[Bug c++/33661] template methods forget explicit local register asm vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33661 Martin Papik changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mp8191mp at gmail dot com --- Comment #17

[Bug tree-optimization/94482] [8/9 Regression] Inserting into vector with optimization enabled on x86 generates incorrect result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94482 --- Comment #26 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bb87d5cc77db1f28083990f44e20b6c0728d925e commit r10-7686-gbb87d5cc77db1f28083990f44e20b6c0728d925e Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: S

[Bug target/94551] [10 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94551 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a615ea71bc8fbf31b9bc71cb373a7ca5b9cca44a commit r10-7685-ga615ea71bc8fbf31b9bc71cb373a7ca5b9cca44a Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Sa

[Bug debug/94495] [10 Regression] Debug info size growth since r10-7515-g2c0fa3ecf70d199a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94495 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a615ea71bc8fbf31b9bc71cb373a7ca5b9cca44a commit r10-7685-ga615ea71bc8fbf31b9bc71cb373a7ca5b9cca44a Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: S

[Bug c++/93383] ICE on accessing field of a structure which is non-type template parameter, -std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93383 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||raphael.grimm at kit dot edu --- Comment

[Bug c++/93383] ICE on accessing field of a structure which is non-type template parameter, -std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93383 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/93639] [c++2a] Segfault on non type template parameter and consteval (master)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93639 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug bootstrap/89494] Bootstrap error when using GCC 4.2.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89494 --- Comment #12 from Piotr Kubaj --- This issue can be fixed with the following patches: --- gcc/dumpfile.c.orig 2020-04-07 14:09:14 UTC +++ gcc/dumpfile.c @@ -2055,7 +2055,7 @@ temp_dump_context::temp_dump_context (bool forcibly_en

[Bug bootstrap/87252] gcc-4.4 cross-builds broken, apparently in self-tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87252 --- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to Abrahm Scully from comment #9) > Either way, building gcc-4.7.4 first and then building gcc-10 with that > produces a compiler without the problem. > > Again, sorry for the noise. Please,

[Bug target/94494] gcc-10 unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94494 --- Comment #5 from Abrahm Scully --- I can't comment on the patch's correctness, but applied to gcc-10-20200405 it does prevent the "unrecognizable insn" error.

[Bug c++/94528] coroutines: ICE building cppcoro in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14399

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94528 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/94538] [10 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.c:2223 (insn does not satisfy its constraints) with -mcpu=cortex-m23 -mslow-flash-data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94538 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 fr

[Bug target/94538] [10 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.c:2223 (insn does not satisfy its constraints) with -mcpu=cortex-m23 -mslow-flash-data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94538 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0666767eb4cc864f00ba34d97b9d58f8dc650bba commit r10-7682-g0666767eb4cc864f00ba34d97b9d58f8dc650bba Author: Iain Sandoe Date: Fri

[Bug c++/94528] coroutines: ICE building cppcoro in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14399

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94528 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0666767eb4cc864f00ba34d97b9d58f8dc650bba commit r10-7682-g0666767eb4cc864f00ba34d97b9d58f8dc650bba Author: Iain Sandoe Date: Fri

[Bug c++/94553] Revisit [basic.scope.declarative]/4.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94553 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- To fix CWG 2289, we need this: --- a/gcc/cp/decl.c +++ b/gcc/cp/decl.c @@ -1705,6 +1705,9 @@ duplicate_decls (tree newdecl, tree olddecl, bool newdecl_is_friend) inform (olddecl_loc, "previous declarat

[Bug middle-end/94548] [AVR] Part of the code seems to have disappeared in the elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94548 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/94548] [AVR] Part of the code seems to have disappeared in the elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94548 --- Comment #2 from fabrice salvaire --- Yes I missed this important point on 8-bit architecture ... This line doesn't also work for some reasons const unsigned long int f0 = (8*(10ULL)^(6ULL)) / (1000*256ULL); but this one works const unsign

