https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93550
Thomas Henlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93498
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #3)
> Patch is against svn r280157.
>
> Index: gcc/fortran/check.c
> ===
> --- gcc/fortran/check.c (revis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #136 from Peter Bisroev ---
(In reply to Peter Bisroev from comment #135)
> #
> ##
> FAIL: .file file names
...
> $ objdump -t ./file.o
>
> ./file.o: fil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93497
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 02:06:01AM +, sgk at troutmask dot
apl.washington.edu wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93497
>
> --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #135 from Peter Bisroev ---
Hi Dave,
I just had a chance to do some testing tonight. So attempting to bootstrap
8.3.0 in stock configuration gives PCREL21B style errors in stage1 as have been
shown before. If I compile stage1 with '-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92003
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3774c0b934c4fe13c2d527b757002bdea09f7039
commit r10-6468-g3774c0b934c4fe13c2d527b757002bdea09f7039
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92003
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |[8/9 Regression]
|cons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93497
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 02:01:21AM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> Index: gcc/fortran/decl.c
> ===
> --- gcc/fortran/decl.c (revision
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93497
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93498
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93610
Bug ID: 93610
Summary: std::call_once not working as expected when the
invocated function thwows an exception.
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93499
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88284
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93600
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92765
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92765
--- Comment #25 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e7868dc6a79daec4f46552fa5c99f88e4eb8de4c
commit r10-6465-ge7868dc6a79daec4f46552fa5c99f88e4eb8de4c
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93608
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93140
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6bef09771cf93e695cf719fb43db8c43e31acf5
commit r10-6464-gf6bef09771cf93e695cf719fb43db8c43e31acf5
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93140
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |[8/9 Regression] Segfault
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93609
Bug ID: 93609
Summary: gcc -flto -fno-comon places symbols into ".text"
section
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93288
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from David Malco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91903
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Target Milestone|10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32306
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93602
--- Comment #11 from Liviu Ionescu ---
> --without-libiconv-prefix looks promising
I'll try it tomorrow and let you know.
Thank you,
Liviu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93405
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93392
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92654
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93602
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Liviu Ionescu from comment #8)
> Is there any way to prevent GCC from picking the freshly compiled libiconv
> and use the system one?
Try the options I suggested. --without-libiconv-prefix lo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93608
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93602
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Ah, something did change: we now use automake-1.15.1 and autoconf-2.69 and
that's where all the iconv handling comes from (via the AM_ICONV macro).
Presumably that changed in upstream automake.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93602
--- Comment #8 from Liviu Ionescu ---
> I would guess either /usr/local/include or ${INSTALL_FOLDER_PATH}/include
Yes, but I have exactly the same configuration when I build GCC 8.x and 7.x,
and GCC does not get confused, the problem occurred on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93608
Bug ID: 93608
Summary: [libbacktrace] Add support for .gnu_debugdata section
(aka MiniDebugInfo)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhanc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93602
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Liviu Ionescu from comment #0)
> GCC 7.x and 8.x are fine, with the same build procedure the libstdc++ shared
> library has no undefined references to libiconv.
Have you checked that recently?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93602
--- Comment #6 from Liviu Ionescu ---
> I think you have libiconv installed locally, which defines the libiconv_xxx
> functions.
That's correct, I have the latest libiconv compiled from sources and GCC (like
many other programs) correctly iden
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93602
--- Comment #5 from Liviu Ionescu ---
> I think you have libiconv installed locally, which defines the libiconv_xxx
> functions.
