https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93796
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8def1d525c52f0f7fccd90f3c4624a8fe6c42882
commit r10-6688-g8def1d525c52f0f7fccd90f3c4624a8fe6c42882
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93751
--- Comment #11 from Alexey Neyman ---
I decided to name the option `-gexternal-variables` - it seems more in-line
with the existing options (which omit "dwarf" from the option name even if the
option is only relevant to DWARF debugging info).
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93751
Alexey Neyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #47845|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93745
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #7)
> But regardless of what language might have even looser rules than C/C++ in
> this area, it would seem like a rather unfortunate design limitation for GCC
> not to be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93792
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> This patch is against svn r280157. The patch fixes the ICE.
> Someone will need to convert the example code into a test
> for the testsuite.
>
> It seems PDT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93798
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93457
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.bolvansky at gmail dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93777
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93778
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93774
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93779
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93779
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #3 from David Malcol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93775
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93775
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d8cde6f9c223f1b6d4f4e4e07088f08a629b7c2a
commit r10-6686-gd8cde6f9c223f1b6d4f4e4e07088f08a629b7c2a
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93792
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93745
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
That's why I asked "What language relies on this?"
But regardless of what language might have even looser rules than C/C++ in this
area, it would seem like a rather unfortunate design limitation for GCC not t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93797
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93796
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93795
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Seems unlikely to be a problem with the libstdc++ definition of std::invocable
rather than a compiler bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93631
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93723
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93753
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93723
--- Comment #4 from Dávid Bolvanský ---
Thanks, created https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93798
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93798
Bug ID: 93798
Summary: ICE in make_region_for_type
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93723
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Dávid Bolvanský from comment #2)
> Without LTO
>
> during IPA pass: analyzer
> common/entropy_common.c: In function ‘HUF_readStats’:
> common/entropy_common.c:196:37: internal compiler error: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93723
Dávid Bolvanský changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.bolvansky at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93723
--- Comment #2 from Dávid Bolvanský ---
Without LTO
during IPA pass: analyzer
common/entropy_common.c: In function ‘HUF_readStats’:
common/entropy_common.c:196:37: internal compiler error: in
make_region_for_type, at analyzer/region-model.cc:598
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93797
--- Comment #1 from Roland Illig ---
Another typo: an extra space at the end
>"speculative call sequence ");
Another variable/diagnostic mismatch:
> error ("number of speculative targets %i mismatched with "
>"num_speculativ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93777
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks. Both cases involve a casting from a NULL pointer type to a
REFERENCE_TYPE (the f90 case to a REAL_TYPE, the .C case to an INTEGER_TYPE).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93797
Bug ID: 93797
Summary: typo: speculative_uid
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93796
Bug ID: 93796
Summary: typo: functoin
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
Assignee: unassign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93795
Bug ID: 93795
Summary: Out-of-line definition of class member template with
'requires std::invocable' constraint fails to
compile
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93599
--- Comment #12 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I ran the test with the patch on several systems that had previously seen a lot
of failures. Even after running it several hundred thousand times there were
no failures seen.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92587
--- Comment #7 from DIL ---
Please download the Updated ICE reproducer as I explain in the comments above
(the reproducer archive uploaded 2020-01-30). It builds with gcc/8.x just fine,
but causes ICE in gfortranc/9.x. As I mentioned, this ICE sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93789
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93585
--- Comment #6 from Norman Goldstein ---
Thank you for that. I hadn't realized there was a -flto flag. It, indeed,
does warn for the mismatched types. The flag also causes the notice
note: code may be misoptimized unless ‘-fno-strict-alias
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93709
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
You are right, it was git g:6d099a76a0f6a040a3e678f2bce7fc69cc3257d8, r10-4161
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93794
Bug ID: 93794
Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_component_ref, at
fortran/trans-expr.c:2497
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
appears that ostream_iterator::difference_type is still void when -std=c++2a
is enabled.
* Branch: GCC trunk
* Version: g++ (GCC) 10.0.1 20200217 (experimental)
* Git Hash: cd23cdb1743b41baed0b937c4b359b9422490ca7
* GCC configured with: ../gcc/configure --disable-nls --disable-multilib
--enable-l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93792
Bug ID: 93792
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_code2string, at
fortran/misc.c:281
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93791
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 from G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93791
Bug ID: 93791
Summary: [9/10 Regression] ICE in
can_represent_integral_type_p, at real.c:5426
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93790
Bug ID: 93790
Summary: Cannot initialize reference from
std::reference_wrapper using direct- or
list-initialization syntax in GCC 10 c++2a mode
Product: gcc
Versi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93789
Bug ID: 93789
Summary: internal compiler error: in tree_to_uhwi, at
tree.c:7361
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93753
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93787
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
The following compiles with free-form source code but shows for fixed-form
source code:
Error: Ambiguous interfaces in generic interface 'acc_create_async' for
‘acc_create_async_32_h’ at (1) and ‘acc_create_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93788
Bug ID: 93788
Summary: Segfault caused by infinite loop in cc1plus
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93787
Bug ID: 93787
Summary: Rejects non-ambigous specific in generic –
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93776
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786
Bug ID: 93786
Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] gimplifier ICE with statement
expression since r8-5526
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58646
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93730
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|NE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58646
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93582
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 47863
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47863&action=edit
gcc10-pr93582-2-wip.patch
WIP on the merging from multiple stores. BIG_ENDIAN still not implemented.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93761
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
The modules branch identifies itself as:
gcc version 10.0.1 20200211 (experimental) [devel/c++-modules
fe76dae46c6:20200212-0942] (GCC)
I added the branch name to the [...] piece last week.
