https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91157
Bug ID: 91157
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error:
position plus size exceeds size of referenced object
in 'bit_field_ref')
Product: gcc
Ver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91149
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Jul 13 06:29:46 2019
New Revision: 273465
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273465&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/91149
* c-omp.c (c_omp_split_clauses): Fix a pasto in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89096
--- Comment #16 from David Edelsohn ---
I applied the patch to GCC to fix this.
ATOS and IBM also are trying to work with CMake to fix the broken patches, but
Kitware isn't being helpful and accommodating.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49348
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57255
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58036
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69142
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91156
Bug ID: 91156
Summary: The associated laguerre polynomial should allow
nedative arguments.
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89096
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Paprocki ---
Created attachment 46597
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46597&action=edit
g++-6 -S output of pcrecpp_unittest.cc
Generated with the command line:
g++-6 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89096
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Paprocki ---
I can reproduce this error with a much simpler project, pcre, that uses
autotools and libtool.
Using pcre 8.42 from https://ftp.pcre.org/pub/pcre/pcre-8.42.tar.gz
$ mkdir build
$ cd build
$ CC=gcc-6 CXX=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80576
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89096
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Paprocki ---
What is the other bug number w/ patch that you're referring to?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91155
Bug ID: 91155
Summary: __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ gets truncated when char template
parameter is '\0'
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91153
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86375
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91148
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I have a patch removing "builtin function" where that is redundant.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91151
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #3)
> #if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
> (v4si) { 0x01020304, 0x05060708, 0x090a0b0c, 0x0d0e0f01 }[i]
> #elif __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91151
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
(v4si) { 0x01020304, 0x05060708, 0x090a0b0c, 0x0d0e0f01 }[i]
#elif __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
(v4si) { 0x04030201, 0x080706
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91154
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91154
Bug ID: 91154
Summary: [10 Regression] 456.hmmer regression on Haswell
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91150
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91151
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Bah, I didn't actually test the BIG_ENDIAN case ... can you maybe check it and
fix it up or report whether it actually miscompiles?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529
--- Comment #44 from Wilco ---
Backported fix to all active branches so this should never fail again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529
--- Comment #43 from Wilco ---
Author: wilco
Date: Fri Jul 12 17:15:13 2019
New Revision: 273453
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273453&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Turn off ipa-ra in builtins test (PR91059)
The gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91153
Bug ID: 91153
Summary: New test case 29_atomics/atomic_float/1.cc execution
test fails
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529
--- Comment #42 from Wilco ---
Author: wilco
Date: Fri Jul 12 17:00:40 2019
New Revision: 273452
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273452&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Turn off ipa-ra in builtins test (PR91059)
The gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89906
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79201
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #66 from EML ---
Created attachment 46596
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46596&action=edit
Test program using islower
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #65 from EML ---
Yes, with that patch on 32bit, I'm not at the error described in comment 58.
I will upload the .final file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529
--- Comment #41 from Wilco ---
Author: wilco
Date: Fri Jul 12 16:41:01 2019
New Revision: 273450
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273450&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Turn off ipa-ra in builtins test (PR91059)
The gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89430
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #10 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89430
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Jul 12 16:28:43 2019
New Revision: 273449
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273449&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-07-12 Jiangning Liu
PR tree-optimization/89430
* t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91152
Bug ID: 91152
Summary: endif-label error when using #pragma with
-fdirectives-only
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89782
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91151
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64*-unknown-linux-gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91151
Bug ID: 91151
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vector-7.c fails with
its introduction in r273435
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91150
Bug ID: 91150
Summary: [10 Regression] wrong code with -O -mavx512vbmi due to
wrong writemask
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-cod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91135
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
-mcall-* should change the calling convention, not anything else OS-related.
-mcall-aixdesc is the *default* for powerpc64-linux.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91148
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
And I am quite serious about that last point: I have to redirect stderr
to file and search that with a text editor to find the errors, there are
a dozen screenfuls of useless warnings (about two screens
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91148
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
12593 |"internal error: builtin function %qs already processed",
That's a fatal_error; users will never see that, *no one* will ever see that.
14747 | error ("builtin function %qs is only vali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90982
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90972
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90914
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90369
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 12 14:42:14 2019
New Revision: 273446
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273446&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-07-12 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90972
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 12 14:42:14 2019
New Revision: 273446
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273446&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-07-12 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90914
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 12 14:42:14 2019
New Revision: 273446
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273446&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-07-12 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91004
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 12 14:42:14 2019
New Revision: 273446
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273446&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-07-12 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90900
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 12 14:42:14 2019
New Revision: 273446
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273446&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-07-12 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90982
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 12 14:42:14 2019
New Revision: 273446
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273446&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-07-12 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91063
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 12 14:42:14 2019
New Revision: 273446
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273446&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-07-12 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91062
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 12 14:42:14 2019
New Revision: 273446
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273446&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-07-12 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91145
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 12 14:36:50 2019
New Revision: 273445
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273445&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-07-12 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/91145
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91145
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Summary|[9/10 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91149
Bug ID: 91149
Summary: GCC 9 and later incorrectly rejects OpenMP task
reduction-modifier on target parallel combined
construct
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86375
--- Comment #1 from Antony Polukhin ---
This was fixed in GCC 9.1
Please add a test case for the issue and close it as fixed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89824
Antony Polukhin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91136
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91136
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.5
--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88492
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Yeah. Again, on x86 with -mavx2 we now have right after late FRE:
[local count: 214748371]:
vect__1.6_64 = MEM [(unsigned char *)b_24(D)];
vect__1.7_63 = VEC_PERM_EXPR ;
vect__2.9_62 = [vec_unpac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88492
Hao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hliu at amperecomputing dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90972
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||91063
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90778
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90316
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91136
--- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Jul 12 10:17:42 2019
New Revision: 273439
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273439&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/91136
* df-core.c (ACCESSING REFS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91136
--- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Jul 12 10:16:51 2019
New Revision: 273438
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273438&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/91136
* df-core.c (ACCESSING REFS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91136
--- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Jul 12 10:16:11 2019
New Revision: 273437
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273437&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/91136
* df-core.c (ACCESSING REFS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91136
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Jul 12 10:15:39 2019
New Revision: 273436
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273436&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/91136
* df-core.c (ACCESSING REFS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91145
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88264
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Another useful tunable would be to alter the meaning of the "default" token for
the std::random_device constructor:
if (token == "default")
{
default_token = true;
fname = "/dev/u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91144
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91145
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91148
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc*-*-*
--- Comment #2 from Richar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91146
--- Comment #3 from Grigorii Lipenko ---
Created attachment 46593
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46593&action=edit
llvm small_vector
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91146
--- Comment #2 from Grigorii Lipenko ---
I remove gtest.h.
#include "small_vector.h"
class A
{
public:
virtual void f () = 0;
};
class B : public A
{
public:
void f () override
{
small_vector v;
v.insert (v.begin (), 1);
}
};
75 matches
Mail list logo