https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91345
Bug ID: 91345
Summary: Typedef'ed restrict pointers may break compilation.
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91344
Bug ID: 91344
Summary: Function pointers in templates with restrict semantics
may fail to compile.
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91343
Bug ID: 91343
Summary: Spurious strict-aliasing warning with template class
inheritance.
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91342
Bug ID: 91342
Summary: Incorrect parameter type for AVX512 streaming
intrinsics.
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91341
Bug ID: 91341
Summary: Missing AVX Intrinsics: load/store u2
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91340
Bug ID: 91340
Summary: Missing AVX and AVX512 Intrinsics: Zero-Extension
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91338
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91339
Bug ID: 91339
Summary: libphobos: ftbfs when the path contains '~'
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91335
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Ridge ---
I suppose a fair question here is, if I'm not going to use 'f', why don't I
just write:
if (foo()) {
return 1;
}
?
That would certainly work in this case. However, in the original code example
that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--- Comment #23 from Iain Sandoe ---
fixed on trunk and for 9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--- Comment #22 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sat Aug 3 20:16:22 2019
New Revision: 274049
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274049&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Darwin, backport fix for PR87030
273746 , 273749, 273768 [Darwin] Fix PR87
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91337
Chinoune changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91338
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91338
Bug ID: 91338
Summary: Implement P1161R3: Deprecate a[b,c]
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90597
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2019-8-3
--- Comment #3 from John Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90597
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
/* However, if the underlying mode requires a bigger alignment than
what the target hook provides, we cannot use the mode. For now,
simply reject that case. */
gcc_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91337
--- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 at 03:14:57PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> --- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to Chinoune from comment #0)
> > I have encountered some underflows/overf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90597
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 46667
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46667&action=edit
Preproccessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91337
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91337
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91326
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91230
--- Comment #6 from Bernard Teo ---
Thank you. I've tried and it works on trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90786
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90813
--- Comment #37 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Aug 3 11:50:39 2019
New Revision: 274038
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274038&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-08-03 Thomas Koenig
Paul Thomas
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90786
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Aug 3 11:50:39 2019
New Revision: 274038
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274038&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-08-03 Thomas Koenig
Paul Thomas
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91337
Bug ID: 91337
Summary: gfortran skips an if statement with some mathematical
optimisations with complex numbers.
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91336
--- Comment #1 from Jonas Hahnfeld ---
Created attachment 4
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4&action=edit
Small test case.
I'm attaching another small test case that shows 3 casts, GCC only warns about
the first one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91325
--- Comment #4 from Jens Seidel ---
LLVM was affected by the same bug. They fixed it. But why is it not
reproducable to everyone?
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39641
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91336
Bug ID: 91336
Summary: Missing -Wcast-qual?
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91334
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91334
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
31 matches
Mail list logo