That's correct, I have the latest libiconv compiled from sources and GCC (like
many other programs) correctly iden
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93140
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93602
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93605
Nicholas Krause changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xerofoify at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93602
--- Comment #3 from Liviu Ionescu ---
The actual configure line is:
bash ${DEBUG}
"${SOURCES_FOLDER_PATH}/${native_gcc_folder_name}/configure" \
--prefix="${INSTALL_FOLDER_PATH}" \
--program-suffix="${XBB_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93602
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think you have libiconv installed locally, which defines the libiconv_xxx
functions. That is being found by GCC instead of the symbols in glibc, as
normally happens.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93605
--- Comment #2 from mike.k at digitalcarbide dot com ---
Interestingly, changing `impl::func`'s signature from `bool v` to `auto&& v`
fixes the issue. Changing it to `auto v` does not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93602
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93557
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5a8ad97b6e4823d4ded00a3ce8d80e4bf93368d4
commit r10-6460-g5a8ad97b6e4823d4ded00a3ce8d80e4bf93368d4
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82507
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84140
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85808
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68451
--- Comment #2 from Tim ---
Still ICEs on 9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93607
Bug ID: 93607
Summary: Deprecated alias templates don't produce warnings
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92947
--- Comment #3 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Any chance of progress on this before 10 ships?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93500
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21182
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.4 |11.0
--- Comment #30 from Jeffrey A. La
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93568
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93569
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93559
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93568
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Michael Meissner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d10cddeaad2a315c114063b7c1ff11c6a356ab65
commit r10-6459-gd10cddeaad2a315c114063b7c1ff11c6a356ab65
Author: Michael Meissner
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93605
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93559
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44334e036526ac269dc6437caa1976e5bf30e849
commit r10-6458-g44334e036526ac269dc6437caa1976e5bf30e849
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93606
Bug ID: 93606
Summary: -fdirectives-only and raw string literals
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: preproce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93568
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93601
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93605
Bug ID: 93605
Summary: GCC suboptimal tail call optimization in trivial
function forwarding with __attribute__((noinline))
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92003
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 47787
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47787&action=edit
proposed fix
The change in C++17 is that static constexpr data members are now implicitly
'inline', so no out-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90951
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] error |[8/9 Regression] error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92593
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 92593, which changed state.
Bug 92593 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE with CTAD using undeclared constraint
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92593
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93603
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93604
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92548
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2020-02-05 1:31 p.m., jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> The problem is that IPA-SRA does not handle structures passed by
> invisible reference and 32bit hppa uses it. I would suggest xfaili
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93594
--- Comment #3 from andysem at mail dot ru ---
...and probably other permute variants involving zeroed input registers, e.g.:
__m256i cvt_permute_zero_v1(__m128i low)
{
return _mm256_permute2x128_si256(_mm256_setzero_si256(),
_mm256_castsi128
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93604
Bug ID: 93604
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_constant_to_tree, at
fortran/trans-const.c:372
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93603
Bug ID: 93603
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at
fortran/trans-types.c:1201
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93602
Bug ID: 93602
Summary: Missing reference to libiconv
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93601
Bug ID: 93601
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in
gfc_element_size
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93600
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 from G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93600
Bug ID: 93600
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_assignment, at
fortran/match.c:1366/1340
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92593
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa0c6e297b22d5883857d0db4a6a8be0967cb16f
commit r10-6457-gfa0c6e297b22d5883857d0db4a6a8be0967cb16f
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93582
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> The warning is in dead code, but due to the optimize_bit_field_compare
> "optimization" we aren't able to find that out until combine.
I am not a fan of that o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93594
--- Comment #2 from andysem at mail dot ru ---
Another test case:
__m256i cvt_permute(__m128i low)
{
return _mm256_permute2x128_si256(_mm256_castsi128_si256(low),
_mm256_castsi128_si256(low), 0x80);
}
https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/4Ddt3C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92548
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
The problem is that IPA-SRA does not handle structures passed by
invisible reference and 32bit hppa uses it. I would suggest xfailing
the scan it like we did in PR77732. John, since you can actually run
the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93588
--- Comment #4 from Alex Reinking ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> >The intrinsics are supposed to map to the corresponding assembly
> >instructions, no?
> NO, it is an interface to what the assembly instructions do; not always
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93549
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 84140, which changed state.
Bug 84140 Summary: Inline friends are not constrained by concepts
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84140
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84140
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85808
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 85808, which changed state.
Bug 85808 Summary: [concepts] unqualified name lookup breaks after qualified
lookup in nested requirement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85808
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91333
--- Comment #17 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #16)
> (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #15)
> > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14)
> > > I think what matters is whether the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82507
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 82507, which changed state.
Bug 82507 Summary: [concepts] premature substitution into constraint of
non-template member function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82507
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93594
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93582
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #13 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93599
Bug ID: 93599
Summary: [9/10 regression] Bug in fortran asynchronous I/O wait
function
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85667
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu ---
I am testing this
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index ffda3e8fd21..f769cb8f75e 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -3153,7 +3153,7 @@ function_arg_64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68683
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68781
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 68781, which changed state.
Bug 68781 Summary: [concepts] requires in member function is not unevaluated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68781
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68781
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85667
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72708
--- Comment #4 from 高橋将 ---
cppreference.com also says:
"Namespace-scope anonymous unions must be declared static unless they appear in
an unnamed namespace."
on Union declaration.
It would be best if this bug was fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88521
Bug 88521 depends on bug 85667, which changed state.
Bug 85667 Summary: ms_abi rules aren't followed when returning short structs
with float values
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85667
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85667
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
