[Bug tree-optimization/92537] [10 Regression] internal compiler error: in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations, at tree-vect-slp.c:2775

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92537 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug ipa/92535] [10 regression] ICF is relatively expensive and became less effective

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92535 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog, |

[Bug target/92534] [10 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-42.c fails after r278262

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92534 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug target/92545] avr: support ATmega devices from the 0-series

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92545 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/92531] [9/10 Regression] ICE in uses_template_parms, at cp/pt.c:10471

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92531 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.3

[Bug target/92545] avr: support ATmega devices from the 0-series

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92545 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Nov 18 07:54:30 2019 New Revision: 278388 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278388&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/92545 * doc/avr-mmcu.texi: Regenerate. Modifie

[Bug target/92545] avr: support ATmega devices from the 0-series

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92545 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Nov 18 07:52:55 2019 New Revision: 278387 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278387&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Add support for AVR devices from the 0-series. PR target/

[Bug libstdc++/92522] valid code using deque throws bad_alloc when compiled with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92522 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/92462] [arm32] -ftree-pre makes a variable to be wrongly hoisted out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92462 --- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 15 Nov 2019, wilco at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92462 > > --- Comment #19 from Wilco --- > > for this. Which "obviously" doesn't alias with

[Bug c++/92556] New: ICE if using dependent name inside lambda expression in simple-requirement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92556 Bug ID: 92556 Summary: ICE if using dependent name inside lambda expression in simple-requirement Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug c++/79274] FAIL: g++.dg/tls/pr77285-2.C -std=c++11 scan-assembler _ZTH4var1B3tag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79274 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||xfail CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/92555] New: [10 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2162

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92555 Bug ID: 92555 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2162 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code Sever

[Bug tree-optimization/92554] New: [10 Regression] ICE in vect_create_epilog_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4325

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92554 Bug ID: 92554 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in vect_create_epilog_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4325 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug target/92448] Confusing using of TARGET_PREFER_AVX128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92448 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/92448] Confusing using of TARGET_PREFER_AVX128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92448 --- Comment #3 from liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: liuhongt Date: Mon Nov 18 02:22:55 2019 New Revision: 278385 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278385&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Split X86_TUNE_AVX128_OPTIMAL into X86_TUNE_AVX256_SPLIT_R

[Bug lto/92553] New: OpenMP offload static linking error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92553 Bug ID: 92553 Summary: OpenMP offload static linking error Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto

[Bug c++/92552] [10 Regression] internal compiler error: in lazily_declare_fn, at cp/method.c:3045 with -fconcepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92552 ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com

[Bug target/91450] __builtin_mul_overflow(A,B,R) wrong code if product <

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91450 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/92552] New: [10 Regression] internal compiler error: in lazily_declare_fn, at cp/method.c:3045 with -fconcepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92552 Bug ID: 92552 Summary: [10 Regression] internal compiler error: in lazily_declare_fn, at cp/method.c:3045 with -fconcepts Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/83118] [8/9/10 Regression] Bad intrinsic assignment of class(*) array component of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118 --- Comment #27 from Damian Rouson --- Thanks, Paul! We'll test the patch. Damian

[Bug c++/92551] New: accepts invalid code in function template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92551 Bug ID: 92551 Summary: accepts invalid code in function template Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/33799] Return value's destructor not executed when a local variable's destructor throws

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33799 dakron changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dakron.systems at gmail dot com --- Comment #8

[Bug target/86160] Implement isinf on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86160 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/83118] [8/9/10 Regression] Bad intrinsic assignment of class(*) array component of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118 --- Comment #26 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #25) > (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #23) > > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #21) > > > > Created attachment 46216 [details] > > > > Patch for th

[Bug tree-optimization/70315] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/sra-17.c scan-tree-dump-times esra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70315 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.5

[Bug tree-optimization/70315] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/sra-17.c scan-tree-dump-times esra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70315 --- Comment #7 from John David Anglin --- Still fails on trunk.

[Bug ipa/92550] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-8.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92550 Bug ID: 92550 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-8.c execution test Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ipa

[Bug rtl-optimization/92549] New: Use x86 xchg instruction more

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92549 Bug ID: 92549 Summary: Use x86 xchg instruction more Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug ipa/92548] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-12.c scan-ipa-dump-times sra "Will split parameter" 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92548 Bug ID: 92548 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-12.c scan-ipa-dump-times sra "Will split parameter" 2 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug tree-optimization/92547] New: FAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/firstprivate-mappings-1.c scan-tree-dump omplower "(?n)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92547 Bug ID: 92547 Summary: FAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/firstprivate-mappings-1.c scan-tree-dump omplower "(?n) Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/92128] fold more non-constant strlen relational expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92128 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug libstdc++/92546] [10 Regression] Large increase in preprocessed file sizes in C++2a mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92546 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Currently includes the whole of , but we might be able to avoid that so that is more lightweight: : | g++ -std=c++2a -P -E -x c++ - -include array | wc -l 7729 : | g++ -std=c++2a -P -E -x c++ - -include

[Bug libstdc++/92546] New: [10 Regression] Large increase in preprocessed file sizes in C++2a mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92546 Bug ID: 92546 Summary: [10 Regression] Large increase in preprocessed file sizes in C++2a mode Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/92545] avr: support ATmega devices from the 0-series

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92545 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr Priority|P3

[Bug target/92545] New: avr: support ATmega devices from the 0-series

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92545 Bug ID: 92545 Summary: avr: support ATmega devices from the 0-series Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug demangler/92544] New: test-demangle < ../../../gcc/libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected: FAIL at line 1452

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92544 Bug ID: 92544 Summary: test-demangle < ../../../gcc/libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected: FAIL at line 1452 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONF

[Bug tree-optimization/92543] New: [10 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-alias-check-1.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92543 Bug ID: 92543 Summary: [10 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-alias-check-1.c etc. FAIL Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug tree-optimization/92543] [10 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-alias-check-1.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92543 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 47284 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47284&action=edit 32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.11 vect-alias-check-18.c.158t.vect

[Bug tree-optimization/92543] [10 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-alias-check-1.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92543 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0