[Bug fortran/93762] Truncation of deferred-length string when passing as optional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93762 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl --- Here's a better testcasei, which removes IO statement, which makes it easier to read -fdump-tree-original. module deepest_call_m implicit none contains subroutine deepest_call(str) charact

[Bug target/94556] [10 Regression] FAIL: nptl/tst-thread-exit-clobber

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94556 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||83641 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- This is

[Bug target/94556] [10 Regression] FAIL: nptl/tst-thread-exit-clobber

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94556 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 48256 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48256&action=edit A tescase [hjl@gnu-cfl-2 tmp]$ /usr/gcc-9.3.1-x32/bin/g++ -mx32 -O2 foo.cc -lpthread [hjl@gnu-cfl-2 tmp]$ ./a.out in

[Bug fortran/93762] Truncation of deferred-length string when passing as optional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93762 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug target/94494] gcc-10 unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94494 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/94548] [AVR] Part of the code seems to have disappeared in the elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94548 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-04-10 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug target/94557] New: [9 regression] r9-8486 causes several builtin instruction test case execution failures on power 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94557 Bug ID: 94557 Summary: [9 regression] r9-8486 causes several builtin instruction test case execution failures on power 9 Product: gcc Version: 9.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/94556] [10 Regression] FAIL: nptl/tst-thread-exit-clobber

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94556 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > It is caused by r10-2846: > > commit bc4aa158c9490e76573bee3eec90f893b7d0b1ae > Author: Uros Bizjak > Date: Wed Aug 28 17:09:51 2019 +0200 > > * config/i386/i386-fea

[Bug target/94556] [10 Regression] FAIL: nptl/tst-thread-exit-clobber

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94556 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug c++/94546] [10 Regression] unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind nontype_argument_pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94546 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Assig

[Bug c++/94523] [10 Regression] error: 'constexpr' evaluation depth exceeds maximum of 512 (use '-fconstexpr-depth=' to increase the maximum) since r10-7490-g76f09260b7eccd6c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94523 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/87252] gcc-4.4 cross-builds broken, apparently in self-tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87252 --- Comment #9 from Abrahm Scully --- I'm no longer convinced that I didn't see the problem previously because I just wasn't running the tests. Stage 1 has checking enabled... so I don't know why this problem showed up for others in gcc 9 but not

[Bug libstdc++/94545] std::to_integer(std::numeric_limits::max()) returns 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94545 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Mercier --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > (In reply to Thomas Mercier from comment #2) > > I thought that might be the response. Then why does it compile? > > Because the standard requires it to. > >

[Bug target/94556] New: [10 Regression] FAIL: nptl/tst-thread-exit-clobber

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94556 Bug ID: 94556 Summary: [10 Regression] FAIL: nptl/tst-thread-exit-clobber Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/94551] [10 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94551 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- I'm bootstrapping/regtesting that patch overnight on {x86_64,i686,powerpc64{,le}}-linux and will commit tomorrow if it passes to unbreak everybody.

[Bug other/94555] [10 regression] ICE compiling gfortran.dg/substr_6.f90 after r10-7665

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94555 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug target/94551] [10 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94551 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- C

[Bug c++/94554] spurious -Waddress warning within "if constexpr" function-null compares

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94554 --- Comment #2 from Melissa --- Templates that take an optional function pointer as a template parameter. It lets you have templates that change behavior if a null function pointer is passed.

[Bug c++/94554] spurious -Waddress warning within "if constexpr" function-null compares

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94554 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug other/94555] New: [10 regression] ICE compiling gfortran.dg/substr_6.f90 after r10-7665

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94555 Bug ID: 94555 Summary: [10 regression] ICE compiling gfortran.dg/substr_6.f90 after r10-7665 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/94545] std::to_integer(std::numeric_limits::max()) returns 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94545 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- cppreference does document this, see the second row of the "Return value" table at https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/numeric_limits/max

[Bug libstdc++/94545] std::to_integer(std::numeric_limits::max()) returns 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94545 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Thomas Mercier from comment #2) > I thought that might be the response. Then why does it compile? Because the standard requires it to. > The fact that it does, and produces a result is surpri