Its ICE and -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93777
--- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha ---
Not necessarily Fortran. It ICEs also on
gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec36.C.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92546
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9cd4eeefcc641dd70d026e08e9d218101b826c52
commit r10-6676-g9cd4eeefcc641dd70d026e08e9d218101b826c52
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90378
--- Comment #3 from Maxim Kuvyrkov ---
The miscompilation went away for a while, but has reappeared just now after
commit 2a07345c4f8dabc286fc470e76c53473e5bc3eb7
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
Date: Fri Jan 31 14:26:26 2020 -0500
Fix fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92546
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c03b53da9129ae2d5ac9629c4b874d0981a7d418
commit r10-6675-gc03b53da9129ae2d5ac9629c4b874d0981a7d418
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93773
--- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha ---
Created attachment 47862
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47862&action=edit
Testcase
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #1)
> Looks like awkgram.y and awk.h - do you still have thos
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93730
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93759
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 47861
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47861&action=edit
gcc10-pr93759.patch
I think this patch should fix both issues, but in gcc.pot lots off the *.opt
messages are t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93773
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks for filing this. You attached the output, and it's clear from that
there's an issue. Are you able to attach the (unreduced) source code in
question ? Looks like awkgram.y and awk.h - do you still ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93784
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93785
Bug ID: 93785
Summary: g++ crash/hang on invalid template
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92518
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93759
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91724
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
I'm checking head with our GCC 8 build on armv7 which we build with
--with-arch=armv7-a --with-tune=cortex-a15 --with-float=hard
notably w/o --with-mode=thumb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93784
Bug ID: 93784
Summary: Pid 4845 in trap loop, signal 11 Memory
fault(coredump) on hpux 11iv2 and 11iv3
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93782
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93381
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93381
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Richard Guenther
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9eba9635f653291804ecb832eebe1ed96e3346ba
commit r8-10033-g9eba9635f653291804ecb832eebe1ed96e3346ba
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92674
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93054
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Richard Guenther
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2065106aed5e32891e2e96881615b922d1a14667
commit r8-10032-g2065106aed5e32891e2e96881615b922d1a14667
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93054
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92674
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Richard Guenther
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a7f319cad03b87020b788c0779cf49a2718e12e
commit r8-10029-g8a7f319cad03b87020b788c0779cf49a2718e12e
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92704
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Richard Guenther
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da1f7a6dfa20d2da45d62bba824766d5ec963ccf
commit r8-10030-gda1f7a6dfa20d2da45d62bba824766d5ec963ccf
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92704
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92763
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92763
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Richard Guenther
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0727fae83508fe21bd510ae380d6a361ac632680
commit r8-10031-g0727fae83508fe21bd510ae380d6a361ac632680
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93609
--- Comment #6 from Laurent Stacul ---
Thanks very much for information!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93764
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93764
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93764
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93783
Bug ID: 93783
Summary: [m68k][build warning] libgcc/config/m68k/fpgnulib.c:
xfgnulib.c:556:10: warning: implicit declaration of
function '__cmpdf2';
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93764
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93585
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Norman Goldstein from comment #4)
> This makes sense. Would it be a reasonable option to have the linker check
> for such mismatches?
As Andrew already said, it can only be done with LTO, and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93766
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93757
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93735
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93726
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93725
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93764
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93706
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93586
Bug 93586 depends on bug 93764, which changed state.
Bug 93764 Summary: [10 Regression] lzo 2.10 test suite fails with -O2 and -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93764
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92152
Bug 92152 depends on bug 93764, which changed state.
Bug 93764 Summary: [10 Regression] lzo 2.10 test suite fails with -O2 and -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93764
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93764
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||93586, 92152
--- Comment #6 from Richar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93764
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The first difference is during DSE1:
--- lzo_init2.i.036t.dse1_ 2020-02-17 07:36:46.0 -0500
+++ lzo_init2.i.036t.dse1 2020-02-17 07:37:08.0 -0500
@@ -109,7 +109,6 @@ lzo_config_chec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93693
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
