https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92442
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||memory-hog
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92450
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92449
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92451
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92447
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
ion failed:
3 | Local(int);
|^
dlhpwdpu.cpp:3:12: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0xe81bf0 crash_signal
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20191110/work/gcc-10-20191110/gcc/toplev.c:329
0x7ec36a add_candidates
/var/tmp/portage/sys
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92441
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Summary|[10-regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92436
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92430
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
char const*, int, char const*)
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20191110/work/gcc-10-20191110/gcc/tree.c:9859
0x628ef8 contains_struct_check(tree_node*, tree_node_structure_enum, char
const*, int, char const*)
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20191110/work/gcc-10-20191110/gcc/tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92433
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #2)
> That doesn't fix the spurious warning, though.
Sure, it doesn't, that was just a random comment when I have spent a minute
looking at the code in question.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92433
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
ompiler error: in extract_insn,
at recog.c:2311
0x66771c _fatal_insn(char const*, rtx_def const*, char const*, int, char
const*)
/var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20191110/work/gcc-10-20191110/gcc/rtl-error.c:108
0x66773c _fatal_insn_not_found(rtx_def const*, cha
-O3 -c i3gqhfra.C
during IPA pass: inline
i3gqhfra.C:62:1: internal compiler error: in inline_small_functions, at
ipa-inline.c:2004
62 | }
| ^
0x7c75c3 inline_small_functions
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20191110/work/gcc-10-20191110/gcc/ipa-inline.c:2004
0x7c75c3 ipa_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88760
--- Comment #43 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
Author: guojiufu
Date: Mon Nov 11 06:30:38 2019
New Revision: 278034
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278034&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Refine small loop unroll in loop_unroll_adjust hook
In this pat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92448
Bug ID: 92448
Summary: Confusing using of TARGET_PREFER_AVX128
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
^
0x5fa0af poplevel(int, int, int)
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20191110/work/gcc-10-20191110/gcc/cp/decl.c:585
0x974569 do_poplevel(tree_node*)
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20191110/work/gcc-10-20191110/gcc/cp/semantics.c:452
0x9777d4 finish_c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92437
--- Comment #2 from zingaburga+gcc at hotmail dot com ---
Thanks for the info Andrew!
Changing the add to `_mm_add_epi64` does seem to eliminate all instances of the
duplication.
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dimitri.gorokhovik at free dot fr
Target Milestone: ---
g++ (GCC) 10.0.0 20191110 (experimental)
The below snippet fails, g++ fails to deduce the type of 'i'.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91413
--- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Sun Nov 10 21:25:25 2019
New Revision: 278027
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278027&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't print warning when moving to static with -fno-automatic
As part of P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88337
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek ---
Not entirely true, this template case should be accepted:
#include
struct B { virtual void f(); };
struct B2 : B { };
template
constexpr bool
fn ()
{
constexpr B2 b2;
static_assert(&typeid(b2) == &typ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92445
Bug ID: 92445
Summary: gcc bootstrap fails on Darwin 19.0.0 in stage 1
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92444
Qirun Zhang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88337
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek
rted LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 10.0.0 20191110 (experimental) [trunk revision 278017] (GCC)
#Expected output
$ gcc-trunk -g abc.c
$ gdb-trunk -x cmds -batch a.out
Breakpoint 1 at 0x400592: file abc.c, line 46.
Breakpoint 1, o () at abc.c:46
46 }
$1 = 1
#Wrong output at O2 and O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635
--- Comment #27 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #26)
> Hi Martin,
>
> Wouldn't it be better if the testcase tested that no warning is given for a
> true case? Otherwise if the bug is fixed, no warning will be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92443
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92429
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92443
Bug ID: 92443
Summary: icein joust, at cp/call.c:11166
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92442
Bug ID: 92442
Summary: Compiling Boost.Spirit.X3 code uses exuberant amount
of RAM
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92123
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Nov 10 18:33:00 2019
New Revision: 278025
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278025&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-11-10 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/92123
*decl.c (gfc_ver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92441
Bug ID: 92441
Summary: [10-regression] ICE: in strip_typedefs, at
cp/tree.c:1681
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92440
Bug ID: 92440
Summary: Error output for first error truncated with
-fmax-errors=1
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67202
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
ing teh crash
g++ (GCC) 10.0.0 20191110 (experimental)
~/gcc-trunk/dist/bin/g++ -std=c++2a -c bug.cpp
bug.cpp:60:70: error: template constraint failure for ‘template
requires ((... && Bitf)) && (dont_overlap) struct encoding’
60 | using b = encoding , bf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92438
Bug ID: 92438
Summary: Function declaration parsed incorrectly with
`-std=c++1z`
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92113
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92113
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Nov 10 12:07:56 2019
New Revision: 278018
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278018&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Put vtab into RO section, same for __def_init if it contains an initial
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92113
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Nov 10 11:19:13 2019
New Revision: 278015
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278015&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Put vtab into RO section, same for __def_init if it contains an initial
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92321
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92321
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Nov 10 09:34:42 2019
New Revision: 278014
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278014&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Commit symbol for external BLAS routine when translating MATMUL to *GEMM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92437
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92437
Bug ID: 92437
Summary: Unnecessary register duplication of vector constant in
x86
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92140
--- Comment #31 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #29)
> Does it help the i386 port if we disallow a hard reg dest as well?
> RA should be able to handle that just fine as well.
I tried this out, and it cre
44 matches
Mail list logo
