[Bug rtl-optimization/89116] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in cfg_layout_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at cfgrtl.c:4482

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89116 --- Comment #7 from Nicholas Krause --- (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #6) > (In reply to Nicholas Krause from comment #5) > > PR84508 does not seem to be reproducible on trunk now as last commented by > > Arseny on trunk. Not sure abou

[Bug rtl-optimization/89116] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in cfg_layout_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at cfgrtl.c:4482

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89116 --- Comment #6 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Nicholas Krause from comment #5) > PR84508 does not seem to be reproducible on trunk now as last commented by > Arseny on trunk. Not sure about backporting a fix but does not seem to > happen on

[Bug rtl-optimization/89116] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in cfg_layout_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at cfgrtl.c:4482

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89116 Nicholas Krause changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xerofoify at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/79755] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE: segfault in cgraph_node::get, at cgraph.h:1261

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79755 --- Comment #17 from Nicholas Krause --- Sorry about that. I've managed to track it down to a problem with a alias issue And from reading the code in the original cvs commit. I'm not able to read it currently but the original function mentioned

[Bug tree-optimization/94043] [9/10 Regression] ICE in superloop_at_depth, at cfgloop.c:78

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94043 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |linkw at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug debug/93751] -g1 does not behave per manual

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93751 --- Comment #18 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52b3aa8be18938486065f5f2a23553b134a10a81 commit r10-7235-g52b3aa8be18938486065f5f2a23553b134a10a81 Author: Alexey Neyman Date: S

[Bug libstdc++/94209] std::variant can't be initialized from unsigned int with gcc trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94209 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/79755] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE: segfault in cgraph_node::get, at cgraph.h:1261

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79755 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/94203] experimental/executor and socket header issues-

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94203 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:98f29f5638f73d8e55590eba8098a537ba746287 commit r10-7233-g98f29f5638f73d8e55590eba8098a537ba746287 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug middle-end/79755] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE: segfault in cgraph_node::get, at cgraph.h:1261

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79755 --- Comment #15 from Nicholas Krause --- (In reply to Nicholas Krause from comment #14) > Created attachment 48052 [details] > Patch for this bug After tracking this down to the new function that replaced verify_edge_corresponds_to_fndecl, cgrap

[Bug middle-end/79755] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE: segfault in cgraph_node::get, at cgraph.h:1261

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79755 Nicholas Krause changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xerofoify at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/94209] New: std::variant can't be initialized from unsigned int with gcc trunk

8:25: error: no matching function for call to 'std::variant::variant()' 8 | std::variant{1u}; // fails | ^ In file included from :1: /opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20200317/include/c++/10.0.1/variant:1407:2: note: candidate: 'template constexpr std

[Bug target/94200] -mabi=ibmlongdouble and -mlong-double-128 produces error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94200 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1

[Bug middle-end/94208] New: missing warning on passing unterminated local array to string functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94208 Bug ID: 94208 Summary: missing warning on passing unterminated local array to string functions Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug preprocessor/94207] error: pasting "::" and "ClassFOO1" does not give a valid preprocessing token

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94207 --- Comment #4 from J.R. Heisey --- Yes, I figured it out too. Sorry for the trouble.

[Bug preprocessor/94207] error: pasting "::" and "ClassFOO1" does not give a valid preprocessing token

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94207 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- #define ENUM_CLASS_TEST_INIT(k) \ mEnumClassTest[(int)EnumClassTest :: k] = EnumClassTest :: k;

[Bug preprocessor/94207] error: pasting "::" and "ClassFOO1" does not give a valid preprocessing token

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94207 --- Comment #2 from J.R. Heisey --- OK I see that now. I still cannot make it work with this #define ENUM_CLASS_TEST_INIT(k) \ mEnumClassTest[k] = EnumClassTest::k; or adding whitespace between :: and k

[Bug c/94172] [arm-none-eabi] ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:5403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94172 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:046c58907ec85884042d9937ea9c25ef9fe57b1d commit r10-7230-g046c58907ec85884042d9937ea9c25ef9fe57b1d Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug preprocessor/94207] error: pasting "::" and "ClassFOO1" does not give a valid preprocessing token

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94207 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/94207] New: error: pasting "::" and "ClassFOO1" does not give a valid preprocessing token

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94207 Bug ID: 94207 Summary: error: pasting "::" and "ClassFOO1" does not give a valid preprocessing token Product: gcc Version: 8.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug middle-end/94206] Wrong optimization: memset of n-bit integer types (from bit-fields) is truncated to n bits (instead of sizeof)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94206 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- This again padding bits.

