[Bug middle-end/91195] [10 regression] incorrect may be used uninitialized smw (272711, 273474]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91195 --- Comment #11 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- r278496 fix my original problem. Thank you

[Bug tree-optimization/92608] [9/10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in find_loop_guard)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92608 prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/92608] New: [9/10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in find_loop_guard)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92608 Bug ID: 92608 Summary: [9/10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in find_loop_guard) Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/92534] [10 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-42.c fails after r278262

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92534 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 fr

[Bug go/92605] [10 regression] r278509 causes/reveals issue in building go library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92605 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/92605] [10 regression] r278509 causes/reveals issue in building go library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92605 --- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Thu Nov 21 01:06:47 2019 New Revision: 278540 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278540&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR go/92605 runtime: declare runtime_usestackmaps in st

[Bug c++/90842] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in poplevel, at cp/decl.c:585

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90842 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Nov 21 01:00:43 2019 New Revision: 278538 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278538&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/90842 * parser.c (cp_parser_decl_specifier_seq): Fo

[Bug fortran/92569] gfortran read with end directive does not trigger in gfortran 9.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92569 --- Comment #3 from Bill Lipa --- Thanks for looking at it. I studied it further and it seems that -O2 is the culprit. Could you please try to reproduce with -O2? $ gfortran -O2 res.f $ ./a.out At line 8 of file res.f (unit = 1, file = 'resul

[Bug d/92607] New: pwned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92607 Bug ID: 92607 Summary: pwned Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: d Assignee: ibuclaw at gdcproje

[Bug c++/92604] GCC accepts invalid conversion from designated initializer list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92604 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Status|UNCON

[Bug target/92606] New: [avr] invalid merge of symbols in progmem and data sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92606 Bug ID: 92606 Summary: [avr] invalid merge of symbols in progmem and data sections Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug go/92605] [10 regression] r278509 causes/reveals issue in building go library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92605 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64le-linux-gnu | Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/92602] Failure in gcc.target/powerpc/bswap64-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92602 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Opened different pr for the go part https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92605

[Bug go/92605] New: [10 regression] r278509 causes/reveals issue in building go library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92605 Bug ID: 92605 Summary: [10 regression] r278509 causes/reveals issue in building go library Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/92604] New: GCC accepts invalid conversion from designated initializer list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92604 Bug ID: 92604 Summary: GCC accepts invalid conversion from designated initializer list Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/92602] Failure in gcc.target/powerpc/bswap64-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92602 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to seurer from comment #1) > > and it causes a link error in building go Please file that seperately because libgo is wrong here.

[Bug c++/92443] [10 Regression] ICE in joust, at cp/call.c:11166

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92443 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/92443] [10 Regression] ICE in joust, at cp/call.c:11166

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92443 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Nov 20 22:59:20 2019 New Revision: 278534 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278534&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Add test for PR c++/92443. * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-92443.C: N

[Bug c++/92443] [10 Regression] ICE in joust, at cp/call.c:11166

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92443 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug rtl-optimization/92602] Failure in gcc.target/powerpc/bswap64-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92602 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/92602] New: Failure in gcc.target/powerpc/bswap64-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92602 Bug ID: 92602 Summary: Failure in gcc.target/powerpc/bswap64-2.c Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-opti

[Bug c++/92593] [10 Regression] ICE with CTAD using undeclared constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92593 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/92463] Cleanups due to minimum MPFR version bump to 3.1.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92463 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Component|fortran |middle-end --- Comment #4 from Janne B

[Bug tree-optimization/92515] [10 regression] ICE in many test cases after r278235

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92515 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug other/92366] new test case gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-41.c fails with its introduction in r277784

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92366 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug other/92366] new test case gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-41.c fails with its introduction in r277784

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92366 --- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Wed Nov 20 21:13:05 2019 New Revision: 278532 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278532&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Restrict bb-slp-40.c to targets with VnQI addition (PR 9

[Bug tree-optimization/92527] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-div-2.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92527 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug tree-optimization/92595] [10 Regression] ICE in related_vector_mode, at stor-layout.c:534 since r278229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92595 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assigne

[Bug tree-optimization/92527] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-div-2.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92527 --- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Wed Nov 20 21:08:52 2019 New Revision: 278531 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278531&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Adjust expected output for bb-slp-21.c (PR 92527) After

