[Bug c++/92954] -Wshadow does not report when a struct member shadows a global

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92954 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/92479] missing warnings for unreachable codes with break (i.e. revive the subset of -Wunreachable-code that fits under clang's -Wunreachable-code-break)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92479 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||87403 Summary|missing warning

[Bug c/92209] Imprecise column number for -Wstrict-prototypes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92209 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/92210] no warning for invariable used in loop condition (i.e. add clang's -Wfor-loop-analysis)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92210 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/91839] missing error diagnosis for undeclared identifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91839 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/91820] missing error diagnosis of '&' in initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91820 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic CC|

[Bug c/93031] Wish: When the underlying ISA does not force pointer alignment, option to make GCC not assume it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93031 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/93036] [9/10 Regression] g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class27.C testcase accepted in -std=c++17 mode since r276248

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93036 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Target Mil

[Bug c++/93036] New: [9/10 Regression] g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class27.C testcase accepted in -std=c++17 mode since r276248

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93036 Bug ID: 93036 Summary: [9/10 Regression] g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class27.C testcase accepted in -std=c++17 mode since r276248 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/91512] [10 Regression] Fortran compile time regression.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512 --- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 23:51:15 2019 New Revision: 279687 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279687&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/91512 PR fortran/92738 * lang.opt (

[Bug tree-optimization/92738] [10 regression] Large code size growth for -O2 binaries between 2019-05-19...2019-05-29

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 23:51:15 2019 New Revision: 279687 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279687&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/91512 PR fortran/92738 * lang.opt (

[Bug demangler/93035] New: Found 91 mangled names which do not demangle using c++filt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93035 Bug ID: 93035 Summary: Found 91 mangled names which do not demangle using c++filt Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c++/92966] Segfault on defaulted operator== with wrong return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92966 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/92992] Side-effects dropped when decltype(nullptr) typed expression is passed to ellipsis

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92992 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed on the trunk so far.

[Bug c++/92965] "note: 'x' is not public" emitted even when no error is emitted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92965 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/92666] [10 Regression] bogus -Wunused-but-set-variable in gcov.c with -Wno-restrict

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92666 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/92973] [10 Regression] Silently accepting defaulted comparison operators in C++11 .. 17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92973 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/93028] internal compiler error: in write_type, at cp/mangle.c:2073

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93028 --- Comment #2 from Colin H Close --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1) > It's not (easily) possible to reproduce the problem with what you've > provided; the shell script has stuff like > /home/colin/Development/bluegriffon/BUILD/gecko

[Bug c++/92745] [8/9 Regression] Initializing array with vec4 results in compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92745 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |[8/9 Regression] |Init

[Bug c++/92745] [8/9/10 Regression] Initializing array with vec4 results in compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92745 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Dec 20 23:30:04 2019 New Revision: 279686 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279686&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/92745 - bogus error when initializing array of vectors.

[Bug c++/92974] diagnostic missing source information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92974 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/92974] diagnostic missing source information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92974 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Dec 20 23:25:44 2019 New Revision: 279685 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279685&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/92974 - bogus location for enum and non-enum in ?: warni

[Bug c++/92965] "note: 'x' is not public" emitted even when no error is emitted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92965 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 23:21:21 2019 New Revision: 279684 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279684&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/92965 * pt.c (invalid_nontype_parm_type_p): Call st

[Bug c++/92966] Segfault on defaulted operator== with wrong return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92966 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 23:19:23 2019 New Revision: 279683 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279683&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/92966 * method.c (early_check_defaulted_comparison)

[Bug c++/92973] [10 Regression] Silently accepting defaulted comparison operators in C++11 .. 17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92973 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 23:18:09 2019 New Revision: 279682 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279682&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/92973 * method.c (early_check_defaulted_comparison)

[Bug c++/92666] [10 Regression] bogus -Wunused-but-set-variable in gcov.c with -Wno-restrict

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92666 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 23:16:58 2019 New Revision: 279681 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279681&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/92666 * call.c (convert_arg_to_ellipsis): For float

[Bug c++/92992] Side-effects dropped when decltype(nullptr) typed expression is passed to ellipsis

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92992 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 23:15:52 2019 New Revision: 279680 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279680&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/92992 * call.c (convert_arg_to_ellipsis): For declt