[Bug middle-end/94206] New: Wrong optimization: memset of n-bit integer types (from bit-fields) is truncated to n bits (instead of sizeof)

-- gcc x86-64 version: gcc (GCC) 10.0.1 20200317 (experimental) -- The right result is ``.

[Bug c++/90995] [8/9 Regression] ICE in grokdeclarator, at cp/decl.c:12024

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90995 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in |[8/9 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/90995] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in grokdeclarator, at cp/decl.c:12024

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90995 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd0b71242738a1901405f421b352e4f6c30ff7c5 commit r10-7229-gcd0b71242738a1901405f421b352e4f6c30ff7c5 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tu

[Bug c++/94205] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression with 'this'-capturing lambda inside an NSDMI since r8-1251

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94205 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/94205] New: ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression with 'this'-capturing lambda inside an NSDMI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94205 Bug ID: 94205 Summary: ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression with 'this'-capturing lambda inside an NSDMI Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/94189] [9 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure on Wstringop-overflow-22.c since r9-3242

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94189 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/94114] [8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5936

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94114 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in

[Bug middle-end/93566] [8 Regression] tree-nested.c ICE on C OpenMP array section reduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93566 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression]|[8 Regression] |tree-n

[Bug debug/94167] [8 Regression] pr71109.c -fcompare-debug failures on x86_64 and powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94167 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] pr71109.c |[8 Regression] pr71109.c

[Bug middle-end/93399] [8 Regression] Annotate assembler option failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93399 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] Annotate |[8 Regression] Annotate

[Bug tree-optimization/94130] [8 Regression] Unintended result with optimization option when assigning two structures, memset and 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94130 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] Unintended |[8 Regression] Unintended

[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org --- Comment

[Bug debug/94167] [8/9 Regression] pr71109.c -fcompare-debug failures on x86_64 and powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94167 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:378e830538afd4a02e41674cc9161fa59b5e09a9 commit r9-8397-g378e830538afd4a02e41674cc9161fa59b5e09a9 Author: Jakub Jelinek Dat

[Bug middle-end/94189] [9 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure on Wstringop-overflow-22.c since r9-3242

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94189 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:65de83595faeccd83bc0fefbfb79768f8a3bb2b6 commit r9-8398-g65de83595faeccd83bc0fefbfb79768f8a3bb2b6 Author: Jakub Jelinek Dat

[Bug middle-end/93566] [8/9 Regression] tree-nested.c ICE on C OpenMP array section reduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93566 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a8fc40fd551a60a97efbfe3fee08721accd80964 commit r9-8396-ga8fc40fd551a60a97efbfe3fee08721accd80964 Author: Jakub Jelinek Dat

[Bug target/94121] ICE on aarch64-linux-gnu: in abs_hwi, at hwint.h:324

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94121 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c2f836c413b1e9ae45598338b4a2ecd33bd926fb commit r9-8395-gc2f836c413b1e9ae45598338b4a2ecd33bd926fb Author: Jakub Jelinek Dat

[Bug middle-end/94111] Wrong constant folding: decimal floating-point infinity casted to double -> zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94111 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:343c467ccdc24edb9acd7c60d54914d9656ab499 commit r9-8389-g343c467ccdc24edb9acd7c60d54914d9656ab499 Author: Jakub Jelinek Dat

[Bug middle-end/93399] [8/9 Regression] Annotate assembler option failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93399 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e0d6777cda966b04fc47d544c09839c4fa94343c commit r9-8387-ge0d6777cda966b04fc47d544c09839c4fa94343c Author: Jakub Jelinek Da

[Bug target/94121] ICE on aarch64-linux-gnu: in abs_hwi, at hwint.h:324

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94121 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a644079a702a6228df2ffaace1d88a5f74e4bb9f commit r9-8390-ga644079a702a6228df2ffaace1d88a5f74e4bb9f Author: Jakub Jelinek Dat

[Bug tree-optimization/94130] [8/9 Regression] Unintended result with optimization option when assigning two structures, memset and 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94130 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a545ffafa380fa958393e1dfbf7f5f8f129bc5cf commit r9-8392-ga545ffafa380fa958393e1dfbf7f5f8f129bc5cf Author: Jakub Jelinek Da