[Bug other/92090] [8/9 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c starting with r276469

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92090 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/92090] [8/9 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c starting with r276469

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92090 --- Comment #19 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Wed Nov 20 20:44:50 2019 New Revision: 278528 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278528&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport fix for PR92090. gcc/ Backport from mainline

[Bug other/92090] [8/9 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c starting with r276469

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92090 --- Comment #18 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Wed Nov 20 20:42:41 2019 New Revision: 278527 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278527&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport fix for PR92090. gcc/ Backport from mainline

[Bug fortran/92463] Cleanups due to minimum MPFR version bump to 3.1.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92463 --- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist --- Author: jb Date: Wed Nov 20 20:08:29 2019 New Revision: 278525 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278525&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR 92463 MPFR modernization: Revert r269139 Commit r269139 fixed an accide

[Bug tree-optimization/88074] [7 Regression] g++ hangs on math expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88074 --- Comment #38 from Janne Blomqvist --- Author: jb Date: Wed Nov 20 20:08:29 2019 New Revision: 278525 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278525&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR 92463 MPFR modernization: Revert r269139 Commit r269139 fixed an accid

[Bug tree-optimization/92152] [10 Regression] Wrong code (Resurrection of PR53663)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92152 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Indeed, following testcase aborts on x86_64-linux with -O2/-O3/-Os and > succeeds with -O0/-O1/-Og: That testcase reminds me of 14319.

[Bug target/91702] [9/10 Regression] ICE with mips16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91702 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/92463] Cleanups due to minimum MPFR version bump to 3.1.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92463 --- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist --- Author: jb Date: Wed Nov 20 20:01:25 2019 New Revision: 278523 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278523&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR 92463 MPFR modernization in GFortran Now that we require a minimum of M

[Bug target/91702] [9/10 Regression] ICE with mips16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91702 --- Comment #5 from Dragan Mladjenovic --- Yes, I believe so.

[Bug c++/92601] error: type variant differs by TYPE_NEEDS_CONSTRUCTING

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92601 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/92601] New: error: type variant differs by TYPE_NEEDS_CONSTRUCTING

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92601 Bug ID: 92601 Summary: error: type variant differs by TYPE_NEEDS_CONSTRUCTING Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-checking Severity: normal

[Bug target/92071] [10 regression][ARM] ice in gen_movsi, at config/arm/arm.md:5378

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92071 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- I'd say this should be fixed in the arm backend, instead of asserts it should check whether operands are aligned and if not, perform unaligned load or store, because the amount of spots in the middle-end that

[Bug target/92071] [10 regression][ARM] ice in gen_movsi, at config/arm/arm.md:5378

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92071 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug other/92090] [8/9 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c starting with r276469

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92090 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.0 Summary|[10 regress

[Bug target/92592] Redundant comparison after subtraction on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92592 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- IFN_SUB_OVERFLOW recognition?

[Bug tree-optimization/92152] [10 Regression] Wrong code (Resurrection of PR53663)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92152 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug ipa/92109] [10 Regression] ICE in modify_call_stmt, at ipa-param-manipulation.c:1586

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92109 --- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor --- So this helps: diff --git a/gcc/cgraphclones.c b/gcc/cgraphclones.c index bfcebb20495..359ea53d8a6 100644 --- a/gcc/cgraphclones.c +++ b/gcc/cgraphclones.c @@ -1079,6 +1079,7 @@ symbol_table::materialize_all

[Bug other/92090] [10 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c starting with r276469

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92090 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #16

[Bug jit/92483] [10 Regression] many jit test failures due to ABRT, SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92483 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgomp/92511] [OpenACC] Support subset subarray mappings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92511 --- Comment #2 from jules at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jules Date: Wed Nov 20 17:51:09 2019 New Revision: 278514 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278514&root=gcc&view=rev Log: OpenACC "present" subarrays: runtime API return value and unmapp

[Bug jit/92483] [10 Regression] many jit test failures due to ABRT, SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92483 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Wed Nov 20 17:51:41 2019 New Revision: 278515 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278515&root=gcc&view=rev Log: jit: fix ICE with GCC_JIT_BOOL_OPTION_SELFCHECK_GC since r278084 (PR ji