[Bug middle-end/78622] [7 Regression] -Wformat-length/-fprintf-return-value incorrect with overflow/wrapping

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78622 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #6) > (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #5) > > Author: jvdelisle > > Date: Fri Dec 16 20:27:51 2016 > > New Revision: 243765 > > > Wrong PR number, my apologi

[Bug tree-optimization/71237] [7 regression] scev tests failing after pass reorganization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71237 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #12) > Author: tkoenig > Date: Sun Feb 10 15:52:38 2019 > New Revision: 268748 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268748&root=gcc&view=rev > Log: > 2019-02-10

[Bug libstdc++/51083] TR1 [tr.c99.cmath.over] and C++11 [cmplx.over] overloads not constrained

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51083 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added URL|http://www.freefilehosting. |http://www.freefilehosting.

[Bug java/64044] Java emits bogus .class$ decls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64044 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed by r218018

[Bug tree-optimization/64004] [5 Regressio] Build error in tree-ssa-loop-niter.c in maybe_lower_iteration_bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64004 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > Author: rguenth > Date: Mon Nov 24 14:02:36 2014 > New Revision: 218018 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218018&root=gcc&view=rev > Log: > 2014-11-24

[Bug fortran/91661] ICE in gfc_conv_intrinsic_dot_product, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:4804

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91661 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|NEW

[Bug c++/29027] template conversion specialization found by using declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29027 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Janis Johnson from comment #3) > Subject: Bug 29027 > > Author: janis > Date: Wed Apr 1 17:31:26 2009 > New Revision: 145422 > > URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145422

[Bug c++/36460] No space between >'s not always handled in C++0x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36460 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Andy Hutchinson from comment #2) > Subject: Bug 36460 > > Author: hutchinsonandy > Date: Wed Jun 18 21:48:50 2008 > New Revision: 136919 > > URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&

[Bug c++/92947] Parenthesized aggregate initialization doesn't work with the library types it's supposed to work with

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92947 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- The problem here is the cp_unevaluated_operand check: 10147 if (DECL_CONSTRUCTOR_P (fn) 10148 && !(flags & LOOKUP_ONLYCONVERTING) 10149 && !cp_unevaluated_operand 10150 &&

[Bug c++/8895] ICE on invalid template default value specification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8895 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Comment 4 belongs to PR 8995.

[Bug fortran/92990] INVALID code with NULLIFY – partially misleading error message "If bounds remapping is specified at (1), the pointer target shall not be NULL"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92990 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch cleaned up and with adjusted error message at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-12/msg00182.html

[Bug libstdc++/93034] variant not constexpr in c++17 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93034 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/93033] [10 Regression] error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- template struct S { S(T *); ~S(); }; struct X { struct C { S d; float e; }; X(); }; S f(S); X::X() { C a[]{f("")}; } $ ./cc1plus -quiet 93033.C 93033.C: In constructor ‘X::X()’: 93033.C:13

[Bug target/93009] [9/10 Regression] AVX512 FMA - wrong code generation since r265288

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93009 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 47537 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47537&action=edit gcc10-pr93009.patch Untested fix. The bug is obvious, these *_bcst_1 patterns used =v,v 0,v v,0 m,m constraints

[Bug c++/93033] [10 Regression] error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug sanitizer/89832] confusing error message when there is a problem with ASAN_OPTIONS "ERROR: expected '='"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89832 --- Comment #11 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi, (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #10) > Fixed on trunk. I am trying to back port the fix for 89832 into our company's gcc8.2.1 release. by looking at the patch, it's huge, and it's inc

[Bug target/93009] [9/10 Regression] AVX512 FMA - wrong code generation since r265288

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93009 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/93033] [10 Regression] error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNC

[Bug libstdc++/93034] New: variant not constexpr in c++17 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93034 Bug ID: 93034 Summary: variant not constexpr in c++17 mode Product: gcc Version: 7.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug c++/93033] error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Reduced C++ code seems to be template class b { public: b(a *); ~b(); }; class c { struct C { b d; float e; }; c(); }; b f(b); c::c() { C a[]{f("")}; }