[Bug tree-optimization/94114] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5936

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94114 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2fd27691f213f2e808626c4cd492b00c801a00fa commit r9-8388-g2fd27691f213f2e808626c4cd492b00c801a00fa Author: Jakub Jelinek Dat

[Bug target/94134] pdp11-aout puts initial variable into .text section rather than .data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94134 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1125cf88ac0c97d819e4f81d556fbcd1161270e commit r9-8391-gf1125cf88ac0c97d819e4f81d556fbcd1161270e Author: Jakub Jelinek Da

[Bug tree-optimization/94001] [10 Regression] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2435 at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94001 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5de0dc84c75a43f78a03c7cdb7e7c443c641a7fa commit r9-8385-g5de0dc84c75a43f78a03c7cdb7e7c443c641a7fa Author: Jakub Jelinek Dat

[Bug debug/93888] Incorrect DW_AT_location generated for copy-constructed function argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93888 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d2a810ee83e2952bf351498cecf8f5db28860a24 commit r9-8386-gd2a810ee83e2952bf351498cecf8f5db28860a24 Author: Jakub Jelinek Dat

[Bug c++/92010] [8/9/10 Regression] gcc internal error since 8x on warning write-strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92010 --- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #6) > (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #5) > > The ICE seems to be revealing a latent issue: In the following example > > (which GCC accepts), according to the

[Bug c++/83258] Rejecting function pointer non-type template parameter without linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83258 S. Davis Herring changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/94033] [10 Regression] is_trivially_copy_constructible<> fails with compiler error on complicated object with private default constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94033 --- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely --- Thanks! And PR 94197 is also now fixed.

[Bug libstdc++/94033] [10 Regression] is_trivially_copy_constructible<> fails with compiler error on complicated object with private default constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94033 --- Comment #16 from Avi Kivity --- I confirm this fixes my original problem, not just the reduced test case.

[Bug tree-optimization/92860] [8/9/10 regression] Global flags affected by -O settings are clobbered by optimize attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #14

[Bug libstdc++/94203] experimental/executor and socket header issues-

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94203 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/94029] [9/10 Regression] gcc crash in coverage.c:655 since r9-4216-g390e529e2b98983d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94029 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- Note that C++ FE is correct: $ g++ pr94029.c --coverage -c void test_t2()=3:3(location_t:2147483629)-3:3(location_t:2147483634) void test_t1()=2:1(location_t:2147483638)-2:1(location_t:2147483643) while C do

[Bug middle-end/91146] [9/10 Regression] -Werror=array-bounds if compile with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91146 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Seems even with that patch 3677 if (stmt_may_clobber_ref_p_1 (def_stmt, ref, tbaa_p)) in tree-ssa-sccvn.c thinks the .ASAN_MARK (UNPOISON, &D.48886, 4); call may clobber MEM[(struct small_vecto

[Bug target/94204] New: m68k: Provide builtins for mathemactical functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94204 Bug ID: 94204 Summary: m68k: Provide builtins for mathemactical functions Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug gcov-profile/94029] [9/10 Regression] gcc crash in coverage.c:655 since r9-4216-g390e529e2b98983d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94029 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- @Marek, @David: Can you please help me with that?

[Bug libstdc++/94203] New: experimental/executor and socket header issues-

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94203 Bug ID: 94203 Summary: experimental/executor and socket header issues- Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug lto/94202] [10 Regression] ICE in do_estimate_edge_time, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:222

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94202 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|lto1: internal compiler |[10 Regression] ICE in

[Bug lto/94202] [10 Regression] ICE in do_estimate_edge_time, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:222

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94202 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Keywords|

[Bug lto/94202] New: lto1: internal compiler error: in do_estimate_edge_time, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:222

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94202 Bug ID: 94202 Summary: lto1: internal compiler error: in do_estimate_edge_time, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:222 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug middle-end/91146] [9/10 Regression] -Werror=array-bounds if compile with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91146 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 48050 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48050&action=edit pr91146.ii.xz Preprocessed source. -O2 -fsanitize=address -Wall

[Bug middle-end/91146] [9/10 Regression] -Werror=array-bounds if compile with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91146 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Ah, should have been: --- gcc/internal-fn.def.jj 2020-01-18 13:47:09.517357706 +0100 +++ gcc/internal-fn.def 2020-03-17 16:04:08.092861394 +0100 @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ DEF_INTERNAL_FN (UBSAN_OBJECT_SIZE, EC

