[Bug testsuite/94334] new tests gcc.dg/lto/pr94271 fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94334 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/93484] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1120 since r7-4028-g87c9fca50cbe7ca9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93484 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc do

[Bug driver/94330] No warning if jobserver not available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94330 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Component|other

[Bug tree-optimization/94043] [9/10 Regression] ICE in superloop_at_depth, at cfgloop.c:78

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94043 --- Comment #12 from Kewen Lin --- Created attachment 48122 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48122&action=edit ppc64le tested patch Thanks Richi! A patch draft attached to ensure on the right track, also bootstrapped/regress

[Bug c/94337] New: Incorrect "dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94337 Bug ID: 94337 Summary: Incorrect "dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules" warning Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug c++/94336] New: template keyword accepted before destructor names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94336 Bug ID: 94336 Summary: template keyword accepted before destructor names Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/60846] Add 128-bit integer types for general use on 32-bit/64-bit CPUs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60846 mirh at protonmail dot ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mirh at protonmail dot ch ---

[Bug tree-optimization/94335] False positive -Wstringop-overflow warning with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94335 --- Comment #2 from Romain Geissler --- Thanks for the explanation. However few observations: - Is it really expected that the wording of the warning seems to imply gcc knows for sure that there is an invalid access ? What is the warning meant

[Bug tree-optimization/94335] False positive -Wstringop-overflow warning with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94335 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic CC|

[Bug target/93819] PPC64 builtin vec_rlnm() argument order is wrong.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93819 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Carl Love : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e97929e20b2f52e6cfc046c1302324d1b24d95e3 commit r10-7389-ge97929e20b2f52e6cfc046c1302324d1b24d95e3 Author: Carl Love Date: Wed Mar 25

[Bug tree-optimization/94335] New: False positive -Wstringop-overflow warning with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94335 Bug ID: 94335 Summary: False positive -Wstringop-overflow warning with -O2 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug target/91614] [10 regression][arm] gcc.target/arm/unaligned-memcpy-2.c FAIL since r274986

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91614 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I think the ARM maintainers need to make a decision here. Bernd, you might want to ping that last patch.

[Bug target/90763] PowerPC vec_xl_len should take const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90763 Will Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #7 from Will Schmidt

[Bug target/90763] PowerPC vec_xl_len should take const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90763 Will Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/94257] ICE in inline nested namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94257 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-03-25 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/91614] [10 regression][arm] gcc.target/arm/unaligned-memcpy-2.c FAIL since r274986

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91614 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- C

[Bug target/91518] [9/10 Regression] segfault when run CPU2006 465.tonto since r263875

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91518 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug target/91498] [10 Regression] STV change in r274481 causes 300.twolf regression on Haswell

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91498 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Priorit

[Bug target/91614] [10 regression][arm] gcc.target/arm/unaligned-memcpy-2.c FAIL since r274986

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91614 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug testsuite/94334] New: new tests gcc.dg/lto/pr94271 fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94334 Bug ID: 94334 Summary: new tests gcc.dg/lto/pr94271 fail Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite

[Bug rtl-optimization/90275] [8/9 Regression] ICE: in insert_regs, at cse.c:1128 with -O2 -fno-dce -fno-tree-dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90275 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:48817fbd7616f086ac7bb1dd38b862f78762c9b8 commit r10-7384-g48817fbd7616f086ac7bb1dd38b862f78762c9b8 Author: Jeff Law Date: Wed Mar 25

[Bug d/94321] gdc.dg/pr92216.d FAILs on 32-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94321 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i386-pc-solaris2.11,|i386-pc-solaris2.11,

[Bug rtl-optimization/90275] [8/9 Regression] ICE: in insert_regs, at cse.c:1128 with -O2 -fno-dce -fno-tree-dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90275 --- Comment #16 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eeb0c7c07133634eb5e98ba0348392684a763c95 commit r10-7383-geeb0c7c07133634eb5e98ba0348392684a763c95 Author: Jeff Law Date: Wed Mar 25

[Bug middle-end/94313] stores into string literals sometimes silently eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94313 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- An implementation is free to do whatever it wants when it finds invalid/undefined code. A quality implementation will also let the user know about it so it can be fixed. An even better one will let the user

[Bug target/81594] Optimize PowerPC vector set and store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81594 --- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool --- Peepholes catch fewer cases, and it is very hard to write correct peepholes. The only reason to use peepholes is when the other passes leave some important optimisation on the table, and you cannot feasi

[Bug c++/94333] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault ( when trying use structure binding in requires(requires{}))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94333 Bug ID: 94333 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault ( when trying use structure binding in requires(requires{})) Product: gcc Version: c++-concepts Status:

[Bug target/94292] [10 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in forward_propagate_and_simplify (fwprop.c:1417) with -O -g -fno-tree-dce since r10-3985-g8b8ab8f473b42933b9c1e292c4b1ab02adf1863a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94292 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/94292] [10 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in forward_propagate_and_simplify (fwprop.c:1417) with -O -g -fno-tree-dce since r10-3985-g8b8ab8f473b42933b9c1e292c4b1ab02adf1863a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94292 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e4cd3cd259af2b5e04986a3f528a4f9f762 commit r10-7382-g6e4cd3cd259af2b5e04986a3f528a4f9f762 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: We

[Bug c++/94306] Improve diagnostic when "requires" used instead of "requires requires" and add fix-it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94306 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/94313] stores into string literals sometimes silently eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94313 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 25 Mar 2020, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94313 > > --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- > Removing invalid code not isn't wrong (as in

[Bug c++/94332] New: [concepts] requires-expression that contains a requires-expression incorrectly evaluates to false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94332 Bug ID: 94332 Summary: [concepts] requires-expression that contains a requires-expression incorrectly evaluates to false Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/94319] gcc/cp/coroutines.cc:2654: strange assignment ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94319 --- Comment #5 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #4) > so fixed That's good news. I've no idea how the broken code would have been reached. Would it be worthwhile adding a test case to the test suite which reaches

[Bug middle-end/94004] [8/9 Regression] missing -Walloca on calls to alloca due to -Wno-system-headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94004 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.0 Summary|[8/9/10 Regressio

[Bug middle-end/94004] [8/9/10 Regression] missing -Walloca on calls to alloca due to -Wno-system-headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94004 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b5228b1bc8cb81be494f5b5faa68b6b859ce0227 commit r10-7381-gb5228b1bc8cb81be494f5b5faa68b6b859ce0227 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Wed

[Bug target/94254] [10 regression] r10-7312 causes compiler hangs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/94254] [10 regression] r10-7312 causes compiler hangs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254 --- Comment #19 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:713ecb3d417363a4b12c725b335fce10355da206 commit r10-7380-g713ecb3d417363a4b12c725b335fce10355da206 Author: Jeff Law Date: Wed Mar 25

[Bug c++/94265] wrong warning "duplicated 'if' condition"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94265 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/94254] [10 regression] r10-7312 causes compiler hangs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #18 f

[Bug c++/94265] wrong warning "duplicated 'if' condition"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94265 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c7a252ba2d0a08397d8fc6d6dc7db34f90f76acb commit r10-7379-gc7a252ba2d0a08397d8fc6d6dc7db34f90f76acb Author: Patrick Palka Date: We

[Bug middle-end/94313] stores into string literals sometimes silently eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94313 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Removing invalid code not isn't wrong (as in non-conforming), but it's decidedly unhelpful in avoiding the undefined behavior that doesn't necessarily go away just because the invalid statement is gone. It ma

[Bug debug/94323] [10 Regression] g++: error: x.cpp: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure since r10-7359-g6e771c087b10d5b730240ea35478eab8694c9c5d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94323 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/94187] [10 Regression] valgrind error in count_nonzero_bytes since r10-2101

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94187 --- Comment #13 from David Binderman --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #10) > There are about 5,800 Fortran source code files, about 16,100 C++ > and about 35,800 C source code files. That's a lot. > > I'll start with Fortran, then

[Bug debug/94323] [10 Regression] g++: error: x.cpp: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure since r10-7359-g6e771c087b10d5b730240ea35478eab8694c9c5d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94323 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug d/94315] [10 regression] new tests gdc.dg/pr93038.d and gdc.dg/pr93038b.d in r10-7320 fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94315 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Priorit

[Bug fortran/94331] New: Bind(C) corrupts array descriptors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331 Bug ID: 94331 Summary: Bind(C) corrupts array descriptors Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/94331] Bind(C) corrupts array descriptors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 48120 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48120&action=edit C code demonstrating problems.