[Bug c++/93033] New: error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033 Bug ID: 93033 Summary: error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/92438] [8/9/10 Regression] Function declaration parsed incorrectly with `-std=c++1z`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92438 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/92775] [8 Regression] Incorrect expression in DW_AT_byte_stride on an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92775 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] Incorrect |[8 Regression] Incorrect

[Bug fortran/92899] [8 Regression] [OpenMP] ICE in gfc_trans_omp_atomic, at fortran/trans-openmp.c:3769

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92899 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] [OpenMP] |[8 Regression] [OpenMP] ICE

[Bug tree-optimization/92930] [8 Regression] GCC incorrectly optimizes away __builtin_apply() calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92930 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] GCC|[8 Regression] GCC |in

[Bug fortran/92756] [9 Regression] ICE in lower_omp, at omp-low.c:12988

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92756 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/92644] [9 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1530

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92644 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for 9.3+ too.

[Bug target/92723] [8 Regression] ICE in expand_shift_1, at expmed.c:2635

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92723 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in

[Bug inline-asm/92615] [8 Regression] ICE in extract_insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92615 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c/90677] [9 Regression] gcc-9.1.0 fails to build __gcc_diag__ souce: error: 'cgraph_node' is not defined as a type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90677 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 92524, which changed state. Bug 92524 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in short program with constexpr and std::array https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92524 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/92524] [9 Regression] ICE in short program with constexpr and std::array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92524 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/91944] [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6156

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91944 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/90842] [8 Regression] ICE in poplevel, at cp/decl.c:585

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90842 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in

[Bug target/90492] simple array-copy not use available simd-registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90492 g.peterh...@t-online.de changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.0 --- Comment #6 from g.pete

[Bug fortran/92977] ICE in gfc_trans_omp_atomic, at fortran/trans-openmp.c:3526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92977 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:45:56 2019 New Revision: 279676 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279676&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-12-19 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug ipa/92357] ICE in IPA pass fnsummary in openmp offload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92357 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:44:50 2019 New Revision: 279675 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279675&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-12-14 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/92930] [8/9 Regression] GCC incorrectly optimizes away __builtin_apply() calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92930 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:44:16 2019 New Revision: 279674 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279674&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-12-14 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/92904] varargs for __int128 is placed at an unaligned location and uses movdqa for the load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92904 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:43:23 2019 New Revision: 279673 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279673&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-12-12 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/92899] [8/9 Regression] [OpenMP] ICE in gfc_trans_omp_atomic, at fortran/trans-openmp.c:3769

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92899 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:42:22 2019 New Revision: 279672 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279672&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-12-11 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/92723] [8/9 Regression] ICE in expand_shift_1, at expmed.c:2635

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92723 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:41:17 2019 New Revision: 279671 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279671&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-12-11 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/92831] CWG1299 extend_ref_init_temps_1 punts on COND_EXPRs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92831 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:37:45 2019 New Revision: 279669 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279669&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-12-06 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/92775] [8/9 Regression] Incorrect expression in DW_AT_byte_stride on an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92775 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:36:48 2019 New Revision: 279668 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279668&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-12-06 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug analyzer/58237] gcc fails to detect obvious resource leaks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58237 --- Comment #8 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #6) > I tried out recent cppcheck on recent gcc trunk and found these resource > leaks: > > trunk/libvtv/scripts/sum-vtv-counts.c:94:4: error: Resource leak: fp_in >

[Bug fortran/92781] ICE in convert_nonlocal_reference_op, at tree-nested.c:1065

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92781 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:36:08 2019 New Revision: 279667 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279667&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-12-05 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/92756] [9 Regression] ICE in lower_omp, at omp-low.c:12988

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92756 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:35:18 2019 New Revision: 279666 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279666&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR fortran/92756 * omp-low.c (check_omp_nesting_restrictio