[Bug tree-optimization/80635] [8/9/10 regression] std::optional and bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org |law at redhat dot com --- Commen

[Bug middle-end/91146] [9/10 Regression] -Werror=array-bounds if compile with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91146 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug tree-optimization/80635] [8/9/10 regression] std::optional and bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635 --- Comment #51 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #48) > This should also work too: > diff --git a/gcc/tree-sra.c b/gcc/tree-sra.c > index ea8594db193..83b1d981439 100644 > --- a/gcc/tree-sra.c > +++ b/gcc/tree-sra.c

[Bug c++/94197] __is_constructible gives an access error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94197 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Ville Voutilainen : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:887085be635101ae1fa16be8dcdbbe6b240b600b commit r10-7219-g887085be635101ae1fa16be8dcdbbe6b240b600b Author: Ville Voutilainen Da

[Bug tree-optimization/94043] [9/10 Regression] ICE in superloop_at_depth, at cfgloop.c:78

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94043 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-03-17 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/94186] [10 Regression] compiler incorrectly accepts a requires clause with predicate of non-bool type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94186 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini --- To wit: diff --git a/gcc/cp/constraint.cc b/gcc/cp/constraint.cc index 697ed6726b8..59b43a31274 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/constraint.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/constraint.cc @@ -2543,8 +2543,7 @@ satisfy_atom (tree t, tree a

[Bug target/94072] [10 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV due to infinite recursion in expand_expr/expand_expr_real_1 with -msve-vector-bits=512 since r10-4197

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94072 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assigne

[Bug tree-optimization/93435] [8/9/10 Regression] Hang with -O2 on innocuous looking code with GCC 8.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93435 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug target/94200] -mabi=ibmlongdouble and -mlong-double-128 produces error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94200 --- Comment #2 from Paul E. Murphy --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > >This was fixed in GCC 8, and does not happen with GCC 7.4.0 > > GCC 7.5.0 was the last release of GCC 7.x series. Can you make sure it > works with the latest

[Bug libstdc++/94199] std::experimental::net::v1::make_service function template not instantiatable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94199 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- I've reported a new library issue (LWG 3414) suggesting we add a public default constructor.

[Bug target/94072] [10 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV due to infinite recursion in expand_expr/expand_expr_real_1 with -msve-vector-bits=512 since r10-4197

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94072 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-03-17 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug tree-optimization/94015] [10 Regression] Another assignment incorrectly omitted by -foptimize-strlen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94015 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/94015] [10 Regression] Another assignment incorrectly omitted by -foptimize-strlen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94015 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a9a437ffc4269650e34af92c4fb095b7ed98f94a commit r10-7213-ga9a437ffc4269650e34af92c4fb095b7ed98f94a Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tu

[Bug middle-end/51663] Desirable/undesirable elimination of unused variables & functions at -O0, -O0 -flto and -O0 -fwhole-program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51663 --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #13) > F.i., an open question for me is the following: I'm now using > -flto-partition=none for testing, but maybe 1to1 should yield better results? I guess it better

[Bug middle-end/51663] Desirable/undesirable elimination of unused variables & functions at -O0, -O0 -flto and -O0 -fwhole-program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51663 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #13) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12) > > (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #11) > > > Cross-referencing PR gdb/25684 - "gdb testing with gcc -flto

[Bug c++/94175] [10 Regression] Passing constexpr empty class variable to function since r10-599

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94175 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug rtl-optimization/92303] [10 regression] gcc.target/sparc/ultrasp12.c times out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92303 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/92264] [10 Regression] Compile time hog in 521.wrf_r with -Ofast -march=znver2 -g since r276318

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92264 --- Comment #11 from Martin Liška --- So it finishes in 50m16s.