[Bug target/94551] [10 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94551 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/94494] gcc-10 unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94494 --- Comment #3 from Abrahm Scully --- Not sure if this is helpful, but "gcc -v" outputs: Reading specs from /opt/tools-20200401/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/10/specs COLLECT_GCC=/opt/tools-20200401/bin/gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/opt/tools-20200401/lib

[Bug target/94494] gcc-10 unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94494 --- Comment #2 from Abrahm Scully --- Created attachment 48255 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48255&action=edit preprocessed source file With gcc-10-20200329, "g++ -Wall -ftree-vectorize -march=pentium3 -O2 -m32 -c illegal-

[Bug c++/94554] New: spurious -Waddress warning within "if constexpr" function-null compares

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94554 Bug ID: 94554 Summary: spurious -Waddress warning within "if constexpr" function-null compares Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug inline-asm/94552] issue with branch offset calculation by m68k-linux-gnu-as

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94552 Jean-Michel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/94553] Revisit [basic.scope.declarative]/4.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94553 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid --- Comment #1 from Mare

[Bug c++/94553] New: Revisit [basic.scope.declarative]/4.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94553 Bug ID: 94553 Summary: Revisit [basic.scope.declarative]/4.2 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/94149] __is_constructible doesn't know about C++20 parenthesized init for arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94149 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/94149] __is_constructible doesn't know about C++20 parenthesized init for arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94149 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62c25d7adb1a5664982449dda0e7f9ca63cf4735 commit r10-7681-g62c25d7adb1a5664982449dda0e7f9ca63cf4735 Author: Marek Polacek Date: Th

[Bug testsuite/92550] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-8.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92550 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |testsuite Summary|[10 Reg

[Bug inline-asm/94552] New: issue with branch offset calculation by m68k-linux-gnu-as

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94552 Bug ID: 94552 Summary: issue with branch offset calculation by m68k-linux-gnu-as Product: gcc Version: 7.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug target/94551] [10 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94551 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94495#c11

[Bug fortran/93762] Truncation of deferred-length string when passing as optional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93762 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/94551] New: [10 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94551 Bug ID: 94551 Summary: [10 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/93579] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_substring_expr, at fortran/trans-expr.c:8587

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93579 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/94545] std::to_integer(std::numeric_limits::max()) returns 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94545 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Mercier --- I thought that might be the response. Then why does it compile? The fact that it does, and produces a result is surprising. I don't know what the standard says, but just looking at cppreference it says that

[Bug c++/94550] New: False positive with -Wparentheses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94550 Bug ID: 94550 Summary: False positive with -Wparentheses Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ A

[Bug c++/17314] Error message wrongly shows declared rather than inherited access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17314 Igel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ich.freak at gmx dot net --- Comment #21 from Ige

[Bug debug/94495] [10 Regression] Debug info size growth since r10-7515-g2c0fa3ecf70d199a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94495 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/94549] New: [10 Regression] Inherited and constrained constructors are "ambiguous" even if they aren't

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94549 Bug ID: 94549 Summary: [10 Regression] Inherited and constrained constructors are "ambiguous" even if they aren't Product: gcc Version: c++-concepts Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/92856] incorrectly accepts invalid C++11 braced initialisation of double from long double

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92856 Giuseppe D'Angelo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dangelog at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug middle-end/93465] [10 Regression] ICE in oacc_verify_routine_clauses, at omp-general.c:1802 since r10-471-gb48f44bf77a39fef

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93465 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|10.0| Resolution|---

[Bug libgomp/92843] [OpenACC] Wrong/missing dynamic reference counting for structured 'REFCOUNT_INFINITY'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92843 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c7a476c5ad3761cb5373f8c59a92e04525c5638 commit r9-8489-g3c7a476c5ad3761cb5373f8c59a92e04525c5638 Author: Julian Brown D

[Bug middle-end/93465] [10 Regression] ICE in oacc_verify_routine_clauses, at omp-general.c:1802 since r10-471-gb48f44bf77a39fef