[Bug analyzer/93032] New: analyzer fails to detect FILE * leak in zlib/contrib/minizip/mztools.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93032 Bug ID: 93032 Summary: analyzer fails to detect FILE * leak in zlib/contrib/minizip/mztools.c Product: gcc Version: analyzer branch Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug c++/92732] Bit-field of scoped enumeration type cannot be initialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92732 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:34:14 2019 New Revision: 279665 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279665&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-12-03 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/92695] P1064R0 - virtual constexpr fails if object taken from array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92695 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:33:13 2019 New Revision: 279664 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279664&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-12-03 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/92695] P1064R0 - virtual constexpr fails if object taken from array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92695 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:32:23 2019 New Revision: 279663 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279663&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-12-02 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/60228] ICE using lambda in #pragma omp declare reduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60228 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:30:38 2019 New Revision: 279662 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279662&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-29 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/92695] P1064R0 - virtual constexpr fails if object taken from array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92695 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:26:28 2019 New Revision: 279661 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279661&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-28 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/91944] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6156

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91944 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:25:39 2019 New Revision: 279660 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279660&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-27 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/92524] [9 Regression] ICE in short program with constexpr and std::array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92524 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:24:30 2019 New Revision: 279659 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279659&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-27 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug debug/92664] Wrong .debug_line section information when compiling stdin input with -g3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92664 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:23:34 2019 New Revision: 279658 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279658&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-27 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libstdc++/92927] Bootstrap failed with CXXFLAGS="-O0"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92927 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/69497] ICE in gfc_free_namespace, at fortran/symbol.c:3701

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69497 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Dec 20 17:10:22 2019 New Revision: 279657 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279657&root=gcc&view=rev Log: fortran: Fix PR number in comment of testcase for PR 69497 The testcase

[Bug libstdc++/92927] Bootstrap failed with CXXFLAGS="-O0"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92927 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Dec 20 17:10:18 2019 New Revision: 279656 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279656&root=gcc&view=rev Log: libstdc++: Add inline to maybe-constexpr functions (PR 92927) Originally

[Bug c++/92648] Handling of unknown attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92648 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:01:08 2019 New Revision: 279655 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279655&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-26 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/61414] enum class bitfield size-checking needs a separate warning flag controlling it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61414 --- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:00:02 2019 New Revision: 279654 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279654&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-26 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/92644] [9 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1530

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92644 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 16:58:07 2019 New Revision: 279652 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279652&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-26 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug sanitizer/92154] new glibc breaks arm bootstrap due to libsanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92154 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 16:58:35 2019 New Revision: 279653 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279653&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-26 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug inline-asm/92615] [8/9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92615 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 16:57:21 2019 New Revision: 279651 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279651&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-23 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/90677] [9 Regression] gcc-9.1.0 fails to build __gcc_diag__ souce: error: 'cgraph_node' is not defined as a type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90677 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 16:56:30 2019 New Revision: 279650 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279650&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-22 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/90842] [8/9 Regression] ICE in poplevel, at cp/decl.c:585

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90842 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 16:55:06 2019 New Revision: 279649 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279649&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-21 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug regression/93009] AVX512 FMA - wrong code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93009 Matthias Hochsteger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INV

[Bug regression/93009] AVX512 FMA - wrong code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93009 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Hochsteger --- Created attachment 47534 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47534&action=edit new code, cout results

[Bug c++/93028] internal compiler error: in write_type, at cp/mangle.c:2073

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93028 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/93031] New: Wish: When the underlying ISA does not force pointer alignment, option to make GCC not assume it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93031 Bug ID: 93031 Summary: Wish: When the underlying ISA does not force pointer alignment, option to make GCC not assume it Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/90040] [meta-bug] modulo-scheduler and partitioning issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90040 --- Comment #2 from Roman Zhuykov --- Same ICE also appears when compiling gcc.c-torture/execute/pr71550.c with -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions -fmodulo-sched -freorder-blocks-and-partition on seve

[Bug c++/93018] Zero initialization not occurring for empty struct in member union when converting constructor is used with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93018 --- Comment #3 from John Drouhard --- I don't think this is a matter of object lifetime. Passing -fnolifetime-dse or -flifetime-dse=1 does not change the generated assembly here at all. As a user of the functions baz1 and baz2, I would expect th

[Bug libgomp/93030] New: [OpenACC] libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/deep-copy-10.c FAILS on AMDGCN – invalid 'async' usage?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93030 Bug ID: 93030 Summary: [OpenACC] libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/deep-copy-10.c FAILS on AMDGCN – invalid 'async' usage? Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/92591] ICE in optimize_sc, at modulo-sched.c:1063

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92591 Roman Zhuykov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   >