[Bug c++/94186] [10 Regression] compiler incorrectly accepts a requires clause with predicate of non-bool type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94186 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Comm

[Bug middle-end/51663] Desirable/undesirable elimination of unused variables & functions at -O0, -O0 -flto and -O0 -fwhole-program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51663 --- Comment #13 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12) > (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #11) > > Cross-referencing PR gdb/25684 - "gdb testing with gcc -flto" ( > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

[Bug middle-end/51663] Desirable/undesirable elimination of unused variables & functions at -O0, -O0 -flto and -O0 -fwhole-program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51663 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #11) > Cross-referencing PR gdb/25684 - "gdb testing with gcc -flto" ( > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25684 ). > > Ideally there would be a way to

[Bug target/94185] [10 Regression] crashes with "error: unable to generate reloads for {*zero_extendsidi2} internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4006

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94185 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:994d48620621fa33d32018be5fb70042e38546d5 commit r10-7209-g994d48620621fa33d32018be5fb70042e38546d5 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tu

[Bug rtl-optimization/92264] [10 Regression] Compile time hog in 521.wrf_r with -Ofast -march=znver2 -g since r276318

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92264 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #9) > With --param max-find-base-term-values=100 it takes 4m24s. > With --param max-find-base-term-values=1 it takes 2m22s. So, if you e.g. bump the timeout to 30 minu

[Bug tree-optimization/94187] [10 Regression] valgrind error in count_nonzero_bytes since r10-2101

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94187 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/94189] [9 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure on Wstringop-overflow-22.c since r9-3242

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94189 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10 Regression] |[9 Regression] |-fcomp

[Bug rtl-optimization/92264] [10 Regression] Compile time hog in 521.wrf_r with -Ofast -march=znver2 -g since r276318

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92264 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- With --param max-find-base-term-values=100 it takes 4m24s. With --param max-find-base-term-values=1 it takes 2m22s.

[Bug tree-optimization/94187] [10 Regression] valgrind error in count_nonzero_bytes since r10-2101

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94187 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:741ff2a263fe0ddc343288331c0047c1a32af8b2 commit r10-7207-g741ff2a263fe0ddc343288331c0047c1a32af8b2 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug middle-end/51663] Desirable/undesirable elimination of unused variables & functions at -O0, -O0 -flto and -O0 -fwhole-program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51663 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11

[Bug middle-end/94189] [9/10 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure on Wstringop-overflow-22.c since r9-3242

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94189 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7afa3b82918a75a486aad7818f11df9ea7504368 commit r10-7206-g7afa3b82918a75a486aad7818f11df9ea7504368 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tu

[Bug rtl-optimization/92264] [10 Regression] Compile time hog in 521.wrf_r with -Ofast -march=znver2 -g since r276318

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92264 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- With --param max-find-base-term-values=10 it takes 2m34s.

[Bug rtl-optimization/92264] [10 Regression] Compile time hog in 521.wrf_r with -Ofast -march=znver2 -g since r276318

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92264 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > In r10-7086-g2e94d3ee47be0742df843d95e3d1bf1da11e4796 I've added a param > controlled cap on the number of VALUEs walked by a single toplevel > find_base_term. > D

[Bug target/94185] [10 Regression] crashes with "error: unable to generate reloads for {*zero_extendsidi2} internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4006

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94185 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/94187] [10 Regression] valgrind error in count_nonzero_bytes since r10-2101

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94187 --- Comment #10 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #9) > (In reply to David Binderman from comment #7) > > Once a month or so, it might be worthwhile running a valgrind enabled > > version of gcc over the C testsuite.

[Bug lto/94157] [10 Regression] error: lto-wrapper failed with -Wa,--noexecstack -Wa,--noexecstack since r10-6807-gf1a681a174cdfb82

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94157 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/94157] [10 Regression] error: lto-wrapper failed with -Wa,--noexecstack -Wa,--noexecstack since r10-6807-gf1a681a174cdfb82

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94157 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ecf2b69a629d4f79efe3c103fe54040437ea18a6 commit r10-7205-gecf2b69a629d4f79efe3c103fe54040437ea18a6 Author: Martin Liska Date: Tue

[Bug preprocessor/88974] [9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in linemap_resolve_location)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88974 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 48049 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48049&action=edit gcc10-pr88974.patch Unfortunately, that patch failed bootstrap miserably (e.g. the compiler generated __static_

[Bug tree-optimization/94187] [10 Regression] valgrind error in count_nonzero_bytes since r10-2101

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94187 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #7) > Once a month or so, it might be worthwhile running a valgrind enabled > version of gcc over the C testsuite. I run ASAN and UBSAN GCC build on weekly basis. But

[Bug c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481 --- Comment #124 from owner at bugs dot debian.org --- Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message has

[Bug c/94201] aarch64：ICE in tiny code model for ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94201 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-03-17 CC|

  1   2   >