[Bug tree-optimization/94131] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have plus_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5927 since r10-2814-g22fca489eaf98f26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94131 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/94131] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have plus_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5927 since r10-2814-g22fca489eaf98f26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94131 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05c13c439903eb78f109bcab62fd9a74f03a3c9b commit r10-7378-g05c13c439903eb78f109bcab62fd9a74f03a3c9b Author: Martin Sebor Date: Wed Mar

[Bug target/81594] Optimize PowerPC vector set and store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81594 --- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner --- If you look at the original patch, it did try to do this optimization. When I looked at it some time later, the combiner no longer generated the sequence because it thought it was slower (due to length, e

[Bug other/94330] New: No warning if jobserver not available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94330 Bug ID: 94330 Summary: No warning if jobserver not available Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug debug/94326] g++: error: pack.ii: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94326 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/94322] Detected memory leaks while using clang AddressSanitizer to build GCC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94322 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-03-25 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/94317] gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h:13907: strange assignment ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94317 --- Comment #8 from SRINATH PARVATHANENI --- Hi David, >>Can the author please indicate where the test cases for this code >>are in the gcc trunk testsuite. I'll give them some exercise. Christophe wrote: > There are lots of tests under gcc.tar

[Bug target/94317] gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h:13907: strange assignment ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94317 --- Comment #7 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #6) > There are lots of tests under gcc.target/arm/mve, About 2,400 C source code files. > In the past I contributed Neon intrinsics executable tests (see > gcc.t

[Bug fortran/93484] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1120 since r7-4028-g87c9fca50cbe7ca9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93484 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2cc686897cc4d9935d4c8302af67565fa54c0aec commit r8-10142-g2cc686897cc4d9935d4c8302af67565fa54c0aec Author: Mark Eggleston

[Bug middle-end/92046] Command line options (that are per-functions) are affecting --params which are global.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92046 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/92046] Command line options (that are per-functions) are affecting --params which are global.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92046 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug target/94317] gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h:13907: strange assignment ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94317 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c/94253] FAIL: gfortran.dg/bind_c_coms.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94253 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin --- Okay, the problem is the test lacks a '-fcommon' option. The default was changed here: 2019-11-20 Wilco Dijkstra PR85678 * common.opt (fcommon): Change init to 1. * doc/invok

[Bug debug/94281] [8/9/10 Regression] g++: error: hash.cpp: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length) since r8-5241-g8697bf9f46f36168

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94281 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #48117|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug sanitizer/94328] Logging of defects to file does not work with Asan and Ubsan combined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94328 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---

[Bug target/94317] gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h:13907: strange assignment ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94317 --- Comment #5 from David Binderman --- I am not sure how much testing this code got before it was put into git. Can the author please indicate where the test cases for this code are in the gcc trunk testsuite. I'll give them some exercise. In

[Bug sanitizer/94328] Logging of defects to file does not work with Asan and Ubsan combined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94328 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Ok, let me take a look.

[Bug sanitizer/94328] Logging of defects to file does not work with Asan and Ubsan combined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94328 Gordon Mc changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||9.2.0 --- Comment #5 from Gordon Mc --- Als

[Bug sanitizer/94328] Logging of defects to file does not work with Asan and Ubsan combined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94328 --- Comment #4 from Gordon Mc --- This seems to be specific to GCC - I just tested with clang 7.1.0, and it behaves as I would expect it to (both Asan and Ubsan content went to the UABSAN log file - none went to stderr)

[Bug sanitizer/94328] Logging of defects to file does not work with Asan and Ubsan combined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94328 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/94325] [8/9/10 Regression] UBSAN: "invalid vptr" false positive for virtual inheritance with -fno-sanitize-recover=all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94325 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug debug/94329] gcc-9: error: use_only.f90: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94329 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/94329] New: gcc-9: error: use_only.f90: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94329 Bug ID: 94329 Summary: gcc-9: error: use_only.f90: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length) Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/94281] [8/9/10 Regression] g++: error: hash.cpp: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length) since r8-5241-g8697bf9f46f36168

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94281 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug sanitizer/94328] Logging of defects to file does not work with Asan and Ubsan combined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94328 --- Comment #2 from Gordon Mc --- Created attachment 48116 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48116&action=edit Script to run the testcase

[Bug sanitizer/94328] Logging of defects to file does not work with Asan and Ubsan combined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94328 --- Comment #1 from Gordon Mc --- Created attachment 48115 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48115&action=edit Makefile

[Bug sanitizer/94328] New: Logging of defects to file does not work with Asan and Ubsan combined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94328 Bug ID: 94328 Summary: Logging of defects to file does not work with Asan and Ubsan combined Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/93484] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1120 since r7-4028-g87c9fca50cbe7ca9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93484 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dff885cdc00bbdccb5bb6277e4711093e3bbad1e commit r9-8416-gdff885cdc00bbdccb5bb6277e4711093e3bbad1e Author: Mark Eggleston D

[Bug c++/94319] gcc/cp/coroutines.cc:2654: strange assignment ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94319 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/94327] Bind(c) argument attributes are incorrectly set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94327 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 48113 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48113&action=edit C code demonstrating problems.

