https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91287
--- Comment #31 from Xiong Hu XS Luo ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #30)
> On Fri, 2 Aug 2019, luoxhu at cn dot ibm.com wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91287
> >
> > --- Comment #28 from Xiong Hu XS Lu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50476
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
would this proposed warning go under an existing flag, or a new one?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80535
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80619
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
Did you do anything about this with your -Wformat-diag changes, Martin?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79959
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3)
> (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2)
> > Should be possible to fix this. Mine.
>
> For gcc 9?
...er, 10 now, I guess?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91350
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91334
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zeccav at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79688
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #3 from Er
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64619
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78155
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
Would you expect this warning to go under an existing flag, or a new one,
Martin?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63710
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70619
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91350
Bug ID: 91350
Summary: ICE in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3190 during GIMPLE
pass: cddce with options -O1 -fipa-sra
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64825
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90570
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||geert.fannes@auro-technolog
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91328
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80745
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80398
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80400
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91325
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91349
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91349
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Mon Aug 5 01:53:31 2019
New Revision: 274106
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274106&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR91349, powerpc64*-*-freebsd* defines _GNU_SOURCE
rev 266496 (git ab6b1bb4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91349
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Mon Aug 5 01:52:33 2019
New Revision: 274105
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274105&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR91349, powerpc64*-*-freebsd* defines _GNU_SOURCE
rev 266496 (git ab6b1bb4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87233
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87233
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Aug 5 00:47:41 2019
New Revision: 274104
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274104&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-08-04 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk
PR fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91349
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91348
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
NRVO happens in the C++ front-end, but not the C one, and the general
tree-nrv.c is rather limited.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91349
Bug ID: 91349
Summary: [9 regression] powerpc*-*-freebsd* defines _GNU_SOURCE
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2396
4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91348
Bug ID: 91348
Summary: Missed optimization: not passing hidden pointer but
copying memory
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89549
--- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Dávid Bolvanský from comment #8)
> Why this annoying note cannot be disabled using
> #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wmisleading-indentation" ?
When a note associated with a warning can't be d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91347
Bug ID: 91347
Summary: [7,8,9 Regression] pointer_string in linux vsprintf.c
is miscompiled when sibling calls are optimized
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86120
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|SIGSEGV without backtrace |ICE caused by unassociated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86120
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|fortran |middle-end
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86120
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91318
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91342
--- Comment #2 from Alex Yee ---
Oh I didn't realize Intel's docs were conflicting. I think most people just use
the interactive intrinsics guide.
MSVC and Intel's own compiler implement the void* variants. Thus, this comes up
when porting code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91314
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91312
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91285
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91341
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 46668
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46668&action=edit
gcc10-pr91341.patch
Untested implementation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86638
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #4)
> Author: rsandifo
> Date: Mon Jul 29 08:52:56 2019
> New Revision: 273872
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273872&root=gcc&view=rev
> Log:
> Preven
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88227
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88227
--- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sun Aug 4 15:52:55 2019
New Revision: 274096
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274096&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-08-04 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/88227
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91346
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91346
Bug ID: 91346
Summary: Implement P1668R1: Permit unevaluated inline asm in
constexpr functions
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91341
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91342
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90709
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.5
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90709
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Aug 4 13:34:19 2019
New Revision: 274095
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274095&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Objective-C, NeXT, backport workaround for PR90709
Since we cannot parse th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91087
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|7.5
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91087
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Aug 4 13:12:26 2019
New Revision: 274092
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274092&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Darwin, testsuite, backport fix for 91087.
The testcase is failing to instr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65364
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65364
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Aug 4 12:04:06 2019
New Revision: 274076
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274076&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Darwin, testsuite, backport fix for PR65364
This test currently fails on Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90698
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Aug 4 11:54:13 2019
New Revision: 274073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274073&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Darwin, X86, backport test adjusts for PR90698.
We don't have support for -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64895
--- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe ---
testsuite fix applied for pic targets on trunk and 9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64895
--- Comment #18 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Aug 4 10:24:34 2019
New Revision: 274062
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274062&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Darwin, X86, backport fixes for 64895.
Although this is marked as rtl-opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27221
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
fixed on trunk and for 9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27221
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Aug 4 10:11:53 2019
New Revision: 274061
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274061&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Darwin, testsuite, backport for for 27221.
This can't pass on 32b power Dar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67958
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.5
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe ---
f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67958
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Aug 4 10:06:33 2019
New Revision: 274060
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274060&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Darwin, X86, backport testsuite fix for 67958.
2019-08-04 Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63891
--- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe ---
fixed on trunk and for 9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63891
--- Comment #14 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Aug 4 09:59:21 2019
New Revision: 274059
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274059&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Darwin, testsuite, backport fix for PR83891
2019-08-04 Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58321
--- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe ---
fixed for trunk and 9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58321
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Aug 4 09:53:37 2019
New Revision: 274058
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274058&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Darwin, X86, backport fix for PR58321.
2019-08-04 Iain Sandoe
B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91334
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
65 matches
Mail list logo