https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94256
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94029
--- Comment #16 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Sandra,
I am pretty sure it should exist,
can you check which git revision you are looking at?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94029
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94255
--- Comment #3 from Nicholas Krause ---
I've managed to track this down to what appears to me to be a issue in:
tree
push_inner_scope (tree inner)
{
tree outer = current_scope ();
if (!outer)
outer = current_namespace;
push_inner_scope
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94255
Nicholas Krause changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94256
Bug ID: 94256
Summary: Setting max-sched-region-blocks to >48 causes GCC
memory usage to explode
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91595
--- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw ---
Created attachment 48078
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48078&action=edit
winnt-d support
Attached patch, though the target is untested.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94255
--- Comment #1 from Vince Bridgers ---
The corrected code successfully compiles. Basically, making sure the template
specialization is in the correct namespace.
namespace clang {
class DynTypedNode {
private:
template struct BaseConver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91600
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91595
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
*** Bug 91600 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91595
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
*** Bug 91666 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91666
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91600
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
The following versions may be defined by the compiler on mingw targets
Windows
MinGW
Win32
Win64
And on cygwin targets.
Windows
Cygwin
Posix
Druntime should compile fine if these exist.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94255
Bug ID: 94255
Summary: template specialization in different namespace causes
crash
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93038
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93038
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a01f7b1e73e98a86520d8a825ddd3777faa7c33
commit r10-7320-g4a01f7b1e73e98a86520d8a825ddd3777faa7c33
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Sun Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 10:27:03PM +, dcb314 at hotmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246
>
> --- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
> (In reply to kargl from comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93245
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a577c0c26931090e7c25e56ef5ffc807627961ec
commit r10-7318-ga577c0c26931090e7c25e56ef5ffc807627961ec
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69008
David Forgeas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.forgeas at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #2)
> So, what happens if you do use the required -fno-range-check
> option?
The code is compiled happily:
$ /home/dcb/gcc/results.20200320.valgrind/bin/gfortran -c -Wall
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94242
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94242
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9fc985118d9f5014afc1caf32a411ee5803fba61
commit r10-7317-g9fc985118d9f5014afc1caf32a411ee5803fba61
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
Bug ID: 94254
Summary: [10 regression] r10-7312 causes compiler hangs
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93983
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Paco Arjonilla from comment #4)
> There is no reason why an extra constructor would affect the semiregularity
> of a type.
That's not true.
A private or deleted constructor that is a better m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94244
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
In other words, you have failed to meet the requirement that the comparison is
a strict weak ordering.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_ordering#Strict_weak_orderings
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94253
Bug ID: 94253
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/bind_c_coms.f90 -O0 (test for
excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94237
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dfb25dfe3d34703f6e493664831dfaf53672b07b
commit r10-7316-gdfb25dfe3d34703f6e493664831dfaf53672b07b
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93694
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:837cece888f36543b6d326101362acb67ac3df0a
commit r10-7315-g837cece888f36543b6d326101362acb67ac3df0a
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
> It will be definitely caused by my g:c8429c2aba80f845939ffa6b2cfe8a0be1b50078.
[...]
> So is the reason usage of ld.gold? Is the default linker f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94252
Bug ID: 94252
Summary: Can't use a lambda in a requires expression
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94250
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #4)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> > A nice catch David! I've got a patch for it.
>
> Thanks. I should also perhaps mention that testsuite file
> ./g+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94250
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> A nice catch David! I've got a patch for it.
Thanks. I should also perhaps mention that testsuite file
./g++.dg/ipa/remref-2.C has the same problem. It would be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94250
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94250
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-03-21
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90835
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #23 from Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94251
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 48077
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48077&action=edit
(Partial patch): Patch for gomp_load_image_to_device to handle link_flag
correctly
[Cross ref: nvptx disables t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94251
Bug ID: 94251
Summary: [OpenMP] 'target link' fails at run time /
libgomp.c/target-link-1.c fails on GCN
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94250
--- Comment #2 from Nicholas Krause ---
(In reply to Nicholas Krause from comment #1)
> After looking through the git history that last time this functions in your
> trace were changed is by commit id,
> db30281f0b2ff6dfc0c4146291baf020a27e4065.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94250
Nicholas Krause changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mliska at suse dot cz,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94248
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94250
Bug ID: 94250
Summary: valgrind error for ./g++.dg/ipa/remref-1.C
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
:semiregular);
There is no reason why an extra constructor would affect the semiregularity of
a type.
$> g++ -std=c++20
In file included from
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20200321/include/c++/10.0.1/compare:39,
from
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20200321/include/c++/10.0.1/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62051
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |11.0
--- Comment #23 from Jan Hubicka ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94066
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b599bf9d6d1e180d350b71e51e08a66a1bb1546a
commit r10-7313-gb599bf9d6d1e180d350b71e51e08a66a1bb1546a
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94239
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at linux dot
vnet.ibm.com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91028
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
> I believe this was fixed a while ago by adding the loop. It no longer fails
> with -fno-use-linker-plugin. Is it OK on Solaris?
It no longer FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91028
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
Bug ID: 94249
Summary: [10 regression] Many -flto -fuse-linker-plugin tests
FAIL: could not add symbols
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94248
Bug ID: 94248
Summary: [amdgcn] Doesn't build with RTL checking
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-checking
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94247
--- Comment #2 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> >and the compiler already knows this
> Not when the warning is generated from the front-end. It does not know the
> range of the char variable there.
Ah, that fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94247
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94247
Bug ID: 94247
Summary: Wrong char-subscripts warning for limited-range index
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.0, 9.3.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246
Bug ID: 94246
Summary: valgrind error for ./gfortran.dg/bessel_5.f90
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94052
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:497498c878d48754318e486428e2aa30854020b9
commit r10-7312-g497498c878d48754318e486428e2aa30854020b9
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94239
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94245
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94245
Bug ID: 94245
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in ipa_find_agg_cst_for_param, at
ipa-prop.c:3467 since r10-7237-g4e3d3e40726e1b68
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
63 matches
Mail list logo
