https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91925
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91933
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha ---
clang++ 9 and icc 18 actually accept this code.
_node const*, tree_code_class, char
const*, int, char const*)
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20190929/work/gcc-10-20190929/gcc/tree.c:9973
0x5bb172 build_simple_base_path
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.0.0_alpha20190929/work/gcc-10-20190929/gcc/tree.h:3390
0x8bfd62 buil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87908
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84245
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80496
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90043
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90043
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60256
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 60256, which changed state.
Bug 60256 Summary: No -Wuninitialized warning for strcpy copying to self
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60256
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35278
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83859
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||madcoder at debian dot org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31893
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31279
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
The C family patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-09/msg01690.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10138
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90463
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88660
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
Targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83859
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91474
Joey Dumont changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|9.1.0 |9.2.0
--- Comment #7 from Joey Dumont ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91474
--- Comment #8 from Joey Dumont ---
I realized I made a silly mistake after I posted this. I was meant to try this
version for the target compiler, not the host compiler.
I successfully built the target compiler (mips64-elf) with r273174.
I ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91641
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sun Sep 29 19:12:08 2019
New Revision: 276272
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276272&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-29 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/91641
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #8)
> I would expect handling -Wunused-but-set-variable during Gimplification to
> make detecting these sorts of things possible at least in the basic cases.
That is wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||89180
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41142
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86465
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
See A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91851
--- Comment #1 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
I have created a guide which explains how to install Debian inside an emulated
qemu-system-m68k VM:
> https://wiki.debian.org/M68k/QemuSystemM68k
The guide is not complete yet, I will finish it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91932
Bug ID: 91932
Summary: #pragma does not silence floating constant overflow
warnings
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91714
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sun Sep 29 16:19:58 2019
New Revision: 276270
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276270&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-29 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/91714
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29776
--- Comment #22 from Steinar H. Gunderson ---
Yes; I had a project recently where I won 15% overall performance (!) by using
an asm statement with bsf instead of ffsll(). (This skipped both the sign
extension and the check for zero; my argument c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29776
Dávid Bolvanský changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.bolvansky at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91931
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 46977
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46977&action=edit
gcc10-pr91931.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91931
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91931
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91726
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Sep 29 10:12:42 2019
New Revision: 276269
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276269&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-09-29 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/91726
* resolve.c (gfc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90543
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Sep 29 10:06:40 2019
New Revision: 276268
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276268&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/90543
* optc-save-gen.awk: Fix up printing s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88562
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
37 matches
Mail list logo