[Bug c++/91706] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in equate_type_number_to_die, at dwarf2out.c:5782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91706 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug middle-end/91858] [9/10 Regression] Compile time hog w/ complex float trigonometric functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91858 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Reduced testcase: _Complex float f = __builtin_ctanf (1.0f + 1.0if);

[Bug ipa/92109] [10 Regression] ICE in modify_call_stmt, at ipa-param-manipulation.c:1586

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92109 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug target/91702] [9/10 Regression] ICE with mips16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91702 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug lto/92600] New: ICE: lto1: internal compiler error: symtab_node::verify failed, building 523.xalancbmk_r with -flto -fno-inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92600 Bug ID: 92600 Summary: ICE: lto1: internal compiler error: symtab_node::verify failed, building 523.xalancbmk_r with -flto -fno-inline Product: gcc Version: 10.0

[Bug middle-end/90796] [8/9 Regression] GCC: O2 vs O3 output differs on simple test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90796 --- Comment #17 from Michael Matz --- Author: matz Date: Wed Nov 20 16:51:10 2019 New Revision: 278512 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278512&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR90796 PR middle-end/90796 * gimple-loop-jam.c (any_acc

[Bug sanitizer/92589] heuristic to avoid flexible array members too liberal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92589 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug c++/92598] explicit specialization of template from unnamed namespace using unqualified-id in enclosing namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92598 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCON

[Bug c++/92597] std::fma gives nan using -march=sandybridge+ with asm volatile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92597 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug rtl-optimization/71785] Computed gotos are mostly optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71785 --- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Aleksey from comment #14) > Performance is not the case here, so don't bother with it. Strict order of > labels and using everywhere "jmp reg" instead of "jmp rel + jmp reg" - this > is wha

[Bug c++/92597] std::fma gives nan using -march=sandybridge+ with asm volatile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92597 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug lto/92599] ICE in speculative_call_info, at cgraph.c:1142

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92599 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/92599] New: ICE in speculative_call_info, at cgraph.c:1142

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92599 Bug ID: 92599 Summary: ICE in speculative_call_info, at cgraph.c:1142 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug c++/92598] New: explicit specialization of template from unnamed namespace using unqualified-id in enclosing namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92598 Bug ID: 92598 Summary: explicit specialization of template from unnamed namespace using unqualified-id in enclosing namespace Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIR

[Bug tree-optimization/91355] [8/9/10 Regression] optimized code does not call destructor while unwinding after exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91355 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think we have two issues. One is that if we sink something on the edge between resx and corresponding landing pad, ehcleanup2 is upset, and the other one is that it is really not beneficial to sink the stm

[Bug c++/92597] New: std::fma gives nan using -march=sandybridge+ with asm volatile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92597 Bug ID: 92597 Summary: std::fma gives nan using -march=sandybridge+ with asm volatile Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/92566] rs6000_preferred_simd_mode isn't very good

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92566 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- The whole function can be something as simple as mode = mode_for_vector (mode, 16 / GET_MODE_SIZE (mode)); if (this is actually an existing mode && !VECTOR_UNIT_NONE (mode)) return mode;

[Bug rtl-optimization/91161] [9/10 Regression] ICE in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91161 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov --- With -fno-dce, a NOTE_INSN_DELETED_LABEL appears between the last "real" insn in the basic block (a sibcall) and a barrier rtx: (call_insn/u/c 20 19 12 3 (call (mem:QI (symbol_ref:DI ("ni") [flags 0x3]

[Bug fortran/48303] [Legacy] Support Character constants in DATA statement for non-character variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48303 MarkEggleston changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mark.eggleston at codethink dot co

[Bug rtl-optimization/71785] Computed gotos are mostly optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71785 --- Comment #14 from Aleksey --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #13) > (In reply to Aleksey from comment #12) > > But adding these two flags "-fno-reorder-blocks-and-partition > > -fno-reorder-blocks" > > If you say that basic bloc

Vamos evoluir juntos?

seu leitor nao suporta emails html

[Bug target/92573] [10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92573 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/92573] [10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92573 --- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Wed Nov 20 13:38:52 2019 New Revision: 278497 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278497&root=gcc&view=rev Log: rs6000: Fix UNORDERED without NaNs, for DFP (PR92573) This is the a

[Bug c++/92593] [10 Regression] ICE with CTAD using undeclared constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92593 Andrew Sutton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrew.n.sutton at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug ipa/92372] [10 Regression] ICE in ipa_update_overall_fn_summary at gcc/ipa-fnsummary.c:3671 since r277780

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92372 Zdenek Sojka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/92596] New: [10 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2162 since r278406

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92596 Bug ID: 92596 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2162 since r278406 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-

[Bug tree-optimization/92596] [10 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2162 since r278406

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92596 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/91333] [9/10 Regression] suboptimal register allocation for inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91333 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- gcc version 9.2.1 20191109 (Debian 9.2.1-19) (current debian testing/unstable) gives me the 3 movapd, whether I use -O1, -O2 or -O3, and -Os gives 2 movapd. I didn't try with a vanilla gcc, not sure which debi

[Bug rtl-optimization/71785] Computed gotos are mostly optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71785 --- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Aleksey from comment #12) > But adding these two flags "-fno-reorder-blocks-and-partition > -fno-reorder-blocks" If you say that basic blocks should not be reordered, then they are not. A

[Bug tree-optimization/91355] [8/9/10 Regression] optimized code does not call destructor while unwinding after exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91355 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/92236] [concepts] Explain non-satisfaction in static_assert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92236 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Sutton --- I'm going to send a patch for this, hopefully this morning, that ties concept diagnostics into static asserts. It wasn't as bad as I thought it was going to be. I didn't implement this: static_assert (!In

[Bug c++/92365] [10 Regression] ice unexpected expression ‘int16_t()’ of kind cast_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92365 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- Just for the record, I see the failure in spatialindex package.

[Bug tree-optimization/91355] [8/9/10 Regression] optimized code does not call destructor while unwinding after exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91355 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- bb 10 into which it is sunk has been created by split_critical_edges, although the edge from the resx 4; bb to the landing pad is not critical, there is: /* PRE inserts statements to edges and expec

[Bug tree-optimization/91355] [8/9/10 Regression] optimized code does not call destructor while unwinding after exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91355 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Compon

[Bug c++/92580] "if constexpr" not discarding branch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92580 Paul Targosz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Paul Targosz

[Bug rtl-optimization/71785] Computed gotos are mostly optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71785 Aleksey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rndfax at yandex dot ru --- Comment #12 from A

[Bug tree-optimization/92595] [10 Regression] ICE in related_vector_mode, at stor-layout.c:534 since r278229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92595 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/92595] New: [10 Regression] ICE in related_vector_mode, at stor-layout.c:534 since r278229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92595 Bug ID: 92595 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in related_vector_mode, at stor-layout.c:534 since r278229 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: i

[Bug middle-end/91433] Performance Regression when upgrading from 8.3.0 to 9.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91433 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 91494 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/91494] Performance Regression when upgrading from 8.3.0 to 9.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91494 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/92582] [10 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault with concept on constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92582 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug c++/92594] [10 Regression] internal compiler error: in build_value_init_noctor, at cp/init.c:400 using std::tuple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92594 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug c++/92593] [10 Regression] ICE with CTAD using undeclared constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92593 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/91333] [9/10 Regression] suboptimal register allocation for inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91333 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/90796] [8/9 Regression] GCC: O2 vs O3 output differs on simple test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90796 --- Comment #16 from Michael Matz --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14) > Time to backport now? Hmpf, I've actually done the regstrapping for gcc9 already but then forgot to submit. Thanks for the reminder.

[Bug middle-end/90796] [8/9 Regression] GCC: O2 vs O3 output differs on simple test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90796 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vsevolod.livinskij at frtk dot ru --- C

[Bug tree-optimization/91240] [8/9/10 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 due to unroll and jam pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91240 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/92537] [10 Regression] ICE in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations, at tree-vect-slp.c:2775

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92537 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/90796] [8/9 Regression] GCC: O2 vs O3 output differs on simple test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90796 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #14

[Bug target/90867] [8 Regression] Multiplication or typecast of integer and double always zero when...

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90867 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression]|[8 Regression] |Multip

  1   2   >