699e75a502bb25a2cb23a456e8d6f036b8f226 Author: Martin Sebor Dat

[Bug c++/94719] ICE with constrained inherited constructor template from class template since r10-7859

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94719 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-4-22 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/94549] [10 Regression] Inherited and constrained constructors are "ambiguous" even if they aren't

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94549 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72d0ef73d2cd46bda2f28e1866d637cfe8edb208 commit r10-7895-g72d0ef73d2cd46bda2f28e1866d637cfe8edb208 Author: Patrick Palka Date: We

[Bug c++/94719] ICE with constrained inherited constructor template from class template since r10-7859

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94719 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72d0ef73d2cd46bda2f28e1866d637cfe8edb208 commit r10-7895-g72d0ef73d2cd46bda2f28e1866d637cfe8edb208 Author: Patrick Palka Date: We

[Bug libfortran/94586] trigd_lib.inc:84:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'fmaf'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94586 --- Comment #38 from John David Anglin --- Because mk-kinds-h.sh has not been modifies, we still get long double in kinds.h with gcc-10: typedef long double GFC_REAL_16; typedef complex long double GFC_COMPLEX_16; However with my patch, this do

[Bug c++/93807] -std=c++2a allows to omit out-of-class declaration in template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93807 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/93807] -std=c++2a allows to omit out-of-class declaration in template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93807 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:edfa7c684d329708dcee733fcb552bed9d931621 commit r10-7894-gedfa7c684d329708dcee733fcb552bed9d931621 Author: Marek Polacek Date: Tu

[Bug libfortran/94586] trigd_lib.inc:84:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'fmaf'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94586 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #48352|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libfortran/94586] trigd_lib.inc:84:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'fmaf'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94586 --- Comment #36 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1868599f8daf7798018ce8a8f314015f5a2ac520 commit r10-7893-g1868599f8daf7798018ce8a8f314015f5a2ac520 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: W

[Bug libfortran/94694] [10 Regression][libgfortran] libgfortran does not compile on bare-metal aarch64-none-elf (newlib)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94694 --- Comment #28 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1868599f8daf7798018ce8a8f314015f5a2ac520 commit r10-7893-g1868599f8daf7798018ce8a8f314015f5a2ac520 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: W

[Bug c++/94721] C++2a: Three-way comparison operator for function pointers rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94721 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Ever con

[Bug c++/94721] New: C++2a: Three-way comparison operator for function pointers rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94721 Bug ID: 94721 Summary: C++2a: Three-way comparison operator for function pointers rejected Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/94707] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94707 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Co

[Bug other/94720] [10 regression] execution failures with r10-7850

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94720 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/94720] New: [10 regression] execution failures with r10-7850

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94720 Bug ID: 94720 Summary: [10 regression] execution failures with r10-7850 Product: gcc Version: 9.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug rtl-optimization/94708] rtl combine should consider NaNs when generate fp min/max

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94708 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-04-22 Status|UNCON

[Bug c/94712] aarch64：Adjust some testcases for ilp32 option conflict

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94712 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug c/94712] aarch64：Adjust some testcases for ilp32 option conflict

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94712 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:545f1addf7247a800bbb943650efaa4c35d3bd1d commit r10-7892-g545f1addf7247a800bbb943650efaa4c35d3bd1d Author: Duan bo Date: Wed

[Bug target/94678] aarch64: unexpected result with -mgeneral-regs-only and sve

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94678 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/94678] aarch64: unexpected result with -mgeneral-regs-only and sve

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94678 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:154ae7d4e921d704118d6a16ee5cc2a10b9047da commit r10-7891-g154ae7d4e921d704118d6a16ee5cc2a10b9047da Author: Fei Yang Date: Wed

[Bug target/94622] testsuite/gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-1.c fails on powerpc64le with -mpcrel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94622 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Aaron Sawdey : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3bcdb5dec72b6d7b197821c2b814bc9fc07f4628 commit r10-7889-g3bcdb5dec72b6d7b197821c2b814bc9fc07f4628 Author: Aaron Sawdey Date: Mon

[Bug target/94710] [8/9/10 Regression] Assembler messages: Error: operand out of range (4 is not between 0 and 3) (xxsldwi 0,32,33,4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94710 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- I guess there are two issues, one is a backend issue that vec_shr_optab expander doesn't handle shift amount 0 correctly, and another in the middle-end, that it shouldn't be dumb and for shift_amt == const0_r

[Bug libfortran/94586] trigd_lib.inc:84:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'fmaf'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94586 --- Comment #35 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2020-04-22 12:27 p.m., sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote: > I suspect that having HPUX map > > REAL(4) <--> float ! f suffix > REAL(8) <--> double ! no suffix > REAL