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93465 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff3f862b451496dd4afbe2dbfae82afab59a42c6 commit r10-7676-gff3f862b451496dd4afbe2dbfae82afab59a42c6 Author: Thomas Schwinge Date:

[Bug c/89433] Repeated use of the OpenACC 'routine' directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89433 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff3f862b451496dd4afbe2dbfae82afab59a42c6 commit r10-7676-gff3f862b451496dd4afbe2dbfae82afab59a42c6 Author: Thomas Schwinge Date:

[Bug libgomp/92843] [OpenACC] Wrong/missing dynamic reference counting for structured 'REFCOUNT_INFINITY'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92843 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:be9862dd96945772ae0692bc95b37ec6dbcabda0 commit r10-7678-gbe9862dd96945772ae0692bc95b37ec6dbcabda0 Author: Julian Brown Date:

[Bug c++/94546] [10 Regression] unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind nontype_argument_pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94546 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|rejects-valid |ice-on-valid-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/94546] unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind nontype_argument_pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94546 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/94548] New: [AVR] Part of the code seems to have disappeared in the elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94548 Bug ID: 94548 Summary: [AVR] Part of the code seems to have disappeared in the elf Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug target/94541] [8/9/10 Regression] -mx32 gcc produces wrong code passing structs by value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94541 --- Comment #16 from Iain Buclaw --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #15) > I will fix it in glibc: > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25810 Thanks, that certainly explains why I couldn't get it down any further.

[Bug debug/94495] [10 Regression] Debug info size growth since r10-7515-g2c0fa3ecf70d199a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94495 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab --- Yes, it does.

[Bug target/82038] Very poor optimization of constant multiply on ARM Cortex-M7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82038 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug target/94541] [8/9/10 Regression] -mx32 gcc produces wrong code passing structs by value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94541 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|https://bugzilla.kernel.org |https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug rtl-optimization/70164] [8/9/10 Regression] Code/performance regression due to poor register allocation on Cortex-M0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70164 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug target/56550] cortex-m3: incorrect write to member of volatile packed structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56550 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org T

[Bug debug/94495] [10 Regression] Debug info size growth since r10-7515-g2c0fa3ecf70d199a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94495 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #9) > This breaks aarch64 -mabi=ilp32. Does https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-April/543702.html fix that?

[Bug debug/94495] [10 Regression] Debug info size growth since r10-7515-g2c0fa3ecf70d199a

r.cc:31: > /opt/gcc/gcc-20200410/Build/aarch64-suse-linux/ilp32/libstdc++-v3/include/ > ext/pool_allocator.h: In member function '_Tp* > __gnu_cxx::__pool_alloc<_Tp>::allocate(__gnu_cxx::__pool_alloc<_Tp>:: > size_type, const void*) [with _Tp = wchar_t]': >

[Bug testsuite/94547] New: gcc.target/arm/acle/cde.c fails on armeb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94547 Bug ID: 94547 Summary: gcc.target/arm/acle/cde.c fails on armeb Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite

[Bug tree-optimization/58195] Missed optimization opportunity when returning a conditional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58195 --- Comment #4 from Joel Yliluoma --- Still confirmed on GCC 10 (Debian 10-20200324-1) 10.0.1 20200324 (experimental) [master revision 596c90d3559:023579257f5:906b3eb9df6c577d3f6e9c3ea5c9d7e4d1e90536] Seems I lack the oomph to update the "confi

[Bug debug/94495] [10 Regression] Debug info size growth since r10-7515-g2c0fa3ecf70d199a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94495 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab --- This breaks aarch64 -mabi=ilp32. during RTL pass: vartrack In file included from ../../../../../../libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/pool_allocator.cc:31: /opt/gcc/gcc-20200410/Build/aarch64-suse-linux/ilp32/libstdc

[Bug libstdc++/94545] std::to_integer(std::numeric_limits::max()) returns 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94545 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/94546] New: unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind nontype_argument_pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94546 Bug ID: 94546 Summary: unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind nontype_argument_pack Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid