https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Henlich ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #5)
> Author: jvdelisle
> Date: Thu Nov 28 18:33:20 2019
> New Revision: 278817
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278817&root=gcc&view=rev
> Log:
> PR f
tion fault
0xe74916 crash_signal
/var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20191208/work/gcc-10-20191208/gcc/toplev.c:328
0x860c1b sprintf
/usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:36
0x860c1b gfc_typename(gfc_typespec*)
/var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-lin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92862
Bug ID: 92862
Summary: Suspicious codes in tree-ssa-loop-niter.c and
predict.c
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29997
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12955
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||geoffk at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92686
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80969
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92686
--- Comment #5 from liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Dec 9 04:16:24 2019
New Revision: 279107
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279107&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Enable mask movement for VCOND_EXPR under avx512f for
128/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92861
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92861
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon Dec 9 03:43:33 2019
New Revision: 279106
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279106&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/92861
runtime: use absolute time for sem_timedwai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92822
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92861
Bug ID: 92861
Summary: Passes relative time to sem_timedwait on GNU/Hurd
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92851
--- Comment #2 from Kohei Takahashi ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> Please provide a complete testcase not a URL, as required by
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/
Sorry, here is reproducible complete code.
struct S
{
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92851
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92859
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92856
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> The behaviour is by design
And documented, see
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options.html#index-Wnarrowing
"For C++11 and later sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92853
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The problem is that the trailing slash in the right operand gets processed
twice:
977 if (it != last && it->_M_type() == _Type::_Root_dir)
978 {
979 ++it;
980 if (it == last)
981
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92855
--- Comment #5 from Thiago Macieira ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #4)
> (FWIW, making 'f' a template in your example makes it non-hidden)
>
> Can you explain why you expect the command-line option to override the
> attribute on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87488
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92858
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92853
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92850
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to fdlbxtqi from comment #2)
> "Are you sure concepts are fully implemented in clang?"
>
> Yes, but feature testing macro is missing.
No, it very obviously doesn't support concepts:
https://god
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92850
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
If the macro is not defined it's either a clang bug, or is intentional because
the implementation is not finished.
It is undefined for you to define any __cpp* macro yourself.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92856
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92858
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65424
Pavel I. Kryukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pavel.kryukov at phystech dot
edu
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92855
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92855
--- Comment #3 from Thiago Macieira ---
The symbol in question is inline, therefore -fvisibility-inlines-hidden should
trigger and cause it to become hidden too.
Testcase showing that GCC will apply that:
#define VISIBILITY(x) __attribute__((vi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92836
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 47441
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47441&action=edit
Output of valgrind --tool=helgrind
The code from https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-12/msg00020.html :
prog
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92191
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92191
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Dec 8 13:50:32 2019
New Revision: 279089
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279089&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/92860
* common.opt (fprofile-reorder-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
Bug ID: 92860
Summary: [8,9,10 regression] Global flags affected by -O
settings are clobbered by optimize attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92859
Bug ID: 92859
Summary: compiler treats enum type as an integer during
overload resolution when a bit-field of this enum is
considered
Product: gcc
Version: 7.4.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92780
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92780
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Dec 8 13:42:42 2019
New Revision: 279088
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279088&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Error on Associate with a program.
2018-12-08 Thomas Koenig
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92764
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92764
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Dec 8 13:02:54 2019
New Revision: 279087
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279087&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-08 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/92764
* interface.c (gfc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92755
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92755
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Dec 8 12:25:15 2019
New Revision: 279086
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279086&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-12-08 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/92755
* dependen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40362
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92858
Bug ID: 92858
Summary: [10 regression] spurious backslashes around switch
string in warning messages
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: di
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92857
Bug ID: 92857
Summary: -Wsign-conversion flag issues false positives for
expression using typedef'ed unsigned types
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92856
Bug ID: 92856
Summary: incorrectly accepts invalid C++11 braced
initialisation of double from long double
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
45 matches
Mail list logo