[Bug translation/94698] Improper French translation for "override"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94698 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c95d1dd7f5ec48e4c6d622b57843aaa25528170b commit r10-7887-gc95d1dd7f5ec48e4c6d622b57843aaa25528170b Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug rtl-optimization/94665] missed minmax optimization opportunity for if/else structure.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94665 --- Comment #17 from Segher Boessenkool --- [ Please don't add other email addresses for me; I get enough mail already, I don't need all bugzilla mail in duplicate :-) ] (In reply to z.zhanghaij...@huawei.com from comment #16) > Ok, I will cre

[Bug target/94707] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94707 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #8) > If C++17 has added new hidden fields It hasn't. What changed is how G++ represents such types. The code is the same in C++14 and C++17, i.e. there's an empty b

[Bug target/94282] [amdgcn] ld: error: undefined symbol: __gxx_personality_v0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94282 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/94719] ICE with constrained inherited constructor template from class template since r10-7859

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94719 --- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka --- I am testing a fix.

[Bug c++/94719] New: ICE with constrained inherited constructor template from class template since r10-7859

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94719 Bug ID: 94719 Summary: ICE with constrained inherited constructor template from class template since r10-7859 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug tree-optimization/94718] Failure to optimize opposite signs check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94718 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/94718] New: Failure to optimize opposite signs check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94718 Bug ID: 94718 Summary: Failure to optimize opposite signs check Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-opti

[Bug tree-optimization/90377] [10 Regression] New -Wstringop-overflow with -O3 since r270852

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90377 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/88443] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overflow warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443 Bug 88443 depends on bug 90377, which changed state. Bug 90377 Summary: [10 Regression] New -Wstringop-overflow with -O3 since r270852 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90377 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/94704] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on s390x/s390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94704 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/94710] [8/9/10 Regression] Assembler messages: Error: operand out of range (4 is not between 0 and 3) (xxsldwi 0,32,33,4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94710 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassig

[Bug target/94707] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94707 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug tree-optimization/94717] New: [10 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in output_merged_store (gimple-ssa-store-merging.c:4307) with -O2 -fnon-call-exceptions -ftracer

/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r10-7870-20200422110559-g413232a55b9-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 10.0.1 20200422 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug libfortran/94586] trigd_lib.inc:84:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'fmaf'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94586 --- Comment #34 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 04:02:01PM +, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94586 > > --- Comment #33 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- > On 2020-04-22 10:54

[Bug fortran/90350] ubound ICE on assumed size array even though explicit bound is specified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90350 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:808a6eadda1a353ce3a70556feac128580491b24 commit r10-7886-g808a6eadda1a353ce3a70556feac128580491b24 Author: Jose Rui Faustino de S

[Bug target/94707] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94707 --- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt --- Thus the compiler is acting as expected in both cases, so far as I can see. If C++17 has added new hidden fields, that seems to have introduced an incompatibility between C++17 and C++14 targeted code for the

[Bug target/91834] [10 Regression ] [AArch64] LSE atomics, warnings due to unpredictable behavior with strx and the same register for s and t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91834 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4eaef24ba1f83ccfb54c9e473eb203cce3a9f12f commit r8-10210-g4eaef24ba1f83ccfb54c9e473eb203cce3a9f12f Author: Andre

[Bug target/93053] [9 Regression] libgcc build failure with old binutils on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93053 --- Comment #16 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a69a60c4969cea06c1d44b5e3e4970595041e510 commit r8-10213-ga69a60c4969cea06c1d44b5e3e4970595041e510 Author: Andre

[Bug target/94435] [9/10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94435 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1dbd821ee74e6c234e61e25b0801a0b0949bcc67 commit r8-10214-g1dbd821ee74e6c234e61e25b0801a0b0949bcc67 Author: Andre

[Bug target/91833] [10 Regression] [AArch64] LSE atomics depends on glibc specific sys/auxv.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91833 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d44ad1e0a66651495ed964058cdd6db0d99d876 commit r8-10211-g5d44ad1e0a66651495ed964058cdd6db0d99d876 Author: Andre

[Bug target/90724] ICE with __sync_bool_compare_and_swap with -march=armv8.2-a+sve

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90724 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69472d76d2456a447f61bc539bd6fe262c167bcf commit r8-10215-g69472d76d2456a447f61bc539bd6fe262c167bcf Author: Andre

[Bug target/94368] [9 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at final.c:3074(error: could not split insn) on aarch64-linux-gnu since r9-3744

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94368 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:163e0d03f2cdc80de4968c4be4694cdaeaf47fcd commit r8-10212-g163e0d03f2cdc80de4968c4be4694cdaeaf47fcd Author: Andre

[Bug target/92692] Saving off the callee saved register between ldxr/stxr (caused by shrink wrapping improvements)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92692 --- Comment #25 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0b65e477890b7fe7f47a3dd85975ab7ee09b0609 commit r8-10205-g0b65e477890b7fe7f47a3dd85975ab7ee09b0609 Author: Andre

[Bug target/94707] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94707 --- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt --- ELF V1 does not have a concept of homogeneous aggregates.

  1   2   >