[Bug c++/94319] gcc/cp/coroutines.cc:2654: strange assignment ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94319 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:83dfa06cb5cff143113cb7d632c90a40edefade8 commit r10-7376-g83dfa06cb5cff143113cb7d632c90a40edefade8 Author: Iain Sandoe Date: Wed

[Bug fortran/94327] New: Bind(c) argument attributes are incorrectly set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94327 Bug ID: 94327 Summary: Bind(c) argument attributes are incorrectly set Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fo

[Bug sanitizer/94325] [UBSAN] "invalid vptr" false positive for virtual inheritance with -fno-sanitize-recover=all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94325 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.0, 9.3.0 Known to work|

[Bug debug/94326] g++: error: pack.ii: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94326 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug debug/94326] New: g++: error: pack.ii: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94326 Bug ID: 94326 Summary: g++: error: pack.ii: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure (length) Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug target/94317] gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h:13907: strange assignment ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94317 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/94317] gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h:13907: strange assignment ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94317 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |srinath.parvathaneni at arm dot co

[Bug lto/94311] LTO produces line info entries with invalid line numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94311 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #3) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > > Err, but isn't this interpreting the dwarf from 'date'? So doesn't this > > mean that valgrind is "miscompiled"

[Bug target/94317] gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h:13907: strange assignment ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94317 --- Comment #3 from Srinath Parvathaneni --- Thanks David for reporting this issue, I'm working on it. Could someone assign this to me, I could not do it myself. Regards, SRI.

[Bug c++/94325] New: [UBSAN] "invalid vptr" false positive for virtual inheritance with -fno-sanitize-recover=all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94325 Bug ID: 94325 Summary: [UBSAN] "invalid vptr" false positive for virtual inheritance with -fno-sanitize-recover=all Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/94324] New: [10 regression] gfortran.dg/default_format_1.f90 etc. FAIL on 32-bit Solaris/x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94324 Bug ID: 94324 Summary: [10 regression] gfortran.dg/default_format_1.f90 etc. FAIL on 32-bit Solaris/x86 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/94324] [10 regression] gfortran.dg/default_format_1.f90 etc. FAIL on 32-bit Solaris/x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94324 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug debug/94323] New: [10 Regression] g++: error: x.cpp: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure since r10-7359-g6e771c087b10d5b730240ea35478eab8694c9c5d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94323 Bug ID: 94323 Summary: [10 Regression] g++: error: x.cpp: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure since r10-7359-g6e771c087b10d5b730240ea35478eab8694c9c5d Product: gcc Version:

[Bug debug/94323] [10 Regression] g++: error: x.cpp: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure since r10-7359-g6e771c087b10d5b730240ea35478eab8694c9c5d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94323 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/94322] Detected memory leaks while using clang AddressSanitizer to build GCC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94322 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 CC|

[Bug lto/94259] --without-zstd seems to have no effect and links libzstd if available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94259 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:68c4570a4dea8ed6fefaea50943fb74ea8f78319 commit r10-7375-g68c4570a4dea8ed6fefaea50943fb74ea8f78319 Author: Martin Liska Date: Wed

[Bug fortran/94289] Assumed-rank array bounds resuscitate on the second call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94289 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Hi all! My first comment is not very clear so to elaborate a bit. For assumed-rank arrays no temporary array descriptor with the correct bounds is created like it is for assumed-shape arrays.

[Bug c/94322] Detected memory leaks while using clang AddressSanitizer to build GCC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94322 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- We're quite lazy in freeing all memory from generator tools (genhooks as you report) but there are also known leaks in the driver when it comes to command-line processing. That is, not all memory leaks are

[Bug c/94322] New: Detected memory leaks while using clang AddressSanitizer to build GCC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94322 Bug ID: 94322 Summary: Detected memory leaks while using clang AddressSanitizer to build GCC Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/94311] LTO produces line info entries with invalid line numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94311 --- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Err, but isn't this interpreting the dwarf from 'date'? So doesn't this > mean that valgrind is "miscompiled" with --enable-lto rather than wrong > debug? The

[Bug d/94321] gdc.dg/pr92216.d FAILs on 32-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94321 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug d/94321] New: gdc.dg/pr92216.d FAILs on 32-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94321 Bug ID: 94321 Summary: gdc.dg/pr92216.d FAILs on 32-bit targets Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: d

[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/94319] gcc/cp/coroutines.cc:2654: strange assignment ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94319 --- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #1) > git blame says: > > 49789fd08378 (Iain Sandoe 2020-01-18 11:54:46 + 2654) do_subtree = 0; > > Adding author. indeed looks like a typo. thanks

  1   2   >